Trump wants to end federal control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Here's what to know
The Trump administration wants to put a new 'welcome' doormat on the front steps of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he wants to undo government ownership of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and let them go public. It's a concept that has occasionally popped up in policy debates since the Obama administration.
Here's what to know about a possible Trump-led effort to end federal control of Fannie and Freddie.
They're a pair of government-supervised mortgage firms with an enormous footprint in the housing market. The firms don't actually make home loans. Instead, they purchase mortgages from lenders, bundle them into securities and sell them to investors with a federal guarantee against default. That guarantee renders Fannie and Freddie attractive to investors since they're shielded from losses.
Fannie and Freddie comprise about 70% of the mortgage market, according to 2023 data from the Urban Institute. The pillar of the market is the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, a distinct American product that insulates homeowners from inflation spikes or changes to interest rates while paying off their homes.
Fannie and Freddie had long operated as publicly-traded businesses responsive to shareholders since their inception. But in 2008, Fannie and Freddie crashed into trouble after buying a flood of toxic loans. Housing prices nosedived and homeowners trailed on mortgage payments. Fannie and Freddie's losses were enormous.
The ensuing mortgage-market meltdown led to a bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which placed them into what's known as 'conservatorship,' an arrangement giving the federal government broad powers in managing the firms. Thatfell just short of full-blown nationalization. The federal rescue of Fannie and Freddie was originally designed as a short-term fix, but the setup has lasted almost two decades.
A federal spinoff of Fannie and Freddie isn't a new idea. Congress has flirted with it before, but several attempts fizzled out over the years.
In 2019, then-Senate Banking Chair Mike Crapo, an Idaho Republican,released a three-page outline that would turn the institutions into private guarantors with a limited share of the mortgage market. The push didn't gain traction.
Some observers argue that privatizing Fannie and Freddie could be achieved through the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), though it would take several years to complete an arduous process.
Fully restoring private control of Fannie and Freddie wasn't an explicit goal of Trump's 2024 campaign and he didn't mention it on the campaign trail. But he has taken an interest in the idea in several social media posts.
In addition to stating his intention of eventually selling off Fannie and Freddie on Tuesday, Trump wants to rewrite the unspoken contract between investors and the federal government. He made explicit what was once treated as implicit in the housing market: The U.S. would again prop up the mortgage giants if another 2008-style economic meltdown fell at their doorstep.
Analysts have widely expected a second Trump administration to try and finish what they started. The first Trump administration sought to promote private competition in the mortgage market, arguing it was an effective method to lower mortgage rates. In 2019, the Treasury allowed Fannie and Freddie to keep more of their earnings and begin rebuilding capital reserves so both could eventually function without government support. Democrats at the time were chilly to the measures.
The Trump administration could try to release Fannie and Freddie from federal ownership without Congress, a step that's likelier given that lawmakers have devoted little time and resources on the issue. 'Its implementation is likely to take many years, potentially longer than the four years Trump II will have in office,' housing expert Donald Layton said in a January blog post for the NYU Furman Center.
Investors such as Bill Ackman, who bought shares at deeply discounted rates, stand to make a windfall if Fannie and Freddie become publicly traded.
Some analysts warn that casting off Fannie and Freddie into the private sector could drive up mortgage rates. But that depends on how their release from conservatorship is structured and the strength of a federal guarantee to rescue them if they fail.
