2025 GWM Haval H6 GT PHEV Review'
Range is critical in an EV, and likewise PHEVs, it would seem. The average PHEV range increased from 50km in 2019 to 80km in 2023. This year it will be higher again. Why? Because of the likes of this Haval H6. The Chinese are going bonkers on PHEVs. Thanks to that, there are now several PHEVs on sale here that offer over 100km of EV range. Some in China offer 245 to 300-odd km.
This H6 GT PHEV is Haval's first example, offering 180km of electric travel from its substantial 35.4kWh battery pack. That's serious range, especially given it sells for $58,990. Pricing is similar to Mitsi PHEVs but there's over double the range. Fact is, there's enough EV potential for a week of in-town motoring. That means you can recharge it on a Friday night before a long weekend away, and have roughly 1000km of range at the ready. A quick 91 refill gives another 800.
What about a battery refresh?
And sensibly there's always electric power to help with overtaking because the system never lets the battery charge sink below 15 per cent. It also allows you to save the energy stored in the battery for urban use if you want.
And you can recharge on the go, using the engine as a generator. Though it would seem they prefer you not to as it's not that straightforward to activate. Alternatively, you can plug in to a 48kW fast charger. It takes half an hour to replenish the battery from 30 to 80 per cent. A 7kW wall charger will do the job in three hours. Or 12 hours on a portable charger.
So it all sounds rather peachy for those who just cannot be bothered with on-the-road recharging, or don't want EV range anxiety.
The downside of a PHEV is using the engine too much. With most PHEVs, you can gobble up the limited EV range on day one. People then forget to recharge each night. When you run them like that, fuel economy won't be great. That's because the engine is tasked with propelling something much heavier. The H6 PHEV is 400kg up on its petrol equivalent (2075kg kerb weight). With much greater EV range, that gives you plenty of time to decide when you are going to plug in again. And then you'll only use the engine on long jaunts. In the urban setting, GWM suggests overall fuel use of 0.8L/100km (rightcar 1.0L/100km). It's around 5.4 otherwise.
Any other downsides then?
This isn't quite as dynamic as the regular ICE-power H6 models, despite decent Michelin Primacy rubber and its AWD status. It can be a bit squirrely in the wet. GWM has fettled the suspension for the increased weight to make it ride appropriately, which it really does. Brakes are uprated too but have an odd pedal feel. No mind, because high-level recuperation does most of the braking for you.
We found the central IFT control screen disappointing. Repeated jabs and stabs were often needed, and it's a bit slow. Moreover, the layout is messy. Its saving grace is a pulldown menu for things you might want to turn off frequently. And voice control; use that when you can.
While this H6 is mercifully free of warning bongs, it makes one loud one when you start it up and set off. Why is unclear, and no, you cannot cull it. The wheel spokes are oddly placed too, forcing a 10 past 2 hand position.
Can it go?
Can it ever! This can really tramp. That's the result of having a motor for each axle and a turbopetrol engine. Overall system output is 342kW and 762Nm. Strewth, that's a heap of grunt for a car costing this much. It can hit 100km/h in just under 4.9sec with LC and needs just over 3sec to jet from 80-120. It would be even quicker if the hybrid two-speed transmission didn't dither between first and second.
Practically speaking this is sound. There's genuinely decent room for five grown-ups. And luggage capacity is 392-1390L. That's the same as for the Ultra GT AWD upon which it is based.
The Haval H6 range gets more, however, 560-1485L, if luggage capacity is a big deal. Same with towing. The PHEV is good for 750-1500kg, while the H6 petrol can haul 2000kg of braked trailer.
What else?
Surprise and delight items include powered, heated and vented seats that are really comfy, a head-up display and surround camera. The overall shape is appealing too, though the rear window is tiny, and has no wiper. But the resolution from the reversing camera compensates.
