
EU eyes action over Hungary's planned Russian-style law – DW – 05/21/2025
Can the EU rein in the Hungarian government and discourage it once again from pushing through a "transparency law" that critics say amounts to a crackdown on activists and media?
Tens of thousands of Hungarians took to the streets over the weekend after the Hungarian government tabled new legislation to monitor foreign funding for NGOs and media outlets or anyone deemed a threat to what it sees as Hungarian sovereign interest.
The bill is labeled "Transparency of Public Life' and the government says it is aimed at protecting Hungary's sovereignty from outside interference. But activists say it mimics Russia's foreign agent law and would similarly offer the Hungarian government sweeping powers to crack down on the press and critical voices in civil society.
The protests are the latest cry for help from Hungarians looking at the European Union to rein in their government.
Some of the protesters in front of the parliament in the Hungarian capital Budapest held a big flag of the European Union imprinted with the English word HELP.
Hungarians want the EU to notice how their government is violating the EU's values and rein it in. Image: Ferenc Isza/AFP
What is Hungary's new 'transparency law?'
If the draft bill were to turn into law, activists say, the government could control media outlets and NGOs or even dissolve them.
In December 2023, Hungary passed a national law on the "Defence of Sovereignty" and established what it called a Sovereignty Protection Office (SPO) to investigate organizations that use foreign funds to influence voters.
With the new law, that agency will be responsible for investigating all kinds of organizations and authorized to blacklist those who receive foreign funding without prior government approval.
If blacklisted, organizations will also lose access to donations through Hungary's annual 1% income tax contribution scheme, potentially pay a fine of 25 times these funds, and their owners will be made to declare their assets.
Reports suggest that the country's secret services have been authorized to assist SPO in any investigations.
Tineke Strik, Hungary rapporteur of the European Parliament, told DW that Hungary's transparency bill was aimed at "dissolving all organizations, all media outlets, even punishing all individuals, that criticize the government. That is exactly what the Russian law does."
Russia's foreign agent law was adopted in mid-2022, in what human right organizations described as a smear campaign to discredit legitimate Russian civic activism.
"The law expands the definition of foreign agent to a point at which almost any person or entity, regardless of nationality or location, who engages in civic activism or even expresses opinions about Russian policies or officials' conduct could be designated a foreign agent, so long as the authorities claim they are under 'foreign influence,'" the NGO Human Rights Watch said.
DW speaks with Viktor Orban's main rival, Peter Magyar
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Hungary's 'transparency' bill 'authoritarian'
Peter Magyar, the leader of Hungary's opposition Tisza party and the only Hungarian politician seen to be a credible challenger to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's 14-year grip on power, also accused the government of adopting Russian-style legislation to strip funding for activists and journalists, including through EU grants. He said it was "copying its master, [Russian President ] Vladimir Putin."
A statement signed by 300 international organizations including the human rights organization Amnesty International described the bill as an "authoritarian attempt to retain power" that "aims to silence all critical voices and to eliminate what remains of Hungarian democracy."
The non-profit group Transparency International said the new bill threatened to "end civil society" and, if passed, would empower the government to "persecute with impunity."
It said the law would apply to EU grants and foreign donations as small as €5 ($5.70), and that "vague language" adopted in the bill left "wide room for political misuse, threatening a broad swath of civil society — including independent media, watchdog organizations, and ordinary citizens engaged in public life."
Last year, Georgia adopted a similar law amidst much uproar at home and in Brussels. The move is suspected to have scuttled the country's chances of joining the EU.
But while Georgia is an EU candidate nation, Hungary is a full-fledged member of the bloc.
Anger in Hungary at Pride ban and restriction of freedoms
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
How can EU ensure Hungary aligns with the bloc's value system?
Zsuzsanna Vegh, a program officer at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, said that theoretically the EU could move ahead with the Article 7 procedure it first initiated in 2018.
The Treaty on the European Union outlines a procedure for addressing serious and persistent breaches of EU values by member states underArticle 7 . It allows for the suspension of certain rights, including voting rights in the Council of the European Union, if a member is determined to be in repeated violations of the EU's fundamental principles, such as weakening rule of law, democracy and freedoms.
