Corporate affairs ministry's warning—related-party violations attract penalties
New Delhi: The ministry of corporate affairs has reminded business promoters of the penalties for not following an arms-length approach in transactions involving company directors, executives, relatives and firms linked to such persons.
Emphasising the importance of adhering to guidelines covering related-party transactions to ensure transparency, fairness, and long-term sustainability of businesses, the ministry said such deals are prone to conflicts of interest.
The ministry's reminder comes amid ongoing proceedings against executives of Gensol Engineering Ltd for alleged diversion of funds to various related parties in violation of rules under the Companies Act.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) last week allowed the Central government to attach the bank accounts and lockers of Gensol Engineering, its 10 subsidiaries, and several individuals after investigations by multiple agencies and regulators revealed systemic fraud, Mint reported on 28 May.
The ministry stated in its newsletter for April released over the weekend that the company law prescribes penalties for directors or employees who violate provisions regarding related-party transactions.
'In a listed company, they could face a penalty of ₹ 25 lakh. For other companies, penalty is of ₹ 5 lakh,' the ministry said.
As per the Companies Act, the consent of a company's board of directors is required for any contract or arrangement with a related party for any sale or purchase of goods and property, leasing of property, availing of services, or appointing agents for such transactions. Also, subscribing to the shares of a related-party entity requires board approval.
However, related-party transactions that happen in the ordinary course of business and are on an arms-length basis do not need board approval, as per law.
Related-party transactions remain in the focus of regulatory authorities because erring businesses and promoters tend to use this route to divert funds raised for specific purposes to privately held entities linked to or controlled by them. Such illicit fund transfers short-circuit the normal functioning of a company.
Given the role of related-party transactions in corporate scandals, audit watchdog National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) keeps special focus on how religiously statutory auditors of a company check such transactions before giving an opinion on the affairs of the company.
The ministry's newsletter stated that the legal provisions in the Companies Act on related-party transactions seek to ensure such deals do not undermine investor confidence or the integrity of the financial system.
'Ultimately, these provisions reflect the growing importance of robust governance practices that align with global best practices, contributing to the long-term sustainability and growth of companies in India,' the ministry said in its newsletter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 hours ago
- Business Standard
Aakash Educational moves NCLT to implead EY in edtech firm Byju's dispute
The dispute between Aakash Educational Services (AESL) and edtech firm Byju's has escalated, with Aakash filing a sharply worded petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Bengaluru, alleging conflict of interest and professional misconduct by global consulting firm Ernst & Young (EY), according to court filings reviewed by Business Standard. In an impleadment application filed on June 1, AESL has urged the tribunal to either dismiss the company petition filed by Byju's under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, alleging oppression and mismanagement, or make EY LLP and its partner Ajay Shah respondents in the case. AESL alleges that EY, which has been involved in a wide range of strategic, financial, and compliance-related advisory services for the company, is now acting against it through Shailendra Ajmera, the Resolution Professional (RP) of Byju's, who is also a senior EY functionary. 'This is a classic case of conflict of interest and abuse of the process,' said the application. 'The very transactions now being challenged in the petition — such as the issuance and conversion of non-convertible debentures (NCDs), equity restructuring, and internal governance matters — were structured and overseen by EY,' the application added. According to the filing, EY advised on the valuation and structuring of NCDs issued to Davidson Kempner. It also advised on tax and regulatory aspects of equity conversion to the Manipal group. Additionally, EY was involved in internal board-level decisions and corporate strategy at AESL as recently as October 2024. AESL is showcasing internal emails and advisory documents, evidencing EY's alleged involvement in financial forecasting, liquidity management, and decision-making processes. 'The RP has suppressed material facts, has no locus standi to file this petition under the Companies Act, and is acting in excess of his powers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC),' AESL said in the filing. AESL has also warned that it may escalate the matter to regulators, including the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, alleging that Ajmera's position as RP is 'severely compromised'. The move comes just days after the RP wrote to the AESL board, seeking clarity on the independence and nomination status of its directors, signalling a broader governance challenge in the ongoing tussle. What's at stake The fight over Aakash, which Byju's acquired in a $1 billion deal in 2021, has become a flashpoint in the edtech giant's ongoing financial and legal troubles. The Manipal group, which took over a significant stake by converting debt into equity, now controls the board of AESL. With this filing, AESL is preparing for a full-blown legal and reputational offensive, challenging both the admissibility of Byju's petition and the professional neutrality of the advisers involved. Both EY and the RP are yet to file a formal reply to the impleadment request. 'The matter is sub judice and, therefore, we cannot offer any further comment at this time. However, we refute the allegations and will defend any such legal action vigorously,' an EY spokesperson told Business Standard on Tuesday.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 hours ago
- Business Standard
Aakash seeks to implead EY in Byju's case, cites conflict, misconduct