With all the new energy brands incoming, it is Leapmotor's C10 REEV at $49,990 plus ORCs that is the Haval's main rival. Sure, it has slightly less EV range (145km) but most will likely find that's enough for a week of urban travel. It's nowhere near as quick, however. The 0-100 claim is 8.5sec because the engine acts only as a generator for the battery. So it is reliant on its lone 158kW/320Nm motor for go power. If you want serious performance, and ridiculously low fuel use, go for the Haval which comes with a seven-year/unlimited km warranty.
GWM Haval H6 GT PHEV
$58,990 / 0.8L/100km / 19g/km
0-100 km/h 4.82s
Engine 1500cc / IL4 / T + twin motors
Max power 321kW
Max torque 762Nm
Weight (claimed) 2075kg
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Autocar
2 days ago
- NZ Autocar
2025 Chery Tiggo 4 Urban Review
Chery had a go at selling cars here a decade ago. That episode was best forgotten but the new line-up is more promising. The Tiggo 4 leads the way on value but does it have genuine appeal? More bad news arrived this month for the established Asian car brands, with the Chery Tiggo 4 now on the road in New Zealand. While Chery has been here before, its first coming is best forgotten. But it appears that the Chinese maker has come a long way since those bad old days, if the Tiggo 4 is anything to go by. This little SUV has been making waves over the ditch since going on sale there last year. It has picked up numerous awards from media outlets in the value category. And it's not hard to see why. The entry-level Tiggo 4 Urban kicks things off here for just $24,990 (plus ORCs) and a quick perusal of its specification sheet is revealing. It has walk-away auto locking, an alarm, parking sensors front and rear, a reverse camera and 17 ADAS features, including active cruise. This Urban model may have cloth trim and manually adjusted seats but it has dual 10-inch displays, CarPlay and wireless Android Auto along with dual zone A/C and a leather-bound steering wheel. There is a limited colour palette (just four) and anything other than red is dubbed premium paint (a.k.a. a cost extra). But otherwise, it doesn't feel like a real stripper. There's no sat nav, but that's something the $70k Cupra Terramar V tested this month also lacks. About the only thing we thought was an odd omission was interior lighting for the second row. That however is one of the upgrades you get when opting for the Ultimate. For its $29,990 price, Chery upgrades the alloys to 18s, you get a surround view camera, seats in fake cow with heaters and power adjustment (driver's side at least), some ambient lighting, a charge pad and sunroof. It's got turbo power Powering the Tiggo 4 is a 1.5 turbopetrol mustering 108kW while the more useful figure is the handy 210Nm it makes at 1750-4000rpm. This is sent via CVT to the front wheels. Fuel consumption is not a strong point, though it does get away with drinking 91 octane. The official figure is 7.4L/100km while our around town numbers were in the low tens. Those are more usual for a medium SUV. On a cruise control-guided trip from Auckland to Hamiltion and back, the Tiggo 4 returned 7.5. For comparison, the ASX is rated at 8.5L/100km, the Mahindra X03 at 6.5L/100km. Chery has a Tiggo 4 hybrid coming if economy is important, with a 5.4L/100km fuel use figure, though entry price starts at $32,990. Big enough? At 4.3m long and 1.8m wide, this Tiggo 4 is all but the same size as the Mitsubishi ASX. That's been trucking along here for some time now, but with prices starting at $27,990, it's a model that features in the top sellers as buyers look for value in these cost-conscious times. But its spec sheet is not as impressive as the newcomer's. The Tiggo 4 is all fairly conventional inside, and in operation too. A mix of buttons and touchpoints get things done fuss-free, while there's a voice controller too. The screens give the cabin a modern vibe and, while there are hard plastics about, the touch points (save for the edge of the console) are soft and lined. Okay, some of those plastics look and feel a bit budget, the headlining and floor coverings as well, but you have to keep that price tag in mind. There's okay adjustment at