Americans increased spending tepidly last month as anxiety over the economy takes hold
Some economists were relieved the numbers weren't worse. Still, many expect consumer spending will grow just 1 percent to 1.5 percent at an annual rate in the first three months of this year, far below the 4.2 percent gain in the final quarter last year.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'Consumer spending is on track to slow sharply this quarter, but not by as much as we previously feared,' Stephen Brown, an economist at Capital Economics, a consulting firm, said in an email.
Advertisement
On Friday, a measure of consumer sentiment fell sharply for the third straight month and is now down more than 20 percent since December. Respondents to the University of Michigan's survey cited policy uncertainty as a leading reason for the gloomier outlook. While the respondents were divided sharply by party — sentiment about the current economy fell among Republican by much less than for Democrats — Republicans' confidence in the economy's future dropped 10 percent.
Consumers from all income levels are feeling more strained.
Hunter Simmons of Austin, Texas, who is a lawyer and journalist, said that the uncertainty around the economy because of the stock market turmoil and tariffs has made him more cautious about spending. He said he used to buy the more expensive farm fresh eggs, but now he's going for the cheapest eggs he can find. He's also been buying fewer fresh vegetables and fruits and has turned to frozen versions. And lately Simmons started to pay for gas in cash and is joining fuel rewards programs.
Advertisement
'I am not a big spender in general, but I have been cutting back in small ways,' he said.
A slew of earnings reports over the past few weeks from major retailers including Walmart, Macy's and Dollar General have cited a slowdown in spending.
Walmart, the nation's largest retailer and a bellwether for the retail sector, released a weak outlook last month citing uncertainty around tariffs.
February sales also fell last month at gas stations, clothing stores, and sporting goods stores. The figures aren't adjusted for prices, and the cost of gas also declined in February, which likely accounts for most of the drop. Excluding gas and autos, retail sales rose 0.5 percent, a healthier figure but still modest after a plunge of 0.8 percent in January.
Also Monday, the National Association of Homebuilders said its index measuring builder sentiment fell three points to 39, the lowest level in seven months, as economic uncertainty dimmed builders' outlook and fewer potential buyers visited homes.
"Economic uncertainty, the threat of tariffs and elevated construction costs pushed builder sentiment down in March," the group said. The homebuilders estimate tariffs will add $9,200 to the cost of a new home.
Macy's says its customers, even at its upscale chains Bluemercury and Bloomingdale's, are feeling angst and its financial outlook this month reflects that.
'I think the affluent customer that's shopping Macy's is just as uncertain and as confused and concerned by what's transpiring,' Macy's CEO Tony Spring said at the time.
Hiring has mostly held up and there are no signs that companies are laying off workers. As long as Americans have jobs, spending could remain resilient. But that is not assured.
Advertisement
Dollar General CEO Todd Vasos said Thursday that the overall economic picture for his customers is not ideal and the company said it would close around 100 stores.
'Our customers continue to report that their financial situation has worsened over the last year as they have been negatively impacted by ongoing inflation ' Vasos said during an earnings call. 'Many of our customers report that they only have enough money for basic essentials, with some noting that they have had to sacrifice even on the necessities.'
Spending patterns at Costco have changed to accommodate a soured view of the economy, including a shift toward ground beef and poultry instead of more expensive cuts of meat, said to Gary Millership, the company's chief financial officer.
American Eagle Outfitters CEO Jay Schottenstein said angst is particularly high among younger customers.
'Not just tariffs, not just inflation," said Schottenstein. "We see the government cutting people off. They don't know how that's going to affect them. And when people don't know what they don't know – they get very conservative.'
The retail sales report mostly just covers goods purchases — as well as restaurant sales — but there are signs Americans are cutting back spending on services as well.
Airline executives at JP Morgan's airline industry conference last week said bookings have fallen.
'There was something going on with economic sentiment, something going on with consumer confidence," said Delta CEO Ed Bastian at the industry conference.
