logo
Inside the legal fight over the telehealth clinics that help women defy abortion bans

Inside the legal fight over the telehealth clinics that help women defy abortion bans

Every month, thousands of women thwart abortion bans in their home states by turning to telehealth clinics willing to prescribe pregnancy-ending drugs online and ship them anywhere in the country.
Whether this is legal, though, is a matter of debate. Two legal cases involving a New York doctor could wind up testing the shield laws some states have passed to protect telehealth providers who ship abortion pills nationwide.
Dr. Margaret Carpenter faces a felony charge in Louisiana for supplying abortion medication through the mail to a pregnant teen in that state. The patient's mother also faces criminal charges. A Texas judge fined the same physician $100,000 after the state accused her of prescribing abortion medication for a woman near Dallas.
So far, the prosecution hasn't progressed thanks to New York's shield law, which has protected Carpenter from extradition to Louisiana. But other telehealth centers operating in states with similar legal protections for abortion providers are watching closely.
'We have great legal counsel who have advised us that what we are doing is legal,' said Dr. Angel Foster, co-founder of The Massachusetts Medication Abortion Access Project, which is among a handful of telehealth providers that facilitate abortions from afar in states with bans.
As more states consider enacting shield laws or expanding existing ones, whether one state can shield providers from liability for breaking another state's laws around abortion is still an unsettled area of law.
Erik Baptist, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which opposes abortion, said shield laws violate a constitutional requirement that states respect the laws and legal judgments of other states.
'What these shield law states are doing are undermining the prerogative of these pro-life states to implement and enforce pro-life laws,' said Baptist, director of the group's Center for Life. 'And so I think the Supreme Court ultimately will want to take this.'
'That is inherently a challenge with shield laws and telehealth,' said Carmel Shachar, faculty director of the Health Law and Policy Clinic at Harvard Law School. 'At a certain point, for the purposes of abortion bans, the courts will need to decide: Do we treat a telehealth abortion as happening within the state of the provider or within the state of the patient?'
Abortion pills sent to your home
Decades ago, the FDA approved the use of two prescription medicines — mifepristone and misoprostol — to terminate pregnancies.
But it wasn't until 2023 that telehealth abortions across states became more popular, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The Society of Family Planning, which supports abortion rights, said that between April and June 2024 there were an average of 7,700 telehealth abortions performed each month in states that either ban abortion totally or after six weeks of pregnancy.
The prescribing process at telehealth clinics varies by provider, but usually takes place entirely online, with the patient answering a series of health-related questions and consent forms.
At some telehealth clinics, medical providers don't come face-to-face with patients, even via videoconferencing, and patients don't necessarily know the prescriber's name unless requested.
For instance, when Foster's clinic, also known as The MAP, puts pills in the mail, only the name of the practice appears on the label, as allowed under the Massachusetts shield law. If patients have follow-up questions, they can talk or text the doctor working that day, but may not know that doctor's name either.
Pills can arrive in a less than a week.
'This has been the safety net, post-Dobbs, of allowing people who don't have the ability to travel out of state to get abortion care,' said Greer Donley, a University of Pittsburgh law professor and abortion law expert.
When dealing with medications not related to abortion, doctors are often able to write prescriptions for patients in other states. However, in most states, if the patient is located within its borders, the doctor must have a license issued by that state, according to Mei Wa Kwong, executive director of the The Center for Connected Health Policy.
States with shield laws
Twenty three states and Washington, D.C., currently have shield laws protecting abortion providers.
Of those, eight have specific provisions protecting them from criminal prosecution or civil lawsuits even if the patient is in another state, according to the nonprofit research organization KFF. They include California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
Louisiana's request to extradite Carpenter hit a roadblock when New York Gov. Kathy Hochul rejected it, citing the state's shield law. (A county clerk also cited the shield law as he refused to file the civil judgment from Texas.)
'These are not doctors providing health care. They are drug dealers,' Republican Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told state lawmakers as she promoted a bill that would expand who can sue and be sued in abortion medication cases. 'They are violating our laws. They are sending illegal medications for purposes of procuring abortions that are illegal in our state.'
Clinics say they will keep prescribing
Julie Kay, the executive director of the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, the nationwide organization co-founded by Carpenter, said providers won't be 'bullied and intimidated' into ceasing operations.
Other telehealth abortion providers said they also won't be deterred by legal threats.
'I have been working in this field for 25 years and this is part of the work,' said Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, founder and director of Aid Access, an abortion pill supplier. 'It's something that we all anticipated would happen,' she said of the legal challenges.
A doctor who is part of A Safe Choice, a network of California-based physicians that prescribes abortion pills to women in all 50 states, told The Associated Press he believes he is protected by the state's shield law, but is also taking precautions.
'I'm not going to be traveling outside of California for a very long time,' said the doctor, who spoke with The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he wanted to protect his identity for safety reasons.
___
Associated Press writer Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Science Says We Age in Spikes—Here's How To Slow Them Down
Science Says We Age in Spikes—Here's How To Slow Them Down

