Indiana Medicaid Changes Could Leave Gary Residents Without Coverage
In Gary, where just over 40% of residents are insured by Medicaid, these policy changes are likely to have far-reaching effects. Residents may face more frequent eligibility checks, reduced flexibility in meeting program requirements, and fewer opportunities to learn about or apply for health coverage. Community advocates have raised concerns that the combined effect of these provisions could increase the number of uninsured individuals in vulnerable populations.
Below is a breakdown of the key provisions and their potential impacts.
The Indiana Office of the Secretary of Family and Social Services Administration is now required to implement a wide-ranging system of eligibility verification for Medicaid recipients. The goal is to ensure that only individuals who meet income and residency requirements remain enrolled. Key provisions include:
Elimination of self-attestation: Applicants will no longer be able to self-report income, residency, household size, or other qualifying details without third-party verification prior to enrollment.
Monthly data matching with the Indiana Lottery Commission and Gaming Commission to flag recipients with winnings of $3,000 or more. Those found ineligible will have coverage terminated.
Quarterly and annual reviews of employment, wages, and tax data from the Department of Workforce Development and Department of State Revenue.
Monthly checks against records from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Department of Correction, and vital statistics to verify residency, incarceration status, and deaths.
Ongoing checks using federal databases covering earnings, benefits, incarceration, and other changes in household circumstances.
Any information indicating a change in eligibility status triggers a required redetermination. The state may also contract with third-party vendors for additional database searches.
How it affects Gary residents: Though the intended purpose claimed for these measures is to improve program integrity, they could lead to coverage disruptions, especially among individuals whose economic or living conditions change frequently.
Several amendments to HIP will create stricter requirements around work participation and cost-sharing:
Work requirements are now more narrowly defined. Eligible adults must meet specified conditions such as employment, participation in job training or volunteer programs, enrollment in substance use treatment, or caring for a dependent. Full-time students and recently incarcerated individuals may also qualify for exemptions.
Cost-sharing rules have been reinforced. Coverage does not begin until an initial contribution is made to a Personal Wellness and Responsibility (POWER) account. Participants must continue making annual payments — either 2% of household income or a minimum set by the state.
Penalties for nonpayment:
Individuals at or below 100% of the federal poverty level face reduced benefits, such as the loss of vision and dental coverage, and new co-pay requirements.
Those above the poverty line are subject to disenrollment and a six-month lockout if they miss payments by 60 days or more.
The law explicitly bars the state from reducing these penalties or waiving the cost-sharing requirements.
How it affects Gary residents: These provisions could pose significant financial challenges for low-income households, potentially resulting in reduced access to care or loss of coverage due to missed payments.
State agencies and their contractors are now barred from advertising or broadly marketing Medicaid programs. While providers may still advertise their own services, general promotion of the Medicaid program is prohibited under the new rules.
How it affects Gary residents: Reduced outreach and public awareness campaigns could make it harder for eligible residents to learn about available programs or navigate the application process, particularly in communities with limited access to digital information or legal aid.
The post Indiana Medicaid Changes Could Leave Gary Residents Without Coverage appeared first on Capital B Gary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
Rep. Ritchie Torres endorses former foe Gov. Kathy Hochul for reelection
Bronx Rep. Ritchie Torres' months-long mudslinging campaign against Gov. Kathy Hochul is officially over as he formally endorsed the incumbent Democrat for reelection Tuesday. Torres, who six months ago called Hochul's reelection 'an electoral train wreck waiting to happen' is now coalescing around the deeply unpopular governor, saying she's 'the kind of leadership we need right now.' 'She's not performative, she's substantive. She's focused on solving problems, and that's the kind of leadership we need right now,' Torres wrote in a statement released shortly after announcing the endorsement on News 12. 'Now, more than ever, it's important for every Democrat and every New Yorker to stand with the Governor as she fights with New York and fights against the Trump administration,' Torres added. A one-time critic, Rep. Ritchie Torres is now endorsing Gov. Kathy Hochul ahead of her 2026 reelection campaign. The former city councilman once publicly toyed with the idea of a primary challenge against Hochul. Torres repeatedly put her on blast over an array of topics, including open-air drug use in the Bronx, the transition of a $9 billion Medicaid homecare program and dragging her feet on combatting antisemitism by banning mask wearing. Amongst those criticisms, Torres once said Hochul is 'fundamentally ineffective at governing' and 'I'm not here to go along to get along. I'm here to be a teller of hard truths.' Hochul, who appeared with Torres Monday at a rally against President Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' in the Bronx, celebrated officially burying the hatchet. 'Congressman Torres and I haven't always agreed on everything, but we know what matters most: delivering a safer, more affordable New York for every family and coming together to fight back against Donald Trump,' Hochul wrote in a statement. Torres once said about Albany: 'I'm not here to go along to get along. I'm here to be a teller of hard truths.' Getty Images Hochul is facing a primary challenge from Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado. North Country GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) says she'll make a decision about a potential gubernatorial run by the end of the year. Another GOP rival, Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) announced he would not run last month.