FHFA director Bill Pulte said during a congressional hearing in February that any exit from conservatorship for Fannie and Freddie should be 'carefully planned' to avoid unsettling mortgage rates.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
31 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
JGBs Mixed; Trade, Geopolitical Tensions May Support
0014 GMT — JGBs are mixed in price terms in the early Tokyo session, but may be supported by trade and geopolitical tensions that typically enhance the safe-haven appeal of sovereign debt. U.S. President Trump said on Friday that he would increase tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum to 50% from current 25%, effective June 4. Meanwhile, Ukraine launched drone attacks on four military airports inside Russia, destroying more than 40 warplanes. Five-year JGB yield is unchanged at 1.015%; 30-year yield is down 1.5 bps at 2.950%. (
32 minutes ago
GOP budget battle over ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Republicans are squabbling over whether President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' will boost the economy, or add trillions to the nation's debt. ABC News' Selina Wang reports.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Small businesses struggle under Trump's tariff whiplash: ‘I'm so angry that my own government has done this to me'
For some small businesses, the last week brought even more twists and turns to the past two months of President Donald Trump's chaotic tariffs. The situation was already confusing, with stops and starts of tariffs at different levels. Then on Wednesday, a US court said Trump overstepped his authority in imposing most of those import levies – only for an appeals court on Thursday to pause the previous court's ruling. The confusion has made it challenging for some small companies to plan, business owners told CNN. In certain cases, they have had to consider changing their product strategy, looking into shifting their supply chains, reducing staff hours or delaying products. 'My fear is, if this continues, there's going to be like the mass extinction of small businesses,' Julie Robbins, CEO of Ohio-based guitar pedal maker EarthQuaker Devices, told CNN. Trump announced blanket tariffs across the globe on April 2, and since then, his plans have changed on a regular basis. In early April, he issued a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs almost everywhere except China. Then, after ratcheting up total tariffs on Chinese imports to 145%, he declared smartphones and certain other electronics would be exempt from the reciprocal tariffs. The US and China agreed in May to roll back reciprocal tariffs for 90 days. And in late May, he threatened smartphone makers like Apple with 25% tariffs if they don't make their phones in the US. He also agreed to push back levies on imports from the European Union until July 9. Those are only some of his changes, which can come at any time of day via the White House, social media posts or other avenues. The whiplash has been hard for companies to keep up with. Even major brands like apparel giant Gap are feeling the impact of tariffs, but small companies with far fewer resources are in an even tougher spot. The National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Optimism Index fell by 1.6 points in April, dipping below the 51-year average for the second consecutive month. The organization's chief economist, Bill Dunkelberg, cited uncertainty as a 'major impediment' for small business owners in a press release. 'It's the sort of more smaller, kind of more niche… brands that are going to really, really get hit by this,' Jack Leathem, an analyst at market research firm Canalys, told CNN in April. Some small business owners have had to make difficult decisions as they've grappled with the impact of tariffs. EveAnna Manley, whose company Manley Labs makes high-end electronics for recording studios, has had to cut her employees' hours by 25%. The reciprocal tariffs that China imposed on the US have been particularly challenging, she says, since China has become a major market for her business. Manley says it took 'decades' for her to 'get the best Chinese importers.' Overall, Manley Labs' sales are down more than 19% compared to last year, she told CNN, which has frozen the company's product development efforts. 'It's just a freaking mess right now,' she said in late May, before this past week's court rulings on Trump's tariffs. 'And I'm so angry that my own government has done this to me.' The best thing small businesses can do right now is to be flexible and diversify their sourcing and procurement strategies, says Tala Akhavan, chief operating officer of Pietra, a platform that helps brands with sourcing, production and logistics among other services. That's what Intuition Robotics, which makes a home robot designed to be a companion for older adults, is doing, according to chief strategy officer Assaf Gad. The company also makes money off its digital subscription accounts, according to Gad, giving it the flexibility to look into a 'plan B' outside of China for producing the company's hardware. Sudden changes in tariff policies haven't really impacted the company's decisions because it's planning for the next nine to 12 months rather than the short term, he said in mid-May. Trump's tariffs have encouraged Gad to think about expanding Intuition Robotics into international markets. 'Maybe this is also a good time to say, 'Let's not put all the eggs in one basket,'' he said, 'and, you know, start looking on other kind of territories that will reduce the risk for us going forward.' But for some companies, finding a plan B isn't so easy. That's the case for Sarah O'Leary, CEO of Willow, which makes wearable breast pumps and accessories. As a medical device company, Willow can't simply just move its manufacturing, O'Leary told CNN. The company had to pause exporting one product it produces in China for postpartum recovery at one point because it became too expensive. The ruling on Wednesday aiming to block many tariffs brought some relief, O'Leary said in an emailed statement on Thursday evening. But she acknowledged that there's still 'so much uncertainty,' adding that 'the chaos will persist.' Any tariffs, even low ones, would be difficult for a small company like hers to absorb, she said in mid-May. 'We don't build our products with that much margin,' she said. 'And so, unfortunately, we are in a position where we have to evaluate what we can do to survive in those contexts.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
