Adding a ‘SPLASH of COLOUR' with Words.
It may be somewhat of a challenge you see, for a non-English speaker to recognise the true meaning of a comment that someone is 'showing their true colours now.' The actual meaning is that the person has revealed their true manner, nature or character now. This usually occurs due to a change in their circumstances or relationship. It has nothing to do with what colour the person is, is wearing, or any part of their appearance, but is a metaphor for their manner, the way they treat or react to people; their nature, the way they behave towards others; or their character, their distinctive mental and moral qualities.
The word 'colour,' in fact has a genuine diversity within the English language that is probably not helped, in language learning, by the fact that the word is spelled differently in the Americas, with the spelling of 'color,' not at all indicative of any difference in meaning. 'Colour' and 'color' mean the same thing but are drawn from different origins and in the matter of the differences in linguistic standardisation on the two sides of the Atlantic, the derivations result from whether the words have Latin or French origin.
America, seeking even subtle forms of independence in the early 19th century, eagerly embraced the spelling differences published by the American lexicographer Noah Webster in his 1828 dictionary. There are hundreds of words, not only spelled differently 'on either side of the pond,' which is itself a metaphor describing the Atlantic Ocean as a pond and referring to the two (American and United Kingdom) civilisations without naming them, in an absolute example of how identifying the differentiation between idioms and colloquialisms can challenge the language learner.
The reality is that they don't have to and can take comfort in the fact that beyond a lesson or two, they will find that 'knowing' the difference is less important than understanding that this amazing language is, in common use, as likely to be figurative, as literal. Familiarisation is the only way to both understand, absorb and utilise even some of the idioms and colloquialisms they will encounter in life. However, that familiarisation will be greatly enhanced by embracing metaphors and synonyms, which sounds dreary, but can be fun.
The distinction, linguistically, is that an idiom has a non-literal meaning, while a colloquialism is a phrase that is likely to be in common usage, based upon regional specificity. Now there is no way that an English language learner would identify the Atlantic as a 'pond,' because in fact, it's a massive great ocean, so the use of the word 'pond' is clearly not literal, making it an idiom. Wouldn't you agree? Yet, the reference to 'either side of the pond,' is also clearly a unique distinction, most likely made by someone from either the States, or the British Isles, therefore regional, therefore more correctly a colloquialism, correct? Such are the joys of this amazing language, which, used well, or heard and understood well, and with an extensive enough vocabulary, can add so much colour, there's that word again, to any discussion or conversation. Wait a minute! What's the difference between a discussion and a conversation? Is there a difference? Yes! A discussion is probably more formal, more structured, focused, usually on a specific issue, between several people and will usually have stated objectives. Whereas, on the other hand, a conversation is generally informal, usually between two people, usually personal, often private, humorous, anecdotal and more intimate, a 'shared' experience.
I know, you're thinking 'It's alright for you. You're English.' And you are right of course, but within any language lies lifelong personal enrichment and that can't be bad... Can it?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
4 days ago
- Observer
Thinking is a luxury good
When I was a kid in the 1980s, my parents sent me to a Waldorf school in England. At the time, the school discouraged parents from allowing their kids to watch too much TV, instead telling them to emphasise reading, hands-on learning and outdoor play. I chafed at the stricture then. But perhaps they were on to something: Today I don't watch much TV and I still read a lot. Since my school days, however, a far more insidious and enticing form of tech has taken hold: the internet, especially via smartphones. These days I know I have to put my phone in a drawer or in another room if I need to concentrate for more than a few minutes. Since so-called intelligence tests were invented around a century ago, until recently, international IQ scores climbed steadily in a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. But there is evidence that our ability to apply that brain power is decreasing. According to a recent report, adult literacy scores levelled off and began to decline across a majority of OECD countries in the past decade, with some of the sharpest declines visible among the poorest. Kids also show declining literacy. Writing in the Financial Times, John Burn-Murdoch links this to the rise of a post-literate culture in which we consume most of our media through smartphones, eschewing dense text in favour of images and short-form video. Other research has associated smartphone use with ADHD symptoms in adolescents, and a quarter of surveyed American adults now suspect they may have the condition. School and college teachers assign fewer full books to their students, in part because they are unable to complete them. Nearly half of Americans read zero books in 2023. The idea that technology is altering our capacity not just to concentrate but also to read and to reason is catching on. The conversation no one is ready for, though, is how this may be creating yet another form of inequality. Think of this by comparison with patterns of junk food consumption: As ultraprocessed snacks have grown more available and inventively addictive, developed societies have seen a gulf emerge between those with the social and economic resources to sustain a healthy lifestyle and those more vulnerable to the obesogenic food culture. This bifurcation is strongly class-inflected: Across the developed West, obesity has become strongly correlated with