Pro-Trump Christian musician to play Alberta legislature grounds
A pro-Trump and Christian singer whose events on his east coast Canadian tour have had to be moved to alternate venues after being cancelled is slated to play at the Alberta legislature grounds in August.
Article content
U.S. musician Sean Feucht has faced protests and cancellations this week on the first leg of his cross-country tour which is slated to stop on Aug. 22 in Edmonton for a performance at the grounds' south bandshell.
Article content
Article content
Article content
A spokesperson for Alberta Infrastructure said in a statement tour organizers had submitted an incomplete event permit application for the event.
Article content
Article content
'We are taking steps to help organizers submit a complete application,' it reads, noting the event must comply with 'security protocols, public safety, and venue guidelines.'
Article content
The statement did not address questions about if the show would go ahead or the possible need for heightened security.
Article content
The guidelines for use of the Alberta Legislature Grounds state applications must be submitted four weeks in advance, with applicants mandated to have at least $2 million in liability insurance, a security plan, and proof of permits and licences, among other requirements.
Article content
Feucht describes himself as a musician, missionary, author and activist, and has drawn opposition for his affinity for U.S. President Donald Trump and the Make America Great Again Movement as well as his views on abortion, gender, and the LGBT community.
Article content
Article content
He was scheduled to play at the York Redoubt National Historic Site in Halifax last Wednesday but Parks Canada revoked the event's permit, citing 'evolving safety and security considerations' amid potential protests and following consultation with police.
Article content
The event later went ahead when a local farmer opened his field for the singer and his audience.
Article content
Since then, events in Charlottetown, Fredericton, Quebec City, Moncton, and Gatineau, Que. have been cancelled with organizers citing security concerns, permitting issues, or local codes of conduct.
Article content
On social media, Feucht said his shows went on after alternate venues were found.
Article content
'Venues have now been replaced and these cities will hear from lawyers soon,' he posted late Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
Braid: Separatism debate heats up as referendum question goes to court
Elections Alberta is taking the separatists to court. It could be some show. Article content The elections office asks Court of King's Bench to decide whether a referendum question proposed by separatists is unconstitutional. Article content Article content Article content Whatever happens in court, the separatist drive for a referendum question is stalled for some time. Article content Some separatists are claiming the system is rigged against them, because any King's Bench judge who hears the case will be a federal appointee. Article content Another problem awaits. A related question has already been approved by Elections Alberta, the independent body established by the legislature. Article content Under the law, there can't be two questions on the same general subject. Article content Article content The pro-Canada leader of this campaign is former PC Deputy Premier Thomas Lukaszuk. Article content He's now branded 'Tommy the Commie' by separatists who seem deeply annoyed that he got the jump on them. Article content He sure did. Lukaszuk's question was approved just before Canada Day. That kicked off a 30-day period for organizing that ends Wednesday. Article content After that, the group can start collecting official signatures to trigger a provincewide vote. Article content Lukaszuk's question was approved while a previous law was in effect. It requires him to gather 300,000 names, all fully checked and approved, in only 90 days. Article content Article content Bizarrely, after Lukaszuk's question was allowed, the UCP proclaimed legislation that lowers the bar to 177,000 signatures over 120 days. Article content That's a much more reasonable goal. But Lukaszuk may be stuck with the old one.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Union Pacific to buy Norfolk Southern for $85 billion
Union Pacific UNP-N said on Tuesday it would buy smaller rival Norfolk Southern NSC-N in an $85 billion deal to create the nation's first coast-to-coast freight rail operator and reshape the movement of goods from grains to autos across the country. If approved, the deal would be the largest-ever buyout in the sector and combine Union Pacific's stronghold in the western two-thirds of the U.S. with Norfolk's 19,500 mile network that primarily spans 22 eastern states. The two railroads are expected to have a combined enterprise value of $250 billion and would unlock about $2.75 billion in annualized synergies, the companies said. The companies said on Thursday they were in advanced discussion for a possible merger. The deal will face lengthy regulatory scrutiny amid union concerns over potential rate increases, service disruptions and job