
Streeting: We are doing everything we can to minimise patient harm during strike
The Health Secretary condemned the strike as 'reckless' and said the Government would not allow the BMA to 'hold the country to ransom'.
Asked about the risk of patient harm during a visit to NHS England HQ in London, he told the PA news agency on Friday: 'I'm really proud of the way that NHS leaders and frontline staff have prepared and mobilised to minimise the disruption and minimise the risk of harm to patients.
'We've seen an extraordinary response, including people cancelling their leave, turning up for work, and resident doctors themselves ignoring their union to be there for patients. I'm extremely grateful to all of them.
'What I can't do today is guarantee that there will be no disruption and that there is no risk of harm to patients.
'We are doing everything we can to minimise it, but the risk is there, and that is why the BMA's action is so irresponsible.
'They had a 28.9% pay award from this Government in our first year, there was also an offer to work with them on other things that affect resident doctors – working lives – and that's why I think this is such reckless action.
'This Government will not allow the BMA to hold the country to ransom, and we will continue to make progress on NHS improvement, as we've done in our first year.'
Asked about next steps and the continued threat of doctor strikes, given the BMA has a six-month mandate to call more industrial action, Mr Streeting said: 'When the BMA asks, 'what's the difference between a Labour government and a Conservative government?', I would say a 28.9% pay rise and a willingness to work together to improve the working conditions and lives of doctors.
Resident doctors are beginning a five-day strike (James Manning/PA)
'That is why the public and other NHS staff cannot understand why the BMA have chosen to embark on this totally unnecessary, reckless strike action.'
It comes as NHS chief executive Sir Jim Mackey told broadcasters on Friday about his different approach to managing the strike, including keeping as much pre-planned care going as possible rather than just focusing on emergency care.
'So the difference this time is the NHS has put a huge effort in to try and get back on its feet,' he said at NHS England HQ in London.
'As everybody's been aware, we've had a really tough period, and you really feel colleagues on the ground, local clinical leaders, clinical operational colleagues etc, really pulling together to try and get the NHS back on its feet.
'And we also learned from the last few rounds of industrial action that harm to patients and disruption to patients was much broader than the original definitions. So we've decided to say it needs to be a broader definition. We can't just focus on that small subset of care.
'Colleagues in the service have tried to keep as much going as humanly possible as well, and the early signs are that that's been achieved so far, but it is early doors.
'In the end, capacity will have to be constrained by the numbers of people we've actually got who do just turn up for work, and what that means in terms of safe provision, because the thing that colleagues won't compromise is safety in the actual delivery. But it does look like people have really heard that.
'They're really pulling together to maximise the range of services possible.'
Asked about further strikes, he said: 'It is possible. I would hope not. I would hope after this, we'll be able to get people in a room and resolve the issue.
'But if we are in this with a six month mandate, we could be doing this once a month for the next next six months, but we've got to organise ourselves accordingly.'
The Prime Minister has said the strikes will 'cause real damage' (PA)
Asked why he was not willing to bump pay from what the BMA calculates is £18 an hour to £22 per hour, Mr Streeting told broadcasters: 'I think the public can see, and other NHS staff can see the willingness this Government showed from day one coming into office to try and deal with what had been over a decade of failure on behalf of the previous government, working with resident doctors to improve their pay and to improve the NHS.
'That's why resident doctors had a 28.9% pay award, and that's why the disruption they are inflicting on the country is so unnecessary and so irresponsible.'
Mr Streeting said 'we know there'll be real challenges over the next five days'.
He added that patients, particularly those who end up waiting a long time for care due to strikes, 'do come to harm, and however much the BMA try and sugarcoat it, what they are fundamentally doing today is forgetting the three words that should be at the forefront of every doctor's minds every day, which is, 'do no harm'.'
On whether strikes are going to become the 'new normal', he added: 'As I've said before, the BMA have had a 28.9% pay award from this Government, and we were willing to go further to help on some of the working conditions that doctors face.
'That offer of joint working, that partnership approach, that hasn't gone away, but it does take two to tango, and I hope that the BMA will reflect very carefully on the disruption they are inflicting on patients, the pressures they're putting on their colleagues, and the circumstances in which they are doing so – a 28.9% pay rise and a government that was willing to work with them.
'Those are not grounds for strike action.'
It comes after Sir Keir Starmer made a last-minute appeal to resident doctors, saying the strikes would 'cause real damage'.
He added: 'Most people do not support these strikes. They know they will cause real damage…
'These strikes threaten to turn back the clock on progress we have made in rebuilding the NHS over the last year, choking off the recovery.'
The BMA has argued that real-terms pay has fallen by around 20% since 2008, and is pushing for full 'pay restoration'.
