Trump Asks Senate Leader to Cancel Summer Recess to Confirm His ‘Incredible Nominees'
'Hopefully the very talented John Thune, fresh off our many victories over the past two weeks and, indeed, 6 months, will cancel August recess (and long weekends!), in order to get my incredible nominees confirmed,' Trump wrote. 'We need them badly!!!'
The Senate is expected to go on recess from Aug. 4 to Sept. 1. It is one of 14 breaks or long weekends on the 2025 calendar. Their most recent break was June 30 to July 4, and then there is another break toward the end of September. Even when the Senate is in session, lawmakers are generally only in their Capitol Hill offices a few days a week, with ample time to travel back home.
Senators are scheduled to vote on six nominations on Monday, including Bradley Hansell for under secretary of defense for intelligence and security, and John Hurley for under secretary for terrorism and financial crimes. The Senate is also slated for a major vote on a funding bill.
The Senate could soon vote on Emil Bove, a controversial nominee to become a judge on a federal appeals court. He served as one of Trump's personal lawyers before taking a role at the Justice Department.
A whistleblower said in June that Bove told lawyers at the Justice Department they 'would need to consider telling the courts 'fuck you' and ignore any such court order' that would block Trump from sending immigrants to prison in El Salvador.
A Senate Judiciary Committee advanced his nomination earlier this week, prompting Democrats to walk out.
'I have respect for you Mr. Chairman, but this is outrageous, this is unacceptable, this is wrong,' said Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.). 'This is an abuse of power. It is an undermining of the wellbeing and the integrity of this Senate.'
More than 75 former judges asked the Senate Judiciary Committee to reject Bove's nomination.
'Mr. Bove's egregious record of mistreating law enforcement officers, abusing power, and disregarding the law itself disqualifies him for this position,' the group wrote.
Another controversial nominee is former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, who is up for the role of U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C. Trump's first choice for the position was Republican lawyer Ed Martin, but he dropped the bid amid opposition.
The Senate Judiciary Committee also voted to advance Pirro's nomination.
Brian Christine, Trump's nominee for assistant health and human services secretary, is an Alabama urologist who said the issue of teen pregnancy should be left to 'the purview of the parents.'
He also said that 'society works best when men and women are fulfilling their roles, when they are doing what they're supposed to do, raising children and propagating the species.'
Dozens of people in Malaysia protested the possibility of 'alpha male' influencer Nick Adams becoming U.S. ambassador to the country over his posts criticizing Islam and supporting the Israeli military.
Another nomination drawing controversy is that of law professor Jennifer Mascott, Trump's nominee for a federal appeals court seat in Delaware, who is not licensed to practice law in the state.
More from Rolling Stone
Tulsi Gabbard Helps Boost Trump's Russia Crusade, Calling for Prosecution of Obama Officials
Democrats Are Preparing a Deliberately Incomplete 2024 Election Autopsy
These Right-Wingers Won't Shut Up About Epstein, No Matter What Trump Says
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
Another high profile contributor reportedly leaves the Washington Post amid fallout from editorial changes
Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart has reportedly accepted a buyout and is leaving the Jeff Bezos-owned paper after nearly two decades. Capehart, who won a Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing with the New York Daily News in 1999, has served as an editorial writer for the Washington Post for over 18 years. He was a member of the editorial board until 2022, when he left the board over a dispute about an editorial on Georgia's voting laws. He is leaving the paper after accepting a buyout, Axios reported Monday. The columnist, who also hosts the MSNBC Show "Weekends with Jonathan Capehart" and provides commentary on the PBS "NewsHour," is the latest high-profile Washington Post editorial contributor to exit the paper. A glut of writers -- Ann Telnaes, David Shipley, Ruth Marcus, Eugene Robinson and, just earlier this month, Joe Davidson – all departed the beltway paper as concerns mount over the Washington Post's editorial slant taking a rightward shift following President Trump's re-election. Following Trump's re-election, Washington Post owner and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos announced that the editorial section of the paper would be changing course, prompting then-opinion editor David Shipley to leave. "We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets. We'll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others," Bezos posted on X in Feb 2025. Bezos' changes led to a sharp backlash in his newsroom, with staffers telling Fox News Digital earlier this month that morale has collapsed at the paper. Washington Post Executive Editor Matt Murray announced a buyout program for staffers seeking to leave the paper in May. "People are shellshocked and keeping their heads down," one Post staffer told Fox News Digital. Washington Post publisher and CEO Will Lewis sent a memo to staff encouraging those who took issue with the paper's new editorial direction to take the buyouts. "I understand and respect, however, that our chosen path is not for everyone, that's exactly why we introduced the voluntary separation program. As we continue in this new direction, I want to ask those who do not feel aligned with the company's plan to reflect on that," Lewis wrote in the memo. Davidson, a post contributor who authored the Post's "Federal Insider" column for 17 years, announced he was quitting the paper in a Facebook post titled "Quitting The Washington Post -- or did it quit me?" He said that he decided to exit the paper after having a column rejected for being "too opinionated." Capehart's relationship with the Washington Post has been increasingly acrimonious. In his recent memoir, "Yet Here I Am: Lessons from a Black Man's Search for Home," the former columnist trashed many of his colleagues at The Post's editorial board. He accused Washington Post editorial board member Karen Tumulty of "robbing me of my humanity" in a disagreement over language used in an op-ed. The former Washington Post contributor has a history of vicious anti-Trump criticism. At one point, he said that MAGA was far more "worrisome" for the country than any foreign threat America could face in a 2021 segment on PBS NewsHour. Fox News Digital reached out to the Washington Post and Capehart for comment.
