How Cereal Box Sizes Are Tricking You Amid Shrinkflation
Humans are creatures of habit. Your morning routine may look something like hitting snooze on an alarm clock once or twice, getting ready for the day, and enjoying a bowl of cereal before leaving for work. It's time to start paying closer attention to the little, sugary circles in your bowl, though, because you may not notice that your cereal boxes are tricking you. Cereals are the latest product on the rise in the phenomenon known as "shrinkflation," otherwise known as the reason why your favorite packaged foods have gotten smaller.
You might pick up a box of Cinnamon Toast Crunch labeled "family size" and think you're getting a better deal for it, but careful examination reveals that although box sizes are growing and labels are changing to appear more appealing, the amount of product inside is actually shrinking. Any person who spots the "family size" or "giant size" label is probably tempted to put it in their cart because who doesn't want a bigger product for a decent price? This is exactly how cereal manufacturing brands expect consumers to behave, falling victim to clever marketing even though the product inside is shrinking compared to previous years.
Read more: 10 Greek Yogurt Brands, Ranked Worst To Best
An article from The Guardian revealed studies from Deakin University that compared the prices of Kellogg's Sultana Bran from 2019 to 2024. Six years ago, an 850-gram box of Sultana Bran cost about $6, but in 2024 the package size shrank to 700 grams and the price increased to about $9. In the United States, research from Consumer World found that Post's Honey Bunches of Oats (one of the top five bestselling cereals in America) used to sell a "family size" 23-ounce box for $5.69. The company shrank the "family size" down to 18 ounces and knocked ten cents off the price, then introduced a supposedly new "giant size" with 23 ounces back at the $5.69 price. General Mills is in on shrinkflation, which caught the attention of two members of Congress in 2024 who wrote letters to the CEO condemning shrinkflation.
Other popular groceries have been hit by the shrinkflation tactic too, and although it exited before the pandemic, consumers are more aware of it now. Companies believe that consumers will pay more attention to the price on the outside of the box than the changing product size. Companies are banking that p;eople will be less upset if their favorite pack of cookies remains at a comfortable $3.59 with a sleeve less of product versus the same amount of product increasing to $4.59. Unfortunately, it looks like the only thing truly getting bigger these days is the illusion of a good deal.
Read the original article on Tasting Table.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Inconvenient truth' that's a growing threat to Australia's international tourism reputation
Tropical savannas cover 20 per cent of Australia's landmass and incorporate some of the nation's biggest drawcards like Kakadu, Nitmiluk Gorge and Arnhem Land. But three top ecologists are warning in a new paper that many of those in the Northern Territory are facing collapse, threatening the future of its $1.2 billion tourism industry, which has traditionally been built around wild places. Insects and birds thrive in the thick grassy understory that grows under open forest and woodlands, but most of the native mammals are already gone. Paper co-author Professor Euan Ritchie fears more losses are imminent. A 'perfect storm' of threats could mean the 'almost deafening' sound of insect noise could soon fall silent. 'You've got the impact of invasive species, you've got fire, you've got climate change. And now to propose a massive increase in land clearing is just going to make the situation worse,' the Deakin University ecologist told Yahoo News Australia. Related: 🛥️ Alarming map highlights growing threats to $3.8 billion whale tourism industry With the Great Barrier Reef facing an 'in danger' listing by UNESCO, and concerns about the degradation of the Pilbara's 40,000-year-old Murujuga rock art making international headlines over the last fortnight, there are concerns the crumbling state of the country's most important landscapes is rapidly becoming an international embarrassment. "Australians are known for being wonderful at sport, but there's this inconvenient truth that we're terrible at conservation and protecting culture. It's shameful," Ritchie said. "We're getting this pretty horrific reputation that we don't take care of the wonders that we have." In 2023, around 84 million hectares of northern Australia burned, but because the region is sparsely populated, few people paid attention. When native grasses try to grow, they have to compete with