Vogue

time24 minutes ago

  • Vogue

Science Says We Age in Spikes—Here's How To Slow Them Down

'The fact is if we're not aging, we're dead,' she says frankly. 'The goal is to age the best that you can, not just physically but mentally. And the physical does affect the psyche.' So, what aging looks like on the face: it's loss of elasticity, lines and wrinkles, and jowling. As noted by Dr. Idriss, another indisputable part of the aging process starts as early as your twenties; collagen production naturally begins to decrease around the age of 25, typically by about 1% per year, contributing to the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles. 'We're much more attuned to our faces and people are noticing them more,' she says—it's a culture thing, where the Instagram feed, front-facing camera, and the celebrity news cycle have us examining our faces in ways we've never done before. But still, Dr. Idriss has noticed a 'subtle shift' in faces. Over the course of six months, there's a 'flatness' that happens. Faces get narrower and longer. According to the derm, that's happening because of slight 'volume shrinkage' on the outer aspect of our faces that shifts things in your face. Can it be prevented? Not hugely, but you can address the more overarching aging shift; Dr. Idriss advises that you stick to a healthy diet, and try not to fluctuate in weight. Yo-yoing can accentuate those facial shifts. Collagen powders won't make an impact either, she belives, because you can't spot target like that. Topical vitamin A-based drugs—AKA retinoids—have been proven to reduce fine lines and wrinkles by increasing the production of collagen. 'Your later self will thank you,' Dr. Idriss says of retinol usage in your twenties. In the derm office, light microneedling can make a difference too—although not with a lot of radio frequency or heat, as Dr. Idriss advises, which could 'melt' the fat or tissue in your face that gives your skin elasticity and that plump appearance. The second peak in your late thirties, as Dr. Idriss says, can be reflected in jowling (sagging skin) around the face over the course of a month. Smile lines can become more prominent. Having a good derm, here, can be important. No cream is going to restore volume—different treatments like PRF (Platelet-Rich Fibrin, derived from your body's blood) or PRP therapies to stimulate your own tissue would be advisable. It can strengthen your tissue, and can slow down the deepening of smile lines. Dr. Idriss says she's noticed it's helped her own under eyes. Filler, when used strategically and done correctly, could also be considered. While fillers won't lift your face, it can be used to fill in the details on your face to create balance and make jowls less prominent. Dr. Idriss also advises ultrasound treatments around this time, which would help to tighten skin over time.

Former Trump surgeon general says "people are going to die" after RFK Jr. halts some mRNA vaccine research
Former Trump surgeon general says "people are going to die" after RFK Jr. halts some mRNA vaccine research

CBS News

time24 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Former Trump surgeon general says "people are going to die" after RFK Jr. halts some mRNA vaccine research

Former Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams — who served during the first Trump administration — argued Sunday that "people are going to die" if the U.S. backs away from mRNA vaccine development, after Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. halted around $500 million in research funding. Kennedy announced last week that the administration was canceling 22 mRNA vaccine development projects, saying the vaccines "fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu." The projects were funded through the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA. Kennedy said the funds would be shifted toward "safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate." Adams, who appeared Sunday on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," said Kennedy's assertions about the efficacy of mRNA vaccines are "simply not true" — citing their effectiveness in the COVID-19 pandemic, during which hundreds of millions of people took Pfizer and Moderna's mRNA vaccines. "We know that by the most conservative estimates, upward of 2 million lives have been saved because of mRNA technology," Adams said. "It helped us develop COVID-19 vaccines in record time. And it's, quite frankly, President Trump's greatest achievement." The mRNA technology was central to Operation Warp Speed, a public-private partnership aimed at quickly developing COVID-19 vaccines at the onset of the coronavirus pandemic near the end of Mr. Trump's first term. If the U.S. had relied on older vaccine technology, it could have taken an extra 18 to 24 months to develop COVID-19 shots, Adams said. Asked about Kennedy's move by CBS News earlier this week, Mr. Trump said, "Operation Warp Speed was, whether you're Republican or a Democrat, considered one of the most incredible things ever done in this country," while noting that he had upcoming meetings on the topic. Adams, who was involved in the Operation Warp Speed effort, said it's "fascinating" to him that, as Mr. Trump and his allies discuss whether he deserves a Nobel Prize, "the thing that he should be considered for the Nobel Prize for, his health secretary is trying to undermine." The former surgeon general explained that mRNA is a type of natural molecule that's present in the body and operates like a "recipe card that tells your body how to make a protein." Beyond COVID-19, Adams said the technology "helps us develop vaccines and new treatments" in other areas — from cancers and HIV to the flu and the Zika virus. The funding cuts could halt progress in one of the "most promising areas of modern medicine," the former surgeon general said. "These are advances that are not going to happen now," Adams said. "People are going to die because we're cutting short funding for this technology." Adams also criticized Kennedy for his response to a shooting outside Centers for Disease Control and Prevention buildings in Atlanta on Friday. Investigators have been looking into possible motives, including the possibility that the suspect believed he was sick as a result of the COVID vaccine, multiple sources told CBS News. "How you respond to a crisis defines a leader. Quite frankly, Secretary Kennedy has failed in his first major test in this regard," Adams said, accusing Kennedy of issuing "tepid response" to the shooting, while adding, "and that's not even considering how his inflammatory rhetoric in the past have actually contributed to a lot of what's been going on." In a statement Friday, Kennedy said, "No one should face violence while working to protect the health of others." But Adams argued Kennedy has not "unequivocally condemned the violence." "There's an out there," Adams said. "If you don't believe that people are working to protect the public, then that means it's okay to commit violence, at least in some people's eyes." The former surgeon general said people at the CDC were calling him after the shooting asking him to make a public statement "because they felt under attack." "They didn't know if this was going to continue," Adams said. "They were scared, and they wanted someone, someone who they felt had a public voice, to go out there and say, 'This is wrong. Violence is wrong.'"

