logo
Global Rate Limbo Reigns After 150 Days of Trump

Global Rate Limbo Reigns After 150 Days of Trump

Yahoo9 hours ago

(Bloomberg) -- Multiple central banks are set to keep interest rates frozen in the coming week while continuing to gauge the impact of trade disruptions instigated by US President Donald Trump.
Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future
Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry
NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban
As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space
Do World's Fairs Still Matter?
From Washington to London, wary officials in countries that account for two fifths of the global economy may display a collective sense of paralysis as they assess risks to inflation and growth from tariffs and stop-start commerce flows. Renewed tensions in the Middle East will only add to their conundrum.
Their challenge was articulated on June 3 by the Paris-based OECD, which cut forecasts for global economic expansion while warning that protectionism is adding to consumer-price pressures. The toll that trade tensions are taking on world prosperity is likely to feature when Group of Seven leaders meet in Canada from Sunday.
Investors will focus most on the Federal Reserve decision on Wednesday, the eve of Trump's 150th day in power. Observers reckon officials there are still months away from being able to make a settled judgment on the implications of White House policy on the economy.
What Bloomberg Economics Says:
'Amid the uncertainty, the FOMC considers the optimal path is to stay put. We expect the median participant to signal just one 25-basis-point cut in 2025, down from two earlier this year — and a sizable minority may see no cuts at all. That's a big gap from market pricing, which still leans toward 50 bps. Powell will try to thread the needle, acknowledging softer data but stressing the Fed is in 'wait-and-see' mode amid policy uncertainty.'
—Anna Wong, Stuart Paul, Eliza Winger, Estelle Ou and Chris G. Collins, economists. For full analysis, click here
The Bank of Japan, meanwhile, may hold off on a rate move while adjusting bond purchases, and counterparts in the UK and Norway are seen following suit with unchanged borrowing costs.
In all, central banks responsible for six of the 10 most-traded currencies in the world are set for decisions. Among them, only those in Sweden and Switzerland are anticipated by economists to tweak rates, with small cuts predicted for each.
Peers in Brazil, Chile, Indonesia and Turkey may also deliver no change as policymakers digest domestic developments and international events.
Elsewhere, a flurry of Chinese economic data, UK inflation, and several speeches by European Central Bank officials might draw attention in one of the more packed weeks of the year so far.
Click here for what happened in the past week, and below is our wrap of what's coming up in the global economy.
US and Canada
US economic data in the holiday-shortened week include the latest readout of consumer demand. Economists project a decline in May retail sales, primarily due to fewer motor vehicle purchases. Excluding autos and gasoline, however, Tuesday's report is likely to show sales firmed after a soft start to the second quarter.
Concerns have been building that flagging consumer sentiment will translate into a sustained pullback in household demand.
Also on tap are reports on May housing starts and industrial production. The Fed's production report on Tuesday is seen showing a second month of declining manufacturing output, as factories contend with uncertainty stemming from trade policy.
Economists forecast figures on Wednesday will show little change in new residential construction, consistent with a sluggish housing market that's battling various headwinds, including high borrowing costs.
For more, read Bloomberg Economics' full Week Ahead for the US
In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney aims to meet with every world leader gathered in Kananaskis, Alberta, for the G-7 summit that starts in earnest on Monday. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Saturday that Britain will seek to restart trade negotiations with Canada.
The Bank of Canada's summary of deliberations will offer new insight into how policymakers are thinking about the future rate path, after they held borrowing costs steady while telegraphing that a cut may be needed if the economy weakens and inflation is contained. Governor Tiff Macklem will also deliver a speech.
Population estimates for the first quarter will reveal how the government's efforts to crack down on temporary migration are shaping up, while retail data for April and a flash estimate for May will shed further light on consumers' response to the trade war.
Asia
It's a big week for central banks in Asia, with most seen holding rates unchanged during a period of uncertainty for trade policy and Middle East tensions. China and Japan will also release a range of economic data.
On Monday, Pakistan's central bank is expected to keep rates steady, followed by the BOJ on Tuesday. It's expected to hold after Governor Kazuo Ueda signaled inflation still isn't at target. Investors will focus on what policymakers do about their bond-purchase program, with about two-thirds of respondents in a Bloomberg survey anticipating a slowdown in cutbacks.
Bank Indonesia is seen keeping rates unchanged on Wednesday, as is Taiwan on Thursday as its economy endures currency volatility that sent the Taiwanese dollar to the strongest in three years. China is forecast to hold its 1- and 5-year loan prime rates steady on Friday.
The Philippines is the only central bank in the region seen cutting — by 25 basis points — as price pressures ease.
China on Monday releases a slew of figures on its economy, including home prices, retail sales, industrial production, foreign direct investment, and the jobless rate. Economists expect that retail sales slowed in May from the prior month, industrial activity held up as companies frontloaded manufacturing, and property investment contracted once again.
Japan starts releasing a number of important insights on Wednesday, including exports that likely contracted in May — the same for machine orders, as US tariff policy weighed on demand. National consumer prices likely strengthened in the month on a core basis in data due on Friday.