invasive buffel grass, which has been seeded for decades by the cattle industry. The region is also riddled with cats and feral pigs, which contribute to the decline in native mammals like the northern quoll, brush-tailed rabbit-rat and black-footed tree-rat. With the Top End already facing mounting challenges, ecologists are worried that the territory's already 'slack' environment protection laws are set to allow more habitat destruction that could tip the savannas over the edge. The researchers estimate that between 2000 and 2020, around 45,000 hectares of savanna habitat was destroyed. Clearing of a further 146,000 hectares has already been approved and another 100,000 could be flattened for the expansion of the cotton industry. As the State and Future of the Northern Territory's Savannas report was released, a senior Wagiman Traditional Owner, Jabul Huddlestone, spoke out about her concerns. "I don't want this rubbish, knocking down trees on my country. They are going to take all the goanna away — take away — everything," she said. "No goanna, no kangaroo, you can't find green plum, black plum, we got the wild potato... but now, there's too much hot fire, too many trees being knocked down — there is no green plum. There used to be big mob down by the riverside — nothing now — all knocked down. Black plum, all knocked down.' 🌏 Tourists to see 'extinct' animals behind national park's 25km predator-free fence 🚨 281 experts call for ban of 'toxic' product sold at Coles, Bunnings, Woolworths, Mitre 10 📸 Beach find highlights dark side of Queensland's $88 million tourism pledge The report was a huge collaboration supported by Charles Darwin University, Deakin University, Wagiman Traditional Owner, Griffith University, The Environment Centre NT, La Trobe University, University of Tasmania, Wilderness Society and World Wide Fund for Nature Australia. Environment Centre NT executive director Kirsty Howey said action from government is urgently needed to protect the savannas from bulldozers. 'These savannas are a fundamental drawcard for our tourism industry and represent the lifestyle we know and love as Territorians,' she said. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story
UnitedHealthcare is suing British newspaper The Guardian for defamation, alleging that the outlet falsely accused them of enticing nursing homes to enroll in a special program that works to restrict medical expenses for elderly patients. "The Guardian knowingly published false and misleading claims about our Institutional Special Needs Program, forcing us to take action to protect the clinician-patient relationship that is crucial for delivering high-quality care. The Guardian refused to engage with the truth and chose instead to print its predetermined narrative," UnitedHealthcare told Fox News Digital in a statement. The Guardian article, published May 21, claimed that UnitedHealthcare is pursuing cost-cutting tactics that jeopardize the health of nursing home patients. The article claims that the health insurance giant provides what amounts to secret bonuses to enroll in a program that stations medical staff that reports directly to UnitedHealthcare, and in practice works to reduce hospitalizations for patients, some of whom allegedly may urgently need the care. Unitedhealthcare Ceo Murder Suspect Luigi Mangione Indicted In New York The article also claims UnitedHealthcare financially entices nursing homes to join their "Institutional Special Needs" program, and allegedly illegally had nursing homes share confidential patient data with the insurer so that it could skirt federal law and market programs to patients – some of whom lack the capacity to make financial decisions on their own – and families. The Guardian also alleged that UnitedHealthcare leaned on nursing home staff to convince patients to sign DNR's, even if they had expressed a desire for all medical options to be used to save their life. "A recent article published by The Guardian presents a narrative built largely on anecdotes rather than facts. It is unfortunate that the article misrepresents a program that, in reality, improves health outcomes for seniors through on-site clinical care, personalized treatment plans, and enhanced coordination among caregivers. We stand firmly behind the integrity of our programs, which consistently receive high satisfaction ratings from our members," UnitedHealthcare said in a statement in response to the article in May. Read On The Fox News App The lawsuit alleged that The Guardian used a "heavily cropped screenshot" of an internal UnitedHealthcare email which they claim, when seen in full, contradicts their reporting. The suit also accuses The Guardian of "gratuitously" linking its report to the