Big Ten coach of the year predictions
So, how does he look as a Big Ten coach of the year candidate? Pretty good, one would think. Here are our picks for the Big Ten's coach of the year for the 2025 season.
Andrew Deal: James Franklin, Penn State
James Franklin finally gets over the "big game" hump this year. Based on my other predictions, Franklin has to be the coach of the year. A pretty favorable schedule has Oregon traveling to Happy Valley for the White Out game. However, the Nittany Lions have to travel to Columbus for a battle with the Buckeyes.
Penn State returns a ton of impact players from last season, while Ohio State will have to fill holes in some key positions. If Penn State goes 11-1 or 12-0, Franklin will have every right to win the Big Ten Coach of the Year.
Sam Woloson: James Franklin, Penn State
This is an interesting one, because the Coach of the Year award has recently gone to the best story, not the best coach overall. Curt Cignetti and David Braun led Indiana and Northwestern to surprise seasons in 2024 and 2023, respectively, but neither team nor coach were the best in the conference. If you wanna go off of the best story, I think James Franklin exorcising his big game demons and winning a conference title could fit the bill, especially if he beats Ohio State to do it.
Christopher Sheppard: Curt Cignetti, Indiana
It will be hard to repeat his stunning success from last year, but Cignetti has a chance yet again to keep the Hoosiers competitive. While he lost two of his best offensive players in Kurtis Rourke and Justice Ellison to the NFL, his recruiting abilities and retention of key players from last year's portal haul make the Hoosiers fun and frisky yet again. Fernando Mendoza brings poise and composure to the QB position, throwing for just over 3,000 yards last year. Elijah Sarratt is perhaps the Big Ten's most underappreciated WR1, and is first among all FBS juniors in receiving touchdowns. And don't forget about Mikail Kamara and D'angelo Ponds defensively, whose decisions to forgo the draft give the Hoosiers two studs in both the D-line and secondary. Look for the man who had people Googling his name to continue to do things no other Indiana head coach has dared to do. I would not be surprised if Indiana is in the CFP yet again...and maybe even have a Big Ten title game appearance to show for it along the way.
Kevin McGuire: Matt Rhule, Nebraska
I am anticipating big things out of Penn State this season under the leadership of James Franklin, but I also take into account the trend of the Big Ten coach of the year honors going to a coach who doesn't necessarily start with a loaded roster with national title aspirations. So my pick will go to Matt Rhule, who I believe has the ability to take Nebraska to a 10-win season that flirts with being on the College Football Playoff radar. This can easily blow up in my face in the first month of the season, but I think Rhule continues his trend of program improvement with the Cornhuskers and puts together an impressive season in Lincoln.
Previously: Our Big Ten defensive MVP predictions
Coming up next: Our Big Ten championship predictions
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 minutes ago
- USA Today
SEC dumps cupcake feast with football schedule expansion. Your move, Big Ten
The SEC just tossed one of its cupcakes into the rubbish bin. Thank goodness. Good riddance. About time. In news that ought to be welcomed by any college football fan who enjoys compelling matchups, instead of games against overmatched directional schools, the SEC announced Thursday, Aug. 21 it will increase to playing nine conference games starting in 2026. That will equal the number of conference games played by the Big Ten and Big 12. Importantly, the SEC still will require its members play at least one non-conference game against either a Power Four opponent or Notre Dame. Let me translate that: SEC teams will be required to play a minimum of 10 games against opponents seated at the big-kids table, leaving room for a maximum of two cupcake games. Hallelujah. Too many irrelevant games had long been one of the few stains on college football's regular season. This decision by the SEC helps rectify that. This move also makes the Big Ten's scheduling model look pitiable. Your move, Tony Petitti. SEC stiffening schedule puts ball in Big Ten's court The Big Ten plays nine conference games, but its members are not required to play a Power Four non-conference opponent. Some Big Ten teams choose to play a marquee non-conference clash, but others – cough, cough, Indiana, cough, cough – pursue the path of least resistance and avoid any non-conference opponent with a pulse. Penn State's non-conference lineup this season consists of Nevada, Florida International and Villanova. That's a bad joke, and unless the Big Ten addresses its scheduling, it won't enjoy a leg to stand on when trying to stump for its members' résumés compared to those forged in the SEC. Six Big Ten teams will not play a single non-conference game against a Power Four opponent this season. For years, the Big Ten fans and coaches held one good card in arguments against SEC peers about which league played a tougher schedule: The Big Ten played one additional conference game compared to the SEC. The SEC would counter that its conference, top to bottom, was stronger than other conferences, but it could not escape the reality that its membership collectively feasted on more cupcakes than other leagues. No more. The SEC's addition of another conference game while maintaining its Power Four non-conference requirement solidifies its strength of schedule campaign and leaves the Big Ten standing on its back foot. SEC aces offseason while Big Ten monkeys around While the Big Ten spent the offseason floating absurd College Football Playoff formats that failed to gain traction, the SEC deftly moved chess pieces to strengthen its positioning in the playoff construct that currently exists – and might continue to exist in 2026 and beyond. First, the SEC waged an offseason messaging campaign focused on its desire for the playoff selection committee to more greatly consider strength of schedule when awarding at-large bids. That campaign hit pay dirt this week. The CFP announced that, effective immediately, it will more greatly weight victories against good competition, minimize the penalty for losses against tough teams, and devalue triumphs over cupcakes. Next, the SEC positioned itself to further capitalize on the CFP's strength of schedule tweaks by adding a ninth conference game. To stick the landing, the SEC could cement a 16-team, 5+11 playoff model that would unlock access to up to 75% of the playoff bracket, while knowing it enjoys the strongest cards in strength of schedule debates. And what's the Big Ten been up to? Well, teams like Nebraska and Indiana got busy canceling future Power Four opponents while filling their plate with tasty cupcakes. Great move, guys. Enjoy those empty calories. There's really only one move for the Big Ten to make. It must reinstate an old requirement that membership play at least 10 games against Power Four opponents. Maybe, Indiana can tape together that contract it tore up when it decided to duck Virginia. Better yet, the Big Ten could stop playing catchup and get ahead of the game by requiring not 10 but 11 total games against Power Four opponents, thereby gaining a trump card over the SEC. Let's hear it, Big Ten. Are you willing to join the SEC and dispose of some cupcake games? The SEC making this overdue decision to add a ninth conference game places it in an unimpeachable position for future résumé debates. The Big Ten's only response can be to add more meat to its schedule. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
