Students condemn Harvard for hosting 'Pakistan Conference' following Pahalgam attack
Live Events
A recent "Pakistan Conference" hosted by Harvard University 's South Asia Institute has sparked significant backlash from students, who criticised the event for potentially legitimising state-backed terror narratives on campus.The controversy escalated following the deadly Pahalgam attack in Jammu and Kashmir , which students described as a "targeted, religion-based massacre."While speaking with ANI, Harvard student Surabi Tomar on Harvard's South Asia Institute hosting a 'Pakistan Conference,' said, "The horrible attack in Pahalgam was a targeted, religion-based massacre. When Harvard invites officials, especially officials who have ideologically justified such acts, it risks legitimising the state-backed terror narratives on our campus. This is the reason why we thought that we should take some action or ask people to take some action."Elaborating more on the event, Tomar said, "It was a pre-planned event, and it was a coincidence. However, even given the coincidence, we do not think that it is correct for anyone, especially a university like Harvard, to legitimise such voices, especially when they in their country are trying to justify such acts and not condemning them."(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates)She further said that the students have urged US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to "deny visas to officials who support terror-linked ideologies.""We shouldn't stay silent after a faith-based killing; that is our belief. We consulted our peers. We received a great deal of support from students from 65 countries. We read the testimonies of survivors, and we acted on a shared moral obligation to speak out. We emphasised that this was not random violence. It was religious persecution. We urged Harvard to stand against Hinduphobia and asked the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to deny visas to officials who support terror-linked ideologies," Tomar added.Another student, Rashmini Koparkar, expressed disappointment, stating that the guests at the event didn't condemn the Pahalgam attack and show sensitivity."We were expecting a certain degree of sensitivity and acknowledgement of what has happened. The event was pre-planned and already discussed. It was a coincidence that the event took place within five days. However, a more thoughtful gesture would have been preferable. First of all, they could have condemned the attacks. Secondly, the number of guests and the high-ranking officials that were arriving at this event were actually in question because this is a state which has been harbouring cross-border terrorism for years. India has been suffering," Koparkar said.Meanwhile, amid growing controversy over the "Pakistan Conference," Harvard University's South Asia Institute issued a statement in defence of the event. The Institute extended its condolences to the victims of the Pahalgam attack, while clarifying that the students and their faculty advisor had independently organised the conference.In a statement released on Tuesday, the South Asia Institute said, "The Institute supports academic research projects and works with other university partners on multiple events throughout the academic year. One such event was "The Pakistan Conference," organised by students from Harvard and held on April 27, 2025. In accordance with our principles of operation, we did not consult any benefactor of the Institute regarding this conference. The students, along with their faculty advisor, independently determined the topics and speakers presenting... We share the grief and anguish with our friends, colleagues, and loved ones in India who have been affected by the attack in Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, and we offer our heartfelt condolences."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
After Harvard, these 60+ universities are now under Trump radar. Check the list
Billions Frozen, Freedoms Challenged Live Events Targeting DEI and Campus Protests A Growing List of Institutions Under Fire (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Trump administration is ramping up pressure on American higher education, launching over 100 federal investigations since May 2024. Prestigious institutions like Harvard and Columbia are now at risk of losing student visa privileges, research funding, or even accreditation as part of a sweeping campaign against what officials call 'ideological indoctrination' and rising antisemitism on has already been hit with a six-month freeze on foreign student visas, while Columbia faces possible loss of accreditation. These actions signal a broader push by the administration to confront diversity programs, gender identity policies, and responses to pro-Palestinian protests—issues officials say promote biased or unconstitutional than 60 universities are currently under active investigation. These include elite schools such as Yale, MIT , and Berkeley, as well as large public institutions like the University of Michigan and the University of Washington. The Department of Education has opened at least 104 inquiries, with 70 focused on colleges and universities—many of them nationally fallout has already begun. Federal research grants—particularly in fields like climate science, sociology, and public policy—are being delayed or frozen. At Harvard, the visa freeze has caused significant disruption for international students and are pushing back, accusing the administration of threatening not just funding, but the core values of academic freedom and institutional autonomy.'It's no longer just about student conduct or curriculum—it's about control,' said one Ivy League administrator who requested to Education Week, at least 52 universities are under scrutiny specifically for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. The administration claims such initiatives promote race-based programming and violate constitutional principles. Other investigations relate to antisemitism, gender identity policies, and responses to the Gaza Trump administration argues that the measures aim to protect Jewish students and dismantle 'leftist indoctrination machines.' But critics say the moves are ideologically driven, not universities that have tried to comply—such as Northwestern, which adopted anti-discrimination reforms—have been added to the list, raising concerns about the motives behind the list of targeted universities spans public flagships, Ivy League schools, STEM-focused institutions, and liberal arts colleges. Among them:MITUniversity of California, BerkeleyUniversity of MichiganUniversity of PennsylvaniaDuke UniversityCornell UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonUniversity of WashingtonVanderbilt UniversityGeorgetown UniversityArizona State UniversityRutgers UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityRice UniversityUniversity of ChicagoNew York UniversityUniversity of Oregon Washington University in St. LouisNorthwestern UniversityUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Western Carolina University(And many more...)Some schools are being investigated for minor compliance failures like incomplete foreign gift disclosures, while others are under scrutiny for allowing or failing to respond to student NextWith billions in federal funding on the line and political pressure mounting, American higher education is bracing for a prolonged ideological clash. University leaders warn that these investigations could reshape campus governance and stifle academic freedom, especially for international students, minority scholars, and those involved in activist the list of investigated institutions continues to grow, so does the uncertainty surrounding the future of higher education under a second Trump term.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump says 'Harvard starting to behave', signals progress in negotiations with university