CBS News
a few seconds ago
- CBS News
Stockton mayor pitches national shipbuilding hub idea to Trump administration in D.C.
Stockton Mayor Christina Fugazi is in Washington, D.C. right now putting on a shipbuilding show for the Trump administration as she pushes for the city to be the next national hub for shipbuilding in the U.S. "So right there, the Capitol, I wish I could show you the White House because actually we're having meetings in the White House as well," Fugazi said. Mayor Fugazi spoke to CBS Sacramento from her hotel room in Washington, D.C., where she is traveling to tout her city to the Trump administration. "We're ready to go," Fugazi said. "Some people have said this could take years, but we're talking about a year." "The west complex is where all the shipbuilding happened back in World War II," Port of Stockton Director Kirk DeJesus said. DeJesus drove CBS Sacramento around the Stockton port in March, showing the possible new prime real estate for a U.S. maritime revival. Some of the old Navy buildings are still standing. The port also sits on 4,000 acres of land. "We have the acreage, we have the docks, we have access to the freeways, to rail, I mean, we're just a prime location," Fugazi said. "How do you think the relationship between the President and the Governor could impact this decision?" CBS Sacramento's Steve Large asked. "I think it has the potential to impact the decision," Fugazi said. "We can't rule out the politics. We definitely need to make sure that we are selling them on the location, that we have the workforce, that we have the space available." San Joaquin County voted for President Trump in the November election. Mr. Trump issued an executive order in April calling for a "maritime action plan" to be in place by the end of the year, with the goal of relaunching the U.S. shipbuilding industry. He cited data showing the U.S. currently builds only 1% of the world's ships. Mayor Fugazi's message to the president is that Stockton is ready to build ships now at full steam ahead. "So if we had an opportunity for a face-to-face, man, I'm bringing my 'A game,' and they're going to want to come out to Stockton, they're gonna want to visit our area because I'm going to sell it." On the mayor's itinerary in Washington, D.C., she is meeting with the Army Corps of Engineers, the National Security Council, the Navy, and a U.S. shipbuilder. She said the next step would be the Trump administration taking a tour of the Port of Stockton so they could see the shipbuilding possibilities themselves.
Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from defunding Planned Parenthood
A judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from stripping Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood after Congress and President Donald Trump agreed to partially defund the nonprofit through passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Judge Indira Talwani of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts said in her order partially granting a preliminary injunction that the bill unconstitutionally punishes Planned Parenthood member organizations that do not provide abortions. The injunction will risk "at most minimal harm—financial or otherwise—to" the Trump administration while the lawsuit proceeds," Talwani, an Obama appointee, wrote. Talwani's order arose from a lawsuit brought by Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion vendor, over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a massive budget bill that passed Congress this month with no Democrat support. Trump signed the bill into law on July 4. A provision in the bill stripped Medicaid funding from Planned Parenthood, which the nonprofit said could force it to close about 200 of its 600 facilities and deprive about half of its customers, more than one million people, of services that do not include abortion. Planned Parenthood attorneys noted in court filings that Medicaid does not cover abortion. The attorneys argued that cancer and sexually transmitted infections would go undetected, especially for low-income people, and that more unplanned pregnancies would occur because of a lack of contraception access. They said the consequences of losing Medicaid funding "will be grave." Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys had previously argued in court filings that the purpose of the budget provision was to stop "federal subsidies for Big Abortion" by freezing federal funds for certain Medicaid recipients who provide abortions. Weakening Planned Parenthood has been one of the pro-life movement's leading priorities since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Talwani granted a temporary restraining order two weeks ago in favor of Planned Parenthood. The judge initially offered no explanation for her decision, a move that led to widespread backlash among Republicans who described it as judicial overreach. Days later, Talwani offered more context in a subsequent order. The preliminary injunction will leave in place the pause on defunding Planned Parenthood indefinitely, but the Trump administration is likely to appeal the order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. DOJ attorneys had previously argued to the court that blocking a measure that was passed by Congress and signed by the president was an extraordinary move and unjustified. "Beyond the futility of the claims on the merits, Planned Parenthood fails to demonstrate imminent irreparable harm to justify an injunction, asserting only classically reparable economic injury and irrelevant potential harm to patients, who are third parties not before this Court," DOJ attorneys wrote.
