Judge Siraj Desai to monitor legal proceedings in high-profile LPC case against attorney Kaamilah Paulse
Attorney Kaamilah Paulse of Herold Gie Attorneys.
Image: Supplied
Respected Ombudsman and retired judge Siraj Desai has confirmed that he will be closely monitoring the disciplinary proceedings involving Cape Town attorney Kaamilah Paulse, who faces serious allegations of professional misconduct.
Desai currently serves as South Africa's Legal Services Ombud, a position he has held since December 2020.
Desai's comments follow a landmark ruling by the Appeals Tribunal of the Legal Practice Council (LPC), which found prima facie evidence of misconduct after a complaint by Johannesburg-based father Asif Casoojee. 'This matter came to our offices after the complainant was turned down by the LPC. He followed the appeal process. I'm pleased to hear that the appeal process is functioning optimally,' said Judge Desai.
'We receive many complaints about attorneys in matrimonial cases, complaints about irregularity or undue influence. We will follow the matter with great interest. It is a sensitive matter. Because of the nature of the complaint, the matter must be fully and properly investigated in the fora of the LPC.'
Casoojee has been entangled in a four-year legal battle with his former spouse over access to their two children. Paulse, a senior attorney at Herold Gie Attorneys, represents Cassojee's ex-wife. Casoojee's complaint includes allegations of unethical conduct, dishonest legal tactics, and interference in both his personal and professional life.
In its ruling dated 13 March 2025, the LPC Appeals Tribunal upheld Casoojee's appeal on two key charges.
The first charge pertains to a protection order obtained by Paulse. The Tribunal found that the interim order, which preceded the final protection order, had not been properly served—SAPS reportedly failed to deliver it, and no return date was issued.
The final order was granted in Casoojee's absence, raising questions about due process. The second and more serious charge involves Paulse's alleged interference in Casoojee's relationship with his children. The Tribunal found that Paulse had played a role in restricting his access to their school records, communication, and general contact.
It ruled that her actions amounted to 'parental alienation.' Additional concerns included her alleged use of unlawfully obtained financial documents and participation in a private WhatsApp group that shared confidential information about Casoojee's business. Tribunal Chair Advocate Sonja Lötter criticised Paulse for failing to address these allegations.
'This is not an answer to the evidence that the complainant has presented,' the Tribunal said. It also noted that since 2021, during protracted legal proceedings, the best interests of the children were not prioritised.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The LPC reaffirmed the duty of all attorneys to uphold the constitutional principle of the child's best interests, as outlined in the Children's Act 38 of 2005. The Tribunal cited Judge Peter Mabuse, who has warned that legal tools should not be used 'as weapons in a battle to annihilate the opposing party.'
The ruling has triggered renewed scrutiny of South Africa's family law system. Although the law theoretically grants both parents equal rights, many fathers argue that the system operates with an unconscious bias.
'There is often an unspoken bias that assumes the mother is always the better caregiver,' said family law expert Advocate Lesedi Mokoena. 'But that is not the law, and it's not always in the best interests of the child.'
Casoojee, who is now applying to the High Court to have Paulse removed from the custody case due to a conflict of interest, insists his efforts are not just about his rights. 'This case is about setting a precedent. Our children deserve better than to be used as pawns in legal warfare.'
On Thursday, Herold Gie Attorneys issued a letter to The Star, urging the paper not to publish the story. 'We strongly disagree with the decision of the LPC Appeals Tribunal to refer the matter back to the Disciplinary Committee.
''While the decision has been made, it should be noted that no final finding has been made regarding Ms Paulse,' the letter stated.
The firm confirmed Paulse intends to challenge the allegations.
The matter now proceeds to the LPC's Disciplinary Committee and may return to the High Court, where the future of Casoojee's relationship with his children could finally be resolved — under close watch from the Ombudsman himself.