The union took out national newspaper adverts on Friday, saying it wanted to 'make clear that while a newly qualified doctor's assistant is taking home over £24 per hour, a newly qualified doctor with years of medical school experience is on just £18.62 per hour'.
BMA council chairman Dr Tom Dolphin told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the union had been expecting more pay for doctors.
He said: 'Where we were last year when we started the pay campaign, we were down a third on our pay compared to 2008.
'So you've got last year's pay offer which did indeed move us towards (pay restoration), but Wes Streeting himself said that pay restoration is a journey, not an event, implying that there would be further pay restoration to come, and we were expecting our pay to be restored in full – that's our campaign's goal.
'We got part way there, but then that came to a halt this year – we've only had an offer that brings us up, just to catch up with inflation.'
Asked what it would take for doctors to go back to work, he said the BMA needed to see 'a clear, guaranteed pathway' to pay restoration.
He added that 'it's very disappointing to see a Labour Government taking such a hard line against trade unions'.
Elsewhere, the Nottingham City Hospital – where Dr Melissa Ryan, co-chairwoman of the BMA's resident doctors' committee works in paediatrics – reached an agreement with the BMA to exempt one doctor from the strike to work on the neonatal intensive care unit.
Speaking from a London picket line, Dr Ryan told The Times: 'I do know that we've granted a derogation already. It is actually at my work, with the babies on one of the neonatal units I work on. That is because it is an intensive care unit for babies.
'We don't have enough senior staff to cover the doctors that aren't there, the residents. And actually, it is important to us that those very sick babies get a lot of care. So we have granted a resident doctor to go back.'
A derogation was agreed for one doctor in the emergency department and another doctor in the ISGM at the Northern General Hospital.
'We advise resident doctors to return to work if contacted by the Trust to staff these shifts tonight,' the BMA said in an X post on Friday evening.
The BMA said it had also agreed a derogation for two anaesthetists to work at University Hospital Lewisham on Saturday to ensure patient safety.
Louise Stead, group chief executive of Ashford and St Peter's and Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trusts, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that around 500 appointments were being rescheduled 'but we are continuing to do about 96% of the work we've had planned'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Plans announced to crack down on cosmetic procedure ‘cowboys'
Ministers have announced plans to cut down on 'cowboy' cosmetic procedures by introducing new restrictions on who can access and provide treatments. Officials said that people have been left 'maimed' by beauty procedures, with some deaths linked to poor care. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said that steps will be taken to protect people from 'rogue operators' with no medical training who often provide 'invasive' procedures in homes, hotels and pop-up clinics. The move will also reduce the cost imposed upon the NHS to fix botched procedures, DHSC added. Proposals include: – Only health workers who are 'suitably qualified' will be able to deliver high-risk procedures such as Brazilian butt lifts (BBLs). – And these workers must be working in providers regulated by the health regulator, the Care Quality Commission. – Those who break the rules on high-risk procedures could face sanctions from the watchdog and financial penalties. – Clinics offering Botox and fillers will need to be licensed and meet certain standards to obtain a licence by their local authority. – Age restrictions will be introduced to prevent children from trying to follow 'dangerous beauty trends on social media', officials said. This would see restrictions for under 18s on high risk cosmetic procedures, unless authorised by a health professional. The Department said that it will launch a consultation next year seeking views on the range of procedures which should be covered in the new restrictions. Alice Webb, 33, from Gloucestershire, died in 2024 after having a BBL. The mother-of-five worked in the beauty industry and lived in Wotton-under-Edge with her family. Her partner Dane Knight said she may not have died if the proposed changes were in place. He told ITV News: 'It would have prevented it. 'I hope something gets put in place before it happens again and another family's just ripped apart and destroyed because it will if something's not done sooner rather than later. 'It's just a shame that it's taken someone's life for it now to be pushed out and for people to start listening and for other people's power to start listening and to enforce this law to stop other families and other people's lives being destroyed. 'Knowing the pain we've gone through, that it might not happen to anyone else is comforting, and knowing it's Alice's legacy brings some comfort to the children and I.' Leading medics said that only surgeons should be able to perform BBLs or any intervention designed for augmentation of the breasts, buttocks of genitals. Last month, the Chartered Trading Standards Institute warned that fat injections, BBLs, Botox and fillers are being offered by untrained people in places such as public toilets. Before the proposed regulations come into force, the Government has urged people seeking cosmetic procedures to ask for the provider's qualifications and insurance, and to be wary of 'suspiciously cheap' offers. It comes after health officials launched an investigation after a number of people had reactions to Botox injections earlier this year. Health minister Karin Smyth said: 'The cosmetics industry has been plagued by a Wild West of dodgy practitioners and procedures. 