losses. The 1996 merger of Union Pacific and Southern Pacific had temporarily led to severe congestion and delays across the Southwest. The deal reflects a shift in antitrust enforcement under U.S. President Donald Trump's administration. Executive orders aimed at removing barriers to consolidation have opened the door to mergers that were previously considered unlikely. Surface Transportation Board Chairman Patrick Fuchs, appointed in January, has advocated for faster preliminary reviews and a more flexible approach to merger conditions. Even under an expedited process, the review could take from 19 to 22 months, according to a person involved in the discussions. Major railroad unions have long opposed consolidation, arguing that such mergers threaten jobs and risk disrupting rail service. 'We will weigh in with the STB (regulator) and with the Trump administration in every way possible,' said Jeremy Ferguson, president of the SMART-TD union's transport division, after the two companies said they were in advanced talks last week. 'This merger is not good for labor, the rail shipper/customer or the public at large,' he said. The SMART-TD union's transport division is North America's largest railroad operating union with more than 1,800 railroad yardmasters. The North American rail industry has been grappling with volatile freight volumes, rising labor and fuel costs, and growing pressure from shippers over service reliability, factors that could further complicate the merger. 7-Eleven owner staves off Canadian takeover, but struggles remain as shares fall The proposed deal had also prompted competitors BNSF, owned by Berkshire Hathaway, and CSX CSX-Q, to explore merger options, people familiar with the matter said. Agents at the STB are already conducting preparatory work, anticipating they could soon receive not just one, but two megamerger proposals, a person close to the discussions told Reuters on Thursday. If both mergers are approved, the number of Class I railroads in North America would shrink to four from six, consolidating major freight routes and boosting pricing power for the industry. The last major deal in the industry was the $31 billion merger of Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern, which created the first and only single line rail network connecting Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. That deal, finalized in 2023, faced heavy regulatory resistance over fears it would curb competition, cut jobs and disrupt service, but it was ultimately approved. Union Pacific is valued at nearly $136 billion, while Norfolk Southern has a market capitalization of about $65 billion, according to data from LSEG.
an hour ago
How U.S. Christian musician Sean Feucht put freedom of expression to the test in Canada
Had you heard of Sean Feucht before this month? If you hadn't, you likely have now. The U.S.-based Christian musician wasn't exactly a household name or selling out the biggest concert venues in this country, but his recent concert tour in Eastern and Central Canada has put him in the spotlight in the past couple of weeks, as permits for some of his shows have been revoked amid an outcry that his controversial views are being given a platform in public spaces. The 41-year-old preacher and activist has raised the ire of people for his support of U.S. President Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again, or MAGA, movement, and over comments he's made about abortion, critical race theory, 2SLGBTQ+ rights and gender diversity. MAGA musician permit revocations spark public space debate (new window) His supporters, including Canadian politicians like Conservative MPs Michael Barrett (new window) and Andrew Lawton (new window) , have decried what they see as an attack on free speech, conservative viewpoints and religion. While some freedom of expression experts do not agree with Feucht's views in any way, they do see the efforts to cancel his concerts — especially those scheduled to be held in public spaces — as problematic and indicative of how censorship is being used as a means of tackling social issues rather than debating them. Because freedom of expression is so fundamental in a democratic society, we restrict it only in the most extreme cases, said James Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University. WATCH | Multiple permits for Sean Feucht's concert tour denied or revoked: Safety or censorship? Over the course of the past week, Feucht saw permits revoked for his concerts in Halifax (new window) , Charlottetown (new window) , Moncton, N.B. (new window) , Quebec City (new window) , Gatineau, Que. (new window) , and Vaughan, Ont. (new window) — all of which were to be held at public sites. The City of Montreal (new window) attempted to halt his Friday night performance at a church, but it went ahead as scheduled. The church, however, is now facing a $2,500 fine for hosting the event without a permit. Feucht is scheduled to tour several cities in Western Canada late next month, including Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Edmonton, Kelowna, B.C., and Abbotsford, B.C. Turk said that public spaces are different than private venues, whose owners