logo
Letters: The Rev. Michael Pfleger's political stand is ironic and hypocritical

Letters: The Rev. Michael Pfleger's political stand is ironic and hypocritical

Chicago Tribune03-03-2025

Regarding the op-ed 'Why is St. Sabina flying the US flag upside down? America is in distress' (Feb. 26): Does anyone see the irony — or is it hypocrisy — in the Rev. Michael Pfleger criticizing President Donald Trump and comparing his administration to Nazi Germany? Unlike the good father, at least Trump was elected by those he serves.
Pfleger is best at street theater, and this is another example. Fortunately, Trump doesn't care, and if allowed, he will do more to help the St. Sabina community — such as reducing crime and increasing opportunity — than our one-party city and state can or has.
That's the biggest irony. One thing that approaches an autocracy in American government is the Democratic Party's stranglehold on Chicago and America's largest cities, which explains their common suffering.
— William Choslovsky, Chicago
We can't stand aside
The Catholic Church is alive! Finally, a Catholic priest has addressed the destruction of democracy.
For weeks, Sunday sermons in Catholic churches have tap-danced around the inhumane issues of the day, and have encouraged parishioners to 'Gaudete' — to have hope, to love one another. Each of these approaches is good, but they aren't getting to the heart of the matter when the soul of America is in jeopardy. By enumerating the many merciless changes in our government since January, the Rev. Michael Pleger is not making a political pitch. He is only summarizing the events that are changing the lives of so many people and asking everyone to respond to them.
Many churches serve all groups — regardless of religious affiliation — with food, shelter, housing and care for those in need. But Pfleger admonishes us that this is not enough. We cannot stand aside and silently witness the despicable treatment of immigrants, the poor, the homeless and government workers. We need to get our government officials involved.
Pfleger's plea is a call for church and state to work together to preserve the spirit of our nation so that our flag can fly honorably in the sun. Together, we can.
— Mary Ann McGinley, Wilmette
Desecrating grounds
Last Sunday was the anniversary of the raising of the American flag on Mount Suribachi, Iwo Jima, 80 years ago by United States Marines. Many of the Marines on Iwo Jima died in combat serving our country.
How could the Chicago Archdiocese allow the Rev. Michael Pfleger to desecrate sacred parish grounds built on American soil and off the sweat of immigrants?
Did he consider the men of faith from St. Sabina Catholic Church who died serving our country, from World War II to Afghanistan?
He can hang his flag upside down at his home. St. Sabina's belongs to all of us who worship Christ and the American flag.
— Patrick J. Madden, Tinley Park
Spread act of protest
Bravo to St. Sabina Catholic Church and the Rev. Michael Pfleger for flying the U.S. flag upside down in front of their church as a symbol of emergency in order to proclaim that America is in distress. I think that is such a beautiful and perfectly apt act of protest by this church — and I wish many more churches and institutions and people would do the same thing.
In my mind, I can imagine upside-down flags flying all over America in protest — planting a flag, so to speak, and saying that what is happening in our country is horribly, unconscionably and heartbreakingly wrong, and we do not support it!
— Victoria Young, DeKalb
Priest failing at duty
I don't need another person, especially a priest, creating an anti-government climate. A church is supposed to be a nondivisive setting. Perhaps the Rev. Michael Pfleger should be told by his superiors to either refrain or to step down. Why is he concerning himself with political issues? Isn't a priest's main goal to lead lost souls to the Lord and not cause the flock to go astray?
Pfleger might want to read Matthew 22:21 and take more time to pray for the pope's health instead of inciting anxiety and confusion in his followers.
— Christopher Gomez, Chicago
US flag outside church
Why does St. Sabina Catholic Church even have an American flag on its property?
— Marty Malone, Chicago
Recall power needed
In response to the op-ed by state Rep. Kam Buckner regarding a city charter for Chicago and mayoral recall, the urgent need for mayoral recall in Chicago cannot be overstated ('A city charter is the reform Chicago actually needs, not recall powers,' Feb. 23). Without this mechanism, residents are left powerless against serious misconduct.
At Recall This Fall, I highlight, with the counsel of former Gov. Pat Quinn, that some Midwestern states allow voters to recall their mayors, while Illinois remains stuck in the past. The Illinois Constitution provides a pathway for home rule municipalities to adopt recall ordinances, yet Chicago has failed to act. This must change immediately for the good of all Chicagoans.
Some, like Buckner, dismiss recalls as disruptive. However, recalls are crucial for holding elected officials accountable. When leaders betray public trust, voters must have the power to demand change. The push for a recall is about ensuring transparency and integrity in our government. Let Illinois HB1084 have its day in court by allowing hearings and a vote in the General Assembly.
Implementing a recall mechanism would not cost taxpayers extra, as elections can align with existing schedules. Rather than being disruptive, it could unite Chicagoans in a demand for better governance, prioritizing citizens over powerful interests such as the Chicago Teachers Union or Cook County Democrats.
A recall law sends a strong message: Mayors must serve the public diligently or face the consequences. Just as shareholders can remove a failing CEO, Chicagoans deserve the right to replace ineffective leadership.
Now is the time for action. We must assert our right to recall our mayor and regain control over the future of our city.
— Daniel Boland, executive director, Committee for Chicago Mayor Recall
'Progressive' incorrect
I think it is wrong to label Mayor Brandon Johnson as a progressive. His policies are not progressive in the sense that I understand the word.
Labeling Johnson progressive is far too positive and actually demeans the concept.
— Allen Schwartz, Chicago
Dangerous conflation
The editorial about the puppet at the Chicago Cultural Center opens up a new, and dangerous, conflation ('Antisemitic fears in Chicago coalesce around a controversial puppet,' Feb. 19). The Tribune Editorial Board indicates that 'blood on your hands' is an antisemitic trope. I could find no instance online in which that expression was particular to Jews or Judaism.
As an non-Jewish, American taxpayer, I do have the blood of 48,000 Palestinians on my hands because I helped pay for the bombs that killed them all and that maimed many, many more.
I would suggest that the many Jews and gentiles who oppose the war in Gaza, as well as the 23 aldermen who didn't sign Ald. Debra Silverstein's letter, might not like being labelled antisemitic.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What are Canada's governing Liberals going to do about AI?
What are Canada's governing Liberals going to do about AI?