May trade figures are also due from India, while Singapore shows electronics exports and Malaysia and Taiwan their overall exports. The data will underscore what's been a tumultuous few months in global commerce as companies attempt to balance tariffs with anticipated customer demand.
Elsewhere, Australia likely added fewer people to payrolls in May. New Zealand reports first quarter gross domestic product, seen contracting from the prior year for the fourth quarter in a row, and Sri Lanka also reports GDP. We'll get a look at inflation trends in South Korea with the export prices index and producer prices, both for May.
For more, read Bloomberg Economics' full Week Ahead for Asia
Europe, Middle East, Africa
The BOE announces its rate decision at noon London time on Thursday, the day after UK inflation figures are released. A vote to hold policy at 4.25% is widely expected, despite signs that UK tax increases and US tariffs are weighing on growth and causing job cuts.
The concern is elevated headline inflation. Economists expect consumer-price growth to be essentially unchanged at 3.4% on Wednesday – well above the 2% target. Fresh Middle East turmoil after Israel struck Iran's nuclear program poses a fresh risk, with oil prices having spiked following the attack.
The Monetary Policy Committee is anticipated by forecasters to vote 7-2 to hold, with two likely dissenters seeking a quarter-point cut. Most expect the BOE to stick with guidance for reductions to be 'gradual and careful,' signaling a quarter-point move every three months. Bloomberg's survey sees three more such steps — in August, November and February — to 3.5%.
Several other decisions are scheduled:
Sweden's Riksbank was supposed to be done with cuts after reducing its rate by 175 basis points since May 2024. But slower growth and lower inflation readings, combined with Trump's trade jolt in April, mean easing is back on the table for the export-reliant Nordic nation. Of nine economists surveyed by Bloomberg, seven expect a cut on Wednesday, to 2%.
In Namibia the same day, officials will also likely reduce their rate at a time when inflation is at the lower end of their 3%-to-6% target band.
It's Norway's turn on Thursday. In a rare example of an advanced economy yet to begin post-pandemic easing, Norges Bank is widely expected to keep its rate at 4.5%. Its plan is to begin loosening from the highest level in more than 16 years in the second half. A key business survey backed that view last week.
The same day, the Swiss National Bank is widely expected to lower borrowing costs by a quarter point to dissuade haven flows into the franc. That would end almost three years of positive monetary policy, and bring the rate to zero — a level officials haven't touched before, despite their previous foray into negative territory.
Botswana may also cut borrowing costs on Thursday to help shore up the economy as inflation is expected to remain low.
Turkey's central bank is tipped to keep its rate at 46% the same day. Officials have used other means to loosen policy amid slowing inflation, such as lowering the average cost of funding from nearly 50% to closer to the benchmark rate.
A slew of euro-area central banker appearances include the Bundesbank chief on Monday, an event in Milan featuring as many as six Governing Council members on Wednesday, and an address by ECB President Christine Lagarde to a Ukrainian central bank conference on Thursday.
Among data highlights, Germany's ZEW investor sentiment survey is released on Tuesday, and euro-zone consumer confidence comes out on Friday.
In Israel on Sunday, data may show inflation eased slightly, to 3.5% in May from 3.6% a month earlier. The central bank has kept its rate at 4.5% for more than a year amid escalating regional tensions.
Inflation numbers are due in South Africa two days later, with a steady outcome of 2.8% expected. On Thursday, the South African Reserve Bank publishes its biannual financial stability review.
For more, read Bloomberg Economics' full Week Ahead for EMEA
Latin America
Brazil's April GDP-proxy data due Monday comes on the heels of robust first-quarter results.
Government handouts to low-income households and a strong labor market, among other tailwinds, are likely to head off any pronounced loss of economic momentum.
In Colombia, GDP-proxy data is on tap, along with trade balance and imports for April. The economy's strong start to 2025 obscured some weak data for March, which may be more indicative of what to expect for April.
Chile's central bank, led by Governor Rosanna Costa, on Tuesday will likely keep its key rate at 5% for a fourth straight meeting.
Local economists surveyed by Banco Central de Chile see a half-point of easing by year-end and a terminal rate to the cycle 50 basis-points lower, at 4%. The same survey has inflation back to the 3% target by year-end 2026.
Chile's central bank on Wednesday releases its quarterly inflation report, featuring updated growth and inflation forecasts in addition to revisions to the bank's monetary policy outlook.
Brazil's central bank may have gotten enough good news out of the May inflation report posted on June 10 to draw a line under its mini tightening cycle, and keep borrowing costs unchanged Wednesday.
That said, policymakers may not be in a hurry to trim the key rate — now at 14.75% — any time soon.
For more, read Bloomberg Economics' full Week Ahead for Latin America
--With assistance from Robert Jameson, Laura Dhillon Kane, Kati Pohjanpalo, Piotr Skolimowski, Ott Ummelas, Monique Vanek, Abeer Abu Omar, Philip Aldrick, Katia Dmitrieva, Brian Fowler and Vince Golle.
(Updates with UK-Canada trade talks in Canada section)
American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination
The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software
New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years
As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining?
US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why did those apartments for the poor cost D.C. more than $1 million each?
Why did those apartments for the poor cost D.C. more than $1 million each?

