EU's main political group on collision course with Germany over budget increase demands
BRUSSELS, June 19 (Reuters) - The European Union's next long-term budget must be bigger than the current one, the main political group in the European Parliament said, putting itself on a collision course with the biggest contributor Germany, which does not want any increase.
The centre-right European People's Party, with 188 deputies in the 720-seat parliament, is the EU's biggest political grouping and its support will be crucial for a deal on the EU's 2028-2034 budget, which pays for joint EU policies.
For decades, the budget, called the Multiannual Financial Framework, has been around 1% of EU gross national income, now about 1.2 trillion euros ($1.38 trillion) over seven years.
"New priorities require new own resources to cover both debt repayments and the Union's increasing spending needs. We cannot do more with less," said Siegfried Muresan, who is the vice-chairman of the party and a negotiator for the next EU budget.
The EU budget pays to equalise standards of living across the 27-nation bloc, support farmers, research and development, innovation, border management and climate action.
But governments also want it to also help with security and defence and to strengthen Europe's industrial base to compete more effectively with China and the United States in leadership in clean and digital technologies.
"The EU budget has a key role in making Europe safer. We need a more ambitious allocation for security and defence. Therefore, a moderate, limited increase of the budget is unavoidable," Muresan said.
Germany, the budget's biggest net contributor, does not want to pay more into the common European pot. "There is no basis for increasing the ... (EU budget) volume relative to Gross National Income," a German document spelling out Berlin's position showed.
Apart from national contributions, which make up the bulk of EU budget revenues, it also gets money from "own resources" - revenues from a share of the Value Added Tax collected by governments, from tariffs and national contributions based on the amount of non-recycled plastic packaging waste generated by a member state.
There is discussion on expanding such dedicated sources of revenue to boost EU income, especially as a way to repay the hundreds of billions of euros the EU jointly borrowed to restart its economy after the COVID pandemic. Germany has left the door open to increasing EU budget revenues in this way.
"The Federal Government will ... constructively examine the Commission's proposals in this regard, so that ... repayments will not have to be made at the expense of the regular EU budget," the German government paper said.
The European People's Party also pushed back at ideas that the next EU budget should link disbursements to an EU country reaching reform milestones and targets, as is the case in the EU post-COVID Recovery Fund.
"Local and regional authorities and other beneficiaries cannot be penalised or held accountable for reforms that are not implemented at the national level," the Party said in a statement.
The Party also said it did not want further centralisation of spending plans at government level. "Regional and local authorities know better the needs and specificities on the ground."
($1 = 0.8714 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
39 minutes ago
- Times
Bank of England holds steady as divisions emerge over rates
The Bank of England missed the party on Thursday when it announced that interest rates would hold steady at 4.25 per cent. On a day littered with monetary policy announcements across Europe, it was the only major central bank to sit tight. Switzerland's central bank cut rates by a quarter point. Sweden's did the same, as did Norway's. In the UK, the monetary policy committee was not for turning and stuck to the script: markets expected rates to be held and the Bank of England duly delivered. However, that the committee voted 6-3 in favour of leaving rates unchanged did somewhat upset the apple cart. Analysts projected a 7-2 vote split. Dave Ramsden, a deputy governor, broke from the centre ground on the MPC and voted alongside Swati Dhingra and Alan Taylor — external committee members who have repeatedly voted for frequent and larger cuts — for a 0.25 percentage point reduction.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Spain rejects Trump's Nato spending demands ahead of summit
Spain has rejected Donald Trump's 'unreasonable' demand that Nato members increase defence spending, throwing plans for a summit of alliance leaders into disarray. Next week's meeting in the Hague has been carefully designed to convince the US president to continue supporting Europe's defence. However, the refusal by Pedro Sánchez, the prime minister of Spain, to commit to a new defence spending target of 5 per cent of GDP has jeopardised the carefully choreographed diplomacy. Mr Trump has threatened to withdraw US protection from allies which don't commit to the new target, which has been raised from 2 per cent amid fears over Russian aggression. Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, has broad support for an increase in military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP by 2030 and 1.5 per cent of investment in defence-adjacent areas such as transport infrastructure and cyber security. Mr Sánchez asked for Spain to be exempt from any spending target agreed next week or that the goal be made optional, even though Madrid has failed to meet even the original 2 per cent target. The letter from Europe's most influential Left-wing leader is a blow for Mr Rutte and could embolden the few other members reluctant to sign up to the 5 per cent. Germany and Poland are among the countries supporting the goal. Britain has committed to hit 2.5 per cent by 2027 but Sir Keir Starmer does not think the economy is strong enough to go above three per cent at this stage. In his letter, Mr Sánchez said hitting the target would only be possible by raising taxes on the middle class and cutting public services. The socialist premier said a 'rushed' effort to hit 5 per cent would damage economic growth and could force his government to slash net zero and development aid budgets. 