D'Innocenzio reported from New York.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Coward' Elon Musk Mocked On His Own Platform After Bending The Knee To Trump
Elon Musk went into damage-control mode early Wednesday as he tried to mend fences with President Donald Trump after their spectacular falling-out last week. And his critics are mocking his public show of fealty on his own platform. Musk spent some $291 million during the 2024 election cycle, most notably to help Trump, according to and became a constant presence by his side. Once in office, Trump put Musk in charge of the 'DOGE' initiative to cut government spending. But Musk left his role, attacked Trump's signature 'big beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination,' and went scorched-earth against his one-time ally in a series of posts on X last week. Musk wrote that Trump won't release the files of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein because the president is named in them, shared a post in support of impeaching Trump and replacing him with Vice President JD Vance, and floated the creation of a third political party. Trump in turn threatened repercussions for Musk's businesses and warned him of 'serious consequences' if he backed Democrats for office. But Musk blinked on Wednesday. He wrote that he regretted some of his posts about Trump and said some of them 'went too far.' He also deleted many of those messages. His critics fired back:
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Foreign investors recoil from ‘discriminatory' tax in Trump's big bill
A proposal in the House version of President Trump's tax and spending cut bill that could levy a 20 percent tax on foreign investors from countries that 'discriminate' against the U.S. has foreign governments and financiers worried. Tax experts say the rule is designed to modify a global minimum tax in a way that could make it compatible with the U.S. tax system, but foreign companies and diplomats are fretting that it could open another front in President Trump's trade war and boost the tide of economic nationalism that's now crashing over international commerce. 'If you're creating such a risk or potential uncertainty tax on businesses here, then many will think twice about investing further in the United States,' United Kingdom Ambassador to the U.S. Peter Mandelson told The Hill. 'If you've got an argument with [foreign] governments, then take it out on the governments. Don't take it out on the businesses and the individuals,' he said. The proposed rule, known as Section 899, targets a 15 percent global minimum tax regime that was being negotiated by the Biden administration. Republicans successfully blocked that deal from being implemented in the U.S. in its current form. While the plan specifically calls out the regime's undertaxed profits rule (UTPR) along with digital service taxes aimed at U.S. tech giants — both of which Republicans have long railed against —the language of the provision is sweeping. Unfair foreign taxes, as designated by the legislation, include 'extraterritorial' taxes, 'discriminatory' taxes, or 'any other tax [that] will be economically borne, directly or indirectly, disproportionately by United States persons.' 'Any country could be deemed to have imposed 'extraterritorial' and/or 'discriminatory' taxes affecting U.S.-headquartered multinationals,' Alex Cobham, head of the U.K.-based Tax Justice Network, wrote in an analysis. 'U.S. multinationals systematically underpay tax by shifting profits out of most jurisdictions where they operate. … Section 899 [seeks] to exert taxing rights on profits arising locally that would otherwise be shifted out.' For some investors, the proposed law evokes the White House's 'reciprocal' tariffs against dozens of countries that used a novel calculation and took the international trade world by storm. '[Section 899] raises the risk of adding a capital war to the current trade war. The impact could well be notable, mostly via its impact on [foreign direct investment],' Deutsche Bank strategist Tim Baker noted in a June 5 note to investors. Lawmakers are also thinking about Section 899 in terms of Trump's trade war. 'President Trump [is] talking about tariffs being fair in terms of reciprocity. That's all it is,' Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) said Tuesday. 'What this tax does is make sure we get fair treatment.' International business groups are warning about the impact on foreign investment in the U.S., as well as the prospect of retaliation against the tax measure by foreign countries. In a letter to Senate leadership, the Global Business Alliance, which represents foreign companies in the U.S., said the rule risks 'prompting retaliatory action by foreign governments against U.S.