US Consulate celebrates National Day with a reception in Kolkata
Held with all the ceremonial flair befitting the occasion, the gala underscored the enduring partnership between the United States and India. Reflecting on the journey of America for freedom and as a democracy, Charge D' Affaires Jorgan K Andrews said, 'There is no better place to celebrate America's birthday than here, the world's largest democracy.'
'This is my first time hosting America's national day here in Kolkata and it caps off an amazing and busy year since I arrived in August. Many of you have opened the doors to my team, me and my family and helped us to forge our allies. When we talk about diplomacy, we often think of governments working together and certainly that is true, but certainly what is also true is the real part, the real connections and the real strength comes from the people'
-
Kathy Giles-Diaz
, US Consul General
'This day marks an inspiring journey of freedom and democracy that the US had undertaken since independence. It also gives us an opportunity to reflect on the profound and enduring relationship between the two nations. Our shared values of democracy, liberty and justice are found in the dynamic partnership that we cherish today. West Bengal holds a special place in this shared history being home to one of the oldest American Consulates in the world and the oldest in India established in 1794'
-Manoj Pant, IAS, chief secretary to the government of West Bengal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Suspended IAS officer in Kerala raises fresh allegations against Chief Secretary Jayathilak
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The tussle within Kerala's IAS top brass has taken a new turn with suspended IAS officer Prasanth N charging fresh allegations against Chief Secretary A. Jayathilak, accusing of file tampering and document fabrication in the State's e-office system. In a strongly worded Facebook post, Prasanth alleged that backend manipulation of official e-office accounts was being carried out to illegally access files and suppress dissenting opinions. He claimed that on March 12, 2024, he first caught Jayathilak in the act of manipulating documents and has now released what he describes as proof to back his charges. According to Prasanth, forged documents were being used to make it appear as though officers had seen and cleared files, which they never actually handled. He said this not only amounted to blatant violation of the IT Act - a cognizable offence - but also undermined transparency in key decisions involving crores of rupees. Prasanth has been under suspension since November 2024 after making similar allegations against Jayathilak, who at that time was serving as the Additional Chief Secretary. More recently, on July 22, the state government appointed a two-member panel to probe complaints raised against Prasanth. With his latest salvo, sources say the inquiry panel now faces a tougher challenge.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Duke in the crosshairs: Trump's federal probe sparks a reckoning over race and academic power
US investigates Duke University over alleged Title VI violations in law journal selection. (Getty Images) The Trump administration has reignited one of the most contentious debates in American education, whether the pursuit of racial equity in universities amounts to unlawful discrimination. Duke University, long celebrated for its academic prestige, now finds itself at the centre of a federal civil rights investigation over allegations that race played a role in selecting editors for its esteemed Duke Law Journal. The investigation, announced Monday by the Department of Education, will examine whether Duke's editorial practices violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits racial discrimination in federally funded educational institutions. At the heart of the inquiry is the claim that the law journal gives preference to candidates from minority communities during its editorial selection process. 'This investigation is based on recent reporting alleging that Duke University discriminates on the basis of race, color, and/or national origin by using these factors to select law journal members,' the department said in an official statement, as reported by Reuters . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Retirees Unaware Of No Deposit Car Insurance Based On Their Age OTTO Insurance Learn More Undo A broader pattern emerges The probe at Duke is not an isolated case. It comes amid a wave of federal scrutiny targeting DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programs at top-tier universities, including Harvard, Columbia, and Brown. The Trump administration has increasingly positioned itself against institutional efforts that acknowledge race as a factor in hiring, admissions, scholarships, or editorial decisions, arguing that such policies unfairly disadvantage others. In a joint letter to Duke's leadership, Education Secretary Linda McMahon and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. urged the university to conduct an internal review and form a special panel 'with delegated authority from Duke's Board of Trustees to enable Duke and the federal government to move quickly toward a mutual resolution of Duke's alleged civil rights violations.' Duke University has not publicly responded to the allegations or the federal request for cooperation. Elite institutions in the crosshairs The intensifying pressure from Washington has put some of the nation's most prominent institutions on the defensive. According to The New York Times , Harvard University is negotiating a settlement with the federal government that could cost as much as $500 million, more than double what Columbia University agreed to pay just last week, to resolve similar civil rights inquiries. While Harvard appears willing to meet the government's financial demands, it is reportedly resisting calls to allow external oversight of its internal operations, considering such a move a breach of academic independence. Meanwhile, Brown University has already taken preemptive financial measures. Following news that the Trump administration planned to freeze over $510 million in research and student aid grants, the university secured a $500 million loan, as revealed in recent regulatory filings. DEI in the crossfire What began as isolated legal disputes has evolved into a full-scale political campaign to dismantle DEI structures in American education. The administration has threatened to cut federal funding not just over race-conscious policies, but also in response to climate-related initiatives, transgender rights, and pro-Palestinian campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza. President Donald Trump has claimed, without evidence, that DEI practices result in discrimination against white students and men. Civil rights groups have consistently rejected such assertions, arguing that DEI efforts are corrective mechanisms designed to confront longstanding inequities that have historically excluded marginalized communities from academic opportunity. Fears over academic freedom For many faculty members and civil liberties advocates, the federal campaign against DEI is seen not as a fight for fairness, but as an intrusion into academic freedom. 