The dispute between Aakash Educational Services Ltd (AESL) and edtech firm Byju's has escalated, with Aakash filing a sharply worded petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Bengaluru, alleging conflict of interest and professional misconduct by global consulting firm Ernst & Young (EY), according to court filings reviewed by Business Standard. In an impleadment application filed on 1 June, AESL has asked the tribunal to either dismiss the company petition filed by Byju's—under sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, alleging oppression and mismanagement—or make EY LLP and its partner Ajay Shah respondents to the case. AESL alleges that EY, which has been involved in a wide range of strategic, financial and compliance-related advisory services for the company, is now acting against it through Shailendra Ajmera, the Resolution Professional (RP) of Byju's, who is also a senior EY functionary. 'This is a classic case of conflict of interest and abuse of process,' said the application. 'The very transactions now being challenged in the petition—such as the issuance and conversion of non-convertible debentures (NCDs), equity restructuring and internal governance matters—were structured and overseen by EY.' According to the filing, EY advised on the valuation and structuring of NCDs issued to Davidson Kempner. It also advised on tax and regulatory aspects of equity conversion to the Manipal Group. Additionally, EY was involved in internal board-level decisions and corporate strategy at AESL as recently as October 2024. 'The RP has suppressed material facts, has no locus standi to file this petition under the Companies Act, and is acting in excess of his powers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,' AESL said in the filing. AESL has also warned that it may escalate the matter to regulators, including the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, alleging that Ajmera's position as RP is 'severely compromised'. The move comes just days after the RP wrote to the AESL board seeking clarity on the independence and nomination status of its directors, signalling a broader governance challenge in the ongoing tussle. What's at stake The fight over Aakash, which Byju's acquired in a $1 billion deal in 2021, has become a flashpoint in the edtech giant's ongoing financial and legal troubles. Manipal Group, which took over a significant stake by converting debt into equity, now controls the board of AESL. With this filing, AESL is preparing for a full-blown legal and reputational offensive—challenging both the admissibility of Byju's petition and the professional neutrality of the advisers involved. Both EY and the Resolution Professional are yet to file a formal reply to the impleadment request. "The matter is sub-judice, and therefore we cannot offer any further comment at this time. However, we refute the allegations and will defend any such legal action vigorously," an EY spokesperson told Business Standard on Tuesday.
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Aakash moves NCLT to implead E&Y in oppression, mismanagement case filed by Byju's
Aakash Educational Services has filed a plea in the insolvency tribunal NCLT, seeking the dismissal of a petition submitted by edtech firm Byju's and to implead consultancy firm E&Y, along with its partner Ajay Shah. In its application, Aakash Educational Services has sought dismissal of the petition filed by Think and Learn , owner of Byju's, on the grounds of vexatious litigation couched as an oppression and mismanagement litigation, which is not maintainable in the law. Aakash Educational Services (AESL) submitted that presence of E&Y is "imperative" in the matter, as it was not only privy but the architect of several key financial and strategic decisions taken by it. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Think and Learn has filed a Company Petition before the Bengaluru Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) against AESL, alleging "oppression and mismanagement" in the affairs of the company under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013. Think and Learn is a minority shareholder of Aakash Educational Services, which operates 316 centres throughout the country. Live Events In the company application, AESL has requested to implead and make E&Y and its partner Ajay Shah a respondent alleging "the records indicate that he helped and played a material and consistent role in advising and facilitating various parties whose interests were privileged and exclusive in a material sense". Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories "The proposed Twenty-sixth Respondent (Ajay Shah) is not only privy but the architect of several key financial and strategic decisions of the Applicant during the periods relevant to the Company Petition," it said. Shah and the team of E&Y (which is respondent no 27) always had access to all privileged and confidential information and were part of the business and strategy discussions of the Applicant Company. "In any event, since all team members, including Shah, represented E&Y, the said Respondent is being impleaded," AESL submitted, adding that "for reasons of structural and professional accountability, the presence of E&Y is imperative". AESL also alleged the Resolution Professional of Byju's, which is currently going through an insolvency resolution process, "belongs to the self-same organisation and has made no disclosure to the Tribunal about his knowledge or organisational association either in the Company Petition or before the Tribunal at the time of accepting the appointment". "This serious matter for the administration of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) requires thoughtful attention by the Tribunal," AESL submitted. It has requested the NCLT to direct the proposed respondents to file an affidavit on oath disclosing details of all transactions that Ernst & Young LLP has been involved in since 2021 till date, in relation to all related parties, including Think and Learn and GLAS Trust Company LLC. The broader legal fight centres around the governance and control of AESL, following the failed acquisition by Byju's -- which has been reeling under charges of mismanagement, and alleged misuse of company funds. Meanwhile, CrestLaw Partners, acting on behalf of Manipal Group (which holds significant stake in AESL), also approached EY, flagging the firm's involvement in advising the Manipal Group in material matters, involving tax and regulatory implications, accounting treatment among others, pertaining to AESL.
