US designates South Korea a ‘sensitive' country over mishandling of lab data
The designation, which relegated the US ally to the lowest tier of a list that includes China, Iran, Israel, Russia, Taiwan, and North Korea, sparked controversy and debate in Seoul, which said it had not been notified by Washington.
'South Korea was put on this list because there was some mishandling of sensitive information,' Yun said in remarks to the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea.
He did not elaborate on the issue, but said more than 2,000 South Korean students, researchers, and government officials visited US labs last year.
The designation was limited to the department's facilities, Yun added, and did not have wider implications for cooperation between the allies.
'It is not a big deal,' he added. 'There were some incidents because there were so many South Koreans going there.'
This week the US energy department confirmed it had designated South Korea a 'sensitive' country in January, but did not explain why.
Vice ministers in Seoul were set on Tuesday to brief acting President Choi Sang-mok on their response, while Industry Minister Ahn Duk-geun is expected to ask for South Korea to be dropped from the list when he visits the United States this week, government sources have said.
In a report last year, the US energy department said it had fired a contractor who tried to board a flight to South Korea with 'proprietary nuclear reactor design software' owned by the Idaho National Laboratory.
That individual, who was being investigated by US law enforcement, had been in contact with an unnamed foreign government, the report said, without identifying the country.
It was not immediately clear if that case contributed to the designation. Officials in the energy department and state department were not immediately available for comment.
The US decision to add South Korea to the list was taken by the previous Biden administration, a spokesperson for the US Department of Energy (DOE) has said.
It came as South Korean officials increasingly raised the prospect of some day pursuing their own nuclear weapons, and in the aftermath of a shock martial law declaration in December that threw the country's leadership into crisis.
On Monday, however, Seoul's foreign ministry said the DOE decision was understood to have stemmed from 'security-related matters' linked to a research center, and not South Korea's foreign policy.
The DOE spokesperson said the designation, due to take effect in April, set no new restrictions but mandates internal reviews before cooperation or visits to listed countries.
Meanwhile, Yun called on South Korea to help reduce the US trade deficit with Seoul, which has more than doubled since the first Trump administration. 'To the new administration in Washington, that is troubling,' he said.
South Korea needs to scrap barriers in the agriculture, digital and service sectors, he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump set to bar college graduates from debt relief program if employers undermine ‘American values'
Donald Trump's administration is considering introducing a new rule that would block college graduates with outstanding loans from having their debt forgiven if their employers are found to be 'undermining national security and American values through illegal means.' The proposal, announced this week by the Linda McMahon-led Department for Education, would bar people from being considered for the federal Public Student Loan Forgiveness program if the businesses they work for engage in 'activities with a substantial illegal purpose.' The examples given by the DOE of what offenses might qualify include 'supporting terrorism, aiding or abetting discrimination or violations of immigration laws, or child abuse.' Announcing the draft rule change proposal, Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said: 'President Trump has given the department a historic mandate to restore the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program to its original purpose – supporting public servants who strengthen their communities and serve the public good, not benefiting businesses engaged in illegal activity that harm Americans. 'The federal government has a vital interest in deterring unlawful conduct, and we're moving quickly to ensure employers don't benefit while breaking the law.' The PSLF was first introduced in 2007 under George W Bush with the intention of rewarding graduates who enter public service professions like teaching or law enforcement by relieving them of the burden of student debt at the outset of their careers. The DOE insists the rule change it is pitching is necessary to preserve the original spirit of the taxpayer-funded program while penalizing companies found to be operating outside of the law. It is now soliciting public comments on its proposal until September 17. According to CBS News, critics of the revision have already warned that it would open the door to DOE officials moving to 'improperly exclude' public servants from the scheme on ideological grounds. In advance of the draft proposal being published, the Student Borrower Protection Center campaign group slammed it last month as 'harmful, horrific, and illegal,' warning it could empower the Trump administration to persecute agencies and firms whose work or ethos conflicts with its own goals. 'To be clear, if implemented this proposal would allow the secretary to disqualify from PSLF any employees of school systems that accurately teach the U.S.'s history of slavery, of healthcare providers who offer gender-affirming care and of legal aid organizations that represent individuals against unlawful deportations,' said the SBPC's legal director Winston Berkman-Breen in late June. The Independent has reached out to the DOE for further comment. Earlier this month, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem offered student loan forgiveness as an incentive to encourage graduates to apply to join ICE as part of a massive recruitment drive to boost the administration's crackdown on undocumented migrants.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin weighs stake in Intel & other chipmakers: Reuters
