Kraft Heinz to remove synthetic dyes from US products amid ‘Make America Healthy Again' pressure
Food giant Kraft Heinz on Tuesday announced plans to remove synthetic dyes from its US products by 2027 and vowed not to launch any new items with the controversial additives. .
The ketchup king was the first major company to publicly tout a rollback of food dyes amid pressure from Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as part of a broader move to address chronic diseases and conditions such as obesity among Americans.
About 10% of Kraft Heinz products — which include brands Crystal Light, Kool-Aid, MiO, Jell-O and Jet-Puffed — contain synthetic dyes.
Advertisement
4 Kool-Aid owner Kraft Heinz announced plans to remove synthetic food dyes from its US products.
Jammy Jean – stock.adobe.com
The dyes will be removed from products altogether or replaced with natural alternatives, the company said in a press release.
'The vast majority of our products use natural or no colors, and we've been on a journey to reduce our use of FD&C colors across the remainder of our portfolio,' said Pedro Navio, Kraft Heinz's North America president.
In 2016, the company removed artificial colors, preservatives and flavors from its Kraft Mac & Cheese, Navio said.
Advertisement
Its trademark bright-red Heinz Tomato Ketchup has never used artificial dyes, he added.
Kraft Heinz said it is also working with licensees of its brands to roll back the use of the artificial colors.
Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' campaign led the Food and Drug Administration in April to announce a plan to phase out the use of artificial dyes — including red dye 40, yellow dye 5, yellow dye 6, blue dye 1, blue dye 2 and green dye 2.
Advertisement
In January, under the Biden administration, the FDA had slapped a ban on the use of Red No. 3 dye in food and drugs after studies found the synthetic dye caused cancer in lab rats.
4 Crystal Light owner Kraft Heinz said it will not make any new products in the US with FD&C colors.
MelissaMN – stock.adobe.com
4 RFK Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' campaign led the Food and Drug Administration in April to announce a plan to phase out the use of artificial dyes.
HandmadePictures – stock.adobe.com
Several studies have found ties between certain food dyes and behavioral issues in children. The FDA's advisory committee, however, has not established a causal link between the two.
Advertisement
'These poisonous compounds offer no nutritional benefit and pose real, measurable dangers to our children's health and development,' Kennedy said in April.
The FDA did not reveal any mandates or formal agreements with the food industry in April. Rather, Kennedy claimed 'the industry has voluntarily agreed' to the restrictions.
4 The dyes will be removed from Kraft Heinz products altogether or replaced with natural alternatives.
AP
Kennedy had met with executives at top food companies including Kraft Heinz, PepsiCo North America, General Mills, WK Kellogg, Tyson Foods and JM Smucker, as well as the industry trade group Consumer Brands Association.
Public opinion has largely turned against the dyes over growing concerns about health risks.
Hundreds gathered outside WK Kellogg headquarters last year to protest the company's continued use of artificial dyes in its breakfast cereals, like Froot Loops and Apple Jacks.
About 15% of WK Kellogg's cereal sales come from products containing artificial colors, a spokesperson told The Post.
Advertisement
None of its products have contained Red No. 3 dye for years, though, and it is currently reformulating cereals sold in schools so they will not include synthetic dyes by the 2026-27 school year, the spokesperson added.