After daughter's devastating Batten diagnosis, Minnesota family fighting to find cure
After daughter's devastating Batten diagnosis, Minnesota family fighting to find cure

CBS News

time24 minutes ago

  • CBS News

After daughter's devastating Batten diagnosis, Minnesota family fighting to find cure

A Victoria, Minnesota, family is channeling their heartbreak into hope. When Dan and Stephanie Born welcomed their daughter Helen into the world, they felt their family was finally complete. Helen Born was spirited from the start and has always loved pink, hugs and all things "girl." Now, that spirit is helping Helen Born — and her parents — fight an unimaginable disease. "It's been a really, really difficult year," Stephanie Born said. It was around age 2 that Dan and Steph Born started to notice some changes. Helen Born was a bit clumsy, and her speech was delayed. Last summer, the seizures started. By age 4, doctors delivered a diagnosis the Born family had never heard of: CLN2 Batten disease — a rare, degenerative and fatal neurological disorder with no cure. "We never thought our world would come crashing down with a diagnosis," Dan Born said. "You could just see it in the doctor's eyes." Batten disease affects just 200 to 300 children in the U.S. It's caused by a deficiency of the TPP1 enzyme, which breaks down waste in cells. Without it, the waste builds up and slowly kills cells, taking away motor function, sight, speech and, ultimately, life. Doctors told the Borns their daughter may not live past the age of 10. "I can't unhear that," Dan Born said. "And I can't live with that." Since her diagnosis, Helen Born has been receiving enzyme replacement therapy every two weeks at Mayo Clinic — the only child there currently undergoing the treatment. Shortly after the diagnosis, a port was surgically placed in her brain to administer the infusions, which aim to slow the disease's progression. But the treatment is not a cure. "This is the best she'll ever be until we find something else," Stephanie Born said. "It's a disease that absolutely robs kids of their childhood." The Borns refused to accept that Helen's diagnosis is the end of her story. "The first night after the diagnosis, there was just this beautiful, pink sky," Dan Born remembered. "Helen has always loved pink. I remember Steph, one of the first nights, said, 'That's a sign from God that he's going to take care of Helen.'" That moment inspired the creation of Helen's Pink Sky Foundation — a nonprofit dedicated to raising money for Batten disease research. In just a few months, they've raised $1 million. None of it goes toward Helen Born's medical care. Every dollar supports research grants, with three institutions already receiving funding. Their goal: raise another $8 to $10 million over the next three years. "We are just getting started," Stephanie Born said. "I think we're challenging things in certain ways that people haven't seen before. That we're going to get a different outcome. I will think nothing less than us finding a cure." The foundation has sparked nationwide support. Hundreds of people across the U.S. are hosting "Pink Lemonade Stands for Helen." During the Indy 500, where Helen Born's cousin and uncle are part of a race team, her story was featured — drawing 10,000 views to the foundation's website in a single minute. The momentum is vital. And in the face of this relentless disease, their fight burns brighter than ever. "We're fighting every day for Helen," Dan Born said. "And we're going to continue to fight for Helen. We can't accept anything else." Helen's Pink Sky Foundation is hosting a fundraising gala Oct. 25 at Hazeltine National in Chaska, Minnesota.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store