The Trump administration is reportedly considering taking an equity stake in Intel (INTC) and other chipmakers using CHIPS Act grants, according to reporting from Reuters. Yahoo Finance Tech Editor Dan Howley outlines what we know. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief. The Trump administration is considering taking stakes in chip makers as part of the CHIPS Act grants program. That's according to Reuters. The report follows comments from Commerce Secretary Howard Letnick, who said the government is eyeing an equity position in Intel as part of its funding package. Joining me now to discuss, senior tech editor, Dan Howley. So, the CHIPS Act originally, right, there's been a lot of talk lately about sort of state capitalism or the melding of government with these private enterprises. And this is the latest step here. So, could have implications, obviously, not just for Intel, but maybe for other chip makers. Yeah, and some of the chip makers that, uh, you know, the Reuters report points out that they may be looking at is Samsung and TSMC, uh, two of the largest chip makers in the world, Micron, uh, as well. Uh, you know, Micron received a huge amount of CHIPS Act funding, but TSMC and Samsung also received funding for their plants in the US. Uh, TSMC is building out, uh, a number of facilities that Apple will take advantage of and Nvidia will take advantage of. Obviously they build chips for AMD as well. And so, you know, the idea that these companies, uh, the TSMCs, the Samsungs may, uh, kind of count the US government as a shareholder if they convert these grants into equity could kind of, you know, raise the prospect of whether or not they would actually want to keep a hold of that CHIPS Act funding. It's not as though, you know, TSMC or Samsung are hurting as much as Intel. Uh, they really need that kind of cash infusion and any kind of help they can get from the government. Obviously, Intel got that, is getting that $2 billion from SoftBank group as well. Uh, but, you know, the idea that we could see the government kind of having that stake in two companies that are one Taiwanese, one South Korean, I mean, it kind of seems a little odd at this point, especially considering that the whole point of the, you know, Intel stake is to write that ship. As I said, it's not as though TSMC is doing poorly. Samsung's had some rough quarters, but they, you know, are still one of the biggest chip makers around. Um, they don't really need the kind of shoring up that Intel does. So it does seem a little odd to kind of change this, but, uh, you know, in that Reuters report they mentioned Letnick had said that the CHIPS Act grants were overly generous. And obviously, President Trump has expressed his displeasure with the CHIPS Act, saying that, you know, they should have raised tariffs on the companies instead to get them to come to the US, and then, you know, maybe give them tax breaks rather than give them grants or the option for loans. Related Videos Stocks steady, Target CEO, US gov't & chipmakers: 3 Things 5 years ago, Apple became the first to reach a $2T market cap How Trump could use CHIPS Act grants to invest in Intel How Intel went from iconic chimaker to AI laggard Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
UPI
7 hours ago
- UPI
Kim Jong Un's sister says South Korea will never be a diplomatic partner
Kim Yo Jong (L), the sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, said South Korea would never be a diplomatic partner, stare media reported Wednesday. She is seen here in Tsiolkovsky, Russia, during a state visit in 2023. File Kremlin Pool Photo by Vladimir Smirnov/Sputnik/EPA SEOUL, Aug. 20 (UPI) -- North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's influential sister repeated her dismissal of Seoul's outreach efforts, state media reported Wednesday, saying that South Korea "cannot be a diplomatic partner." Kim Yo Jong "sharply criticized the essence of the deceptive 'appeasement offensive'" by the administration of South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, state-run Korean Central News Agency said. "We have witnessed and experienced the dirty political system of the ROK for decades," Kim told North Korean Foreign Ministry officials during a meeting on Tuesday, using the official acronym for South Korea. "The ambition for confrontation with the DPRK has been invariably pursued by the ROK, whether it held the signboard of 'conservatism' or wore a mask of 'democracy,'" Kim said. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the official name of North Korea. Kim's remarks come as the United States and South Korea are holding their annual summertime Ulchi Freedom Shield joint military exercise. The 11-day exercise began Monday and includes live field maneuvers, computer simulation-based command post exercises and related civil defense drills. Some 21,000 troops, including 18,000 South Korean personnel, are participating this year. President Lee has stressed that the drills are defensive in nature and has made a series of overtures to North Korea since taking office in June in an effort to improve strained ties. In a speech Friday marking the 80th anniversary of Korea's liberation from Japanese colonial rule, Lee vowed to "respect" North Korea's political system and said Seoul would not pursue "unification by absorption." "We have no intention of engaging in hostile acts," Lee said. "Going forward, our government will take consistent measures to substantially reduce tensions and restore trust." Kim called Lee's defensive characterization of the joint military exercise "gibberish" and said his administration's "stinky confrontational nature is swathed in a wrapper of peace." "Lee Jae Myung is not the sort of man who will change the course of history," she added. The Blue House, South Korea's presidential office, responded to Kim's comments Monday, calling them "regrettable." "The Lee Jae Myung administration's preemptive measures for peace on the Korean Peninsula are not self-serving or for the benefit of one side, but rather are for the stability and prosperity of both South and North Korea," the office said in a statement. "It is regrettable that North Korean officials are misrepresenting and distorting our sincere efforts." Kim Yo Jong has made multiple public statements in recent weeks dismissing Seoul's rapprochement efforts, which include removing its anti-Pyongyang propaganda loudspeakers from border areas inside the DMZ. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Monday said the U.S.-South Korea joint military exercise demonstrated the allies' "will to ignite a war" and called for the rapid expansion of Pyongyang's nuclear capabilities
