'A complete disaster': Cafe Hollander Wauwatosa will be closed for six weeks after flooding
Hours later, it was submerged in four feet of water.
It was the result of the two-day, 1,000-year flood that caused the Menomonee River, which flows directly alongside Café Hollander's Wauwatosa location, to rise from just under two feet to more than fives times that height in two hours.
On Aug. 11, the restaurant and bar, in the heart of the Tosa Village, announced on social media that it would be temporarily closed for an 'unexpected remodel.'
The cost of that 'remodel' could approach $1 million and six weeks of business closure.
That's according to Eric Wagner, founder and CEO of the Lowlands Group, which owns Café Hollander and its four other locations, as well as Milwaukee-area restaurants Buckatabon Tavern & Supper Club, Café Benelux and Centraal Grand Café & Tappery.
He got his first call at around 6:30 a.m. Aug. 10, when early-morning employees showed up to the restaurant.
Water had already started coming into the kitchen, which is located on the restaurant's lower level. Over the next three or four hours, he and his employees watched it swell to four feet deep.
Outside, the Menomonee River splashed over the pedestrian bridge that leads to the restaurant's outdoor patio. The water crested about four feet above Café Hollander's kitchen.
The entire lower level is almost a total loss, including cooking equipment, walk-in coolers, the manager's office, the stereo system and all the food stored in the kitchen.
'When there's pressure from the river, the water starts getting into the drywall. There was equipment floating everywhere and the electrical got all burned out,' Wagner said. 'It was a complete disaster.'
That's when we started to realize that it was going to be more of a construction project than just the cleaning project.'
The first flooding of its kind at Café Hollander
When Café Hollander opened in the Tosa Village in 2009, its proximity to the Menomonee River provided one of the area's most picturesque waterfront views.
Wagner never expected that the restaurant would see this amount of water damage. It's the first time the space has flooded in its 16 years.
'With all the investments that have been made in the retention ponds and systems here, we assumed that those issues wouldn't be there anymore,' Wagner said.
What's left now is the clean-up effort, led by Milwaukee's Sid Grinker Restoration, with plenty of help from employees and volunteers from the community.
"Even on Sunday, when we were moving furniture around, I looked up and there were just people in the community that had been down here picking up tables and umbrellas and moving chairs without being asked,' Wagner said. 'It was really cool to see.'
Hourly employees of Café Hollander's Wauwatosa location have been placed at other restaurants within the Lowland Group, with managers continuing at other locations or overseeing the cleanup.
'Our people should not be impacted much at all,' Wagner said.
Buckatabon Tavern & Supper Club will open for weekday breakfast
For those who'd like to support the business, Wagner encouraged customers to dine at any of the Lowlands Group restaurants, which all remain open.
He also hopes the community will support neighboring businesses in any way they can. That includes donating to the Wauwatosa BID's fundraiser supporting small businesses impacted by the flood. To donate, visit wauwatosavillage.org.
'In the village or any of these other areas that got hit, I think every single one of these business owners would really appreciate people coming by to say 'hello,'' Wagner said.
And for those who will miss their weekday breakfasts at Café Hollander, sister restaurant Buckatabon Tavern & Supper Club, located next to Hollander in the Village, will extend its hours to offer breakfast beginning Aug. 15. In addition to its standard weekend brunch, Buckatabon will serve breakfast from 8 to 11 a.m. Monday to Friday while Hollander is closed.
When will Cafe Hollander Wauwatosa reopen after flooding?
Café Hollander Wauwatosa will be closed for about six weeks, Wagner said, aiming for a potential reopen date of Sept. 28.
There is a possibility that its bar could reopen sooner. Wagner is working with the city of Wauwatosa to open its bar, without food service, in time for TosaFest, the annual community festival that kicks off in the village on Sept. 5.
But the time in between will be spent rebuilding, restocking and bolstering a community that's been rocked by this unprecedented flooding.
"Of course, it's an incredible business impact. But our hearts really go out to the residents and homeowners. What's happened in their basements and what they're going through has got to be incredibly challenging,' Wagner said. "We see this happen all over the country, but seeing it firsthand and the power of it was pretty scary.'