the seat (which is comfy) and though the wheel moves for both height and reach, it could extend out further for taller drivers. Outward vision is sound but the resolution of the backing camera image is grainy. While not quite as family friendly as a proper medium-SUV, the Tiggo 4 is doable for the whanau. Head and legroom in the rear is commendable for its size, entry good too. And you'll find a flattish floor for mid-row feet, a charge point and air vents. In the boot, some load length has been sacrificed for that rear legroom, but there's enough on offer for the groceries or a few shrubs. But golfers will be needing to fold the rear seat (split 60/40), converted by way of levers next to the headrests. It's not a flat area either, but you do get a spare wheel under the floor, albeit a space saver. Go okay? This Tiggo 4 suits its Urban tag. It's right-sized for the city, being easy to park and commute in. The CVT has a decent launch feel, and responds quickly to the need for added go. Thanks to the turbo bolstering the torque, this feels sufficiently quick though, as mentioned, fuel use is on the high side. The ride is good, outward vision too. The steering is one aspect that needs rethinking. It is overly light, even for city running. The steering column could be constructed of overcooked spaghetti, such is the response at highway speeds; you're often making multiple adjustments to stay on your intended line, such is the lack of sensation. Hitching things up a notch in Sport mode (accompanied by an 'it is in Sport mode' announcement), we couldn't detect much of a difference from the default Eco setting. Apart from the CVT, that seemed to get a bit livelier. But steering aside, this gets along okay. The ride is passable, it didn't crash into the big bumps, though the roll control could be improved upon. When things get too hot, the ESP snuffs it quickly before it gets out of line. While a panic stop is done rather calmly, the pedal feel is a little too spongy under foot. There's enough go for an overtake, but pick your moment for sure. Things don't get too noisy either in terms of tyre roar or engine wail, though the 1.5 does get a bit more vocal past 3000rpm. The ADAS systems in Chinese sourced machines can be more of an annoyance than an aid but the Tiggo 4's arsenal of functions actually does an alright job. The driver monitor does as intended, calling you out with a discreet ding when you do look away, but it could give you a little more slack. There's a speed limit recognition but no bonging when you do exceed it, and there are far worse offenders when it comes to lane keeping as well (but you might feel the need to switch that off too). There is an assisted drive mode for the active cruise but best deactivate that. Without it, the cruise does a good job, apart from the size of the gap it leaves. And false alerts were largely non-existent. With seven airbags (including one in between the front passengers), Tiggo 4 has a five-star ANCAP rating, something the ASX doesn't (its rating having expired in 2022). A value contender then? Yes, certainly. For those after an affordable motor in 2025, this is definitely worth a look. It's backed by Chery's seven-year unlimited kilometre warranty, has a seven-year capped price servicing scheme and up to seven years of roadside assistance as well. So far Chery has 10 dealers on board, though only one Christchurch dealer for the South Island. Chery Tiggo 4 Urban $24,990 / 7.4L/100km / 168g/km 0-100 km/h 9.56s 80-120 km/h 7.40s (208m) 100-0 km/h 37.98m Speedo error 97 at an indicated 100km/h Ambient cabin noise 72.8dB@100km/h Engine 1498cc / IL4 / T / EFI Max power 108kW@5500rpm Max torque 210Nm@1750-4000rpm Drivetrain CVT / FWD Front suspension Mac strut / swaybar Rear suspension Torsion beam Turning circle 10.6m (2.7 turns) Front brakes Ventilated discs Rear brakes Discs Stability systems ABS, ESP Safety AEB, ACC, BSM, LDW, RCTA, ALK Tyre size f/r-215/60R17 Wheelbase 2610mm L/W/H 4307 / 1825 / 1660mm Track f/r-1550mm Fuel capacity 51L Luggage capacity 380-1225L Tow rating Not rated to tow Service intervals 12months / 15,000km Warranty 7yrs / unlimited km ANCAP rating (2024) Weight (claimed) 1404kg
