Over a dozen beaches are closed in Massachusetts this weekend due to bacteria. Here's where
After another week of high summer temperatures, you may be in the mood to head over to one of Massachusetts' beaches this weekend.
However, if you're planning a weekend beach trip, you'll want to avoid the beaches closed due to unsafe swimming water.
The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) states that swimming in the water at these closed beaches poses a threat of illness due to high levels of bacteria. Symptoms of water-borne illness can range from nausea and vomiting to a sore throat and fever, or even rashes and infections.
Heading into this weekend, several Massachusetts beaches are closed. Here's the full list.
The following MA beaches, listed by town, are closed as of Friday, June 13:
Ashland: Hopkinton Reservoir-Upper Beach (Bacterial Exceedance)
Boston:
Malibu (Bacterial Exceedance)
Tenean (Bacterial Exceedance)
Chatham: Oyster Pond (Bacterial Exceedance)
Dartmouth:
Hidden Bay (CSO/SSO event)
Jones Town Beach North (CSO/SSO event)
Jones Town Beach South (CSO/SSO event)
Great Barrington: Old Maid's Park (Bacterial Exceedance)
Revere: Short (Bacterial Exceedance)
Saugus: Peckham Pond at Camp Nihan (Bacterial Exceedance)
Templeton: Beamans Pond - Campground (Bacterial Exceedance)
Winthrop:
Donovans (Bacterial Exceedance)
Halford (Bacterial Exceedance)
Most beaches are closed due to bacterial exceedance, meaning the levels of bacteria in the water are higher than the limits set by the MDPH.
Those in the "other" category can be closed due to a variety of chemical or physical hazards, such as riptides and poor visibility.
More: Want to park for free at the beach this summer in MA? Boston Beer Company can help
Another popular beach is closed for the summer, but not due to bacteria.
According to an announcement from the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) on May 30, the main beach at Walden Pond in Concord will be closed for the season as the site undergoes construction. Red Cross Beach, another beach at Walden Pond, will still be open for the summer, but with no lifeguards present and limited parking availability.
Over the summer, Walden Pond will be getting a new $6.1 million bathhouse, according to the DCR. The new single-story, 2,700 square-foot building will replace the current two-story bathhouse from 1947, which is not ADA compliant. This project will bring Walden Pond State Reservation's facility up to federal and state accessibility requirements.
More: Popular MA beach to stay closed all summer due to construction. Here's where
According to the MDPH website, beaches can only re-open when their bacteria levels are back within the safe range, so there is no set amount of time for a closure.
The status of a closed beach can be checked on the website's water quality dashboard, which is updated at 9:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. daily.
This article originally appeared on The Patriot Ledger: 14 Massachusetts beaches are closed this weekend. Here's where
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Over a dozen beaches are closed in Massachusetts this weekend due to bacteria. Here's where
After another week of high summer temperatures, you may be in the mood to head over to one of Massachusetts' beaches this weekend. However, if you're planning a weekend beach trip, you'll want to avoid the beaches closed due to unsafe swimming water. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) states that swimming in the water at these closed beaches poses a threat of illness due to high levels of bacteria. Symptoms of water-borne illness can range from nausea and vomiting to a sore throat and fever, or even rashes and infections. Heading into this weekend, several Massachusetts beaches are closed. Here's the full list. The following MA beaches, listed by town, are closed as of Friday, June 13: Ashland: Hopkinton Reservoir-Upper Beach (Bacterial Exceedance) Boston: Malibu (Bacterial Exceedance) Tenean (Bacterial Exceedance) Chatham: Oyster Pond (Bacterial Exceedance) Dartmouth: Hidden Bay (CSO/SSO event) Jones Town Beach North (CSO/SSO event) Jones Town Beach South (CSO/SSO event) Great Barrington: Old Maid's Park (Bacterial Exceedance) Revere: Short (Bacterial Exceedance) Saugus: Peckham Pond at Camp Nihan (Bacterial Exceedance) Templeton: Beamans Pond - Campground (Bacterial Exceedance) Winthrop: Donovans (Bacterial Exceedance) Halford (Bacterial Exceedance) Most beaches are closed due to bacterial exceedance, meaning the levels of bacteria in the water are higher than the limits set by the MDPH. Those in the "other" category can be closed due to a variety of chemical or physical hazards, such as riptides and poor visibility. More: Want to park for free at the beach this summer in MA? Boston Beer Company can help Another popular beach is closed for the summer, but not due to bacteria. According