Google software engineer accused of stealing AI technology for China
SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) — A former Google software engineer stole artificial intelligence (AI) technology from the Silicon Valley tech giant, prosecutors said Tuesday.
A federal grand jury returned an indictment Tuesday charging 38-year-old Linwei Ding, also known as Leon Ding, with seven counts of economic espionage and seven counts of theft of trade secrets.
Google, which is headquartered in Mountain View, hired Ding as a software engineer in 2019. Between 2022 and 2023, Ding uploaded more than 1,000 files containing confidential information from Google's network to his personal Google Cloud account, according to the indictment.
'While Ding was employed by Google, he secretly affiliated himself with two People's Republic of China (PRC)-based technology companies,' the U.S. Attorney's Office Northern District of California wrote. By mid-2023, Ding had founded his own technology company focused on AI and machine learning in China and was acting as the company's CEO, according to investigators.
'Ding intended to benefit the PRC government by stealing trade secrets from Google,' prosecutors wrote.
Salesforce cutting 1,000 jobs, hiring salespeople for AI
China sponsors talent programs incentivized people to engaged in research and development outside the PRC to transmit that knowledge and research back in exchange for salaries, research funds, lab space, or other incentives, according to federal investigators.
Ding is accused of stealing technology from Google relating to:
The hardware infrastructure and software platform that allows Google's supercomputing data center to train and serve large AI models.
Trade secrets about the architecture and functionality of Google's Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) chips and systems and Google's Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) systems, the software that allows the chips to communicate and execute tasks, and the software that orchestrates thousands of chips into a supercomputer capable of training and executing cutting-edge AI workloads.
Trade secrets on Google's custom-designed SmartNIC, a type of network interface card used to enhance Google's GPU, high performance, and cloud networking products.
The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Casey Boome and Molly Priedeman, as well as trial attorneys Stephen Marzen and Yifei Zheng of the National Security Division's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Will Musk's explosive row with Trump help or harm his businesses?
When Elon Musk recently announced that he was stepping back from politics, investors hoped that would mean he would step up his involvement in the many tech firms he runs. His explosive row with President Donald Trump - and the very public airing of his dirty White House laundry - suggests Musk's changing priorities might not quite be the salve they had been hoping for. Instead of Musk retreating somewhat from the public eye and focusing on boosting the fortunes of Tesla and his other enterprises, he now finds himself being threatened with a boycott from one of his main customers - Trump's federal government. Tesla shares were sent into freefall on Thursday - falling 14% - as he sounded off about President Donald Trump on social media. They rebounded a little on Friday following some indications tempers were cooling. Even so, for the investors and analysts who, for months, had made clear they wanted Musk off his phone and back at work, the situation is far from ideal. Some though argue the problems for Musk's businesses run much deeper than this spat - and the controversial role in the Trump administration it has brought a spectacular end to. For veteran tech journalist Kara Swisher, that is especially so for Tesla. "Tesla's finished," she told the BBC on the sidelines of the San Francisco Media Summit early this week. "It was a great car company. They could compete in the autonomous taxi space but they're way behind." Tesla has long attempted to play catch-up against rival Waymo, owned by Google-parent Alphabet, whose driverless taxis have traversed the streets of San Francisco for years - and now operate in several more cities. This month, Musk is supposed to be overseeing Tesla's launch of a batch of autonomous robo-taxis in Austin, Texas. He posted to X last week that the electric vehicle maker had been testing the Model Y with no drivers on board. "I believe 90% of the future value of Tesla is going to be autonomous and robotics," Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives told the BBC this week, adding that the Austin launch would be "a watershed moment". "The first task at hand is ensuring the autonomous vision gets off to a phenomenal start," Ives added. Who is Elon Musk? How the Trump-Musk feud erupted But with Musk's attention divided, the project's odds of success would appear to have lengthened. And there's something else to factor in too: Musk's own motivation. The talk in Silicon Valley lately centres less on whether Musk can turn things around and more on whether he even cares. "He's a really powerful person when he's focused on something," said Ross