logo
Putin should be arrested in Alaska not feted

Putin should be arrested in Alaska not feted

Telegraph12 hours ago
Vladamir Putin is indicted by the International Criminal Court, accused of ordering the theft of thousands of children from Ukraine to be sold to childless couples in Russia. This charge is just the tip of a massive iceberg, and the war crimes of using chemical weapons and directly targeting civilians must surely be added. With others, I hunted down the evidence that Putin's 'puppet' in Syria, Bashar Al Assad was using chemical weapons against his own population, perhaps under the direction or certainly the knowledge of Putin, and the German government will arrest Assad on this charge, if he ever leaves the Kremlin's clutches.
Hence, Putin should be arrested when he touches down in Alaska to meet the US president on Friday – not feted and lauded like some conquering hero, who seems to have a worryingly beguiling hold over the greatest dealmaker on the planet. The Russian leader has again stated that he has no interest in a peace deal which does not come with a huge swathe of Ukraine, some already illegally annexed and some still very much in Ukrainian hands.
This is pretty minimalistic from the Russian dictator, as the original aim of his Special Military Operation was the complete subjugation of Ukraine. A few weeks ago, an article from the Russian State news agency RIA Novosti was headlined 'There is no other option: no one in Ukraine should be left alive', under a chilling image of the Grim Reaper hovering over destroyed Ukrainian tanks, below an apocalyptic red sky. This leaves doubt as to the aims of the Russian tyrant, whatever guff he might be peddling to the US leader.
President Trump should know, or at least must be briefed on the Budapest Memorandum which the US, the UK and Russia signed in 1994 'guaranteeing' the safety and the integrity of the borders of Ukraine, in return for Ukraine giving up its nuclear weapons. What Trump and Putin appear to be suggesting as the basis for their discussions in Alaska is in direct contravention of this treaty. I agree with Ben Wallace, the excellent former defence minister, that if Zelensky is not in Alaska, then the UK's Prime Minister should be there to ensure that the Budapest Memorandum is adhered to in word and deed – and the 'gangster' and the 'real estate king', don't hatch some dreadful deal that completely ignores the rights and will of the Ukrainian people.
So, President Trump, if you are the greatest dealmaker in the universe then arrest Putin in Alaska and the war in Ukraine will end on Friday. No doubt there are many in the Kremlin and certainly most of the Russian population who would support this, with their economy in freefall and the rank and file barely able to feed themselves. Those with money cannot travel to their previously beloved Mediterranean beach resorts, and even flying to Russian holiday spots is often disrupted by Ukrainian cyber and drone attacks. Russia might be making a few small gains on the frontlines in Ukraine, but Ukraine is making massive strategic gains deep in Russia, destroying 17 per cent of its oil industry, routinely grounding flights and destroying armaments factories. With a bit more help Mr President, they could probably send Mr Putin packing themselves!
The US president must understand that Ukraine is not losing this war and Russia is not winning it, so he must not appease Putin for an easy peace deal to enhance his rather obnoxious desire for the Nobel Peace Prize. The only acceptable peace deal is one that is 'just' and acceptable to President Zelensky and the Ukrainian people – and at the moment neither appear to be represented in Alaska where their fate may well be determined.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine prepared to give up territory ahead of Trump-Putin peace talks
Ukraine prepared to give up territory ahead of Trump-Putin peace talks

