Two months after CoreWeave's IPO fizzled, the AI company has surged 250% and left doubters baffled
On Monday, data center company Applied Digital announced two 15-year lease agreements with CoreWeave, an AI infrastructure company. The news sent CoreWeave's stock soaring by more than 40% over the next few days.
Such double digit percentage gains have become par for the course during CoreWeave's brief life as a publicly traded stock. On May 27, the stock jumped over 20% after the company announced $2 billion in senior notes, and on May 16 it popped 22% on news that Nvidia infused it with a $900 million investment. The stock tumbled 17% on Thursday, but was back up 4% in midday trading on Friday. Even for a high beta stock, the overall trendline is overwhelmingly positive: Coreweave's stock is up a whopping 250% since its March IPO, with the company's market cap now roughly $70 billion.
This has baffled many Wall Street analysts who believe the company is in a precarious financial situation despite the explosive revenue growth logged on its top line. 'Nothing from a fundamental perspective would support the magnitude of change that we've seen in the stock since the IPO,' says Nick Del Deo, a managing director at MoffettNathanson who covers CoreWeave and other tech companies.
Of the 19 analysts who cover the company, just three had a 'buy' rating on the stock and four others had positive opinions while the consensus rating is firmly 'hold' as of June 6. The average price target among all analysts who cover the stock is $72.61, well below the $145 level Coreweave was trading at on Friday and the 52-week high of $166.63.
Some analysts believe the demand for the stock is being driven by retail investors who, on average, engage in contrarian and momentum-driven trading and may be eager to invest in CoreWeave due to its multi-billion dollar contracts with Nvidia, OpenAI, Microsoft and other major companies propelling AI. It's worth noting that institutional investors like Coatue Management and Jane Street do hold CoreWeave positions worth over $1 billion each.
Big announcements like the Applied Digital leases are one factor driving up shares of the stock. An even more fundamental dynamic is that investors are looking for ways to capitalize on the success of OpenAI, which is privately held, and see CoreWeave as one of the few vehicles for exposure in the public markets. OpenAI owns a percentage of CoreWeave and signed a multi-billion deal as its cloud infrastructure provider until April 2029. Plus, CoreWeave is a preferred partner of Nvidia, currently the most valuable company in the world by market cap, which is also an investor in CoreWeave.
CoreWeave 'is positioned to capture meaningful share of an AI cloud provider market growing at a server-melting pace,' wrote Mizuho's Gregg Moskowitz, who has an 'outperform' rating on the stock, in a note after the company's released its quarterly earnings report in mid-May. In the first quarter, CoreWeave beat revenue estimates by over 10% and forecasted second-quarter above consensus predictions, too, per Yahoo Finance. Moskowitz and the other optimistic CoreWeave analysts did not respond to Fortune requests for comment.
Coreweave posted revenue of $981.6 million in the first three months of the year, up a staggering 420% from the year-ago period. The meteoric growth reflects Coreweave's well-timed pivot to AI. Founded in 2017 by three commodity traders, Coreweave began as an ethereum mining company. In 2019 it pivoted to cloud infrastructure to enhance GPU capabilities, attracting investment and chips from Nvidia–beginning its journey to the upper echelons of AI computing.
The company's public market debut was not auspicious. Coreweave reduced the price range of the offering, and the stock finished its first day trading just one penny above its $40 IPO price.
For analysts skeptical about CoreWeave's value, their dim view is driven by the company's debt-saddled balance sheet, its ultra-dependence on Microsoft, and customers' development of proprietary technologies to replace contracts with the cloud computing company.
The bullishness of day traders and bearishness of investment professionals may be creating a short squeeze situation similar to the GameStop one that rocked markets in 2021 by causing the stock to go from $17 to $483 over the course of a month. The volatility of the CoreWeave in this instance is amplified by its low float—meaning that only a small amount of shares are available for purchase. It would make sense that CoreWeave could be a short squeeze target: short interest is approximately 8.44% of its float, well above the 2% to 5% average across U.S. stocks, though still far below the 140% of GameStop near the onset of its famous squeeze.
One Coreweave short seller experiencing the squeeze is Felix Wang, a managing director and partner at Hedgeye Risk Management. Yet, Wang maintains his short position despite facing potentially enormous losses. His argument is multifaceted but boils down to the company's net debt, lease liabilities and its dependence on Microsoft and a tiny handful of others for the bulk of its revenues. 'Investors should be more concerned about their operating and financial obligations,' he tells Fortune.
This is because the company has a 387% debt-to-equity ratio, -38.7% profit margin and $11.9 billion debt with just $1.28 billion in cash. These fundamentals combined with the fact that Microsoft accounted for over 70% of CoreWeave's revenue last quarter leads Wang to compare CoreWeave to WeWork at the time of its failed 2019 IPO.