'We look forward to working with Health and Human Services and the FDA to identify ways to effectively remove FD&C colors from the small percentage of our food that contains them today,' WK Kellogg said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's purges come for the U.S.' nuclear safety board
Happy Tuesday. Here's your Tuesday Tech Drop, a collection of the past week's top stories from the intersection of technology and politics. Donald Trump's efforts to strip federal agencies and commissions of their independence took an alarming step Monday, when the president fired one of the five commissioners who sit on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a congressionally authorized entity that exists 'to ensure the safe use of radioactive materials for beneficial civilian purposes while protecting people and the environment.' Christopher T. Hanson was initially appointed by Trump in his first term and reappointed by Joe Biden in 2024. The White House implied Hanson's firing was to make this important commission more favorable to Trump's agenda. 'All organizations are more effective when leaders are rowing in the same direction,' deputy press secretary Anna Kelly told NPR. 'President Trump reserves the right to remove employees within his own Executive Branch who exert his executive authority.' Read more at NPR. A new report by The New York Times highlights how Trump allies working in the president's so-called Department of Government Efficiency tried to wield power over bureaucrats at the Social Security Administration and to weaponize misinformation (and conclusions based on their own misunderstandings) about the agency to spread false claims about fraud in the program. (A White House spokesperson told the Times that the agency under Trump 'will continue to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse while protecting benefits for eligible Americans.') Read more in The New York Times. Ten Democratic lawmakers, led by Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, sent a letter on Tuesday to Palantir CEO Alex Karp over reports that the Trump administration has tapped the company to assist in creating a massive database of Americans' personal information. The letter demands answers and assurances as to how the project will comply with laws meant to protect Americans' privacy. The letter reads, in part: The unprecedented possibility of a searchable, 'mega-database' of tax returns and other data that will potentially be shared with or accessed by other federal agencies is a surveillance nightmare that raises a host of legal concerns, not least that it will make it significantly easier for Donald Trump's Administration to spy on and target his growing list of enemies and other Americans. Palantir has posted multiple responses to social media, framing the New York Times' reporting about the alleged database as 'unfounded speculation' and denying claims it is building a database to enable mass surveillance of Americans. Read more at FedScoop. The Trump sons announced plans to roll out a Trump-branded phone and mobile service this week. In addition to the ethical concerns swirling around a president's potentially profiting from his position, there are a lot of tech-related questions about the quality of the product and service being offered. With those questions in mind, CNET writer Mike Sorrentino makes a pretty compelling argument as to why 'Trump Mobile and the T1 Phone Don't Make Any Sense, Even for Trump Fans.' Read his take over at CNET. David Plouffe, a campaign manager for Barack Obama's presidential campaign and adviser to Kamala Harris' presidential bid, signed on to the global advisory council for the pro-Trump cryptocurrency firm Coinbase. Some progressives who've been disgusted by the firm's financial support for the Trump administration are arguing that a Democrat's working closely with a MAGA-aligned crypto company is reflective of everything that's wrong with politics today. For his part, Plouffe argued at a crypto conference Thursday that 'the folks who own crypto are pretty politically competitive' and that 'these are not MAGA voters. They are swing voters,' according to the AP. Read more about the outrage in Common Dreams. Some users of Meta's artificial intelligence platform may have unwittingly shared personal or otherwise embarrassing information in written or spoken prompts that are readily available for other users to read. Recent reports have highlighted how the user interface for Meta's AI platform may have contributed to users' confusion over whether they were submitting questions privately or sharing their AI prompts with the masses — a situation that has been described as a 'privacy disaster.' (Facebook did not comment on the record for TechCrunch's story.) Read more in TechCrunch. Users of the popular online game Roblox have been attending in-game protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, continuing a growing tradition of protesters' using video games to promote their causes. Read more in Teen Vogue. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas stops providing new funding for border wall construction
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas has stopped putting new money toward building a U.S.-Mexico border wall, shifting course after installing only a fraction of the hundreds of miles of potential barrier that Republican Gov. Greg Abbott set out to construct four years ago. State lawmakers this month approved a new Texas budget that does not include continued funding for the wall, which had been a multibillion-dollar priority for Abbott as part of a sprawling immigration crackdown. He even took the unusual step of soliciting private donations for construction, saying in 2021 that many Americans wanted to help. On Tuesday, Abbott's office said President Donald Trump's aggressive efforts to curb immigration allowed the state to adjust. The halt in funding was first reported by The Texas Tribune. 'Thanks to President Trump's bold leadership, the federal government is finally fulfilling its obligation to secure the southern border and deport criminal illegal immigrants," Abbott spokesman Andrew Mahaleris said. 'Because of these renewed federal assets in Texas, our state can now adjust aspects of state-funded border security efforts.' The state has completed 65 miles (104 kilometers) of border wall since construction began. The Texas border with Mexico is roughly 1,200 miles (1,931 kilometers). The wall has gone up at a slow pace as the state has navigated the drawn-out process of buying private land and confronting local opposition in some places. Abbott announced plans for the wall at a time when large numbers of migrants were showing up at the border, saying in 2021 that he believed a combination of state-owned land and volunteered private property would "yield hundreds of miles to build a border wall.' The number of migrant crossings has fallen dramatically this year. 'There was no need for it in the first place,' said Scott Nicol, a board member for Friends of the Wildlife Corridor, a habitat preservation group in the Rio Grande Valley. He has criticized the wall as ineffective. "The only thing that's changed is the political dynamic,' he said. The new budget approved by Texas lawmakers allocates about $3.4 billion for border security for two years. That amount will not be used to build out new projects for the wall and instead go to the Texas Department of Safety and the Texas National Guard, the main agencies responsible for Operation Lone Star, Abbott's key immigration program launched in 2021 during the Biden administration. The money allocated for border security is nearly half the $6.5 billion that was dedicated to immigration efforts the last time lawmakers earmarked the state budget two years ago. Funds previously allocated for the wall will allow work on it to continue through 2026 and 'will set the federal government up for success,' said Republican Sen. Joan Huffman, the lead budget writer in the state Senate. The agency responsible for constructing the wall has about $2.5 billion remaining in funding to cover up to 85 additional miles (135 additional kilometers) of the wall by 2026, according to a statement made in April by Texas Facilities Commission executive director Mike Novak, whose agency is overseeing construction of the project. 'This wall should have never been built, it's useless,' said Bekah Hinojosa, co-founder of the South Texas Environmental Justice Network. "It divides our community.' ___ Lathan is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
USA Today
22 minutes ago
- USA Today
Minimum wage should be $0. Hawley and Republicans are wrong to try to raise it.