Axios
9 hours ago
- Axios
Medicaid effort to target undocumented immigrants may create enrollment hurdles
Federal health officials announced a new push on Tuesday to ensure that Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) enrollees are U.S. citizens or have a satisfactory immigration status. Why it matters: The effort could create new administrative hoops for enrollees to jump through. Driving the news: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will begin providing states with "monthly enrollment reports identifying individuals whose citizenship or immigration status could not be confirmed through federal databases," the Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement. The reports will draw on data from sources including the Department of Homeland Security's Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program. HHS emphasized that states are responsible for reviewing cases, verifying the immigration status of individuals on the CMS' reports, and "taking appropriate actions." All states will receive these reports within the next month, per the HHS. Reality check: Traditional Medicaid coverage is not available to undocumented immigrants. "Undocumented immigrants are not eligible to enroll in federally funded coverage including Medicaid, CHIP, or Medicare or to purchase coverage through the ACA Marketplaces," per the non-partisan Kaiser Family Foundation. HHS did not respond to Axios' request for comment. What they're saying:"Every dollar misspent is a dollar taken away from an eligible, vulnerable individual in need of Medicaid and CHIP," said CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz. Between the lines: The change looks to put the burden of proof on the individuals whose immigration statuses the CMS cannot verify through the databases. By the numbers: Despite the assertions of Oz — and other parts of President Trump's administration — there is not evidence that undocumented immigrants are broadly receiving Medicaid benefits they're not eligible for. Medicaid reimburses hospitals for emergency care provided to individuals who meet other eligibility requirements but lack eligible immigration status. Emergency spending rose less than 1% of total Medicaid spending between 2017 and 2023, according to KFF. Immigrants in the country legally may also qualify for Medicaid or CHIP, but face eligibility restrictions. There is a five-year waiting period for these modified forms of Medicaid and CHIP, which states can eliminate for children and pregnant people. An early version of Republicans recently passed tax-and-spending bill would have cut federal payments to states that covered undocumented immigrants with their own funds. The provision was dropped after it was found to violate Senate rules. The White House claimed that the provision would "protect Medicaid for Americans by removing at least 1.4 million illegal immigrants from the program." The other side: The 1.4 million figure "is unequivocally false," according to Georgetown University's Center for Families and Children.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
New work rules could deny food stamps to thousands of veterans
Darryl Chavis, 62, served in the U.S. Army for two years as a watercraft operator. He stands outside the Borden Avenue Veterans Residence, a short-term housing facility in the Long Island City neighborhood of Queens, N.Y., where he lives. Chavis relies on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and is worried about new work requirements for the program, commonly known as food stamps (Shalina Chatlani/Stateline). NEW YORK — After a year in the U.S. Navy, Loceny Kamara said he was discharged in 2023, because while on base he had developed mental health issues, including severe anxiety and nightmares, and had fallen into alcoholism. Kamara, 23, went to rehab and managed to get sober for some time while living with family in the Bronx, he said. But after he lost his job as a security guard in December, Kamara was kicked out of his home. Now he lives at a veterans homeless shelter in Long Island City, a neighborhood in Queens, New York, and he relies on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — commonly known as food stamps — and odd jobs to make ends meet. Each month, nearly 42 million people receive SNAP benefits to help supplement their grocery budgets. Able-bodied SNAP recipients who are between 18 and 54 and don't have children have always been required to work. Veterans, however, have been exempt from those rules — but that's about to change. The giant domestic policy measure that President Donald Trump signed on July 4 eliminates that exemption. Beginning in 2026, veterans will have to prove they are working, volunteering, participating in job training, or looking for work for at least 80 hours a month to keep their food stamps beyond three months, unless they qualify for another exemption, such as having certain disabilities. Republicans in Congress and conservatives who helped formulate the law say these eligibility changes are necessary to stop people who could be working from abusing the system. But critics say the change fails to take into account the barriers many veterans face, and that the new work rules will cause thousands of veterans to go hungry. 'I'm pissed. I mean, I cannot get a job. Nowhere to live,' said Kamara. As he spoke, Kamara pointed to his collared shirt, noting that he had just dressed up to interview for a job as a security guard. He learned that morning he hadn't gotten the job. 'I've been out of work for eight months,' Kamara told Stateline. 'It's hard to get a job right now for everybody.' Nationally, around 1.2 million veterans with lower incomes, or about 8% of the total veteran population of 16.2 million, rely on food stamps for themselves and their families, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning research group. An analysis by the group found veterans tend to have lower rates of employment because they are more likely to have health conditions, such as traumatic brain injuries, that make it difficult for them to work. They also tend to have less formal education, though many have specialized skills from their time in the military. There has been a work requirement for most SNAP recipients since 1996. But Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, said the rules have 'never really been enforced.' Rector argued that able-bodied people who have been exempt from the work requirement, such as veterans and homeless people, create an unnecessary burden on the system if they are capable of working but don't. 