Number of children in England missing school for prolonged periods has risen
Overall, 147,605 pupils were classed as severely absent, which means they missed at least 50% of possible school sessions, in the autumn term of 2024/25, compared to 142,487 in the autumn term of 2023/24.
In the autumn of 2019, the term before the pandemic, only 0.86% of pupils (60,244) were severely absent.
The data also suggests 17.79% of pupils in England, about 1.28 million young people, were 'persistently absent', missing at least 10% of school sessions, in the autumn term of 2024/25.
This is down on the same period in 2023/24 when 19.44% of pupils were persistently absent, but it is still higher than the pre-pandemic autumn of 2019 (13.14%).
The former Conservative government announced plans to increase fines for parents who take their children out of class without permission, in February last year, as part of a drive to boost attendance since the pandemic.
In September, school absence fines in England rose from £60 to £80, and a parent who receives a second fine for the same child within a three-year period will now receive a £160 fine.
The latest figures show the overall unauthorised holiday rate in autumn 2024 was 0.47%, broadly unchanged from 2023 despite the increased fines, though the exact data indicates a very slight fall from 0.474% to 0.466%.
An analysis by the PA news agency found the unauthorised holiday rates in the autumn were down in most regions across England compared to the same period last year, apart from the North West, East and South East, where they reached a record high at 0.59%, 0.39% and 0.38% respectively.
Separate figures released by the DfE on Thursday showed that more than one in nine (11.6%) pupils in England were absent on the last day of this academic year (July 18), with 6.3% on unauthorised absence.
These were the highest figures for any day in the entire 2024/25 school year, but they are lower than the equivalent figures for the last day of the 2023/24 school year (12.7% and 7.0% respectively), PA analysis shows.
Overall, the pupil absence rate across the 2024/25 academic year was 6.9%, down from 7.2% last year.
Margaret Mulholland, Send and inclusion specialist at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'It is troubling that, even as absence rates are coming down overall, the percentage of pupils missing at least 50% of their education is rising.
'We need to focus on helping these pupils overcome the barriers preventing them from being in school on a regular basis.
'This means investing in attendance services, liaising directly with families to identify the issues at play and then ensuring specialist support is available as soon as required.
'We've got to do more to ensure these pupils receive a complete education and all the benefits this brings.'
Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'Overall, these figures are another small step in the right direction.
'It is clear however that there is still a long way to go to improve pupil attendance and that significant barriers remain for some children who missed a majority of their school sessions during the autumn term.
'Schools work tirelessly to ensure children are in the classroom, but they alone are not equipped to address all the deep-seated reasons for absence which can range from routine sickness to mental ill-health and social challenges facing children and families, including poverty.
'Fining parents is a crude tool which does not address many of the root causes, what is needed is better support for families and schools.'
Beth Prescott, education lead at the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), said: 'Five years on from school closures, classroom absences can no longer be viewed as a post-pandemic blip.
'The material risk now is that this issue is becoming deeply entrenched.'
She added: 'Ministers must now build on the progress they have made and work with local charities and families to provide more absent pupils with the mentorship they need to return to school.
'But with the crisis deepening we need to attack the root causes of school absence, including softening parental attitudes to attendance and an education system that fails to engage thousands of young people.'
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'The record improvement in school attendance shows we are turning the tide on a crisis that saw a generation go missing from England's schools.
'Getting children back in classrooms, where they belong, is non-negotiable if we are to break the unfair link between background and success so we can build a fairer country, a cornerstone of our plan for change.