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Cafe Hollander Wauwatosa to be closed for 6 weeks due to flood damage
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
The 'Layer 1' Fight Is Not About Stablecoins But The Future Of Finance
With the GENIUS Act signed, stablecoins are on a tear. According to the management consultancy McKinsey, the total value of issued stablecoins has doubled to $250 billion today from $120 billion 18 months ago, and it is forecast to reach more than $400 billion by year-end (and $2 trillion by 2028). Wow. In addition to stablecoins tokens, a number of yield-bearing tokens are out there now. These tokens, typically an investment in short-duration government securities, such as the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund ($2.9 billion) and the Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund ($0.8 billion). Big money, and hence the reasons for the 'Layer 1' or 'Layer 2' discussions in decentralised finance (DeFi) circles. Who Cares About Layer 1 or Layer 2? I am sure you are all familiar with the distinction, but for those who are new to this space, when DeFi people talk about Layer 1 they mean a distributed ledger of some kind (such as the Bitcoin blockchain) whereas Layer 2 networks run on top of the Layer 1 blockchains in order to delivered improved performance or additional functionality. The Layer 2 networks execute transactions off of the ledgers but use Layer 1 to provide the underlying security and finality. So, for example: Bitcoin is a Layer 1 protocol, but on top of this people have built Lightning, which is a Layer 2 service that uses off-chain 'payment channels' to make Bitcoin transactions work at point-of-sale (POS). Similarly, Ethereum is a Layer 1 blockhain and Arbitrum is a Layer 2 service that uses a 'rollup' mechanism to anchor transactions. Well, so far, so technical. But there is escalating competition in this space and that has business implications. The news that major players, such as Circle and Stripe, are developing their own Layer 1 networks is rather interesting. Given their investments in the stablecoin space it seems logical for Stripe, for example, to create a new high performance Layer 1 blockchain specially designed to for payment processing. Their blockchain, known as 'Tempo', is compatible with Ethereum's programming language so developers will be able to easily migrate 'smart" 'contracts' to the new blockchain. Similarly, Circle announced its new Layer-1 blockchain 'Arc' (also compatible with the Ethereum programming language) which they say is optimised for stablecoin-based financial services. Arc has native support for the Circle Payments Network (CPN) and stablecoins including USDC, EURC and USYC1. It also has, rather interestingly from my point of view, an opt-in privacy schemes that offers selectively shielded transactions. Circle say that Arc is designed not only for stablecoins but for all forms of digital money and tokenized value in the future, a point I will return to later on. Now you might ask, since Bitcoin and Ethereum seem to work, why are serious players in the stablecoin space looking to build their own Layer 1 blockchains while others are already building Layer 2 rails (such as Robinhood's chain on Arbitrum and Coinbase's Base on the OP Stack) that also seem to work. There are, broadly speaking there are two business pressures: functionality and economics. Functionality first. A good reason to develop a Layer 1 is to ensure the development of features that are required by the ecosystem. Now that this infrastructure is no longer a technical detail but a defining factor in who leads the next phase of digital finance, business is paying attention and as stablecoins begin to be used in mainstream business applications, so operational pressures will increase and favour platforms that are secure, compliant and capable of high-throughput transactions. As the respected industry commentator Noelle Acheson noted in the case of both Circle and Stripe, these will be the priorities of most financial services players but they are not necessarily the priorities of blockchains such as the Bitcoin blockchain, which was optimised for censorship resistance. There is also the element of control: decentralisation sounds good but it would be annoying to find that your payroll payments to employees are held up because everyone is playing some sort of cryptokitties game or messing around with NFTs. Then there are the economics. The fact is that running decentralised network is expensive. If you want the censorship resistance of Bitcoin then you have to consume enormous amounts of energy and therefore charge significant fees. This is a key reason people started building Layer 2 networks in the first place. But if you don't need the pseudonymity and censorship resistance (ie, you are running a regulated financial service) then you can redesign the infrastructure in a far more cost-effective way. You can imagine, then, that if Stripe offers stablecoin services to its global customer base, it will offer them its own stablecoins running over its own network and the transactions will never go anywhere near the world's banking networks except for on- and off-ramps. Assuming, that is, that Stripe's customers won't want to hold stablecoin balances that are non-interest bearing. (Of course once the service is up and running then Stripe can offer their infrastructure to third-parties so that they can use the Stripe Layer 1 to provide stablecoin services to their own customers. Given that payments are such a huge, but vulnerable, profit pool for the TradFi incumbents they they will have to respond.) Layer 1 And The Real World Where does this take us then? I suspect that the average consumer (eg, me) will have zero interest in Layer 1 or Layer 2 of indeed how any payments get anywhere. If I tell my accounting package to go ahead and pay a supplier in Canada, I really do not care how the money gets there: if Stripe uses open banking to take the money out of my UK account, take Canadian Dollar stablecoins from their Treasury and then send these stablecoins over to Canada where they are then paid out to the supplier using Interac e-Transfer, or whether they send the money from my bank account via SWIFT to a Canadian bank account, I do not care. Hence the winners and losers here will be determined by their cost-benefit performance for business. The battle for Layer 1, though, is not only about the battle to control payments, because it is about much more than stablecoins. As Circle indicated, it is about the future of value, a future in which the continuous exchange of 'real world' digital assets replaces the traditional infrastructure (and associated overheads) of clearing and settlement vanish. In this world, the next-general financial market infrastructure of distributed ledgers, tokens and protocols (that is, 'defi') that will in essence become critical national infrastructure. Can this really be provided Circle or Stripe? Or will it ultimately need Big Tech or governments or someone else to deliver the platform for innovation?