Washington Post

time8 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Why did those apartments for the poor cost D.C. more than $1 million each?

The June 8 front-page article 'D.C. apartments for the poor exceeding $1 million to build,' which highlighted the high costs of a handful of developments financed in part with the Low-Income Housing Tax Credits program, did not reflect typical costs of developments financed by the credit program. The credit, which has been the primary federal incentive for the construction of rent-restricted apartments for low-income families since 1986, has generated construction of more than 54,000 properties containing more than 3.7 million affordable homes nationwide. The vast majority have been built at comparable costs to similar buildings serving higher-income households — even as credit-financed properties must meet a host of federal and local labor, environmental and approval requirements and achieve standards of quality and durability far beyond the typical market-rate project. Stockton Williams, Washington The writer is executive director of the National Council of State Housing Agencies. Jubilee Housing appreciated the June 8 front-page article highlighting the cost of producing affordable housing in D.C. The affordable housing crisis remains one of the most pressing issues of our time, and we must harness every possible solution to meet the need. That said, the article's focus on the cost efficiency of Ontario Place, which Jubilee Housing is developing, missed a crucial point: Cost per unit is only one part of a complex picture and often a misleading one. Ontario Place provides 52 affordable homes, and nearly half are large enough for families. A lower per-unit-cost design with mostly one-bedroom units could have yielded more smaller units — and a more typical per-unit cost — but it would have been able to house fewer people overall. Maximizing family-size units not only meets District policy goals; in this project, it was actually 10 percent less expensive per person housed than the original design with mostly one-bedrooms and studios. We agree that in most jurisdictions, affordable housing developments are expected to achieve numerous additional policy goals. These include local hiring, higher wage scales and environmental sustainability features. Though those are worthy goals, such requirements can add 10 percent to 25 percent to project costs in D.C. On top of this, bond financing and low-income housing tax credits, which provide more favorable rates but higher transaction fees, are inherently more expensive than market-rate financing. That is especially true for smaller projects such as Jubilee's, where the percentage of financing costs is higher. Until viable alternatives exist, these remain a cost of doing business. Also, for decades, affordable housing was built where land was cheap, placing families far from transit, jobs, fresh food and quality schools. That strategy failed. Continuing it while expecting different outcomes is, as they say, the definition of insanity. Yes, affordable housing in D.C. is expensive, and it is a strategic investment. Affordable housing providers must meet public policy mandates and, in doing so, create economic value across the region. More important, Jubilee delivers what D.C. needs most: high-quality, affordable, family-size homes close to amenities and resources. Economist Raj Chetty has shown that the highest predictor of future success is the Zip code we live in, and other experts have shown that families in high-opportunity neighborhoods see long-term income gains — estimated at a combined $1.4 million over a decade for Ontario Place residents. The on-site aquaponics farm that some commentators have focused on will generate a combined $500,000 in annual wages for the people it employs and $920,000 annually in public savings from reduced reincarceration and reduced health incidents. The project will generate nearly $10 million in long-term public benefit. To break cycles of poverty, we must embrace innovation. We shouldn't just focus on per-unit development costs but also on how many lives can be supported by that investment. Alex Orfinger, Arlington The writer is chair of the board of Jubilee Housing. The June 8 front-page article on publicly funded housing in D.C. underscored an alarming and indefensible failure in the city's approach to affordable housing. The fact that so-called affordable apartments exceed $1 million per unit to construct is not just unsustainable — it's outrageous. This is further evidence that Democratic Mayor Muriel E. Bowser's housing strategy is completely out of touch with the lived reality of most District residents. While the city pours $100 million into the Housing Production Trust Fund, we see little oversight and even less affordability. Developers are racking up extravagant costs while D.C. taxpayers foot the bill. There is no justifiable reason