Wang looks at CoreWeave's creditors Blackstone and Magnetar Financial. He says that these lenders are currently charging CoreWeave 10% to 15% interest on its debt and will have provisions to charge higher interest and accelerate the repayment schedule if CoreWeave's clients like Microsoft end or downgrade partnerships with the cloud provider. 'If your customers are the most highly-rated AAA clients in the world, other than OpenAI, then why are you paying 10% to 15% interest by yield on your debt agreements?' ask Wangs.
CoreWeave's debt obligations have, in-part, led D.A. Davidson Head of Research Gil Luria to rate the stock as an underperformer. He explains that CoreWeave's debt obligations are so large that equity holders own a very little portion of the company. Plus, CoreWeave customers Microsoft and Google are building products to directly compete with it, he says. 'The only reason that they're using CoreWeave is that CoreWeave was able to build quickly enough while Microsoft and Google weren't getting enough chips from Nvidia,' leading them to ink three- or five-year deals with CoreWeave, he says. 'Their need for CoreWeave will go away within the life of the contract.'
These incredulous analysts may be vindicated in September when the lockup period on the IPO expires in September and restricted shareholders can offload their CoreWeave holdings and the stock price will drop. But as CoreWeave's stock bounced back Friday after plunging 17% on Thursday, perhaps the only thing that's clear is that the AI company will continue to leave believers, and skeptics, scratching their heads.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple's two biggest problem areas ahead of its WWDC 2025
Ahead of Apple's (AAPL) 2025 Worldwide Developers Conference kicking off this Monday, June 9, Needham analysts downgraded the iPhone maker from a Buy rating to Hold while removing its price target on the tech stock. Needham & Company senior media and internet analyst Laura Martin — the analyst behind the call — examines several of Apple's biggest problems as it faces pressures in China's consumer market and the team-up between OpenAI and former Apple designer Jony Ive. Here's a look at what to expect from the 2025 WWDC event. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. Let's take a look at Apple here. It's down 19% year to date, the lowest performing member of the magnificent seven and trailing the S&P 500, which is now up for the year. Ahead of Apple's company, uh, Worldwide Developers Conference, Needham and company cut its Apple rating from buy to hold and removed its $225 price target for the stock. We've got the person behind that call, Laura Martin, Needham and Company senior media and internet analyst joining us now. Really appreciate you making the time to break this down for us, Laura. What was the single biggest driver behind this call on Apple? So I think, I think we're focusing on two things. There's like an urgent problem for Apple and then an important problem for Apple. The urgent problem is, a, it's really expensive today at 26 times next year's earnings, which is twice its normal multiple over the last 10 years, and about a 25% premium to the S&P 500. So it's too expensive. Second, there are real risks to their fundamentals over the next 12 months. Not only tariffs, but, um, but also like the Chinese demand, which used to be 19% of their total iPhone sales, went to 17% last year. We expect it to go to 15% of total sales this year. So there, um, there really is issues with the rising nationalism in China and Chinese, uh, consumers buying competitive products and not Apple products. Um, also, we have risk of fundamentals services revenue because you may have seen that epic, uh, the epic court decision, which allows all these apps to actually get direct payment and not pay the Apple 30% tithe on, on these app payments. So that actually threatens services revenue. Anyway, lots of fundamental risks, um, coming from the outside world in the near term, again, to their fundamental earnings per share, a risk in addition to just tariffs. And the important problem here that isn't as urgent, but it is really important is competition. So what's happening is generative AI is opening up the possibility of replacing the smartphone with, if you think meta and Google are right, glasses, like these Ray-Ban glasses that Meta's already sold a million units of. Or, more importantly, um, Jony Ive, who used to was actually the designer behind every major Apple product on the market today, he was at Apple for 27 years, has recently, his company's been bought by Sam Altman's OpenAI, and they're talking about a new form factor that isn't a smartphone and it isn't glasses, but it's going to compete and replace, I mean, I think over the long term replace the iPhone because Jony Ive, who invented the iPhone as a design fact, uh, hardware, said he doesn't like screens. He wants to move consumers away from screens, which would be lovely if you could have a conversation with a 15-year-old where they weren't looking at their screens. So I'm completely supportive, but all of this is a competitive is a competitive threat to the largest iPhone maker, you know, the largest smartphone maker in the world. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Gizmodo
35 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Sam Altman's Brief Ouster at OpenAI Is Getting the Movie Treatment
