BREAKING NEWS 'Do not eat': Supermarkets issue urgent warning for popular ice creams due to deadly risk
Food firm Unilever has issued a safety notice for its Wall's Mini Milk Vanilla, Strawberry and Chocolate Ice Cream Lollies, warning that the ingredients label fails to list key allergens in English.
The affected batches contain milk and may also include pistachio nuts, peanuts and soya—posing a serious health risk to anyone with food allergies or intolerances.
The recall applies to ten-pack boxes—(10 x 35ml)—with the following batch codes: L5123, L5126, L5127, L5128, L5129, L5141 and L5142, and a best before date of May 2027.
In a statement, safety watchdog the Food Standards Agency (FSA) said: 'This means the product is a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy or intolerance to milk or milk constituents, and/or an allergy to nuts (pistachios), peanuts or soya.'
Unilever has confirmed it is removing the affected items from shelves and is advising customers who have bought them not to consume them.
Instead, they are urged to contact the company's careline for a refund.
While allergic reactions to food are often manageable they can, in some cases, be severe and even fatal if not treated promptly. More to follow.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
NHS issues vaccination warning for pregnant women over dangerous virus currently surging in Australia
Expectant mothers and people over 75 are being urged to get vaccinated against a potentially deadly virus following a record number of cases in Australia. Health chiefs say the Australian winter often predicts how viruses will spread in the UK, and already this year cases of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have steadily risen in many areas. The virus, which is a common cause of coughs and colds, may also cause a chest infection called bronchiolitis. Some people have a high risk of becoming seriously ill with it, including babies and adults over 75. According to NHS England, RSV is a leading cause of infant deaths worldwide and a main cause of children being taken into hospital. Last winter, almost 7,000 bed days in England were taken up by children with RSV. NHS England is encouraging pregnant women to get a jab that protects against RSV so their babies are protected after birth. Kate Brintworth, chief midwifery officer for NHS England, said: 'While for most adults RSV only causes mild, cold-like symptoms, for older adults and young children it can lead to serious breathing problems that can end up in hospitalisation. 'Getting vaccinated while pregnant is the best way to protect your baby from the moment they are born, and now is the time for mums to act, to make sure their babies are protected ahead of their first few months this winter, when there tends to be more bugs circulating.' Yusra Osman says that when her son, Zakariya, was three months old, he developed bronchiolitis from the virus. He had a fever and was gasping for breath. The 34-year-old, from north London, said: 'Everything was a blur, but I remember his chest was caving in and out and he was really struggling to catch his breath.' Nurses found her son's oxygen levels were dangerously low. Ms Osman, a student midwife, said: 'That was one of those things you don't want to hear as a mum. He was crying, and we kept trying to put an oxygen mask on, but he was fighting to get it off and didn't want to be touched.' Zakariya, who is now seven, needed oxygen and a feeding tube in hospital. 'It's a mum's worst nightmare. Had the RSV vaccine been available then, I'd definitely have had it,' Ms Osman said. The RSV vaccine was offered to pregnant women in England for the first time last September and health officials say it has since helped to protect more than 300,000 mothers and babies. Pregnant mothers from 28 weeks onwards are eligible, as are adults aged 75 to 79. In the coming weeks, NHS England is set to invite more than a million people to have a jab, before the season for infections, which starts in October. Greta Hayward, consultant midwife at the UK Health Security Agency, said babies born in late summer or the autumn are most likely to be admitted to hospital with the virus. 'Hundreds of babies attend emergency departments each day for bronchiolitis through most of November and December,' she said.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Nostalgia and selective memory are clouding judgment on doctors' strikes