A day after barring the entry and admission of foreign students in Harvard University, US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that the administration of the Ivy League university has "started to behave". Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday, the Republican leader said, "I think they're starting to behave, actually, if you want to know the truth.' As per Bloomberg, the US President added that all the administration wanted was the list of international students enrolled in the top university. 'Harvard didn't want to give us the list. They're going to be giving us the list,' Trump said during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. ALSO READ | After Harvard and Columbia, Trump admin continues to target over 60 universities Speaking to reporters, the US president added that the government wants foreign students to come, but would like to check and "vet" them first. On Wednesday, Donald Trump announced that he has suspended the entry of foreign students seeking to study at Harvard University through exchange programmes. The US president cited "national security" as he instated the six-month ban. "Considering these facts, I have determined that it is necessary to restrict the entry of foreign nationals who seek to enter the United States solely or principally to participate in a course of study at Harvard University," said Trump. Trump's escalation comes as part of an ongoing legal row with Harvard University, which is one of the US's most prestigious universities, after Harvard refused to hand over a list of international students enrolled in the university to the Trump administration.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Harvard visa ban could disrupt fall admissions and set college precedent
President Trump's proclamation empowers the Secretary of State to revoke visas of international students at Harvard, raising concerns for fall admissions and international education policies Sanket Koul New Delhi Donald Trump's 4 June proclamation suspending the entry of foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in exchange programmes at Harvard University has raised alarm among education experts, who fear it may set a precedent for action against other Ivy League institutions. The move comes amid escalating tensions between the Trump administration and higher education institutions, especially Harvard. The administration had last month banned foreign students' admission to the university, an order that was blocked by a court. This was followed by the US State Department instructing all consular missions and embassies overseas to begin social media vetting of visa applicants intending to travel to Harvard University for any purpose. The 4 June presidential proclamation invokes authority under sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), granting the president broad powers to suspend entry of any class of people deemed "detrimental to the interests of the United States." The order halts new international admissions to Harvard but also grants the Secretary of State discretionary power to revoke existing F, M, or J visas of international students already at Harvard. Harvard currently hosts 10,158 international students and scholars across its schools. Of these, 788 — the second-largest cohort — are from India, according to university data. China tops the list with 2,126 students. Commenting on the situation, Kajal Dave, co-founder of LaunchEd, said the move affects thousands of international students currently applying or planning to study in the US, casting uncertainty over their academic futures. 'While the order specifically targets Harvard, it may set a troubling precedent, raising fears among students and universities nationwide about the stability of international education policies,' she added. However, according to the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the move follows Harvard allegedly refusing to provide information on certain foreign students involved in protest activities. 'Admission into the United States to attend, conduct research, or teach at our nation's institutions of higher education is a privilege granted by our Government, not a guarantee,' the proclamation signed by President Trump stated. It added that this privilege is necessarily tied to the host institution's compliance and commitment to following federal law. 'Harvard University has failed in this respect, among many others,' it alleged. While the suspension of visas applies to foreigners wanting to attend Harvard through the Student and Exchange Visitor Programme (SEVP) after the date of the proclamation, the Secretary of State has discretion to revoke visas of foreign nationals currently attending Harvard on F, M, or J visas. Highlighting concerns about fairness and due process, Dave said the move could abruptly disrupt the lives and studies of students already residing in the US. Zaveri added that the possibility of reviewing and revoking existing academic or exchange visas adds to the uncertainty for those already enrolled. 'However, students are being informed in advance and, in some cases, may be advised to consider transferring or seeking admission to alternate institutions, depending on guidance issued by relevant authorities,' he said. Experts say the ongoing tension between the federal government and top academic institutions has created a climate of uncertainty for students planning to join US universities this fall. Dave said the resulting uncertainty has understandably affected students preparing for the upcoming fall session. She added that despite past court interventions blocking similar actions, repeated policy shifts are prompting many students to reconsider or delay their plans, with some now looking to alternative destinations with clearer, more student-friendly visa policies. The continuous and growing uncertainty has led Indian students to seek new academic destinations, with Germany, Ireland, New Zealand and even Russia gaining favour—despite language barriers—for their easier immigration policies and promise of work opportunities after courses end. According to education ministry data, Germany saw a 68 per cent increase in Indian students — to 34,702 in 2024 from 20,684 in 2022. New Zealand witnessed a 354 per cent jump from 1,605 to 7,297 during the same period. Russia saw a 59 per cent rise in Indian students, and Ireland 49 per cent.