At some point, Hollywood decided the world of tech was a nice little well for drama, but it can probably just throw out the latest material that it's happened into rather than serving it to the rest of us. According to The Hollywood Reporter, we're going to be getting a movie based on the five-day period that Sam Altman was ousted and ultimately reinstated as the head of OpenAI. The film, which will reportedly be titled 'Artificial,' already has a pretty star-studded call sheet, though everything is still in the rumor period, it seems. Luca Guadagnino, director of Call Me by Your Name and Challengers, is reportedly in talks to direct the picture. Andrew Garfield is currently the favorite to play Altman, which is very much in his wheelhouse after his performance as Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin in The Social Network. Monica Barbaro, who played Joan Baez in A Complete Unknown, is reportedly in talks to play former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, and Anora breakout star Yura Borisov is up for company co-founder and Altman antagonist Ilya Sutskever. Comedy writer Simon Rich, who wrote for 'Saturday Night Live' and created 'Miracle Workers,' is reportedly responsible for the screenplay. One of the problems for Hollywood repeatedly going after these real-life Big Tech dramas is that the industries are now so entangled. This OpenAI flick, for instance, is handled by Amazon MGM Studios. Amazon is about $8 billion deep into investments into OpenAI rival Anthropic. So like, do they have the motivation to trash OpenAI in this thing? (Not that external pressure to do so is necessary, but still.) And sure, the drama at OpenAI is compelling. It's not too often that the founder of one of the hottest companies around gets kicked out by the board because they no longer trust him, only for him to be reinstated five days later. And, as stories like the Wall Street Journal's accounting of the events highlight, there is no shortage of intrigue and backstabbing along the way that will probably play well on the big screen. But ugh is the list of these Silicon Valley dramas getting long, and it doesn't feel like it's really accomplishing much other than pumping the egos of the subjects. The Social Network remains probably the best work the genre has produced (save for HBO's 'Silicon Valley,' which hasn't aged a day since it came to an end), and even that failed to really capture just how greedy and unethical these people would turn out. (Though, give Aaron Sorkin this, he probably was ahead of the curve on calling out the bro-ish-ness of Zuckerberg that is now on display when he pops up on Joe Rogan's podcast.) The rest of the offerings have their charms, to be sure. 'The Dropout,' 'WeCrashed,' and 'Super Pumped' all manage to pull out some great performances and are built around compelling stories. But none of them really sufficiently get at the greed, corruption, and frankly, the disdain for everyone from regulators to actual, regular people who get harmed while these people amass their fortunes. Maybe that's because the stories typically follow the central figures—the Altmans and Zuckerbergs and Holmeses of the world—from their seats in the C-suites, and they are so rarely confronted with reality there.


CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
At WWDC, How Will Apple Address Its Lackluster First Year of Apple Intelligence?
At WWDC 2025, how is Apple going to spin what can be objectively seen as a year of AI promises unkept? Leading up to WWDC 2024, AI had broken into the mainstream, capturing the imagination of early adopters and the general public. Services like Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT showcased features that used large language models and generative AI to write, search the internet and create near-photorealistic artwork in a way that only books and movies had imagined before. AI was the future, and all the major tech companies needed to be pointed in that direction. But Apple, being secretive by nature, kept its AI plans closely guarded. By the time Tim Cook, Apple's CEO, took the stage during last year's WWDC keynote presentation, analysts and financial experts thought the company had fallen way behind on AI, especially after Google featured nothing but AI at its Google I/O event. When Cook introduced Apple Intelligence at WWDC, the collection of features was a more modest approach to incorporating AI into the iPhone and Mac. Far from seeming like a straggler, Apple had us praising a measured, practical rollout. Instead of throwing more slop against the wall, Apple Intelligence promised to focus on practical features like notification summaries and removing distractions from photos. Siri was going to be the loom that wove together various threads of your personal information and become a true virtual assistant. But after a slow rollout of Apple Intelligence features, we learned about Siri's internal struggles, and Apple acknowledged that progress was "going to take us longer than we thought." Now it's unclear whether Siri will advance significantly at all this year. So how will Apple deal with this AI-generated elephant in the room? Will the presenters hype what's been accomplished so far? Or maybe ignore the issue altogether and focus on whatever is coming next? That seems like the most likely -- the most Apple -- way for this to go. However, let's not forget that WWDC as a whole is still primarily an event for developers, treating them like members of an exclusive club even as the keynote event serves to showcase technologies that will dominate the rest of the year for everyone else. Apple's senior vice president of software engineering, Craig Federighi, has consistently delivered news with a light touch. As just one example, the fabulously coiffed exec, sometimes referred to as "Hair Force One," even donned a silver hair-shaped helmet during the introduction to WWDC 2024 in the guise of parachuting over Apple's Cupertino, California, campus. "Hair Force One," Craig Federighi, prepares to skydive into last year's WWDC keynote presentation. Apple/Screenshot by Jeff Carlson/CNET And even though tech giants like Apple and Google are laser-focused on competing to own the AI future, they're not always so serious that they don't poke fun at each other, as Rohan Shah, senior product manager, Android platform, did during this year's Google I/O Android Show when he mentioned that Gemini "isn't just an app," and continued out of the side of his mouth, "like on some other phones." I'm guessing Federighi will have a few clever lines acknowledging that Apple's aspirations were higher than the state of the art, give the audience a "we all know what I mean" knowing wink, and then push through to what's new in the next versions. Because honestly, we'll all be wondering how Apple is going to move forward to make up the ground it's lost so far. We'll know for sure during the WWDC 2025 keynote presentation on Monday, June 9, which Apple will stream live starting at 10 a.m. PT. Members of the CNET team are attending the event to report on developments as they drop -- hopefully not from the sky by parachute this year.