taxpayers should be asked to subsidize $1 million apartments under the false promise of affordability. We must demand an immediate audit of all Housing Production Trust Fund expenditures, freeze new luxury-affordable projects and refocus the city's housing investments toward cost-effective, community-based development. The District needs leadership that prioritizes working families. D.C. can and must do better. Ernest E. Johnson, Washington The writer is a Democratic candidate in the D.C. mayoral race. The Post's June 5 online editorial 'Eliminating the tipped minimum wage has been a disaster' shared only part of the story of D.C.'s restaurant industry after the covid-19 shutdowns. Full-service employment, after fully recovering from the covid-19 pandemic in 2023, has remained at levels consistent with pre-pandemic employment, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. And D.C.'s food service employment has outpaced those of Maryland and Virginia. BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages data shows that the restaurant industry in D.C. is growing, including in full-service restaurants that employ tipped workers. Wages for tipped workers have shown steady growth thanks to Initiative 82. And BLS data shows that average wages for staff in full-service restaurants rose above their pre-shutdown level. But let me be clear: I do not want to minimize the challenges our local restaurants are experiencing. Like so many families here in the District, restaurants have been hit hard by rising food prices and federal layoffs in the wake of the Trump administration's policies. Even before President Donald Trump took office, my colleagues and I sought to spur economic opportunities for our small businesses and restaurants through legislation, including through the Restaurant Revitalization Act, which was passed last year. Good policy must be guided by good data, and the numbers do not justify going back on our word to workers. The data shows that wages have been rising and that the number of restaurants has increased since I-82 was implemented. As a council, our responsibility is to make our economy work for everyone and not balance our budgets by rolling back wages and protections for working families. Janeese Lewis George, Washington The writer represents Ward 4 on the D.C. Council. The Editorial Board is right that Initiative 82 has been bad for both D.C.'s restaurants and workers. The BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages shows D.C. has lost about 5 percent of its restaurant jobs since the law went into place. That's over four times higher than the losses seen in surrounding Maryland and Virginia counties. The District's workers have lost over $11.8 million in earnings since the law took effect because of a loss of income from tips. With this context, it's easy to see why even the city's leadership is taking measured steps to stop the law's devastation. Rebekah Paxton, Arlington The writer is research director for the Employment Policies Institute. I agree with the June 5 online editorial, 'Eliminating the tipped minimum wage has been a disaster.' Implementing Initiative 82 was a misguided effort rooted in policy frameworks that don't align with the realities of the city's hospitality industry. The policy disproportionately targets large chain restaurants with large staffs and also hurts the city's diverse food scene. Initiative 82 has hurt local restaurants in two key ways: First, it ignored the ripple effects of payroll hikes. Increasing base wages doesn't just affect take-home pay — it also increases payroll taxes and administrative costs. The law mandates higher operational costs within D.C. that put restaurants here at a competitive disadvantage relative to restaurants in Virginia and Maryland. Second, under the previous law, restaurants were already required to ensure that tipped workers made at least minimum wage. If tips fell short, employers were legally obligated to make up the difference. And, the service fees that have been introduced to cover rising costs are revenue to the restaurants that do not have to be distributed to staff. Ironically, under the new system, there is potential for some servers to earn less than they did before, with diners paying less in tips because of those service fees. The city should return to the previous system, which minimized costs for businesses while still guaranteeing a safety net for workers. It's encouraging that The Post's Editorial Board opposed both Initiative 82 and its predecessor, Initiative 77. But many restaurant workers and diners have come to a similar conclusion far too late. Jonathan Halperin, Washington

Leonard A. Lauder, Philanthropist and Cosmetics Heir, Dies at 92
Leonard A. Lauder, Philanthropist and Cosmetics Heir, Dies at 92

New York Times

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Leonard A. Lauder, Philanthropist and Cosmetics Heir, Dies at 92