'Most of the people that are in this category live in households with other people that have incomes, and so there really isn't a chronic food shortage here,' Rector said in an interview. 'We have tens of thousands of free food banks that people can go to. So it's just a requirement to nudge these people in the proper direction, and it should no longer go unenforced.' Darryl Chavis, 62, said that view ignores the difficulties that many veterans face. When Chavis left the U.S. Army at 21 after two years of service, he said, he was 'severely depressed.' 'Nobody even came to help me,' said Chavis, who served as a watercraft operator, responsible for operating and maintaining tugboats, barges and other landing craft. Chavis said he was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, which has made it difficult for him to keep a job. He just moved back to New York from Virginia after leaving a relationship. He's been at the housing shelter in Long Island City since January. 'What I'm trying to do is get settled in to, you know, stabilize into an apartment. I have the credentials to get a job. So it's not like I'm not gonna look for a job. I have to work. I'm in transition, and the obstacles don't make it easy,' Chavis said. The new SNAP work rules apply to all able-bodied adults between 55 and 64 who don't have dependents, and parents with children above the age of 14. Some groups, such as asylum-seekers and refugees, are no longer eligible for the program. Barbara Guinn, commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, estimates that around 300,000 New Yorkers could lose SNAP benefits due to work requirements. Of those, around 22,000 are veterans, homeless or aging out of foster care, she said. Almost 3 million New Yorkers relied on SNAP as of March 2025. Veterans in other states are in a similar situation. In California, an estimated 115,000 veterans receive SNAP benefits, according to a study by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The number is nearly 100,000 in Florida and Texas, and 49,000 in Georgia. Between 2015 and 2019 about 11% of veterans between the ages of 18 and 64 lived in food insecure households, meaning they had limited or uncertain access to food, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees SNAP. 'We know that SNAP is the best way to help address hunger. It gets benefits directly to individuals,' Guinn said. 'There are other ways that people can get assistance if they need it, through food banks or other charitable organizations, but we do not think that those organizations will have the capacity to pick up the needs.' In addition to the work rule changes, the new law reduces federal funding for SNAP by about $186 billion through 2034 — a cut of roughly 20%, according to the Congressional Budget Office, an independent research arm of Congress. The federal government expects the new work requirements to reduce SNAP spending by $69 billion as people who don't comply are dropped from the rolls. SNAP has historically been funded by the federal government, with states picking up part of the cost of administering the program. Under the new law, states will have to cover between 5% and 15% of SNAP costs starting in fiscal year 2028, depending on how accurately they distribute benefits to people who are eligible for the program. 'This has been a strategic agenda to dismantle SNAP and to blame states for doing so, because they knew they are making it so incredibly burdensome to run and operate and unaffordable,' said Gina Plata-Nino, SNAP deputy director at the Food Research & Action Center, a poverty and hunger advocacy group. 'States are going to have to cut something, because there's no surplus. There are no unlimited resources that states may have in order to be able to offset the harm.' Guinn said New York expects to see a new cost burden of at least $1.4 billion each year. In California, new state costs could total as much as $3.7 billion annually, according to the California Department of Social Services. Kaitlynne Yancy, director of membership programs at Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said many veterans with disabilities will not be able to fulfill the work requirements or find resources elsewhere. And it's unclear whether states will be able to provide their own relief to people who are no longer exempted from work requirements or will be excluded from the program. 'It is a frustrating thing to see, especially for those that have been willing to put everything on the line and sacrifice everything for this country if their country called them to do so,' she said. Yancy, 35, served in the U.S. Navy from 2010 to 2014. She began to use food stamps and the Medicaid program, the public health insurance program for people with lower incomes, as she navigated life's challenges. They included going back to school to pursue her bachelor's degree, becoming a single mother, and a leukemia diagnosis for one of her children. Frequent trips to the hospital made it hard for her to work steadily or attend school for 20 hours each week, she said. Guinn said the new rules will create significant administrative challenges, too; even SNAP recipients who are working will struggle to prove it. 'Maybe they're working one month, they have a job, and then their employer cuts their hours the next month,' Guinn told Stateline. 'There are mechanisms for people to upload documentation as needed to demonstrate compliance with the program, but from an administrative standpoint, right now, we don't have any super-high-tech automated way of doing this.' Stateline is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Stateline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Scott S. Greenberger for questions: info@ Solve the daily Crossword