poverty. I fear that so, too, will be the tide of post-literacy. Long-form literacy is not innate but learned, sometimes laboriously. As Maryanne Wolf, a literacy scholar, has illustrated, acquiring and perfecting a capacity for long-form, 'expert reading' is literally mind-altering. It rewires our brains, increasing vocabulary, shifting brain activity towards the analytic left hemisphere and honing our capacity for concentration, linear reasoning and deep thought. The presence of these traits at scale contributed to the emergence of free speech, modern science and liberal democracy, among other things. The habits of thought formed by digital reading are very different. As Cal Newport, a productivity expert, shows in his 2016 book, 'Deep Work,' the digital environment is optimised for distraction, as various systems compete for our attention with notifications and other demands. Social media platforms are designed to be addictive, and the sheer volume of material incentivises intense cognitive 'bites' of discourse calibrated for maximum compulsiveness over nuance or thoughtful reasoning. The resulting patterns of content consumption form us neurologically for skimming, pattern recognition and distracted hopping from text to text — if we use our phones to read at all. Tech notables such as Bill Gates and Evan Spiegel have spoken publicly about curbing their kids' use of screens. Others hire nannies who are required to sign 'no phone' contracts, or send their kids to Waldorf schools, where such devices are banned or heavily restricted. The class scissor here is razor-sharp: A majority of classical schools are fee-paying institutions. Shielding your kids from device overuse at the Waldorf School of the Peninsula will set you back $34,000 a year at the elementary grades. Even beyond Silicon Valley, some people are limiting digital stimulation (like social media or video games) for set periods of time as part of the self-improvement practice of dopamine fasting. The ascetic approach to cognitive fitness is still niche and concentrated among the wealthy. But as new generations reach adulthood having never lived in a world without smartphones, we can expect the culture to stratify ever more starkly. On the one hand, a relatively small group of people will retain, and intentionally develop, the capacity for concentration and long-form reasoning. On the other, a larger general population will be effectively post-literate — with all the consequences this implies for cognitive clarity. Lest you mistake me, there is no reason the opportunity to sideline the electorate or to arbitrage the gap between vibes and policy should especially favour either the red team or the blue team. This post-literate world favours demagogues skilled at code-switching between the elite language of policy and the populist one of meme-slop. It favours oligarchs with good social media game and those with more self-assurance than integrity. It does not favour those with little money, little political power and no one to speak up for them.
Observer
4 days ago
- Observer
Requests for admission modifications end on Thursday
MUSCAT: The Higher Education Admission Center (HEAC) of the Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation, continues to receive preference modification requests for undergraduate admissions for the 2025/2026 academic year, with this phase remaining open until Thursday evening. The centre reported that the number of successfully registered students as of Tuesday morning reached 42,907 (19,988 males and 22,919 females). Among them, 41,027 students have listed their programme preferences for government higher education institutions, domestic scholarships, private-sector-funded grants for private institutions, external scholarships, and grants from friendly nations for the 2025/2026 academic year. Within the same context, the HEAC announced the opening of registration for the Omani Cultural and Scientific Cooperation Program for the 2025/2026 academic year, starting from Thursday, August 21. Admission results will be announced on August 28. The programme offers tuition-free scholarships for students from Arab and friendly nations residing in Oman who have completed Grade 12 in Omani government or international schools. These scholarships are for studies at the University of Technology and Applied Sciences (UTAS), which has allocated seats for non-Omani children of its employees in recognition of their contributions and to support their children's higher education opportunities. — ONA
Muscat Daily
4 days ago
- Muscat Daily
SQU opens International Undergraduate admissions under new ‘Afaq' programme
By OUR CORRESPONDENT Muscat – Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) has officially opened applications for international undergraduate students for the academic year 2025/2026. The announcement was made by the university's Deanship of Admissions and Registration, with the application window running from Wednesday, July 30 to Sunday, August 17. This year's admission cycle marks the launch of a new strategic initiative called 'Afaq', designed to broaden access to higher education and support Oman's national development goals under Oman Vision 2040. The programme targets both international students and Omani students seeking academic specialisations not currently offered through the Unified Admission Center. SQU noted that all applications must be submitted online, and applicants must upload required documents in PDF format only. Incomplete submissions or failure to meet entry requirements will result in disqualification. Priority will be given to candidates with the highest competitive scores. Additionally, applicants holding non-Omani certificates must submit an equivalency letter from the Ministry of Education. Accepted students will be given a limited period to confirm their offer, after which unconfirmed seats will be forfeited. The university reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, stating that it reserves the right to reject any application that does not adhere to the guidelines or fails to meet admission standards. More information is available at: Inquiries can be directed to: 📧 [email protected] 📞 24141817 / 24143818 / 24142072 / 24141887 / 24146770