Rejoice, 9-3 SEC teams! The College Football Playoff awaits
The wheels are greased, and 9-3 SEC teams received runway clearance to soar into the College Football Playoff. The announcement came subtly, buried in the third paragraph of a midweek news release. The playoff selection committee, beginning this season, will weight strength of schedule metrics in an evolved way that should tend to more greatly benefit SEC teams. The tweaks won't ensure playoff bids for three-loss SEC teams, and nothing technically prevented them from qualifying in the past, but this adjustment increases their qualifying chances. This pivot comes after the committee rejected three 9-3 bubble teams from the SEC last season in favor of Indiana and SMU – teams with superior records but inferior strength of schedule. Here's what's changing in the committee's strength of schedule evaluation process: These changes are a major win for the SEC and a culmination of the conference's offseason messaging campaign during which key stakeholders encouraged the committee to more heavily weight schedule strength. Historically, the committee looks kindly upon the SEC, but the conference qualified only three teams for the inaugural 12-team playoff. If these metrics tweaks had been in place last season, the committee might have felt more compelled to admit one of the SEC's 9-3 teams instead of Indiana or SMU, teams that avoided bad losses while stockpiling wins against average to bad teams. The committee's evaluation tweaks can help or hamper teams from any conference, but they're positioned to most greatly benefit the SEC, considering its number of teams that usually rank within the top 40. That creates a setup in which conference members play a bulk of games against top-40 opponents in any given season. The metrics changes also erect some dissuasion to loading up a schedule with cupcake opponents. (Looking at you, Indiana.) The committee's rules tweaks ought to have included additional weight to head-to-head results. It boggles the mind that SMU and BYU each entered Selection Sunday with two losses, and SMU received the playoff's No. 11 seed while BYU got snubbed with a No. 17 ranking, despite SMU losing on its home field to BYU. For all of the SEC's offseason squabbling, the committee's biggest err proved its seeding of Big Ten teams and not its rejection of three-loss teams. The committee flubbed by seeding Ohio State No. 8. The Buckeyes deserved a stronger seed, courtesy of wins against playoff qualifiers Penn State and Indiana, but the committee overvalued conference runners-up. Ohio State beat Penn State on the road in November, but the committee seeded the Nittany Lions two spots ahead of Ohio State, because Penn State advanced to the Big Ten championship game and Ohio State didn't. That occurred, in part, because of Penn State's more accommodating schedule. If you didn't know better, you'd have thought based off the committee's seeding that Penn State beat Ohio State, and not the other way around. The committee also showed too much deference to SMU, the ACC runner-up. The Mustangs cashed in on a favorable schedule that avoided Clemson and Miami during the regular season. I don't object to the committee's adjustment on how it plans to evaluate strength of schedule metrics, but any 9-3 team that lost twice to opponents that finished 6-6 still deserves ample scrutiny. (Looking at you, 2024 Alabama.) Who ought to celebrate these selection rules tweaks? I give you Oklahoma. The Sooners will play seven opponents ranked in the preseason polls, including No. 1 Texas, No. 8 Alabama and No. 9 LSU. With the wheels lubricated by an August news release, a 9-3 Sooners team could glide into the playoff. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Pursuing No. 2 In-State Wideout
Texas Longhorns head coach Steve Sarkisian comes into 2025 with a 38-17 record and multiple bowl game appearances. Sarkisian last took Texas to the semifinal round of the inaugural 12-team College Football Playoff, losing 28-14 to the Ohio State Buckeyes. Ohio State won the national championship over the Notre Dame Fighting Irish 34-23. The head coach is preparing for the future and recruiting talent in the 2027 class. The Longhorns are one of the teams competing for 2027 wideout Tre Moore, who has been attracted to the program by the track record of passing game coordinator and receivers coach Chris Jackson, per Rivals' Sam Spiegelman. 'I like how professional they are,' he started. 'It's very business-like. It's very NFL-like, and I feel like Texas is a spot to be if you want to go to the NFL as a receiver. They've been producing so much lately, and they've just been giving me crazy love. They've been hitting me up, talking to me, telling me how much they want me. Even when I went up to the practices in the spring, they were just showing me love, showing me the ropes … Everything!' Moore is the No. 2 receiver from the state of Texas in the Rivals Industry Rankings, hailing from Pflugerville. He is also a four-star prospect and the No. 19 receiver in the class. The Longhorns are not afraid to pull out all the stops for recruiting, even using quarterback Arch Manning. Manning met with five-star edge rusher Zyron Forstall on a visit since the two were natives of New Orleans, Louisiana. While making the CFP in two straight seasons has been an incredible achievement, Sarkisian has yet to win a national title at Texas. However, ESPN predicted the Longhorns would do just that in 2025. ESPN had Texas in the National Championship Game, beating the Clemson Tigers to win its first national title since 2005. Texas opens with the Ohio State Buckeyes on August 30 at Noon ET on story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Aug 18, 2025, where it first appeared in the College section. Add Athlon Sports as a Preferred Source by clicking here.