Daily Mirror

timea minute ago

  • Daily Mirror

Ukraine prepared to give up territory ahead of Trump-Putin peace talks

Volodymyr Zelensky has told European leaders they must reject any settlement proposed by Donald Trump in which Ukraine gives up further territory - but with a condition Ukraine could agree to stop fighting and give up territory already held by Russia as part of a European-backed plan for peace, it has tonight emerged. ‌ European leaders have been told by Volodymyr Zelensky they must reject any settlement proposed by Donald Trump in which Ukraine cedes further land - but that Russia could be allowed to retain some of the territory it has taken. ‌ But this would mean freezing the frontline where it is and handing Russia de facto control of the territory it occupies in Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea. It comes after Vladimir Putin warned of nuclear war when he unleashed another night of hell on Ukraine. ‌ Mr Trump and Mr Putin are set to hold talks in Alaska on Friday. Ukraine and Europe have become increasingly concerned Mr Trump and Mr Putin could negotiate an end to the long-running war over Mr Zelensky's head. But the latest development - the European-backed plan for peace - softens the negotiating position. Characterising a frantic weekend of diplomacy between Kyiv and its allies, a Western official said: "The plan can only be related to the current positions held by the militaries." ‌ It is believed US officials have pledged to consult European leaders ahead of the face-to-face talks between Mr Trump and Mr Putin. Speaking today, Donald Tusk, Poland's prime minister, said: "I have many fears and a lot of hope." Chief among European concerns was a purported peace plan endorsed by Moscow, which included freezing the frontlines in south-eastern Ukraine if Kyiv agreed to withdraw from areas of Donetsk and Luhansk that it controls. European diplomats say there has been no notable change in Mr Putin's overall war aims, which seek to topple Ukraine's Western-facing government and replace it with a Moscow-friendly proxy. Russia is still aiming for the "full capitulation" of Kyiv, including blocking any prospect of Nato membership and demilitarisation, according to a report by the Institute for the Study of War, the Washington-based think tank. On Monday evening, Mr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, said there were no signs Russia was preparing to bring an end to the war despite the looming peace talks. Citing a report from Ukraine's intelligence, Mr Zelensky said: "On the contrary, they are moving their troops and forces in such a way as to launch new offensive operations." While seemingly content with ceding some territory, it is thought Ukraine will only agree to a peace settlement that offers robust security guarantees in the form of weapons deliveries and a path to Nato membership.

The Guardian view on the Trump-Putin summit: European leaders must help Zelenskyy resist a carve-up
The Guardian view on the Trump-Putin summit: European leaders must help Zelenskyy resist a carve-up

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on the Trump-Putin summit: European leaders must help Zelenskyy resist a carve-up

In recent weeks, as Russia continued its assault on Ukraine in frank disregard of White House deadlines and demands, there was hope in Kyiv and European capitals that the scales might finally be falling from Donald Trump's eyes. Last month, Mr Trump noted that although his conversations with Vladimir Putin repeatedly led him to believe that a ceasefire deal was in reach, the Russian president then routinely went on to 'knock down a building in Kyiv'. More bluntly, he has accused Mr Putin of stringing him along with 'bullshit'. It was ostensibly on those grounds that the US president set an 8 August deadline for Mr Putin to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine, on pain of 'significant' sanctions. Yet instead of being punished for ignoring this injunction too, Mr Putin has been rewarded with a summit with Mr Trump in the United States, and apparently allowed to veto any suggestion that Volodymyr Zelenskyy should also attend. Suddenly, and alarmingly, it feels a little like February again, when Mr Trump and his vice-president, JD Vance, treated Mr Zelenskyy with outrageous disrespect in the White House, and appeared disposed to pursuing a peace agreement on Mr Putin's terms. There are conflicting accounts of discussions between Mr Putin and the US presidential envoy, Steve Witkoff, last week. But there is no evidence that Mr Putin has any intention of compromising on his maximalist goals in Ukraine, including the annexation of eastern regions, demilitarisation and the abandoning of Ukraine's aspiration to Nato membership. Morally and practically speaking, the Ukrainian president's absence on Friday will mean that any 'deal' struck by Mr Trump and Mr Putin in Alaska lacks all legitimacy. But Kyiv understandably fears a carve-up in which Ukraine is pressured by Washington and Moscow to unilaterally surrender land in its east, and make other concessions, in exchange for a pause in the fighting. This would be, of course, to reward Mr Putin's illegal invasion and betray a nation whose fate is tied up with Europe's security as a whole. The very fact of Friday's summit, from which European leaders are also excluded, is already a wholly unearned diplomatic win for Mr Putin. Mr Trump is driven by mercantilism and ego: he may be persuaded that if Ukraine could be bullied into accepting the unacceptable, opportunities relating to Russian oil and gas could be unleashed, and the Nobel peace prize he covets become a genuine possibility. After frantic mediation, it emerged on Monday that Mr Zelenskyy and European leaders may take part in a joint call with Mr Trump on Wednesday. The Ukrainian president has already made it clear that there will be no concession of further territory to Russia's occupying forces. In the lead-up to Alaska, and afterwards, Europe must ensure that his words are lent weight by a unified and robust stance on what would constitute a just peace, as opposed to one imposed against Ukraine's will. Ultimately, that will need to include credible security guarantees for Kyiv from Europe and the US, and an agreed sanctions regime to be enacted should Russia renege on its commitments. But the first priority must be pressuring Mr Putin to agree to a ceasefire immediately in order that meaningful negotiations can begin. Until last week, that appeared to be the approach Mr Trump had decided to adopt. It was the right one. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Peace cannot be ‘imposed upon' Ukraine, Starmer says
Peace cannot be ‘imposed upon' Ukraine, Starmer says