Gerber, President and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management. "Before, it was about proving to the world that he would make EVs - the tech that nobody else could do. It was about proving he could make rockets. He had a lot to prove." A longtime Tesla investor, Gerber has soured on the stock, and has been pairing back his holdings since Musk's foray into right-wing politics. He called Thursday an "extremely painful day." "It's the dumbest thing you could possibly do to think that you have more power than the president of the United States," Gerber said, referring to Musk's social media tirade against Trump. The BBC reached out to X, Tesla, and SpaceX seeking comment from Mr Musk but did not receive a response. A particular problem for Musk is that, before he seemingly created an enemy in Donald Trump, he already had one in the grassroots social media campaign against his car-maker. Protests, dubbed #TeslaTakedown, have played out across the country every weekend since Trump took office. In April, Tesla reported a 20% drop in car sales for the first three months of the year. Profits plunged more than 70%, and the share price went down with it. "He should not be deciding the fate of our democracy by disassembling our government piece by piece. It's not right," protestor Linda Koistinen told me at a demonstration outside a Berkeley, California Tesla dealership in February. Koistinen said she wanted to make a "visible stand" against Musk personally. "Ultimately it's not about the tech or the Tesla corporation," said Joan Donovan, a prominent disinformation researcher who co-organized the #TeslaTakedown protests on social media. "It's about the way in which the stock of Tesla has been able to be weaponized against the people and it has put Musk in such a position to have an incredible amount of power with no transparency," Donovan added. Another aspect of Musk's empire that has raised the ire of his detractors is X, the social media platform once known as Twitter. "He bought Twitter so that he had clout and would be able to - at the drop of a hat - reach hundreds of millions of people," Donovan said. There is another possibility here though. Could Musk's high-profile falling out with Trump help rehabilitate him in the eyes of people who turned against him because of his previous closeness to the president? Patrick Moorhead, chief analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy, thinks it could. "We're a very forgiving country," Moorhead says in a telephone interview. "These things take time," he acknowledges, but "it's not unprecedented". Swisher likened Musk's personal brand to that of Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates more than two decades ago. She said Gates was once regarded as "the Darth Vader of Silicon Valley" because of his "arrogant and rude" personality. Today, despite his flaws, Gates has largely rehabilitated his image. "He learned. He grew up. People can change," Swisher told me, even though Musk is "clearly troubled." The problem for Musk is the future for him and his companies is not just about what he does - but what Trump decides too. And while Trump needed Musk in the past, not least to help fund his presidential race, it's not so clear he does now. Noah Smith, writer of the Noahpinion Substack, said Trump's highly lucrative foray into cryptocurrencies - as unseemly as it has been - may have freed him from depending on Musk to carry out his will. "My guess is that this was so he could get out from under Elon," Smith said. In Trump's most menacing comment of the day, he suggested cutting Musk's government contracts, which have an estimated value of $38 billion. A significant chunk of that goes to Musk's rocket company SpaceX - seemingly threatening its future. However, despite the bluster, Trump's warning may be a little more hollow than it seems. That's because SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft ferries people and cargo to the International Space Station where three NASA astronauts are currently posted. It demonstrates that SpaceX has so entrenched itself in the US space and national security apparatus, that Trump's threat could be difficult to carry out. You could make a similar argument about Musk's internet satellite company, Starlink. Finding an alternative could be easier said than done. But, if there are limits on what Trump can do, the same is also true of Musk. In the middle of his row with Trump, he threatened to decommission the Dragon - but it wasn't long before he was rowing back. Responding to an X user's suggestion he that he "cool down" he wrote, "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." It's clear Musk and Trump's friendship is over. It's less certain their reliance on each other is. Whatever the future for Musk's businesses is then, it seems Trump - and his administration's actions - will continue to have a big say in them. Trump and Musk trade insults as row erupts in public view Tesla shares tumble as Trump-Musk feud erupts Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns
-- CoreWeave Inc (NASDAQ:CRWV) reported a strong debut earnings release as a public company, delivering better-than-expected revenue and robust guidance. Yet, shares fell by 5.4% in Thursday's trading, with investors focusing on the company's aggressive capital expenditure plans. Despite near-term pressure, analysts overwhelmingly reiterated bullish ratings and have significantly raised price targets. They cited rapid AI infrastructure demand and substantial new customer wins as the driving forces behind CoreWeave's long-term positioning. The AI-oriented cloud infrastructure firm delivered first-quarter revenue of $981.6 million, surpassing estimates by over $100 million and growing 420% year-over-year. CoreWeave expects Q2 revenue of $1.06 billion to $1.1 billion and full-year revenue between $4.9 billion and $5.1 billion, well ahead of consensus estimates. However, CapEx guidance of $3 to $3.5 billion for the second quarter, roughly three times expected revenue, led to concerns around free cash flow and dilution risk. Investors reacted negatively to the elevated spending levels despite the otherwise strong results. BofA analyst Brad Sills raised his price target to $76 from $42 while maintaining a Buy rating, calling CoreWeave's Q1 performance validation of its 'best-of-breed' position in the AI infrastructure market. Sills flagged better-than-expected return on net assets and strong contract signings, including a $12 billion OpenAI deal and $4 billion expansion with another large enterprise. While acknowledging CapEx came in above forecasts, he highlighted margin stability when adjusting for IPO-related costs. Mizuho's Gregg Moskowitz lifted his price target to $70 from $46 and reiterated an Outperform rating. He noted that the company's top-line guidance is 'materially' ahead of already strong Street expectations. 'CRWV is positioned to capture meaningful share of an AI cloud provider market growing at a server-melting pace,' Moskowitz wrote. He acknowledged near-term pressure on margins due to accelerated investment but said valuation remains reasonable. Jefferies analyst Brent Thill raised his price target to $80 from $51. He called CoreWeave a 'multi-year winner' based on customer growth and its ability to align CapEx with signed contractual deals. Thill cited new enterprise traction and the deal with OpenAI as evidence of momentum. He said the stock's premium to peers is justified by its unmatched growth profile in a rapidly scaling market. Not all analysts were bullish. Citi reiterated a Neutral rating and $43 target, pointing to mixed profitability and declining RPO. DA Davidson downgraded the stock to Underperform with a $36 target. The firm warned that investors 'may not want to scale this business,' drawing comparisons to the pitfalls of scaling WeWork (OTC:WEWKQ). Still, most analysts see CoreWeave as poised to capitalize on accelerating AI infrastructure demand. As Morgan Stanley's Keith Weiss wrote, 'Accruing large contracts from the most demanding GenAI users provides strong validation of CoreWeave's positioning.' Related articles Analysts raise price targets on CoreWeave after blowout Q1, despite CapEx concerns Constellation Brands jumps as Berkshire raises stake CrowdStrike CEO Kurtz said 'not riding off into sunset', remains large shareholder Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Two months after CoreWeave's IPO fizzled, the AI company has surged 250% and left doubters baffled
On Monday, data center company Applied Digital announced two 15-year lease agreements with CoreWeave, an AI infrastructure company. The news sent CoreWeave's stock soaring by more than 40% over the next few days. Such double digit percentage gains have become par for the course during CoreWeave's brief life as a publicly traded stock. On May 27, the stock jumped over 20% after the company announced $2 billion in senior notes, and on May 16 it popped 22% on news that Nvidia infused it with a $900 million investment. The stock tumbled 17% on Thursday, but was back up 4% in midday trading on Friday. Even for a high beta stock, the overall trendline is overwhelmingly positive: Coreweave's stock is up a whopping 250% since its March IPO, with the company's market cap now roughly $70 billion. This has baffled many Wall Street analysts who believe the company is in a precarious financial situation despite the explosive revenue growth logged on its top line. 'Nothing from a fundamental perspective would support the magnitude of change that we've seen in the stock since the IPO,' says Nick Del Deo, a managing director at MoffettNathanson who covers CoreWeave and other tech companies. Of the 19 analysts who cover the company, just three had a 'buy' rating on the stock and four others had positive opinions while the consensus rating is firmly 'hold' as of June 6. The average price target among all analysts who cover the stock is $72.61, well below the $145 level Coreweave was trading at on Friday and the 52-week high of $166.63. Some analysts believe the demand for the stock is being driven by retail investors who, on average, engage in contrarian and momentum-driven trading and may be eager to invest in CoreWeave due to its multi-billion dollar contracts with Nvidia, OpenAI, Microsoft and other major companies propelling AI. It's worth noting that institutional investors like Coatue