assassination of their former CEO Brian Thompson. Unitedhealth Shares Slide As Criminal Probe Report Adds To Investor Fears "The Guardian knew these accusations were false, but published them anyway," the lawsuit stated. The Guardian told Fox News Digital it stood by its reporting. "The Guardian stands by its deeply-sourced, independent reporting, which is based on thousands of corporate and patient records, publicly filed lawsuits, declarations submitted to federal and state agencies, and interviews with more than 20 current and former UnitedHealth employees – as well as statements and information provided by UnitedHealth itself over several weeks. It's outrageous that in response to factual reporting on the practice of secretly paying nursing homes to reduce hospitalizations for vulnerable patients, UnitedHealth is resorting to wildly misleading claims and intimidation tactics via the courts," a representative from The Guardian said. Click To Get The Fox News App When asked by Fox News Digital for clarification regarding the "heavily cropped screenshot," a representative for The Guardian said the image was in fact a "visual illustration" and the so-called missing information was provided "in an on-record comment and a denial from UnitedHealth" in the proceeding paragraph. The Guardian rep also claimed that UnitedHealthcare never asked the press outlet to alter the article source: UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Nintendo Switch 2 launch survives Trump tariffs, but holiday prices remain uncertain
NEW YORK, June 6 — Nintendo enthusiasts across the United States are rejoicing as they unbox the newly launched Nintendo Switch 2 consoles, dodging a potential price hike caused by former US President Donald Trump's erratic trade tariff policies. As reported by The Guardian, the console hit shelves yesterday as scheduled, but the journey to its release was fraught with delays and uncertainties stemming from Trump's tariffs on imports. Priced at US$450 (RM2,070) at launch, the Switch 2 was initially threatened by tariffs as high as 46 per cent on imports from Vietnam, where most of its production is based. According to the report this uncertainty forced Nintendo to delay pre-orders initially scheduled for early April, causing widespread frustration among gamers. Pre-orders eventually resumed on April 24, and the console sold out quickly. 'What saved Nintendo in this case was that Trump chickened out,' Robert Johnson, an international economist from the University of Notre Dame, told The Guardian. He referred to Trump's decision to issue a 90-day pause on tariffs to allow for negotiations with affected countries. This window allowed Nintendo to proceed with the console's June 5 release without additional costs being passed on to consumers. However, industry experts told The Guardian that the reprieve might be short-lived. If negotiations fail and the tariffs are reinstated, the Switch 2 could face price increases during the holiday season, a critical period for console sales. 'It takes a long time and significant capital outlays to bring new production facilities online. Producers really like to operate in a stable environment. The current trade environment is the exact opposite of that,' Johnson was quoted as saying. Nintendo's strategic shift to manufacture in Vietnam—a move made during Trump's first term to sidestep earlier tariffs on Chinese imports—has now left it vulnerable to the latest trade policies. Sony and Microsoft, expected to release their next-generation consoles in 2027, are likely to encounter similar challenges. Despite this, Nintendo has managed to ship an estimated 746,000 Switch 2 units to the US ahead of potential tariff hikes, ensuring that these units are exempt from additional import duties. Accessories, however, are not immune. The company has confirmed that certain peripherals will see price adjustments. According to CNBC, docks used for connecting the Switch to a full-size screen now cost US$10 more, while controller straps have seen a US$1 increase. Johnson also speculated to The Guardian that the company may consider raising the console's price later this year if tariffs resume. 'I find it difficult to imagine that the Trump administration will want thousands of stories written during the holiday season about how Trump ruined Christmas,' Johnson said, noting the political ramifications of such a move. As The Guardian highlighted, while hardware costs remain a concern, Nintendo's revenue model relies heavily on software and online subscriptions, which are unaffected by tariffs. 'In the end, Nintendo wants to sell consoles to get people to buy games and accessories,' Johnson said. 'As a result, it may be willing to hold down the price of consoles.'