'There are countless horror stories of cosmetic cowboys causing serious, catastrophic damage. 'This government is taking action to protect those seeking treatments, support honest and competent practitioners, and root out the cowboys as part of our Plan for Change. 'This isn't about stopping anyone from getting treatments – it's about preventing rogue operators from exploiting people at the expense of their safety and keeping people safe. 'We're giving them peace of mind and reducing the cost to the NHS of fixing botched procedures.' Millie Kendall, chief executive of the British Beauty Council, said: 'Any measures that increase protection for the general public and professionalise the industry will help instil confidence as well as helping to prevent the normalisation of horror stories that have become synonymous with our sector.' Ashton Collins, director of Save Face – a register of accredited practitioners, added: 'I am delighted that the government has recognised the significant and potentially fatal risks posed by highly dangerous procedures like liquid BBLs, and has made it a priority to implement restrictions to protect public safety. 'I have seen firsthand the devastating impact these procedures can have on the lives of victims and their families — none more so than the family of Alice Webb.' Tim Mitchell, president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, said: 'It's encouraging to see recognition of the risks associated with procedures such as liquid Brazilian Butt Lifts, however we believe this procedure – along with any intervention designed for buttock, breast or genital augmentation – should only be performed by a Cosmetic Surgery Board Certified surgeon. 'Medical oversight is essential to prevent serious complications and protect individuals from lasting physical and psychological harm and, at worst, death. 'These plans could help improve regulation of lower-risk non-surgical interventions, but the government must also urgently improve regulation of surgical procedures – ensuring only surgeons who are Cosmetic Surgery Board Certified can perform such operations. 'This will ensure high standards of care, reduce avoidable harm, and give patients the confidence they deserve when seeking aesthetic treatments.' Nora Nugent, president of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, added: 'We await with great interest for the details such as which healthcare practitioners fall under these regulations and who the higher complexity and risk procedures are restricted to. 'These should be restricted to doctors and in some situations, only those with the level of training of a qualified plastic surgeon. 'Overall, this is a very welcome step forward for patient safety.'


Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Brazilian butt lifts, botox and fillers face strict regulations in crackdown on 'cowboy' operators
Ministers have launched a crackdown on cosmetic 'cowboys' who recklessly deliver Botox, fillers and Brazilian butt lifts. Patients will be protected by 'robust' new restrictions on who can access and provide the treatments and where they can be done. Officials warn 'rogue operators' with no medical training are maiming and killing people by carrying out 'invasive' procedures in homes, hotels and pop-up clinics. The NHS is often left to pick up the cost of correcting botched care, the Department of Health and Social Care said. Under the new rules, only health workers who are 'suitably qualified' will be able to deliver high-risk procedures such as Brazilian Butt Lifts (BBLs), which involves injecting chemicals into the bottom to give a plumper appearance. These practitioners must be working in providers regulated by the health regulator, the Care Quality Commission. Those who break the rules on high-risk procedures could face sanctions from the watchdog and financial penalties. Clinics offering Botox and fillers will need to be licensed and meet certain standards to obtain a licence by their local authority. And age restrictions will be introduced to prevent children from trying to follow 'dangerous beauty trends on social media', officials said. This would see restrictions for under 18s on high risk cosmetic procedures, such as liposuction and intravenous vitamin drips, unless authorised by a health professional. The Department said it will launch a consultation next year seeking views on the range of procedures which should be covered in the new restrictions. Leading medics said only surgeons should be able to perform BBLs or any intervention designed for augmentation of the breasts, buttocks of genitals. Last month, the Chartered Trading Standards Institute warned that fat injections, BBLs, Botox and fillers are being offered by untrained people in places such as public toilets. Before the proposed regulations come into force, the Government has urged people seeking cosmetic procedures to ask for the provider's qualifications and insurance, and to be wary of 'suspiciously cheap' offers. Health minister Karin Smyth said: 'The cosmetics industry has been plagued by a Wild West of dodgy practitioners and procedures. 'There are countless horror stories of cosmetic cowboys causing serious, catastrophic damage. 'This government is taking action to protect those seeking treatments, support honest and competent practitioners, and root out the cowboys as part of our Plan for Change. 'This isn't about stopping anyone from getting treatments – it's about preventing rogue operators from exploiting people at the expense of their safety and keeping people safe. 'We're giving them peace of mind and reducing the cost to the NHS of fixing botched procedures.' Health minister Karin Smyth op-ed Writing for the Daily Mail, health minister Karin Smyth said: 'I'll never forget the name Alice Webb. 'She was a young woman – and a mother of five - who simply wanted to feel better about herself. Instead, a cosmetic procedure she had in England ended up costing her life. 