'This is not about fairness—this is about power,' said a spokesperson for a national civil rights coalition, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity. 'These federal investigations are a thinly veiled attempt to dismantle the very frameworks that have enabled underrepresented voices to gain a foothold in elite institutions.' Legal scholars warn that the outcome of these cases could have far-reaching implications, not just for the future of DEI but for how much autonomy universities will be allowed to exercise in shaping their intellectual and editorial communities. At a national crossroads The federal government's expanding push into campus policy marks a critical moment for higher education in the United States. With lawsuits, investigations, and negotiations unfolding across the Ivy League and beyond, the Duke case reflects more than a single institutional dispute; it represents a broader reckoning with how the country defines fairness, opportunity, and inclusion. As Duke braces for what could become a landmark legal and cultural confrontation, the outcome may well determine how freely American universities can pursue diversity in the years to come, or whether such efforts will now be viewed through the lens of civil rights violations. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
News18
44 minutes ago
- News18
How Wokes Are Deploying Cloward-Piven Strategy To Create Anarchy
Last Updated: After sowing the seeds of anarchy and chaos in the developed West, the wokes are now moving towards democracies like India and other countries of the global South. The United States might win some of the tariff battles but it is all set to lose the larger economic war because of the complete surrender of the American corporations to the leftist-woke ideology. These are the lessons that every democracy needs to learn including India. New York Post journalist Charles Gasparino talked about this 'noxious ideology of progressive politics in the boardroom" in his 2024 book Go Woke, Go Broke: The Inside story of Corporate Radicalization in America. This is an ideology, he says, that 'needs to die a thousand deaths." 'The left-wing forces have assembled to transform Corporate America into something resembling the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. The left might hate capitalism but it has been busy implementing capitalist tools to bend big business at will," adds Gasparino. Abhijit Joag has dwelt on this issue in detail in his seminal work, Termites: How the Left is Destroying the World through Subversion, exposing how wokes are globally coordinating to destroy the corporate economy in the democratic world. And whatever tariff wars a country may win or lose, all the gains will be ultimately swept away. According to Joag (pp. 230), in the name of social justice, neo-Marxists are conducting audits of company boards to find out whether adequate representation has been given to 'protected groups' like Blacks, Minorities and the LGBTQ, and are pressurising corporates to increase this representation. Behind this seemingly noble cause, the Left wants to promote identity conflict within the corporate sector and subvert it from within. 'Woke consultants conduct Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Audit of corporates and rank them on 'social conduct'. Legal suits are filed against those with poor ranks. This way wokeism has monopolised the right to distribute character certificates to corporates and publish those who do not fall in line.' Cloward-Piven Strategy Joag interestingly goes back to the 1960s and helps us recall the Cloward-Piven Strategy which is in full display now not only in the US but is being replicated in most of the liberal democracies and civilisational states including India. A neo-Marxist couple, Francis Pox Piven, a Professor in Political Science and Sociology at the Graduate Centre of the City University of New York, and her husband Richard Cloward, published a paper on May 2, 1966 that detailed out a strategy to engineer a huge crisis in the US economy, which would augur the way for Communism. This is known as the Cloward-Piven Strategy. The idea behind this strategy is to overload the welfare system excessively by discouraging people to work and encouraging them to enjoy freebies. This would ultimately lead to collapse of the system. The key elements: of this strategy are mobilising the marginalised sections of the society to demand their 'rightful" benefits from the government, and then overloading the welfare system through mass enrolment. Cloward and Piven argued that this would create a political crisis that could only be resolved by implementing more 'progressive policies' which actually meant paving the way for Marxist or Communist regime. If you remember the riots and violent protests by so-called pro-Palestine supporters over the last couple of years and the anti-farm laws and anti-CAA protests of the 'wokes' and 'Islamists' in India, you should match the script with the prose of the 1967 book by Cloward and Piven: The Breaking of American Social Compact. The book advocates the use of 'Disruptive Protest' to push their demands. By disruptive protest, they mean, 'incendiarism, riots, sit-ins and other forms of civil disobedience, great surges in demand for relief benefits, rent strikes, wild cat strikes, obstructing production on assembly lines". The goal is to 'weaken the regime'. When the regime is vulnerable and insecure it is more likely to bargain and compromise. Cloward and Piven say social movements thrive on conflict. So, where there is no conflict, the wokes will have to create one. The fact that this paper came in 1966 followed by the book as mentioned above is evidence of how Marxists have penetrated the capitalist systems since the 1960s and arguably much before. In a nutshell, there are four steps of the Cloward-Piven strategy: Overload and break the welfare system; create anarchy and chaos; take control of the situation; implement socialism and communism to establish a new order. It is clear that the sustained pressure of the left is forcing creation of gigantic welfare states across the world. Welfare schemes are seen as entitlements now even in the developed economies and the same is happening in emerging economies too especially wherever there are democratic regimes. This has led to an increasing pressure of debt on the economies. In an increasingly fragmented global economic order, this has added to the fragility of the nation states especially the US and the West. top videos View all After sowing the seeds of anarchy and chaos in the developed West, the wokes are now moving towards democracies like India and other countries of the global South. What we need is a collective will and effort to fight these dark forces both at the domestic as well as at the global level. The writer is an author and a columnist. His X handle is @ArunAnandLive. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. First Published: July 29, 2025, 17:29 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