to an announcement from the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) on May 30, the main beach at Walden Pond in Concord will be closed for the season as the site undergoes construction. Red Cross Beach, another beach at Walden Pond, will still be open for the summer, but with no lifeguards present and limited parking availability. Over the summer, Walden Pond will be getting a new $6.1 million bathhouse, according to the DCR. The new single-story, 2,700 square-foot building will replace the current two-story bathhouse from 1947, which is not ADA compliant. This project will bring Walden Pond State Reservation's facility up to federal and state accessibility requirements. More: Popular MA beach to stay closed all summer due to construction. Here's where According to the MDPH website, beaches can only re-open when their bacteria levels are back within the safe range, so there is no set amount of time for a closure. The status of a closed beach can be checked on the website's water quality dashboard, which is updated at 9:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. daily. This article originally appeared on The Patriot Ledger: 14 Massachusetts beaches are closed this weekend. Here's where
Washington Post
3 days ago
- Washington Post
Supreme Court makes it easier to sue schools over disability accommodations
The Supreme Court on Thursday made it easier for students to prove schools are not making proper accommodations for their disabilities, ruling for the family of a Minnesota teen with a severe form of epilepsy who claimed a school district must do more to offer her instruction outside normal school hours. In a unanimous decision, the justices sided with the family of Ava Tharpe who argued that schoolchildren had to meet an unfairly high burden to show schools are falling short under the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), Rehabilitation Act and other disability statutes. The ruling means students' claims against schools are subject to the same standards that apply in other disability discrimination contexts. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote in an opinion that some lower courts were 'implicitly limit[ing] the ability of disabled schoolchildren to vindicate their independent ADA and Rehabilitation Act Rights, thereby making it more difficult to secure statutory remedies provided by Congress.' Ava's case began in 2015 when she transferred to a Minnesota school. She has a rare form of epilepsy that causes the most intense seizures in the morning, so she is unable to attend classes before noon. She also needs help walking and using the bathroom. Ava's old school accommodated her needs by giving her evening instruction, but Osseo Area Public Schools denied her request for similar accommodations. The schools offered shifting rationales, including that providing the services would set an unfavorable precedent for other school districts and that they did not want to teach Ava in her home. Between 2015 and 2018, Ava received only 4¼ hours of instruction per day as opposed to 6½ hours of instruction for a typical student. After the school district proposed additional cuts, Ava's parents filed a discrimination claim under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which provides federal funds to states in exchange for guarantees that disabled students receive a 'free appropriate education.' An administrative law judge found Osseo schools had violated IDEA, and federal courts affirmed the decision. The family then sued under the ADA and other provisions requesting a permanent injunction, but a district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit issued a summary judgment for the school district. The 8th Circuit found that a student must show 'something more than a mere failure to provide' a free appropriate education. For technical reasons, the court found the appropriate bar should be a heightened standard of 'bad faith and or gross misjudgement' — one not used in other types of disability discrimination cases. Other courts use an easier-to-prove requirement known as 'deliberate indifference.' 'It's wrong to impose any sort of uniquely stringent standard on children facing discrimination in schools,' Roman Martinez, an attorney for Ava's family, told the justices during oral arguments in April. Lisa Blatt, an attorney for Osseo schools, told the justices that the 'district cares deeply about Ava and gave her more service than any other student' but that changing the legal standard for proving a disability claim would weigh heavily on schools. She said schools would be exposed to more legal action and possibly severe sanctions under the ADA. 'Reversing … would expose 46,000 public schools to liability,' Blatt said. 'Every good-faith disagreement would risk liability or even the nuclear option — the loss of federal funding.' This is a developing story. It will be updated.