'Her heartbreaking story is a stark reminder of what happens when dangerous, unqualified individuals are allowed to operate unchecked in the cosmetic industry. 'We're not going to stand by while innocent people are harmed by chancers passing themselves off as cosmetic surgeons. 'These charlatans are luring in vulnerable people - especially young women - with cheap procedures that can go catastrophically wrong. Kitchen table operations. Dangerous injections in someone's front room. Industrial-grade silicone being pumped into people's bodies. 'The human cost can be devastating. And who picks up the pieces? Taxpayers and NHS doctors and nurses, already stretched to breaking point. 'That's why I'm declaring war on this industry's cowboys. 'High-risk procedures like Brazilian butt lifts will soon only be performed by qualified healthcare professionals. No exceptions. 'Clinics offering Botox and facial filler treatments will need to prove they're trained, insured and working to proper hygiene and safety standards. Every practitioner and clinic will need to be licensed. These rules will also reduce the cost to the NHS of fixing botched procedures. 'To protect kids we will work to introduce restrictions for under 18s to prevent them from being able to access treatments which are not suitable for them. 'Patient safety isn't negotiable. Rogue practitioners are being put on notice that the cosmetics Wild West ends now.' Millie Kendall, chief executive of the British Beauty Council, said: 'Any measures that increase protection for the general public and professionalise the industry will help instil confidence as well as helping to prevent the normalisation of horror stories that have become synonymous with our sector.' Ashton Collins, director of Save Face – a register of accredited practitioners, added: 'I am delighted that the government has recognised the significant and potentially fatal risks posed by highly dangerous procedures like liquid BBLs, and has made it a priority to implement restrictions to protect public safety. 'I have seen firsthand the devastating impact these procedures can have on the lives of victims and their families — none more so than the family of Alice Webb.' Ms Webb, 33, from Gloucestershire, died in 2024 after having a BBL. The mother-of-five worked in the beauty industry and lived in the Wotton-under-Edge area of Gloucestershire with her family. Tim Mitchell, president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, said: 'It's encouraging to see recognition of the risks associated with procedures such as liquid Brazilian Butt Lifts, however we believe this procedure – along with any intervention designed for buttock, breast or genital augmentation – should only be performed by a Cosmetic Surgery Board Certified surgeon. 'Medical oversight is essential to prevent serious complications and protect individuals from lasting physical and psychological harm and, at worst, death. 'These plans could help improve regulation of lower-risk non-surgical interventions, but the government must also urgently improve regulation of surgical procedures – ensuring only surgeons who are Cosmetic Surgery Board Certified can perform such operations. 'This will ensure high standards of care, reduce avoidable harm, and give patients the confidence they deserve when seeking aesthetic treatments.' Nora Nugent, president of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, added: 'We await with great interest for the details such as which healthcare practitioners fall under these regulations and who the higher complexity and risk procedures are restricted to. 'These should be restricted to doctors and in some situations, only those with the level of training of a qualified plastic surgeon. 'Overall, this is a very welcome step forward for patient safety.'


The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
Lord Kinnock slammed as ‘hypocrite' over call to slap VAT on NHS patients who go private
LORD Kinnock was last night accused of hypocrisy after calling for the government to slap VAT on desperate NHS patients who go private. The ex-Labour leader, 83, says the £2billion move would provide 'vital funding' as the NHS looks to reduce waiting lists. He said: 'Ending the VAT exemption to generate much-needed revenue is a reasonable and widely supported step.' But opponents pointed out that - when he had been party leader - he was exposed for himself having previously gone private. Lord Kinnock went to a private Osteopathy practice for a recurring neck complaint following a rugby injury. It led to a heated exchange with then Tory PM John Major came in 1990. Shadow Health Secretary Stuart Andrew last night 'This is hypocrisy at its best. "This is same old Labour. Do as I say, not as I do. "Neil Kinnock has used private healthcare before, yet he now wants to slap VAT on it. 'This will punish ordinary families simply trying to access timely care. 'Many turn to private healthcare out of frustration with long NHS waits. "Some of them are hard-working, middle-class families already under financial pressure and this plan would punish them for seeking alternatives. LIVE: Starmer vows to unleash biggest overhaul of NHS in 70 years 'Labour should be fixing the causes of the crisis, not taxing those trying to get the care they need.' Mr Kinnock admitted that he attended the British School of Osteopathy in London triggered after a rugby incident some 25 years earlier. The private practice at the time charged £14 per visit and provided same-day appointments compared to long waits on the NHS. Kinnock attacked the then PM over the NHS in the Commons. Mr Major hit back: 'Unlike some people on the Labour benches, I unfailingly use the National Health Service'. The Sun reported at the time that Mr Kinnock pledged to scrap private hospitals if he ever wom power. A source told The Sun at the time that he had osteopathy treatment 'four or five times' for a recurring pain in the neck. Lord Kinnock last night declined to comment. 1