I write in response to Prof David Cameron (Letters, 28 July). I also trained as a doctor during the 80s and early 90s and experienced the long working hours of that time. It is easy to fall into the trap of nostalgia and selective memory as we become older and detached from the frontline. I was looked after by the hospitals in which I worked, which were less managed than they are today. I worked in a close team, led by a consultant to whom I was responsible, and who was responsible for me. I spoke to no managers. I was provided accommodation, hot food day and night, and other privileges. I speak to many young doctors in my current workplace and see the conditions in which they work. They are isolated and harassed by managers, who are in turn harassed by a target-driven culture. Their training is politicised and diluted by the physician assistant programme. They cannot get hot food after 4pm or at weekends, they pay for parking, they are ripped off by hospital accommodation services and see their pay eroded by below-inflation awards over many years. Small wonder they are angry. Pay is the quickest way by which they can obtain some redress for the deterioration in working conditions which they have Robin HollandsConsultant, Shrewsbury As a foundation year 1 (FY1) doctor who has nearly completed my first year of medical training, I have been deeply disheartened by the discourse around the resident doctor strikes. The British Medical Association (BMA) has failed to properly advocate for changes that will improve the working lives of doctors and the media has unsurprisingly been intensely critical of the BMA's current objectives. It was exceptionally generous for the government to provide us with a 22% pay rise last year, but the BMA's current demands for a further 29% are totally unrealistic and appear tone deaf to the many other public sector workers who have received much less. It is therefore not surprising that many media outlets have agreed that we are 'greedy'. Despite this, I believe the strikes are a representation of a much deeper dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs for resident doctors and this needs to be addressed. Resident doctors across the country are often working extensive hours on understaffed, dysfunctional hospital wards, with now ever-diminishing prospects of career progression. The latest BMA figures that 52% of FY2 doctors have no secure employment from August is deeply shocking and is a failure of the system that may threaten the future of the NHS. It is time that both the BMA and the government woke up to the reality that there will be a severe doctor unemployment crisis unless urgent action is taken. This is the real problem that needs to be addressed. Pay restoration should absolutely remain a long-term goal, but there is little point improving my current resident doctor salary if there are no future pathways for resident doctors in the Will GiffinSheffield Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
FDA issues recall for snack distributed nationwide
An urgent recall has been issued for a popular snack distributed nationwide for being contaminated with a diarrhea-causing bacteria. Texas-based Navarro Pecan Holdings issued a voluntary recall of 32,670 pounds of pecan products on July 10 due to concerns about potential Salmonella contamination. The products were distributed to commercial and retail distributors in five states; Texas , Minnesota , Oklahoma , Arkansas and New Jersey. They were also distributed internationally to Italy , the Netherlands and UAE, the FDA said. The government agency has updated the recall as Class I, as the nuts have the potential to be contaminated with the bacteria salmonella , which hospitalizes 26,000 Americans every year. A Class I recall is a 'situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death'. The FDA says salmonella can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Healthy people infected with the bacteria often experience fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. No other products produced by Navarro Pecan Holdings have been impacted and as of yet, there have been no reported illnesses. Founded in 1977, Navarro Pecan Holdings prides itself on being one of the largest pecan shellers in the world. It is not clear how the Salmonella contamination was discovered. Salmonella is an infection contracted from eating foods contaminated with animal feces. It typically causes diarrhea, fever, and stomach cramps that begin six hours to six days after initial infection. Most people recover within days, though the illness is responsible for more than 26,000 hospitalizations and 400 deaths a year. The CDC estimates that most Salmonella infections are linked to chicken, fruits, pork, and seeded vegetables (such as tomatoes). But any food can become contaminated, even processed foods, such as flour. Nuts can become contaminated with Salmonella during various stages of production, including pre-harvest, harvest, processing, and storage. Contamination can occur from soil, contaminated harvesting equipment, and inadequate storage conditions. Moisture during the storage period can also contribute to the spread of Salmonella. The recalled products from Navarro Pecan Holdings include small and medium pecan pieces and mammoth pecan halves. Distributors and consumers who purchased the pecans should return it to the retailer for a full refund. The FDA has advised anyone who falls ill after eating the product to contact local health authorities. Most people sickened with salmonella suffer from a four to six-day illness that causes stomach cramps, diarrhea and abdominal pain. But officials warn children under five years and adults over 65 years old are more at risk from the bacteria because they have a weaker immune system.