Newsweek
4 days ago
- Newsweek
Is This the Real Reason Southwest Changed Its Boarding Policy?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On a recent Southwest flight from Las Vegas to San Jose, so many passengers requested wheelchair pre-boarding that the plane took off late—only for most of those passengers to walk off the aircraft upon arrival, no wheelchair necessary. Frequent fliers call them "Jetway Jesuses" — apparently disabled passengers who take advantage of the perks of boarding via wheelchair, only to miraculously recover in the air and deplane with full use of their legs. Travel industry outlets have repeatedly called out what has become a common practice—part of a growing trend that is drawing increased scrutiny from airline analysts, truly disabled travelers and even law enforcement. Now, some regular Southwest fliers are wondering if this surge in last-minute wheelchair requests is one of the reasons the airline is changing its signature open-seating policy. Newsweek reached out to Southwest for comment but did not immediately hear back. A boarding agent (r) checks his computer as travelers wait to board a delayed Southwest Airlines flight inside Denver International Airport's Concourse C. A boarding agent (r) checks his computer as travelers wait to board a delayed Southwest Airlines flight inside Denver International Airport's Concourse C. Getty Images The Context For years, Southwest maintained an open policy where passengers could take any available seat upon boarding. That meant those who were first in line to board would have the best options available to them. The way to board early? Be a frequent flier, buy a higher-tier ticket — or use a wheelchair. Then last summer, Southwest stunned the travel industry by announcing it would move away from that well-known practice of not assigning seats—the biggest change in the company's 53-year history. The Dallas-based airline made the announcement in July 2024, following a tough year in which profits fell more than 46 percent compared to 2023. Southwest said the move was intended to "elevate the Customer experience, improve financial performance, and drive Shareholder value." What to Know Under federal law, airlines are not permitted to require medical proof of disability or inquire into the nature of a passenger's condition. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and subsequent aviation-specific guidelines are designed to ensure accessibility for all. But that openness, critics argue, has made the system vulnerable to exploitation. Reports of wheelchair pre-boarding followed by miraculous recoveries at arrival gates have become frequent enough to gain their own nickname in the industry. "We used to call them 'Miracle Flights,'" said a former Southwest flight attendant quoted in a Simple Flying article. "The worst were flights from LaGuardia to Palm Beach—40 wheelchairs on, nearly all of them walked off." The consequences are not just logistical, say industry insiders—they're ethical and financial. Passengers with genuine mobility limitations often find themselves waiting behind those using wheelchairs for convenience. In View from the Wing, travel pundit Gary Leff put it bluntly: "They don't all need a wheelchair. They've just cracked the code." Beyond perceptions of unfairness, the policy also affects scheduling. Wheelchair pre-boarding can add at least several extra minutes to the already tight boarding process—delays that cascade across an airline's daily operations. "A 10-minute delay can affect passengers with connections and delay downline flights operated by the same aircraft or with the same crew," Leff noted. Hey @SouthwestAir it is absurd that people have to pay extra to board as early birds so we can feel safe in your boarding process and then see 25 individuals in wheelchairs, boarding first for free and running and walking once we land. Stupidity or miracles? — Rubén Ortiz (@rubennortiz) December 12, 2020 The shift to assigned seating won't affect Southwest's legal obligation to accommodate passengers with disabilities. The airline will still offer wheelchair boarding and assistance. What changes is the outcome: those who pre-board will go directly to their assigned seats—not to the prime spots near the front of the plane. "This is going to eliminate a lot of the nonsense," Leff wrote. "Seat savers, the wheelchair scams, and the last-minute disputes over row space—it all goes away." Among other changes, Southwest has updated its checked bag policy. For the first time, passengers with a standard ticket will no longer get two free checked bags. Instead, the airline will begin charging fees for checked luggage. What Happens Next Southwest plans to eliminate its open seating model and shift to assigned seating starting next year. In a press release, the airline said it would begin selling tickets with seat assignments in late 2025.