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
China's automakers using Red Sea route shortcut -while others take the slow boat to Europe
The Chinese cargo ship BYD Explorer No.1. While other Asian automakers are still shipping to Europe by the longer, more expensive route around Africa, car-carrying ships to Europe from Chinese ports through the Suez Canal and Red Sea have continued at an unabated clip, leading shipping analysts to assume that the Chinese Government reached an understanding with Iran or the Houthi rebels, who sunk two cargo ships in July. Photo / Ore Huiying, The New York Times Chinese automakers are shipping cars to Europe through the Red Sea and Suez Canal, nearly two years after the Iran-backed Houthi militia in Yemen started attacking vessels in the critical Middle East transit route. Other automakers are still shipping cars from Asia by way of a much longer, and expensive,
NZ Autocar
4 days ago
- NZ Autocar
2025 BYD Shark 6 vs GWM Cannon Alpha Lux PHEV Review
Mud plugging is more synonymous with utes than plugging in but the times they are a changing. You can now get plug-in hybrid double cabs with decent electric range, a new example being GWM's Cannon Alpha PHEV. Is it good enough to upset BYD's Shark 6? There has been a bit of hoopla surrounding hybrid utes lately. Toyota made quite a thing about introducing a hybrid Hilux last year but that was a mild affair. GWM was the first to introduce a high-voltage hybrid ute with its Cannon Alpha HEV but that missed the mark. But they haven't given up, recently launching a Cannon Alpha PHEV that could give the brand a boost here. One plug-in hybrid ute that is doing the business is the BYD Shark 6. We thought pretty highly of this and it seems so does the buying public. Shark was the third-best selling ute last month, spurred on by Fieldays action, though remember it has just one, high-spec model to hawk. If BYD can maintain the momentum, it's on course for a top three finish in the commercial race behind Hilux and Ranger. Not bad going at all. But will the arrival of the Cannon Alpha PHEV impede that sales impetus? The Alpha range includes good old diesel power, starting at $55k. They still have an HEV version too at $69k (though on special until October for $63k). The Lux PHEV lists for $69,990 though currently GWM is matching BYD's $5k Fieldays discount, bringing the price to $64,990. The up-spec Ultra is $72k with the discount. There's just one Shark 6 variant priced at $69,990, though subject to a $5k discount at present. Unique underneath While both are plug-in hybrids, they are quite different. The Shark is a series hybrid, operating like an EV while its 1.5T engine is used primarily to power a generator, making electrons for the battery. It has an electric motor on each axle to deliver 321kW and 650Nm. There is no multi-speed transmission, or mechanical connection between the axles. The GWM runs a parallel type set-up, with a 180kW/380Nm 2.0-litre turbopetrol working with a 120kW/400Nm motor that resides in the nine-speed auto's housing. GWM quotes a total output of 300kW and 750Nm which flows to the rears the same way it would in the ICE-powered Alpha. The PHEV also utilises a torque-on-demand 4WD system, to ensure the outputs stick. The plug-in status allows GWM to quote fuel consumption at 1.7L/100km and BYD 2.0L/100km. Actual consumption varies depending on how fastidious you are at plugging in. Both have body on frame construction, but the Shark has independent, coil suspension front and rear, the Alpha sticking with the usual solid axle out back, but gains coil springs. The BYD has a 29.6kWh battery pack that is said to give a 100km EV range (NEDC) before it will switch to hybrid mode. The GWM has a 37kWh battery for 115km. The reality is a bit different however, with the Shark good for around 80km, while we managed to get 89km from the Cannon Alpha. You will want to ensure these are charged each night to minimise your fuel use. Once in hybrid mode, they both start to drink, the Shark 6 hovering around the high-nine mark for city driving, the Cannon nudging up to 15! Given the size of the batteries, you're not going to get a full recharge overnight using a