-headquartered companies, further destabilizing an already fragile international tax environment.' Section 899 would add a 5 percent tax per year on the U.S.-based income of individuals and companies from the 'discriminatory' foreign countries that levy such taxes. The surtax would top out at 20 percent. The law appears designed to nullify the effects of the global minimum tax in its current form. The global minimum tax is also known as 'Pillar 2' and was negotiated through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a Western-led group of wealthy countries. The Joint Committee on Taxation, Congress's in-house tax scorer, estimated that the U.S. would lose about $120 billion under that deal, while Section 899 is estimated to raise a comparable $116 billion in revenues over 10 years. That's about 0.2 percent of annual U.S. revenues. Pillar 2's undertaxed profits rule allows U.S. subsidiaries of multinational corporations to be taxed if their parent company isn't taxed at the minimum rate of 15 percent. Digital service taxes allow foreign countries to tax companies like Facebook and Google, since their products are used abroad even though they're headquartered in the U.S. 'Several countries have already made the wise decision to exclude the UTPR surtax from their implementation of the OECD global minimum tax,' House Ways and Means Republicans warned in a January statement related to the proposal. Tax experts say Section 899 is primarily focused on getting rid of the UTPR within Pillar 2 and making sure that countries don't start taxing tech giants for using their products. 'We've heard Treasury officials now speak publicly multiple times. [Their position] has consistently been [that] this is not about getting rid of Pillar 2. This is about getting rid of a mechanism that is essentially forcing countries to adopt an income tax,' Pat Brown, co-leader of accounting firm PwC's tax practice, told The Hill. Brown said the broader language in the bill that's perturbing foreign investors is likely intended to be a safeguard against semantic workarounds for instituting digital service taxes and subsidiary top-up taxes — not to be a general-purpose punitive tool in an escalating trade war. 'I don't think there's something else specific on their radar. I think this is more [lawmakers' saying] 'We just need to make sure our bases are covered and somebody doesn't get cute,'' he said. Analysts for JPMorgan speculated that the practical scope of the provision would be much smaller than a 20 percent tax on foreign direct investment in the U.S., or even 'trivial.' 'More realistically, the effect of Section 899 should be much smaller, and perhaps trivial,' they wrote in a Tuesday note to investors. Notably, the big Republican bill does not axe the global minimum tax regime. However, there are questions about its prospects, given the inclusion of Section 899 in Republicans' big bill. 'If we look at Pillar 2 in a vacuum where the U.S. doesn't retaliate with tariffs and, say, Section 891 and proposed Section 899 … then I think Pillar 2 could definitely survive — although I think what I just said is unrealistic,' Scott Levine, former Treasury Department deputy assistant secretary for international tax affairs, said in April. 'We already know that we're not in a world without any of those measures.' Doing away entirely with the OECD regime would likely open up a floodgate of digital service taxes against U.S. tech giants that could drown countries in bilateral trade confrontations. European taxation and regulation of American Big Tech companies operating on their continent have been a sensitive spot for successive U.S. administrations. Vice President Vance voiced disapproval of European tech regulations, including the EU's wide-ranging Digital Service Act, at a conference on artificial intelligence in Paris earlier this year. 'Many of our most productive tech companies are forced to deal with the EU's Digital Services Act and the massive regulations it created about taking down content and policing so-called misinformation,' he said in February. Despite Republicans' overall maintenance of the OECD framework, some international tax groups have argued that Section 899 makes a rival framework advancing at the United Nations a more attractive option for international tax coordination. 'The negotiations of the U.N. tax convention are the best and perhaps only opportunity to act collectively against the unilateral threat posed by the Trump administration,' the Tax Justice Network's Cobham wrote. Sarakshi Rai contributed.