'When we tackle attendance head-on, everyone benefits – pupils get the consistent education they deserve, teachers can focus on driving up standards, and we build the stronger workforce our economy needs.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 minutes ago
- Sky News
'Deport now, appeal later' scheme for foreign criminals expanded to 23 countries
A hostile environment era deportation policy for criminals is being expanded by the Labour government as it continues its migration crackdown. The government wants to go further in extraditing foreign offenders before they have a chance to appeal by including more countries in the existing scheme. Offenders that have a human right appeal rejected will get offshored, and further appeals will then get heard from abroad. It follows the government announcing on Saturday that it wants to deport criminals as soon as they are sentenced. The "deport now, appeal later" policy was first introduced when Baroness Theresa May was home secretary in 2014 as part of the Conservative government's hostile environment policy to try and reduce migration. It saw hundreds of people returned to a handful of countries like Kenya and Jamaica under Section 94B of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, added in via amendment. In 2017, a Supreme Court effectively stopped the policy from being used after it was challenged on the grounds that appealing from abroad was not compliant with human rights. However, in 2023, then home secretary Suella Braverman announced she was restarting the policy after providing more facilities abroad for people to lodge their appeals. Now, the current government says it is expanding the partnership from eight countries to 23. Previously, offenders were being returned to Finland, Nigeria, Estonia, Albania, Belize, Mauritius, Tanzania and Kosovo for remote hearings. Angola, Australia, Botswana, Brunei, Bulgaria, Canada, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia are the countries being added - with the government wanting to include more. The Home Office claims this is the "the government's latest tool in its comprehensive approach to scaling up our ability to remove foreign criminals", touting 5,200 removals of foreign offenders since July 2024 - an increase of 14% compared with the year before. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: "Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced." Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: "We are leading diplomatic efforts to increase the number of countries where foreign criminals can be swiftly returned, and if they want to appeal, they can do so safely from their home country. "Under this scheme, we're investing in international partnerships that uphold our security and make our streets safer." Both ministers opposed the hostile environment policy when in opposition. 👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈 In 2015, Sir Keir Starmer had questioned whether such a policy was workable - saying in-person appeals were the norm for 200 years and had been a "highly effective way of resolving differences". He also raised concerns about the impact on children if parents were deported and then returned after a successful appeal. In today's announcement, the prime minister's administration said it wanted to prevent people from "gaming the system" and clamp down on people staying in the UK for "months or years" while appeals are heard.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
American sparks backlash for his unbelievable attack on Australia - as huge problem in one state becomes our global shame
An American has been blasted after mocking police for rolling out machete drop-off bins across Victoria in a bid to tackle a surge in knife violence. The US resident, who frequently addresses conservative political topics on his TikTok page Republican Reads Comments, wasted no time labelling the initiative 'silly'. Machete bins have been placed around Victoria where locals can dispose of their blades before a state-wide ban takes effect on September 1. The ban will be brought in after the state was rocked by a spate of knife attacks, including a wild ten-person brawl at Northland Shopping Centre in May. The US resident questioned why taxpayer dollars were being wasted on the bins and not being spent on hiring more officers to protect the public. 'So when a criminal sees one of these boxes, when they're getting ready to do what criminals do, which is commit crime, they're going to say to themselves, "Gee, I better just drop my knife in the machete bin, because I wouldn't want anyone to get hurt",' he said sarcastically. 'I've seen a lot of ridiculous stuff over the years here in the United States, but this, this is pretty silly. Common sense is hard.' The US resident was immediately roasted online, as several Aussies said he should take a closer look at the problems in his own country. 'I don't think anyone from the USA is in any place to criticise any other country,' one said. 'I couldn't imagine having to choose between my kids going to school and getting shot or homeschooling them.' 'You realise this worked with our guns right?' another said. 'Australia hasn't had a fatal mass shooting since 1996 because sensible laws work,' a third added. 'Now Victoria is banning machetes to tackle knife crime, and we believe this will help too. 