'The empirical reality is that, for Spain, as for other Nato countries, reaching 5 per cent defence spending will be impossible unless it comes at the cost of increasing taxes on the middle class, cutting public services and social benefits for their citizens,' he wrote. He added that diverting money from education, technology and healthcare would cost the Spanish economy, as well as increase debt and inflation. In 2024, Spain spent just 1.28 per cent of GDP on defence, which has drawn criticism from the US president. Mr Sánchez claimed Spain was committed to the 2 per cent target but wanted the scope widened to include the fight against climate change and illegal migration. He has announced more than €10 billion of fresh defence investment to hit the 2 per cent target this year. But he faces a balancing act of aligning with Nato allies and cajoling his junior coalition partner, the far-Left alliance Sumar, which is hostile to increasing military spending. Mr Sánchez has taken swipes at Mr Trump and his political allies such as Javier Milei, the president of Argentina. Spain's formal recognition of Palestine and criticism of Israel will have won it no favours with the White House and neither will its liberal transgender rights laws. Mr Trump will be handed a one-page communiqué to sign off at the Nato leaders' summit in a concession to his short attention span and as part of an effort to head off a spending row between Europe and the US. Nato has cut back the 32-leader strong summit to just one working session of two and a half hours dedicated to the spending target. Strategic shortening of summit The meeting was originally meant to last three days, but shortening it will prevent Mr Trump from leaving early, as he did at the G7 meeting in Canada this week. Mr Trump's departure, ostensibly to respond to Israel's strikes on Iran, meant he missed talks with Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president. Sources have claimed he left because he was angered Emmanuel Macron, the French president, had visited Greenland on his way to Canada. Mr Trump has said he wants to buy the Arctic Island, but Mr Macron declared that the Danish autonomous territory was 'not for sale'. Mr Zelensky has been invited to a dinner of Nato leaders on Tuesday night hosted by the King and Queen of the Netherlands, but will not take part in the summit. The US has ruled out future Nato membership for Ukraine. Russia and Ukraine said on Thursday that they had completed another exchange of captured soldiers, part of a deal reached earlier in June at peace talks in Istanbul. 'Our people are returning home from Russian captivity,' Mr Zelensky said on social media. Fighting between Iran and Israel could deflect global attention from the Russian invasion of Ukraine and even bolster the Kremlin's war effort, Ukrainian officials say. The conflict has pushed up the price of oil – a key revenue stream funding Russia's invasion. However, Kyiv has welcomed Israeli attacks on Iran, which has directly aided and provided weapons to Moscow for its own strikes on Ukraine.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Eurocrats shut down Labour's hopes of ECHR reform
The head of the organisation overseeing the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) has slapped down Labour's calls for reform. Just a day after Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, called for the ECHR to 'evolve' or lose public trust, Alain Berset, the secretary general of the Council of Europe, declared that he was 'not calling for reform' of the convention. Mr Berset appeared to distance himself from previous comments that he made no more than two weeks ago when he suggested that the ECHR must adapt in face of a growing backlash over migration, with 'no taboo' on rewriting its rules. The future of the ECHR – and the UK's application and disapplication of it – is one of the key dividing lines between the UK political parties. Nigel Farage's Reform wants out; Kemi Badenoch has suggested it is likely the UK will quit without reform of the ECHR; and Labour is seeking reform per se while drawing up new rules to curb judges' use of it in immigration cases. It has been brought to the fore by The Telegraph's exposure of dozens of cases where foreign criminals and illegal migrants have avoided deportation by claiming their ECHR rights would be breached if they were removed. In an interview with Politico, the political website, Mr Berset appeared to put himself at odds with all three main parties. He said: 'I am not calling for reform of the European Convention on Human Rights, nor do I support any effort that would weaken it. 'It should never be used as a scapegoat in domestic political debates. When states face complex challenges, the answer is not to dismantle the legal guardrails they themselves helped build. 'The proper place for dialogue is through our institutions, not through pressure on the European Court of Human Rights or attempts to bypass the system.' 'Meaningful reform is impossible' Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said Mr Beset's comments 'proved... meaningful reform is impossible'. He added: 'This proves what has long been clear: meaningful reform of the ECHR is impossible. Labour's fake plans to reform it is a ruse to trap us in the convention for decades more while our border crisis worsens. Starmer doesn't care enough about protecting the British public to leave.' Meanwhile, Ms Mahmood has warned the ECHR was 'fraying' public confidence in the rule of law because it is out of step with common sense. In a speech at the Council of Europe on Wednesday, she said public trust in the court was 'eroding' because it 'too often protects those who break the rules, rather than those who follow them'. UK ministers are proposing to raise the threshold to make it harder for judges to grant the right to remain based on article 8 of the ECHR, which protects the right to a family life, and article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. There is not just pressure from the UK. Last month, nine EU leaders wrote to the Council of Europe warning that the ECHR was preventing them from deporting foreign criminals. They said European judges were interpreting the ECHR so widely that the 'wrong people' were being protected. This was placing 'too many limitations' on their governments' abilities to deport 'serious violent' offenders and drug dealers. They warned that the ECHR was threatening the safety of citizens because the way it was being interpreted prevented governments from tracking foreign criminals they could not deport. The nine – including Donald Tusk, the former president of the European Council and now the Polish prime minister, and the Italian premier Giorgia Meloni – said the ECHR was also undermining efforts to counter Russia's weaponising of migrants against the EU bloc.