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What are Canada's governing Liberals going to do about AI?

Fresh off his election victory, Prime Minister Mark Carney has been focused on standing up to Donald Trump's claims on Canada as the 51st state and American tariffs. But while that political drama unfolds, one topic that seems to have quietly slipped under the radar is the rise of artificial intelligence. Despite its transformative impact on everything from jobs to national security, AI received surprisingly little attention during the campaign and in the first weeks following Carney's victory. The consequences of that lack of attention are already starting to show, as emissions and electricity costs continue unabated without a clear vision of where AI fits in. Read more: Although Carney has appointed former journalist Evan Solomon as Canada's first-ever AI minister, it's not yet clear what action the Liberal government plans to take on AI. The Liberals' 'Canada Strong' plan outlining the prime minister's proposals is scarce on details. Still, it provides some clues on how the Liberals see AI and what they believe it offers to the Canadian economy — and also what they seem to have misunderstood. First, the plan includes some robust initiatives for improving Canada's digital infrastructure, which lags behind other leading countries, especially in terms of rural broadband and reliable cell service. To accomplish these goals, the Liberals say they'll incentivize investment by 'introducing flow-through shares to our Canadian startup ecosystem…to raise money faster' for AI and other technologies. In other words, they will reuse the model of mining and oil companies whereby investors can claim a tax deduction for the same amount as their investment. A major question is whether Canada's investment ecosystem has enough big players willing to take these risks. The plan gets less promising as it comes to the implementation of AI within 'the economy of tomorrow.' The Liberals say they plan to build more data centres, improve computing capacity and create digital supply chain solutions 'to improve efficiency and reduce costs for Canadians.' All that that sounds OK — so far. But how will they do this? The Liberals plan to establish the Bureau of Research, Engineering and Advanced Leadership in Science (BOREALIS), linking AI development directly to the Canadian Armed Forces and the Communications Security Establishment Canada, which provides the federal government with information technology security and foreign signals intelligence. This approach to AI is focused on what it offers to Canada's defence, whether by manufacturing semiconductors or improving intelligence gathering, so that it can rely less on the U.S. Similarly, Canadian defence tech firms will access funding to help reduce dependence on American suppliers and networks. The Liberals are pledging sovereignty and autonomy for Canada's defence and security, all enabled by 'the construction and development of AI infrastructure.' What goes unsaid is the intense power needs of data centres, and the consequences for emissions and climate action of 'building the next generation of data centres' in Canada. New data centres cannot be built without also constructing more renewable energy infrastructure, and none of this addresses emissions or climate change. If the centres crop up in big numbers as planned, Canadians could also see their electricity costs go up or become less reliable. That's because finding space within the existing grid is not as easy as it may sound when AI data centres require over 100 megawatts (MW) of electricity demand versus five to 10 MW for a regular centre. With the rapidly evolving market for AI-based data centres, Canadian policymakers need to provide clear guidance to utilities in terms of their current decisions on competing industrial-scale demands. As the Canadian Climate Institute points out: 'Anything less risks higher rates, increased emissions, missed economic opportunities — or all of the above.' So far, the Liberal plan fails to address any of these concerns. What else does the 'economy of tomorrow' hold? Apparently, it means more efficient government. According to the Liberal plan, AI 'is how government improves service delivery, it is how government keeps up with the speed of business, and it is how government maximizes efficiency and reduces cost.' Despite otherwise clashing with the Trump administration, this language is reminiscent of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has also centred its use of AI. Read more: The Liberals will open an Office of Digital Transformation, which aims to get rid of red tape and 'reduce barriers for businesses to operate in Canada.' They don't seem to really know what this would actually look like, however. They say: 'This could mean using AI to address government service backlogs and improve service delivery times, so that Canadians get better services, faster.' Their fiscal plan points out that this frame of thinking applies to every single expenditure: 'We will look at every new dollar being spent through the lens of how AI and technology can improve service and reduce costs.' The economy will also benefit, the government argues, from AI commercialization, with $46 million pegged over the next four years to connect AI researchers with businesses. This would work alongside a tax credit for small and medium-sized businesses to 'leverage AI to boost their bottom lines, create jobs, and support existing employees.' But a new report by Orgvue, the organizational design and planning software platform, shows that over half of businesses that rushed to impose AI just ended up making their employees redundant without clear gains in productivity. Creating a tax credit for smaller companies to introduce AI seems like a recipe for repeating the same mistake. Much of the Liberal plan seems to involve taking risks. There's a shortsightedness on this rapidly advancing technology that requires significant guardrails. The government seem to view AI as a solutions machine, buying into the hype around it without taking the time to understand it. As policy is properly hashed out in the weeks and months to come, the Liberals' feet will have to be held to the fire on the issue of AI. Canadians must benefit from its limited uses and be protected from its abuses. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organisation bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Jake Pitre, Concordia University Read more: Canada has a chance to lead on AI policy and data governance at the 2025 G7 Leaders' Summit Artificial intelligence should not be allowed to adjudicate cases in Canada's Federal Court AI and criminal justice: How AI can support — not undermine — justice Jake Pitre does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Leaked Audio Reveals DNC Chair in Despair Over Dem Civil War: ‘No One Knows Who the Hell I Am'
Leaked Audio Reveals DNC Chair in Despair Over Dem Civil War: ‘No One Knows Who the Hell I Am'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Leaked Audio Reveals DNC Chair in Despair Over Dem Civil War: ‘No One Knows Who the Hell I Am'