portable 2kW charger, meaning you might have to factor in a wallbox system. Both can accept DC charge, the GWM up to 50kW, the Shark 6 55kW. How do they go? The GWM's PHEV electric operation is okay, with enough power to get along in traffic, and a reasonable regen operation. Though anytime you require real acceleration, expect the engine to fire into action. When operating in hybrid mode, the blending of the power sources is better than we remember the HEV being. But it never feels like you are getting 750Nm of torque delivered. And there can be a delay in the action when getting away before it's really into its stride. There is the odd shunt from the driveline too, while it can take too long engaging the drive when switching between D and R. Neither are things you'll experience in the Shark. The BYD's power delivery is quick and smooth, refined and powerful. Like the GWM, you can adjust the steering weight, brake response and regen, though more of the latter would be good in its 'high' setting. It has a better creep function than the GWM, and better brake action at parking speeds. The Shark's ride is slightly jittery compared with the Cannon Alpha's, which has a polished progress. Both of these are monsters come time to manoeuvre around town, with 13m turning circles and each is close to 5.5m long. Both have plentiful driver assist functions, some of which you'll want to get rid of. The GWM was sounding off after just 50m behind the wheel, but thankfully we managed to permanently mute much of it. The BYD's speed warning is pretty insistent and its driver monitor is more vigilant. But its lane keeping is more tolerable than the GWM's, and adaptive cruise is better too (just not the assisted mode). Shark better on road Through a few bends, the Cannon's powertrain responds well enough, more so in Sport mode, where the trans shifts a little more enthusiastically. But again, it never feels like you have 750Nm of torque at your disposal. Although, we noted the performance remains consistent, even with the battery right down low. There's not a lot happening at the wheel but you get just enough back to know what's going on below. It holds on okay at both ends, the rear with a touch of roll at times which is probably due to the battery positioning. The ride remains civil at highway speeds too; it's actually quite good unladen. Its brakes remain a bit spongy under the pump though. The Shark 6 drives better for sure. It steers more accurately with more connection, while it has better balance and roll control. The brakes are superior in action as well. Its unladen ride is a little more settled at speed, but not as calm as the Cannon's. The motors deliver a good surge of power, with no lag in the response. It's a good idea to set the battery save mode to 50 per cent if heading out rurally to ensure consistent performance. Once down around the 15 per cent mark, the power really drops off. If it matters, the Shark is quicker, with a 0-100 of 6.3sec, a second ahead of the Cannon Alpha on both of our performance measures. Capable though? The Shark has a whopper of a tray, measuring 1520mm long and is 1360mm wide at the tailgate and 1200mm between the arches. You might notice a slight issue with the Cannon, that spare wheel eating into the load capacity. There's no room for it underneath (where you'll find the Shark's spare) due to the siting of the battery, which is perched up above the rear axle. That sees a slight rise in the deck floor too. The Alpha's tray is the same length as the Shark's (and is slightly wider at the tailgate) but it's only 1060mm wide with that spare wheel in place, and is 80mm narrower at the arches. As to payload, the Cannon PHEV is rated at 685kg while the Shark 6 has the ability to haul up to 790kg. The Shark's V2L outlets are handily integrated into the side of the tray, whereas the Cannon has an adapter that needs to be plugged into the charge port. Neither is easily converted from wellside to a flatdeck due to the electrical bits, though BYD says it has cab chassis variants (including single cab options) coming next year. If towing is important, you'll lean toward the Cannon PHEV with its 3500kg braked rating. This is one of the