'Meanwhile, the US had over 600 mass shootings last year that is almost two a day! We don't need that kind of freedom.' Others pointed out Prime Minister John Howard's gun buyback in the 90's, after Martin Bryant murdered 35 people in Port Arthur using semi-automatic rifles, was proof these policies worked. One commented that Australia hasn't had a fatal mass shooting since 1996 because sensible laws work, not the freedom to bear arms. 'Australia has some of the toughest gun laws in the world, and gun crimes are relatively rare. But knife crimes are becoming more common,' they said. 'Now Victoria is banning machetes to tackle knife crime, and we believe this will help too.' Some social media users sided with the US resident and said the machete bins brought shame to their state. 'I'm an Aussie, trust me when I say we are all embarrassed,' one said. 'Someone inclined to carry illegal weapons isn't just going to go, "Oh wow. I should be a good person now and put this in a bin",' another said. 'The Victorian government is the laughing stock of the world,' a third added. Another claimed it would just motivate criminals to use other weapons. 'If you outlaw all the guns, they'll use machetes,' they wrote. 'If you outlaw machetes, they'll use hammers. If you outlaw the hammers, they'll use spoons. It's the people, not the guns.' A machete amnesty will run until November 30 so residents can dispose of their blades at one of more than 40 bins installed at select police stations across metropolitan and regional Victoria. There is currently an interim machete sales ban in place. Shopping centres have emerged as new crime hotspots involving machetes with machete-related gang brawls prompting lockdowns and spurring swift police action. In 2025 alone, Victoria Police have confiscated nearly 7000 edged weapons, including swords, knives, and machetes, averaging 44 seizures a day, a notable spike from previous years. On the weekend a 14-year-old boy was attacked by six men wielding machetes at Werribee Plaza. It followed a violent brawl at the same location just days earlier. Penalties for possessing a machete will be up to two years in prison and fines of more than $47,000.
Glasgow Times
5 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
‘Deport now, appeal later' scheme expanded in drive to remove foreign criminals
Offenders from another 15 countries including India, Bulgaria and Australia will now be included in the scheme, bringing the total to 23 countries. The scheme allows the UK to deport offenders who have had a human rights claim against their removal rejected, with any appeals heard from abroad over a video link. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said foreign criminals had been 'exploiting' the immigration system by 'remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on'. She said: 'That has to end. Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced.' The Home Secretary said expanding the 'deport now, appeal later' scheme would prevent more people from 'exploiting' the immigration system (Jacob King/PA) The other countries now in the scheme are Angola, Botswana, Brunei, Canada, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia. The Home Office said the expansion of 'deport now, appeal later' would help 'scale up' the country's ability to remove foreign criminals, alongside measures announced on Sunday to deport offenders as soon as they are sentenced. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the move, which requires parliamentary approval, would save £54,000 a year per prison place. Since Labour came to power last year, almost 5,200 foreign offenders have been deported, representing a 14% increase on the previous 12 months. Officials have said increasing deportations will help ease pressure on overcrowded prisons. But figures from the Ministry of Justice from the end of June suggest there are currently just 772 prisoners from the 15 new countries covered by 'deport now, appeal later'. Of the new countries, only Indians are in the top nationalities among current prisoners, while there are no offenders from Botswana or Brunei currently behind bars. The 'deport now, appeal later' scheme for human rights claims was introduced in 2014 but was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court three years later in cases where deportation would prevent the offender from giving live evidence in their appeal. But the court noted that giving evidence over a video link could be sufficient, provided it was financially and logistically possible, in effect limiting the policy to countries where video appeal facilities were realistically available. The UK currently has arrangements for video appeals with eight countries, including Tanzania, Belize, Finland and Estonia. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'We are leading diplomatic efforts to increase the number of countries where foreign criminals can be swiftly returned, and if they want to appeal, they can do so safely from their home country. 'Under this scheme, we're investing in international partnerships that uphold our security and make our streets safer.' Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'We welcome Keir Starmer's step in the right direction of Conservative Party deportations policy. But with record numbers of illegal arrivals, this is only a drop in the ocean. 'But even with this U-turn, only the Conservative Party is committed to deporting all foreign criminals. 'Until Keir Starmer either commits to deporting all foreign criminals or stops rolling out the red carpet for migrants the world over, this problem is not going away.'