"The EU could declare that there is indeed systematic violation of democracy and rule of law in Hungary and suspend its voting rights" in the Council of the European Union, where the bloc debates and decides its policies, Vegh said.
"But that is still a political decision and it is unlikely."
In April, Hungarians protested against a government decision to ban gay pride marches. Image: Peter Kohalmi/AFP/Getty Images
Some European parliamentarians have advocated that the EU slash Hungary's funding to force it to reduce corruption that has an adverse impact on the EU's financial interests. But experts say the same method could also be effective in encouraging Hungary to stick to the EU's value system.
"We urge the European Commission to increase pressure on Viktor Orban's government to cease violating EU values and EU Laws by immediately suspending all EU funding for Hungary in line with the applicable legislation to protect the Union's financial interest," more than two dozen EU parliamentarians wrote in a letter to the European Commission on May 20.
Vegh said that while some funds for Hungary had already been cut there was no precedent of the EU cutting all funding marked for a member state.
However, Teona Lavrelashvili, a visiting fellow with the Wilfried Martens Center in Brussels, said this could be done.
"Yes, the European Union can suspend funds to Hungary if its new transparency bill — or any law — undermines the rule of law or threatens the EU's financial interests. This power comes from the Rule of Law Conditionality Mechanism."
She contended that a law that weakens civil society also undermines the EU's overall economic interests.
Some experts argue that the EU could suspend Hungary's voting rights to teach it a lesson and make it align with the EU's value system, but that is still seen as a step too far. Image: Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP Photo/picture alliance
What can the EU do next?
The EU also has other options that it can resort to before cutting funds intended to aid economic development in Hungary and thus to benefit the general population.
Back in 2017, it managed to dissuade Hungary from introducing a similar transparency law by initiating an infringement procedure, a multilayered process through which the EU expressed its displeasure to Hungary. Upon no change in Budapest's attitudes, Brussels eventually took Hungary to the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU)
The court concluded that Hungary had "introduced discriminatory and unjustified restrictions on foreign donations to civil society organizations."
Since the new bill was tabled last week, the EU has refrained from scolding Hungary and merely said it is waiting to see whether it is enacted into law.
Vegh believes another infringement procedure is the EU's likely next step.
But the fact that Hungary is trying to push through the law again, may require the EU to change its approach and take a more stern stand.
Edited by: A. Thomas
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
8 hours ago
- DW
Italians vote on citizenship rules, labor laws – DW – 06/08/2025
Italian voters face questions on citizenship and labor laws in a referendum that must draw 50% turnout for results to be valid. PM Giorgia Meloni has urged supporters to skip the vote. Polls opened in Italy on Sunday, in a two-day voting session for a referendum that could change citizenship law and labor laws. The vote was triggered by an NGO-led grassroots campaign. According to Italy's constitution, a referendum can be called if a petition is signed by at least 500,000 voters. Results are expected after polls close on Monday at 3 p.m. local time (2pm UTC). Over 51 million Italians are eligible to participate in the vote, but the results are only binding with a 50% turnout. Italy has held 78 referendums, but the results of many of them were not enacted due to not reaching over 50% turnout. Italians voting on easing citizenship rules On the ballot are several questions related to the country's labor law, while immigration policy, a hotly contested issue in Italy, is one that has recieved the most attention. Italians will be asked if they support reducing the time required to apply for citizenship that makes it easier for children born to foreigners in Italy to obtain citizenship. Currently, a non-EU adult resident without marriage or blood ties to Italy must live in the country for 10 years before they can apply for citizenship. The referendum asks to reduce that to 5 years. Campaigners for the change in the citizenship law say it will help second-generation Italians born in the country to non-EU parents better integrate into a culture they already see as theirs. They say this reform would bring Italy's citizenship law in line with many other European countries, including Germany, adding that it would benefit around 2.5 million people. Italian voters will also choose whether they agree with greater worker protections against dismissal, access to higher severance payments, support for the conversion of fixed-term contracts into permanent ones, and about liability in cases of workplace accidents. Meloni's government urges abstention Politically, the center-left Democratic Party and other groups that oppose Italy's current