North Wales Chronicle

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Peace cannot be ‘imposed upon' Ukraine, Starmer says

The US president and his Russian counterpart are set to meet in Alaska this week to discuss the future of the Kremlin's invasion. In a phone call on Monday with Mark Carney, the Prime Minister and Canada's leader agreed Ukraine's future 'must be one of freedom, sovereignty and self-determination'. It comes after Mr Trump signalled he thinks Ukraine might need to cede territory in order to end the conflict. A Downing Street spokesperson said: 'The Prime Minister spoke to the prime minister of Canada Mark Carney this afternoon. 'They discussed their unwavering support for Ukraine and ongoing work to stop the killing, and end Russia's war of aggression. 'Both leaders underscored that Ukraine's future must be one of freedom, sovereignty and self-determination. 'They welcomed continued international efforts, led by President Trump, to bring peace and agreed that this must be built with Ukraine, not imposed upon it. 'Both leaders agreed they would continue to work closely with President Trump and President Zelensky over the coming days. They agreed to stay in touch.' Earlier on Monday, No 10 had backed Mr Trump's interventions over the war but warned that Mr Putin cannot be trusted 'as far as you can throw him'. Asked whether Sir Keir believes the Russian president could be trusted in negotiations, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said the UK supported both Kyiv and the US president's push for peace, but not Moscow. 'Never trust President Putin as far as you could throw him, but we obviously will support Ukraine,' he said. 'We will obviously support President Trump and European nations as we enter these negotiations. 'But it is exactly why we've been leading this work on the coalition of the willing, because any ceasefire, as I say, cannot just be an opportunity for President Putin to go away, re-arm, restrengthen, and then go again. 'So we're not going to leave it to trust. We're going to ensure that we're prepared such that we achieve a ceasefire.' Planning for the so-called coalition of the willing, which would involve a European-led peacekeeping force sent to Ukraine to monitor any future truce, began in March. Downing Street said 'operational planning continues at a military level' despite no talks between leaders planned for this week, but indicated that there was little left to finalise. Another week has ended without any attempt by Russia to agree to the numerous demands of the world and stop the killings. In just the past 24 hours on the front, there have been 137 combat engagements, and this is the case every day. The Russian army is not reducing its pressure.… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 11, 2025 Asked whether work relating to the coalition had been put on hold to keep the road clear for Washington-led mediation this week, the Prime Minister's spokesman said: 'No… if anything, the next step really is reaching that ceasefire, such that we're then able to implement the security guarantees.' European leaders including Sir Keir said the path to peace for Kyiv 'cannot be decided without Ukraine' and the current line of contact between Russia and Ukraine could only be a 'starting point of negotiations'. In a joint statement, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the European Commission said: 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. 'Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. 'We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force.' The statement comes a day after Mr Trump announced that he would meet Mr Putin in Alaska on Friday, as he seeks an end to a conflict he had promised he could finish on his first day in office. The US president had earlier suggested that any peace deal was likely to involve 'some swapping of territories', with reports suggesting this could involve Ukraine giving up its Donetsk region. But President Volodymyr Zelensky has already rejected any proposal that would compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity, something that is forbidden by Ukraine's constitution. He said Mr Putin wanted to 'exchange a pause in the war, in the killing, for the legalisation of the occupation of our land – he wants to get territorial spoils for the second time'. Mr Zelensky added: 'We will not allow this second attempt to partition Ukraine. 'Knowing Russia, where there is a second, there will be a third.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store