Leonard A. Lauder, the art patron and philanthropist who with his mother, Estée Lauder, built a family cosmetics business into a worldwide juggernaut that supplied generations of women with the creams, colors and scents of eternal youth, died on Saturday at his home on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. He was 92. The death was announced by the Estée Lauder Companies. While best known for his business enterprises, Mr. Lauder was also one of America's most influential philanthropists and art patrons. He gave hundreds of millions to museums, medical institutions, and breast cancer and Alzheimer's research, as well as to other cultural, scientific and social causes. His art collections ranged from postcards to Picassos. In 2013, he pledged the most significant gift in the history of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, a trove of nearly 80 Cubist paintings, drawings and sculptures by Picasso, Braque, Léger and Gris. Scholars put the value of the gift at $1 billion and said its quality rivaled or surpassed that of the collections of the Museum of Modern Art in New York, the State Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg, Russia, and the Pompidou Center in Paris. After the gift was announced, he added another dozen major Cubist works, The New York Times reported in a profile of Mr. Lauder last year. The eldest son of Estée Lauder, who in 1946 founded the company that bears her name, Mr. Lauder was for decades a senior executive and the marketing expert and corporate strategist behind his mother, the flamboyant public face of the Lauder empire, who pitched its lipsticks, bath oils, face powders and anti-wrinkle creams with almost messianic zeal. A complete obituary will be published soon.

Gas Prices Are Under $3 In Half Of U.S. States—Here's Why That Likely Won't Last
Gas Prices Are Under $3 In Half Of U.S. States—Here's Why That Likely Won't Last

Forbes

time14 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Gas Prices Are Under $3 In Half Of U.S. States—Here's Why That Likely Won't Last

The average price for a gallon of regular gas has dropped below $3 in 25 states as of Sunday, though the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran in the Middle East could soon lead to higher prices, some industry analysts say. Israel launched attacks on Iran last week, raising concerns among investors about disruptions to the ... More global oil trade. American drivers are paying about $3.13 for a gallon of gas on average as of Sunday, with prices below $3 in 25 states, including the lowest per-gallon average of $2.66 in Mississippi, according to AAA data. Oil prices rose last Friday after Israel attacked Iran: The West Texas Intermediate, a national benchmark for crude oil, surged by more than 7.2% to $72.98 per barrel while the global benchmark, Brent Crude, rose by 7% to $74.23 per barrel. Patrick de Haan, GasBuddy's head petroleum analyst, said he expects national gas prices to increase between five and 15 cents 'over the next week or two' in response to rising oil prices and Israel's conflict with Iran, after earlier estimating an increase by as much as 25 cents per gallon. Oil prices could rise even farther if Israel and Iran's conflict escalates, Ramanan Krishnamoorti, a petroleum engineer professor at the University of Houston, told ABC News, suggesting oil prices could substantially spike (up to $120 per barrel) if Iran's oil infrastructure is damaged. If oil prices reached $120 per barrel, gas prices could increase to around $5.13 per gallon, Krishnamoorti said. States in the western U.S. have the most expensive gas on average, according to AAA. California ranks highest, with an average price of $4.65 per gallon, followed by Hawaii ($4.47), Washington ($4.37) and Oregon ($3.98). Richard Joswick, head of near-term oil analysis at S&P Global Commodity Insights, said in an investor note Friday that an increase in gas prices likely won't last long. A spike in gas prices after Israel and Iran last traded strikes in October 2024 was short-lived, Joswick said, though he noted the conflict at the time did not significantly escalate 'and had no impact on oil supply.' 'We're ready to act,' Fatih Birol, executive director of the International Energy Agency, wrote Friday, adding the organization is 'actively monitoring' the Iran-Israel conflict and has over 1.2 billion barrels of emergency oil in stockpiles. OPEC+ opposed Birol's statement, writing on X it 'raises false alarms and projects a sense of market fear through repeating the unnecessary need to potentially use oil emergency stocks.' About one-fifth of the world's oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz between Oman and Iran, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration data from 2023. Gas prices have fluctuated in the U.S. as tensions have escalated in the Middle East over the last year. Israel's war with Hamas, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and Israel's latest attacks on Iran have factored into a spike in oil prices. It's unclear whether Israel's conflict with Iran will deescalate soon, despite President Donald Trump signaling both countries 'should make a deal, and will make a deal.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has suggested Israel's military campaign would intensify, following reports that Israel had targeted Iran's oil and gas industry for the first time, though it's unclear whether the attacks have disrupted oil production or infrastructure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store