Management and Jane Street do hold CoreWeave positions worth over $1 billion each. Big announcements like the Applied Digital leases are one factor driving up shares of the stock. An even more fundamental dynamic is that investors are looking for ways to capitalize on the success of OpenAI, which is privately held, and see CoreWeave as one of the few vehicles for exposure in the public markets. OpenAI owns a percentage of CoreWeave and signed a multi-billion deal as its cloud infrastructure provider until April 2029. Plus, CoreWeave is a preferred partner of Nvidia, currently the most valuable company in the world by market cap, which is also an investor in CoreWeave. CoreWeave 'is positioned to capture meaningful share of an AI cloud provider market growing at a server-melting pace,' wrote Mizuho's Gregg Moskowitz, who has an 'outperform' rating on the stock, in a note after the company's released its quarterly earnings report in mid-May. In the first quarter, CoreWeave beat revenue estimates by over 10% and forecasted second-quarter above consensus predictions, too, per Yahoo Finance. Moskowitz and the other optimistic CoreWeave analysts did not respond to Fortune requests for comment. Coreweave posted revenue of $981.6 million in the first three months of the year, up a staggering 420% from the year-ago period. The meteoric growth reflects Coreweave's well-timed pivot to AI. Founded in 2017 by three commodity traders, Coreweave began as an ethereum mining company. In 2019 it pivoted to cloud infrastructure to enhance GPU capabilities, attracting investment and chips from Nvidia–beginning its journey to the upper echelons of AI computing. The company's public market debut was not auspicious. Coreweave reduced the price range of the offering, and the stock finished its first day trading just one penny above its $40 IPO price. For analysts skeptical about CoreWeave's value, their dim view is driven by the company's debt-saddled balance sheet, its ultra-dependence on Microsoft, and customers' development of proprietary technologies to replace contracts with the cloud computing company. The bullishness of day traders and bearishness of investment professionals may be creating a short squeeze situation similar to the GameStop one that rocked markets in 2021 by causing the stock to go from $17 to $483 over the course of a month. The volatility of the CoreWeave in this instance is amplified by its low float—meaning that only a small amount of shares are available for purchase. It would make sense that CoreWeave could be a short squeeze target: short interest is approximately 8.44% of its float, well above the 2% to 5% average across U.S. stocks, though still far below the 140% of GameStop near the onset of its famous squeeze. One Coreweave short seller experiencing the squeeze is Felix Wang, a managing director and partner at Hedgeye Risk Management. Yet, Wang maintains his short position despite facing potentially enormous losses. His argument is multifaceted but boils down to the company's net debt, lease liabilities and its dependence on Microsoft and a tiny handful of others for the bulk of its revenues. 'Investors should be more concerned about their operating and financial obligations,' he tells Fortune. This is because the company has a 387% debt-to-equity ratio, -38.7% profit margin and $11.9 billion debt with just $1.28 billion in cash. These fundamentals combined with the fact that Microsoft accounted for over 70% of CoreWeave's revenue last quarter leads Wang to compare CoreWeave to WeWork at the time of its failed 2019 IPO. Wang looks at CoreWeave's creditors Blackstone and Magnetar Financial. He says that these lenders are currently charging CoreWeave 10% to 15% interest on its debt and will have provisions to charge higher interest and accelerate the repayment schedule if CoreWeave's clients like Microsoft end or downgrade partnerships with the cloud provider. 'If your customers are the most highly-rated AAA clients in the world, other than OpenAI, then why are you paying 10% to 15% interest by yield on your debt agreements?' ask Wangs. CoreWeave's debt obligations have, in-part, led D.A. Davidson Head of Research Gil Luria to rate the stock as an underperformer. He explains that CoreWeave's debt obligations are so large that equity holders own a very little portion of the company. Plus, CoreWeave customers Microsoft and Google are building products to directly compete with it, he says. 'The only reason that they're using CoreWeave is that CoreWeave was able to build quickly enough while Microsoft and Google weren't getting enough chips from Nvidia,' leading them to ink three- or five-year deals with CoreWeave, he says. 'Their need for CoreWeave will go away within the life of the contract.' These incredulous analysts may be vindicated in September when the lockup period on the IPO expires in September and restricted shareholders can offload their CoreWeave holdings and the stock price will drop. But as CoreWeave's stock bounced back Friday after plunging 17% on Thursday, perhaps the only thing that's clear is that the AI company will continue to leave believers, and skeptics, scratching their heads. This story was originally featured on
