School Education Dept. told to ensure forming of Student Safeguarding Advisory Committees
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed the School Education Department to ensure constitution of Student Safeguarding Advisory Committees in schools across Tamil Nadu.
The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by G. Shabna of Theni district, who sought a direction to the department to ensure constitution of the Student Safeguarding Advisory Committees in government schools, create awareness of the committees among the students and ensure teaching and non-teaching staff complete an annual mandatory orientation programme on the POCSO Act.
The counsel for the petitioner submitted that a G.O. was issued by the School Education Department in 2021 providing guidelines to protect and safeguard the students from sexual harassment. The Student Safeguarding Advisory Committees are to be constituted to create awareness among the students.
The State submitted that in Coimbatore, Dharmapuri, Dindigul, Kallakurichi, Krishnagiri, Madurai, Mayiladuthurai, Theni, Tiruppatur, Tiruppur and Sivaganga districts, 11,820 government schools had reconstituted the committees. In 2023-24, these schools conducted 42,126 meetings and in 2024-25, 42,194 meetings were conducted.
Annual orientation training on the POCSO Act awareness to the teachers and the staff members was conducted in 11,820 government schools in 2023-24, in which 68,245 teachers and 46,281 staff members participated. A total of 70,105 teachers and 49,974 staff members were given training in 2024-25, the State submitted and sought time to compile the data for the remaining districts.
A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and A.D. Maria Clete observed that the Student Safeguarding Advisory Committees had been constituted in several areas, but yet to be constituted in some areas across the State. The court directed the authorities to collect the data in respect of the districts where the committees had not been constituted and initiate action to constitute them as per the G.O. in eight weeks. It posted the matter for reporting compliance to August 5.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Church staff member held under Pocso for sexual abuse of 3 minor boys in Chennai
An assistant to a Church Father in Chennai's Ambattur area has been arrested under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for alleged sexual assault involving three minor accused, identified as Yesudas, is said to have engaged in sexual activities with the three teenage boys over a period of five months. Police said the boys, who are cousins, regularly visited the church where the accused worked as an case came to light when the father of one of the boys, disturbed by changes in his son's behaviour, secretly followed him. He was shocked to discover that his son was accompanying Yesudas to an OYO hotel room. The parent then approached the Church Father with his concerns, but was reportedly told to be cautious and received little assistance. Unconvinced by the response, the boy's father filed a complaint with the Ambattur Police. Following preliminary inquiry, police arrested Yesudas and booked him under various sections of the POCSO Act, including BNS section 3A, 3D and 4(1), which deal with penetrative sexual assault on sources told India Today that the accused made the boys watch pornographic videos before the assaults. What began with one boy allegedly led to two others being drawn in, according to statements given to the police. All three boys have confirmed they were abused at hotel rooms by the accused. The investigation is IN THIS STORY#Tamil Nadu#Chennai
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
‘Mere Medical Evidence Can't Prove Guilt': HC Quashes Charges Against Man Accused Of Kidnap, Rape
Last Updated: The High Court held that the trial court had failed to appreciate that there was no direct or circumstantial evidence tying Bashir to the alleged offences The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court recently quashed charges against a man accused of kidnapping and sexually assaulting two minor girls, ruling that 'mere medical evidence of sexual intercourse is not enough to establish guilt under POCSO or rape charges". A single-judge bench of Justice Sanjay Dhar made these observations while discharging Basit Bashir, against whom a Special POCSO Court had previously framed charges under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The High Court held that the trial court had failed to appreciate that there was no direct or circumstantial evidence tying Bashir to the alleged offences. The ruling underscores a key principle in criminal law, that suspicion, however strong, cannot substitute for proof of guilt, and framing charges against a person must be based on material that discloses 'grave suspicion supported by evidence." CASE BACKGROUND The incident traces back to a first information report (FIR) lodged by the father of a 14-year-old girl, alleging that his daughter and her friend were missing and suspected to have been sexually assaulted. The police investigated and alleged that Bashir had enticed the two girls into his vehicle, kidnapped them, and committed penetrative sexual assault upon them. In March 2022, the trial court framed charges against Bashir under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. Aggrieved by this order, Bashir challenged it in the High Court, arguing that there was no direct or circumstantial material tying him to the alleged offences and that the trial court failed to appreciate the principle that charges should be supported by sufficient grounds. Justice Dhar carefully examined the statements of the two minor girls under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). The girls stated that they voluntarily left their homes to visit a nearby market and later boarded Bashir's vehicle due to a lack of available transport. Importantly, the minors expressly denied any coercion or inducement by Bashir. 'The girls boarded the vehicle of their own volition, uninfluenced by any promise or allurement from the petitioner. Their statements contradict the prosecution's claim of kidnapping under Section 363 IPC." The Court also took into account the testimony of the family members, noting that none supported the view that the girls were abducted against their will. Furthermore, the medical reports, while confirming that the girls were sexually active, did not, in and of themselves, connect Bashir to the alleged offences. Importantly, no forensic traces (such as spermatozoa or DNA) were recovered to implicate him in the alleged rape. Justice Dhar held, 'The medical opinion, without corroborative material, cannot be a basis to frame charges." He added, 'The statements of the victims under Section 164 CrPC do not reflect any coercion or rape by the petitioner." The Court drew from Supreme Court judgments, including Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal, Dilawar Balu Kurane, and Sajjan Kumar v. CBI, which prohibit framing charges in the absence of a strong suspicion supported by material on record. The trial court, in this context, was expected to act judiciously and not simply forward the trial without proper consideration of the material placed before it. FINAL ORDER The High Court held that the trial court had acted as a 'post office" for the investigating agency and failed to appreciate the gaps in the evidence. The Court quashed the charges against Bashir, discharged him, and dismissed the challan. 'Therefore, even if the material collected by the investigating agency during the investigation were to remain unrebutted, the same is not sufficient to raise a grave suspicion against the petitioner," the Court said. The Bench held, 'For the foregoing reasons, the instant petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 09.03.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO Cases) (Principal Sessions Judge) Srinagar, whereby charges have been framed against the petitioner/accused, is set aside. The petitioner is discharged and the challan against him shall stand dismissed." Sukriti Mishra, a Lawbeat correspondent, graduated in 2022 and worked as a trainee journalist for 4 months, after which she picked up on the nuances of reporting well. She extensively covers courts in Delhi. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 17, 2025, 15:15 IST News india 'Mere Medical Evidence Can't Prove Guilt': HC Quashes Charges Against Man Accused Of Kidnap, Rape
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Supreme Court directs Karnataka to respond on theatre protection for release of Kamal Haasan's ‘Thug Life'
In a plea seeking protection of theatres in Karnataka from threats over the release of Kamal Haasan movie 'Thug Life', the Supreme Court today directed the Karnataka government to file their response by tomorrow. The top-court stated that it had issued notice to the respondent State seeking its response, in the last hearing, considering the urgency of the matter. A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan also stated that the rule of law demands that every film which has been approved by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) must be allowed to be released and mobs and vigilantes shall not be allowed to take to the streets and create ruckus over the issue. The top court also ordered that the case pending before the Karnataka High Court on this issue be transferred to itself. (This is a breaking news)