The Democratic National Committee's internal chaos shows no signs of slowing down—just ask the chair. DNC chair Ken Martin accused vice chair David Hogg of undercutting his leadership and confessed he'd considered quitting his position during a Zoom call with party leaders, a leaked recording has revealed. 'No one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win,' Martin said in the recording, which was obtained by Politico. 'I don't think you intended this,' Martin told Hogg on the May 15 Zoom meeting, 'but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it's really frustrating.' Martin, 51, has been grappling with an intraparty feud ignited when Hogg, 25, announced that his organization, Leaders We Deserve, intends to spend $20 million backing primary challengers to what he called 'ineffective' Democratic incumbents in safe blue districts. Martin won a contested leadership election in February and has been tasked with getting the Democratic party back on its feet after crushing election defeats in November. But he admitted the challenges of his job have left him demoralized. 'I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job… the other night I said to myself for the first time, I don't know if I wanna do this anymore,' he said in the meeting, which was attended by approximately 10 DNC officers, according to Politico. In a statement to Politico, however, Martin said, 'I'm not going anywhere.' 'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats,' he added. 'As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda. That's the work that I will continue to do every day.' Malcom Kenyatta, a second vice chair who was also on the Zoom meeting, came to Martin's defense, as did other party officers who were on the call. 'Breaking news: a human being had a frustrating day at work. That's all Ken expressed on that call,' he said, according to Politico. In response to Hogg's divisive pledge to try to oust Democrats he believes are 'asleep at the wheel,' Martin has attempted to pressure him into signing a neutrality pledge. At the same time, a DNC panel has voted to advance a challenge to Hogg and Kenyatta's election over alleged rule violations and concerns about gender equity. After the vote, Hogg said it was 'impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform the party which loomed large over this vote' and that the 'DNC has pledged to remove me, and this vote has provided an avenue to fast-track that effort.'

South Korea President Lee's election law violation hearing postponed indefinitely, court says
South Korea President Lee's election law violation hearing postponed indefinitely, court says

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

South Korea President Lee's election law violation hearing postponed indefinitely, court says

SEOUL (Reuters) -A Seoul court said on Monday it will indefinitely postpone a trial of President Lee Jae-myung on charges of violating election law in 2022. South Korea's Supreme Court ruled in May, before Lee was elected, that Lee had violated election law by publicly making "false statements" during his 2022 presidential bid, and sent the case back to an appeals court. The Seoul High Court, which had scheduled a hearing for the case on June 18, said on Monday that it will postpone the hearing "to be decided later" without a date, a court spokesperson confirmed. Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The court said its decision to postpone the hearing was due to "Constitution Article 84", without elaborating. South Korea's Constitution, Article 84, says a sitting president is "not subject to criminal prosecution while in office" for most crimes. However, legal experts are divided on whether that applies to ongoing trials that were already prosecuted before a president was elected. The National Court Administration under the Supreme Court gave as its opinion that judges of each court where Lee's trials are being held will have to decide whether to stop or proceed, according to its statement to a lawmaker in May. "The court in charge of hearing the case will determine whether Article 84 of the Constitution should be applied to a criminal defendant who was elected in the presidential election," the statement said. Lee's ruling Democratic Party, which controls parliament, is planning to pass a bill this week which suspends ongoing trials for the incumbent president, local broadcaster KBS reported on Monday. The Constitutional Court may be asked to rule whether the bill is unconstitutional, legal experts have said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store