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Why Your Electricity Bill May Be Skyrocketing
PHOENIX: The Palo Verde Nuclear generating plant, until recently the nation's largest nuclear power plant, is seen between two Saguaro cactus in Phoenix, Arizona. (Photo by) Getty Images Over the past month, friends, family, and acquaintances have asked why their electricity bills have skyrocketed. One friend wrote, 'I am curious if you have any thoughts about why electric bills are doubling and, in some cases, tripling? People in my area are in shock. In two months, my bill doubled.' I live in Phoenix, and we actually have reasonable electric bills because we are served by the Palo Verde Generating Station. Despite the intense heat here, my electric bill never rises above $300 except in July. More on that later. That's not the case everywhere. From the Midwest to the Southeast, people are seeing bills that are several times higher than that. What's driving these sudden spikes isn't just 'using more power' or 'a hot summer.' The reality is more complex, and it won't be easy to solve. Here are the five biggest forces reshaping your electric bill. The surge in artificial intelligence has unleashed a gold rush in data center construction, and it's quickly becoming one of the most powerful forces driving electricity demand. These facilities are energy-intensive, often consuming 30 times more electricity than traditional data centers. A single AI center can draw as much power as 80,000 homes, and by 2030, data centers are projected to require 30 GW of new capacity—the equivalent of 30 nuclear reactors. To meet this demand, utilities are scrambling to add transmission lines and upgrade grid infrastructure, with those costs inevitably showing up on customer bills. At the same time, utilities that sell power into competitive markets—rather than operating under regulated rate caps—are seeing a windfall. Texas-based NRG Energy, for example, has seen its stock price triple in just two years, as soaring wholesale prices boosted profits. Natural gas powers about 40% of U.S. electricity generation, and U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports have risen by nearly a factor of seven in the past seven years to over 13 billion cubic feet per day. That means when Asian or European buyers bid up LNG cargoes, U.S. households indirectly feel it in their electricity bills. Put simply, you're now competing with the world for the same fuel—and global demand is strong. A year ago, at this time, the spot price of natural gas in the U.S. was about $1.00 per Million Btu cheaper than it is this year. That translates directly into higher electricity bills this year. July 2025 saw record-breaking temperatures across much of the country, with a 'heat dome' trapping high humidity and driving peak demand to 758,149 MWh in a single hour—a national record. Air conditioning loads surged, and in many regions, utilities had to buy expensive spot-market electricity to meet demand. That cost gets socialized across monthly bills. The U.S. grid is old and straining under new loads. More than 70% of transmission lines and transformers are over 30 years old. Replacing and upgrading them is both essential and expensive. Delivery charges—the part of your bill that covers the poles, wires, and transformers needed to move electricity—have climbed sharply in recent years. For households, that means even if fuel costs ease or demand moderates, the higher cost of maintaining and upgrading the grid will likely keep electricity prices from returning to the levels we saw just a few years ago. Finally, policy isn't keeping up. The repeal of clean energy tax credits under the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' slowed renewable deployment. At the same time, permitting bottlenecks have delayed new transmission and generation. Layer on top of that the electrification push—EVs, heat pumps, electric appliances—and electricity demand is rising faster than utilities can build capacity. The mismatch creates structural upward pressure on rates, regardless of short-term market moves. While millions of Americans are grappling with sticker shock, there are notable exceptions—regions that enjoy stable or even declining electricity prices, thanks to their unique energy mix. Phoenix is one of them. As previously noted, despite triple-digit temperatures, my own bill rarely exceeds $300, largely because the Palo Verde Generating Station provides stable, low-cost nuclear power. Nuclear plants offer a huge advantage: their fuel (uranium) isn't tied to volatile global gas markets, and their reactors run around the clock at high capacity factors. It also doesn't hurt that Arizona has seen a 187% increase in wind and solar power over the past decade, and the state ranks 3rd nationally in installed battery storage capacity. Other regions also benefit from abundant local resources: Idaho: The lowest average rates in the nation at just 11.9 cents per kWh, thanks to hydroelectric power (which can be impacted by droughts). Pacific Northwest (WA, OR): Wholesale prices are falling in 2025 due to strong hydropower and growing solar generation. Texas (ERCOT): Despite surging demand, competitive market dynamics and solar buildout are keeping wholesale prices flat or slightly lower. By contrast, states heavily reliant on natural gas—California, New Jersey, Ohio—are seeing double-digit rate hikes as LNG exports and peak demand drive up costs. It's worth pausing on nuclear. Yes, the upfront capital costs are high, but once plants are built, their operating costs are remarkably stable—about 9.3 cents per kWh, compared to 7 cents for gas and 9.5 cents for coal. Nuclear also avoids carbon pricing and doesn't need backup generation like intermittent renewables. In a grid increasingly stressed by AI demand, climate extremes, and geopolitical risks, nuclear's ability to provide price stability, energy security, and reliability is hard to match. So, why did your bill suddenly double? It's not just about running your air conditioner a little harder. It's about structural shifts in the energy system: AI data centers reshaping demand LNG exports reshaping fuel markets Heat waves stressing supply Aging infrastructure raising delivery costs Policy bottlenecks slowing new capacity At the same time, regions anchored by nuclear or hydro have been shielded from the worst price spikes. That contrast underscores an important truth: the U.S. doesn't face a single energy reality—it faces many, depending on local resources and policy choices. Unless utilities, regulators, and policymakers find smarter ways to expand capacity and modernize the grid, the broader trend is clear: for many households, higher electricity bills aren't just a fluke—they're the new normal.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Leach International Corporation Approves FDH Electronics Brand Stealth Aerospace as an Authorized Channel Partner for the Commercial Airline and MRO Markets
Commercial aviation industry to benefit from access to Leach's trusted product lines through a reliable, scaled and independent distribution partner FDH Electronics & Leach Aerospace OKLAHOMA CITY, Aug. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Oklahoma-based FDH Electronics, a unified FDH Aero division focused solely on serving the mil-aero market's electronic component needs, is pleased to announce that its aftermarket division, Stealth Aerospace, has been named as an approved distribution channel by Leach International Corporation to support commercial airline and MRO customers. This strategic partnership builds on the companies' long-standing relationship and reinforces their shared commitment to deliver best-in-class service, product availability and technical support to the commercial aviation aftermarket sector. Alon Glickstein, Vice President at FDH Electronics, commented: 'We are incredibly proud to have established this partnership with Leach International. Their long-standing reputation for high-reliability products fits perfectly with our mission at FDH Electronics — to provide our customers with exceptional service, technical support, and inventory availability that meets their evolving needs.' Leach International, a leading manufacturer of advanced electrical switches, relays, and power distribution components for the aerospace and defense markets, sees this partnership as a key step toward strengthening its presence in the aftermarket segment. Justin Coates, Vice President of Sales & Marketing at Leach International Corporation, added: 'This agreement with FDH Electronics' Stealth Aerospace division ensures that Leach's products will be supported with an incredibly high level of service. Their proven performance in the aerospace aftermarket gives us full confidence that customers will benefit from rapid access to inventory, technical insight, and dedicated aftermarket expertise.' This announcement marks a new chapter in aftermarket excellence and provides the commercial aviation industry with access to Leach's trusted product lines through a specialized and reliable distribution partner. About FDH ElectronicsFDH Electronics is a global one-stop shop with one of the most expansive inventory levels in the industry, built on FDH Aero's industry-leading supply chain solutions. It supplies a variety of interconnect, wire and cable, and electromechanical components for the aerospace, defense, and space markets. FDH Electronics is your go-to resource for value-added connectors, 1553 Data Bus interconnect products, custom harnesses, high-performance aerospace-grade wire and cable, and high-frequency RF connectors. When you need critical interconnect or electromechanical components, you can rely on FDH Electronics to deliver. To search by part number, please visit: Contact:Heather RosenowExecutive Vice President, Marketing & Communicationsmediarelations@ About Leach International CorporationLeach International Corporation has been a leader in aerospace switching and control technology since 1919. Leach designs and manufactures high-reliability relays, contactors, and power distribution systems for aerospace, defense, and industrial applications. Contact:relayed@ A photo accompanying this announcement is available at in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