can choose who they do and don't host without violating the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There are a very limited number of reasons why municipal, provincial or federal governments could justify cancelling an event like this, he said, and there would need to be reasonable grounds to believe that the person is going to engage in illegal activity in that space. In most of the cases, officials cited safety and security concerns and not the content of Feucht's shows or his past comments. Enlarge image (new window) A performance by Feucht took place in a church in Montreal on Friday. The City of Montreal attempted to halt his performance, but it went ahead as scheduled. The church is now facing a $2,500 fine for hosting the event without a permit. Photo: Radio-Canada / Violette Cantin But Turk said he doesn't believe Feucht's performance would have created such a threatening situation that local police forces wouldn't be adequate to handle it. I fear that, as in many cases, the use of security as an excuse is just that — an excuse to otherwise to deny what's a fundamental right of freedom of expression in this country, he said. If there was a situation in which tempers could flare if critics or protesters tried to disrupt one of Feucht's shows, government agencies responsible for pubic spaces have an obligation to provide the resources to ensure safety and order, said Stephen Newman, a professor emeritus in the politics department at York University in Toronto. But in an email to CBC News on Monday, he wrote that acting on unspecified concerns and preventing Feucht's concerts from taking place in response to public outcry is akin to what is known as a heckler's veto — in which groups or individuals suppress or shut down (new window) another's speech by means of disruption, intimidation or even violence. LISTEN | Discussing why Quebec City cancelled Sean Feucht's performance (new window) Capitalizing on controversy Feucht may have fewer gigs on his tour schedule, but he just gained a wealth of free publicity, said Dax D'Orazio, a post-doctoral fellow in the University of Guelph's political science department who researches freedom of expression in Canada. If you generally disagree with someone, if you think their expression is harmful, you have to think really long and hard about what the best way to counteract that in society is, he said. Sometimes calling for the cancellation of events Is not always the most strategic way to go about things. Enlarge image (new window) People line up outside a church in the west end of Toronto on Sunday to see Feucht. Hundreds of people attended his show. Photo: CBC D'Orazio said performers like Feucht can earn symbolic capital in public discourse if they can claim they're a victim. Matthew Taylor, a senior Christian scholar at the Institute for Islamic, Christian and Jewish Studies in Baltimore who has written about Feucht, shared that sentiment. He's been doing these provocative, in your face, intentionally trying to draw a response from local officials, even trying to get barred or banned, and then he presents that as persecution, that he is the victim of anti-Christian bias, he told CBC News last week. Feucht, for his part, celebrated that he and his followers were triumphant over attempts to scuttle the performances, having rebooked some to other venues or properties. The plan of the enemy has backfired BIG TIME up here!! Feucht wrote in a Facebook post (new window) on Thursday. Just like the book of Acts, what the activists tried to stop has now gone viral — IT BACKFIRED!! They are having to report on worship and the preaching of the gospel every night! We did not seek this controversy — yet God will use it for His glory!, he said in a separate post (new window) that same day, noting it was the third year in a row of bringing his "Let Us Worship" movement to Canada. WATCH | Feucht's show goes on after permit revoked for national historic site near Halifax: 'Price of a democracy' Both Turk and D'Orazio said they see a bad precedent being set by public agencies revoking permits for a divisive figure like Feucht. There could end up being a tit-for-tat situation, D'Orazio said, in which people or groups holding opposing views can target one another using Feucht as an example of public agencies shutting down events just because people on one side are rallying against the other. It doesn't matter if people view Feucht as spreading hate, Turk said, because it's unlikely anything he says would rise to the level of being considered hate speech in the eyes of Canada's justice system. Turk said in the case of someone crossing that line, they should indeed be prevented from having a platform. But beyond that, he said, freedom of expression must be protected for everyone equally — regardless of which views we hold. The price of a democracy is we're always exposed to divergent views, some of which we love, some of which we hate. Nick Logan (new window) · CBC News · Senior Writer Nick Logan is a senior writer with CBC based in Vancouver. He is a multi-platform reporter and producer, with a particular focus on international news. You can reach out to him at With files from Anjuli Patil