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Sergio Gor cements himself as ‘vital' part of Trump's White House
Sergio Gor, head of the White House Office of Presidential Personnel, has quietly been at the center of President Trump's effort to aggressively reshape the size of the federal government and stock it with loyalists. Gor is a lesser-known figure to those outside the Beltway, but sources told The Hill he is a highly influential aide with strong ties to the MAGA movement. He is a close ally of Donald Trump Jr. and a fierce loyalist to the president. As one Trump ally put it, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller shapes Trump's policies, staff Secretary Will Scharf shapes who and what President Trump sees, and Gor shapes who serves in the administration. 'Sergio has led the effort to ensure committed, principled America First advocates staff the President's government. He's done a great job, and will continue to do so,' Vice President Vance said in a statement to The Hill. Gor is a former aide to Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a somewhat ironic twist given Paul's current opposition to the massive reconciliation package containing key pieces of Trump's agenda, as well as Paul's recent sparring with Miller. But Gor's MAGA credentials are not in question. He co-founded a publishing company with Donald Trump Jr. that has published books by the president and conservative figures such as Charlie Kirk and senior Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro. Gor also led the pro-Trump super PAC Right for America. Gor has maintained a mostly low-key profile, though he has been in the headlines as a central figure in the acrimonious split between the president and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who departed his role as a special government employee late last month. Musk and Gor reportedly clashed in recent months, including at Cabinet meetings where Musk chastised Gor over personnel disagreements. Musk, who led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), had pushed for more access and authority for his top deputies. Gor was also cited as an animating figure in pushing for the withdrawal of Jared Isaacman, a Musk ally who had been tapped to lead NASA. President Trump pulled the nomination shortly after Musk's departure from government, citing 'prior associations,' a reference to Isaacman's donations to Democrats. An administration official told The Hill that the decision to pull Isaacman's nomination ultimately rested with the president. The official also downplayed talk of a wider feud between Gor and Musk. They noted that Gor oversaw the hiring of DOGE officials and argued the two were broadly aligned on the agency's goals. Gor has been instrumental in one of Trump's biggest undertakings so far in his second term: reshaping the federal government and stocking it with loyalists. DOGE made it its mission to drastically slash the number of employees working in the federal government, leading to a wave of layoffs at various government agencies that affected tens of thousands of workers. Some of those layoffs were allowed to go forward by the courts. Gor, meanwhile, has been leading the Office of Presidential Personnel, which handles the recruiting, vetting, interviewing and hiring processes for workers across the federal government. Trump's first term saw some of his most controversial policies and impulsive suggestions undercut or rebuffed by Cabinet officials and appointees who disagreed with him, including one who penned an anonymous op-ed in The New York Times. But those occasional guardrails have more or less been removed this time around, with Gor at the tip of the spear to ensure appointees are aligned with Trump. Gor said shortly after Inauguration Day that all political appointee hiring decisions were going through the White House. Applicants were asked how they supported Trump during the 2024 campaign, among other questions that amounted to loyalty tests. Hiring guidelines sent out by the Office of Personnel Management late last month include a question about how applicants would advance Trump's executive orders and a request to cite examples of policy initiatives they find significant. The result has been an administration that abides by the old adage that 'personnel is policy,' with Trump loyalists largely in unison carrying out the president's agenda at an aggressive and more synchronized speed than his first term. 'Sergio is a vital member of the team and he has helped President Trump put together an Administration that is second to none,' White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement to The Hill. 'As a long-time advisor, there is nobody more capable of ensuring the government is staffed with people who are aligned with the mission to make America great again and work towards implementing the president's agenda.' When Musk was on a social media tirade against Trump last week, he dropped what he referred to as the 'really big bomb,' one that the Tesla CEO may have known would cause ripples with the president's base. Musk alleged last Thursday that Trump was named in documents related to the federal investigation of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Those documents, and Epstein's death, have been a source of numerous conspiracy theories and wider fascination among Trump supporters. That fascination has put officials, such as Attorney General Pam Bondi, under a microscope and prompted outcry from some in MAGA World who aren't buying the administration's insistence that there's no nefarious plot to uncover. It just so happened that as Musk was posting, two top Trump officials were taping appearances with influential podcasters whose audiences overlap with those interested in the Epstein case. Vice President Vance was on Theo Von's podcast, while FBI Director Kash Patel joined Joe Rogan. Both Rogan and Von are part of the 'manosphere,' which comprises programming that appeals to young men in particular. Vance learned of the since-deleted Epstein post in real time as Von, host of the 'This Past Weekend' podcast, read it aloud. 'Here's my basic reaction to all this stuff. First of all, like, absolutely not, Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein. Whatever the Democrats and the media says about him, that's totally BS,' Vance said. Patel, meanwhile, had already spoken at length about the Epstein files with Rogan when Musk's post came up. But Patel, who has already caught flak from some in the MAGA base for insisting Epstein killed himself, was not taking the bait to delve further into conspiracies. 'I'm not participating in any of that conversation between Elon and Trump,' Patel told Rogan. 'I know my lane, and that ain't it.'