The misconduct case against Paulse is gaining national traction, as several fathers' rights groups and civil society organisations prepare to back Casoojee in his long legal battle.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Gaza ministry says Israel killed more than 30 aid seekers, Israel denies
More than 30 Palestinians were killed and nearly 170 injured on Sunday near a food distribution site in south Gaza, the health ministry said, as witnesses reported Israeli soldiers fired on people trying to collect aid and Israel denied it. The US-based Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) said food was distributed without incident on Sunday at the distribution point in Rafah and there were no deaths or injuries. GHF released an undated video to support its statement that showed dozens of people gathering around piles of boxes. Reuters could not independently verify the video or what took place. Witnesses said the Israeli military opened fire as thousands of Palestinians gathered to receive food aid. Israel's military said an initial inquiry found soldiers had not fired on civilians while they were near or within the distribution site. The Hamas-controlled Gaza health ministry said 31 people were killed with a single gunshot wound to the head or chest from Israeli fire as they were gathered in the Al-Alam district aid distribution area in Rafah. It said 169 were injured.
The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
Joslin Smith court case: What happened to state witness?
Western Cape High Court Judge Nathan Erasmus has imposed a life sentence on convicted traffickers of Joslin Smith, including her mother, Kelly Smith. But what about the state witness, Lourentia Lombaard? The woman – a former accused who turned State 204 witness – has stated under oath that Kelly allegedly sold her daughter to a sangoma for R20 000. Kelly, her boyfriend Jacquin 'Boeta' Appollis, and pal Steveno van Rhyn received concurrent sentences for trafficking and kidnapping. During his sentencing hearing, Western Cape High Court Judge Erasmus revealed that the trafficking trial's fourth former accused, turned state witness, Lourentia Lombaard, would hear her fate in another court date. Lombaard – a State 204 witness – previously stated under oath that Joslin's mother, Kelly Smith, allegedly sold her to a sangoma for R20 000. Charges were withdrawn against Lombaard, who has been granted provisional indemnity from criminal prosecution. However, her credibility was questioned when she admitted to lying to police in a recorded statement after Joslin Smith's disappearance. Her version of events from her March 2024 statement differs from her confession to police in October, when she agreed to turn state witness. According to the Criminal Procedure Act, a Section 204 witness can receive indemnity from criminal charges, provided that their testimony and evidence help incriminate the accused. In the case of Joslin Smith, the National Prosecuting Authority offered Lourentia Lombaard witness protection in exchange for her testimony against Kelly Smith, Boeta Appollis, and Steveno van Rhyn. However, if the court finds that the witness has not testified truthfully, they may face prosecution for perjury and related charges. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
The South African
11 hours ago
- The South African
SECOND group of white Afrikaner 'refugees' arrive in United States
A second group of white South African Afrikaners have reportedly arrived in the United States under a controversial refugee policy signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year, sparking renewed global debate over race, immigration, and political messaging. According to posts from the US-based advocacy group Amerikaners , nine white South Africans landed in Atlanta this week as part of a pilot programme framed by the Trump administration as a response to alleged violence and land expropriation in South Africa – claims widely discredited by international human rights organisations. The executive order, quietly signed in February, granted refugee status to select white South Africans, citing fears of a so-called 'white genocide' – a term critics say is rooted in white nationalist rhetoric rather than verified facts. Organisations like Human Rights Watch and Africa Check maintain that while farm attacks do occur, there is no evidence of systemic targeting along racial lines. Among the recent arrivals is Charl Kleinhaus, 46, from Mpumalanga, who told the BBC he left his home, family, and dogs behind to pursue what he called a 'safer future' for his children. Another, 48-year-old Errol Langton, a farmer from KwaZulu-Natal, expressed hope to continue farming in the US. A source within the US government told The Hill that the goal is to resettle 'thousands more' Afrikaners by the end of the American summer, with consular processing already being expedited in Pretoria and Cape Town. This rapid acceleration has raised red flags. Critics say the policy selectively elevates a racially privileged group while overlooking far greater humanitarian crises in conflict zones like Sudan, Yemen, or the DRC. Still, right-wing US commentators have praised the move as a humanitarian response. South African reactions, meanwhile, remain split: some see it as a lifeline; others as a dangerous and racially charged distortion of the country's reality. Both the US State Department and the South African government have declined to comment publicly on the numbers or long-term intentions of the refugee programme. Analysts warn it could become a flashpoint issue in both domestic and foreign policy – particularly as the US heads into the 2026 election cycle. For now, however, the quiet arrival of these Afrikaner families marks the start of a broader, more contentious immigration experiment – one unfolding at the intersection of politics, identity, and international diplomacy. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