Minimum wage should be $0. Hawley and Republicans are wrong to try to raise it. | Opinion $15 an hour? Republican Sen. Josh Hawley is teaming up with Sen. Bernie Sanders to push a liberal policy on federal minimum wage. Why? Show Caption Hide Caption What does the GDP mean for the future of the U.S. economy? How will the latest GDP numbers impact the U.S. economy moving forward? Republicans, for a long time, had the right idea on economics with their embrace of the free market. The phrase "Free markets, free people" has been often quoted as a description of the GOP's economic view for decades. Now that is rapidly changing. President Donald Trump has already made his economic illiteracy clear, and Republicans in Congress have proved their fiscal policy to be entirely irresponsible, but now a Republican senator is endorsing a higher federal minimum wage, among other ill-fated left-wing policies. The correct minimum wage is $0, and Republicans would be wise to revisit the free market principles that guided the GOP of the past. Republican Party abandons conservative free market principles The Republican Party is completely abandoning the market-based approach to economics that it had become synonymous with for decades. The first apparent example of this is Trump's protectionist tariff policies, which hike taxes in the interest of protecting certain industries from foreign competition. These taxes are passed on to the consumer and limit growth. The newest example is Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who is in cahoots with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, in proposing legislation that would raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, up from $7.25 an hour. Hawley has a history of opposing free market principles, including legislation capping credit card interest rates, opposing right-to-work laws, and now his endorsement of a higher minimum wage. Opinion: Trump's dysfunctional government can learn from these Republican governors Hawley's growing left-wing economics are a part of a troubling trend within the GOP, in which Republican elected officials are becoming more sympathetic to state involvement in the economy far beyond simply encouraging competition. For a long time, we had the prudence not to embrace policies that gave the state more say in the economy, but now Republicans are increasingly willing to do so. Nothing about these types of policies is conservative, and they are damaging to the country and the Republican Party. The result is that both major parties have prominent voices advocating for more government involvement in the economy and, in turn, our daily lives. Americans don't need a federal minimum wage Employment is an agreement between individuals. The true value of labor is somewhere between the minimum wage someone is willing to work for and the highest wage that someone is willing to pay. Republicans have long resisted minimum wage raises because minimum wage laws are seen as an intervention into the market approach to wage setting. Republicans rightly criticized California's $20 minimum wage for fast-food workers at the time of its signing in September 2023, and that bill led to at least 9,600 job losses a year later. Private sector fast-food employment in California decreased by 1.1% despite 1.6% growth nationally over the same period. Opinion: Newsom comes with too much baggage. Democrats need a new voice for 2028. Minimum wage laws surely increase the standard of living for those employees who are able to keep their jobs, but at the expense of those who are priced out of the labor market entirely. When President Joe Biden and Democrats made their push to raise the federal minimum wage in 2021, estimates foretold that while wages would rise for 17 million Americans, 1.4 million would lose their jobs. That push was unsuccessful at the time, and average hourly pay has risen since then, which both lowers the number who would be priced out of the market and the number who would see financial benefit from a minimum wage hike, but such a policy remains ill-advised. In addition to all of that, federal minimum wage laws impact regions very differently. If there are to be minimum wage laws, they should be enacted at the most local form of government possible. There is no reason why New York City residents should be under the same minimum wage as rural Montana. A higher federal minimum wage implies that the federal government is better equipped to make judgments about local economies than local governments themselves. Many blue cities have already enacted their own minimum wage laws, thereby making it so that a higher federal wage would even further disproportionately impact more rural Americans, who have fewer job prospects than those in large cities. Republicans are ditching the free market principles that made America wealthy in exchange for the Democrats' love for big government. All of this is happening because Republicans in the Trump era crave power rather than prosperity. It's far easier to promise the government will fix your problems than to give people the freedom to fix them themselves. Democrats have known this for years, and Republicans like Hawley are taking a page out of their playbook. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