pros of its drivetrain type. The Shark 6 can tow, and does so quite well but is rated to 2500kg braked. And with a 350kg down load rating, the Cannon's hitch can take 100kg more than the Shark. The other area the Cannon Alpha PHEV beats the Shark 6 is off road. Its conventional solid rear axle gives it superior wheel articulation. It also has a locking rear diff (the Ultra adds another up front) and a low range. GWM has better clearance at 210mm, though only by 10mm, and a better rampover angle, but the Shark has superior approach and departure angles. The Shark 6 only has a few traction control settings to help it off road. It struggles for traction when its wheels are on differing surfaces, or unloaded. They spin all too easily as they scramble for grip. We would have thought the traction control could sort it more efficiently. A brief drive on gravel reaffirms the Cannon Alpha's superior ride quality and ability to isolate bumps, where those big potholes and corrugations send more of a wobble through the Shark's cabin. Loaded of course Typical of Chinese origin vehicles, they have a hefty list of kit. Without going into all the details, the Shark is better outfitted; you'd need to upgrade to the Alpha Ultra to match it. Though we reckon you'd get by with what the Lux offers; it's comprehensively equipped as well. The Shark's cabin sure is a nice place to be. The seats are SUV quality, form fitting and well trimmed. It's well made, with few hard plastics about. It reinforces the Shark's lifestyle vibe; you don't want to jump on board in grubby overalls. The GWM is also nicely constructed, though not quite as premium. It has a more conventional layout, though the Shark isn't too tricky to be fair. Both have a smattering of buttons, though most aspects are controlled via the screen. Shark's big display is vibrant and more feature-packed (the kids loved the Karaoke app) but larger touch points would be appreciated. Both have good surround-view cameras and the voice assistant can prove helpful at times. They each have a roomy back row with a comfortable bench. The BYD has a three-pin plug back there and some USBs, its flat floor giving better legroom for everyone. Which one is up to you Given their differences, what you use your ute for will determine which one you buy. If you genuinely need the extra tow and off-road ability, well it's got to be the Cannon Alpha. If it's an SUV with a tray you're after, the Shark 6 would get our money. BYD Shark 6 $69,990 / 2.0L/100km / 46g/km 0-100 km/h 6.31s 80-120 km/h 4.07 (115m) 100-0 km/h 41.07m Speedo error 97 at an indicated 100km/h Ambient cabin noise 69.8dB@100km/h Engine 1498cc / IL4 / T / DI Max power 135kW Max torque 260Nm Motor output f-170kW / 310Nm / r-150kW / 340Nm Battery 29.58kWh EV Range 100km Hybrid System Output 321kW / 650Nm Drivetrain Single speed auto / e-AWD Front suspension Wishbones Rear suspension Wishbones Turning circle 13.5m (3.5 turns) Front brakes Ventilated discs Rear brakes Discs Stability systems ABS, ESP, TV Safety AEB, ACC, BSM, LDW, RCTA, ALK, AHB Tyre size f/r-265/65R18 Wheelbase 3260mm L/W/H 5457 / 1971 / 1925mm Track f-1660mm r-1660mm Fuel capacity 60L Payload 790kg Tow rating 750kg (2500kg braked) Service intervals 12 months / 20,000km Warranty 6yrs / 150,000km ANCAP rating ★★★★★ (2024) Weight (claimed) 2710kg GWM Cannon Alpha LUX PHEV $69,990 / 1.7L/100km / 39g/km 0-100 km/h 7.25s 80-120 km/h 5.09s (143m) 100-0 km/h 41.98m Speedo error 96 at an indicated 100km/h Ambient cabin noise 70.0dB@100km/h Engine 1998cc / IL4 / T / DI Max power 180kW Max torque 380Nm Motor output 120kW / 400Nm Battery 37.1kWh EV Range 115km Hybrid System Output 300kW / 750Nm Drivetrain 9-speed auto / on-demand AWD Front suspension Wishbones / sway bar Rear suspension Solid axle Turning circle 13.0m (2.7 turns) Front brakes Ventilated discs Rear brakes Discs Stability systems ABS, ESP Safety AEB, ACC, BSM, LDW, RCTA, ALK, AHB Tyre size f/r-265/60R18 Wheelbase 3350mm L/W/H 5445 / 1991 / 1924mm Track f-1650mm r-1650mm Fuel capacity 75L Payload 685kg Tow rating 750kg (3500kg braked) Service intervals 12 months / 15,000km Warranty 7yrs / unlimited km ANCAP rating ★★★★★ (2024) Weight (claimed) 2810kg