government are backing the referendum and urging voters to pass the measures. But the governing right-wing coalition in Rome, led by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, is advising its supporters and the wider public not to participate, essentially hoping that the vote does not reach the 50% threshold. Meloni has said she would go to the polls but not cast a ballot, a move that was widely criticized by the left as antidemocratic. Last month's opinion polls showed that only 46% of Italians were aware of the issues driving the referendums. Turnout is projected to be around 35%, which would be well below the target for the reforms to pass. Meloni does not back the citizenship measure. Her far-right party Brothers of Italy has sought to curb illegal immigration, while increasing the number of legal work visas for migrants. She praised the current system as "excellent law, among the most open, in the sense that we have for years been among the European nations that grant the highest number of citizenships each year." Edited by: Roshni Majumdar


DW
a day ago
- DW
German govt to ask EU court to rule on migrant turnbacks – DW – 06/07/2025
06/07/2025 June 7, 2025 German interior to seek EU verdict on border turnbacks Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the German government would seek a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the legality of migrant turnbacks at the border. Dobrindt's comments to the Funke media group follow a ruling by a court in Berlin on Monday that the refusal to allow three Somali nationals to enter last month was unlawful. The court ruled that on May 9, border guards failed to initiate proper asylum procedures and returned the trio to Poland. According to the court, Germany should have applied the European Union's so-called Dublin Regulation, establishing which country is responsible for the asylum claim of the migrants, before they were sent back. The Dublin rule specifies which EU state should process an asylum application, partly to prevent arrivals from making claims in wealthier countries rather than the first EU nation that they entered. Dobrindt said the government would provide its rationale for invoking Article 72 — a special clause under EU law that permits exceptions to the Dublin rule in emergencies. "We will submit sufficient justification, but the European Court of Justice should decide on the matter," Dobrindt said, adding: "I am convinced that our actions are in line with European law." Dobrindt insisted that Germany had to crack down on illegal migration, which he said would prevent the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from pushing more radical solutions. German Chancellor Merz rejects criticism of border controls To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany introduced tougher border checks on May 7, including new rules allowing asylum seekers to be turned away at the border for the first time. In the first days of the new rule, 19 people who sought asylum in Germany were denied entry, along with nearly 300 other migrants, local media reported. Following this week's court ruling, the cabinet approved even stricter measures.


DW
a day ago
- DW
Germany: Car drives into crowd in Passau – DW – 06/07/2025
06/07/2025 June 7, 2025 German interior to seek EU verdict on border turnbacks Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the German government would seek a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the legality of migrant turnbacks at the border. Dobrindt's comments to the Funke media group follow a ruling by a court in Berlin on Monday that the refusal to allow three Somali nationals to enter last month was unlawful. The court ruled that on May 9, border guards failed to initiate proper asylum procedures and returned the trio to Poland. According to the court, Germany should have applied the European Union's so-called Dublin Regulation, establishing which country is responsible for the asylum claim of the migrants, before they were sent back. The Dublin rule specifies which EU state should process an asylum application, partly to prevent arrivals from making claims in wealthier countries rather than the first EU nation that they entered. Dobrindt said the government would provide its rationale for invoking Article 72 — a special clause under EU law that permits exceptions to the Dublin rule in emergencies. "We will submit sufficient justification, but the European Court of Justice should decide on the matter," Dobrindt said, adding: "I am convinced that our actions are in line with European law." Dobrindt insisted that Germany had to crack down on illegal migration, which he said would prevent the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from pushing more radical solutions. German Chancellor Merz rejects criticism of border controls To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany introduced tougher border checks on May 7, including new rules allowing asylum seekers to be turned away at the border for the first time. In the first days of the new rule, 19 people who sought asylum in Germany were denied entry, along with nearly 300 other migrants, local media reported. Following this week's court ruling, the cabinet approved even stricter measures.