
Eastern Bay Mayors Hit Out Against Amalgamation Talks
'As mayors of the Eastern Bay, we know our communities value the accountability, and the control they get from our three councils. Amalgamation would see our communities swallowed into Tauranga and whose interests does that serve? Not the interests of the Eastern Bay of Plenty,' the statement said.
The comments come on the back of Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale's push to start conversations about changing the way Bay of Plenty councils are arranged.
At a recent Bay of Plenty Mayoral Forum, Mr Drysdale said communities were crying out for things to be delivered more efficiently and effectively.
He said there were seven councils represented around the forum table, which meant seven times the overhead.
'We can wait five years and have the Government do it for us or we can be proactive and say, let's look at it.'
Mr Drysdale will also be speaking to a remit put to this week's Local Government New Zealand conference by Tauranga City Council for a review of local government arrangements to achieve better balance. The remit was supported by LGNZ's Metro Sector councils.
Whakatāne Mayor Victor Luca said he could find no evidence that amalgamation of councils would result in lower rates.
He cited two academic studies published in the past three years that pointed against any efficiencies being achieved by amalgamation.
A 2022 report called Does Size Matter, from independent Crown organisation the Infrastructure Commission, found little evidence of cost efficiencies from larger local governments.
The report looked at whether council size and structure affected road maintenance, building consents and council overhead costs.
'Our analysis suggests that population size neither decreases nor increases the cost to provide these three services,' the report stated.
Dr Luca also referenced a 2024 economic paper by University of Otago professor Tom Stannard and TDB Advisory's Philip Barry about scale efficiency gains in electricity distribution.
The paper looked at both public and private organisations and found that potential gains from scale alone, without considering population density, were very limited.
'The only way that reducing the number of slices in a pie can result in any benefit is if the pie also shrinks,' Dr Luca said.
'I'm actually quite annoyed that (Mr) Drysdale makes the argument that everybody trots out without evidence. The real evidence is there, and he completely ignores it.'
He felt Whakatāne district would be the loser in any amalgamation arrangement with the wider Bay of Plenty.
'We represent 16 percent of the population of the Bay of Plenty, and you only have to look at how we fared in receiving funding through the Regional Transport Committee. We only got 1 percent of the budget request allocated to us.
He felt there were efficiencies that could be made through the councils working more closely together.
'For example, we're all using different enterprise software. That is something that could easily be fixed without throwing the baby out with the bathwater.'
Ōpōtiki Mayor David Moore said he felt Mr Drysdale should be talking to his community about how they felt before he started talking about amalgamating councils.
'The first thing you learn in local government is you need to talk to your community first, before we make plans.'
Mr Moore was doubtful that amalgamation would create efficiencies, pointing out a number of failures of central government in providing police, education and health services to the region.
'That day (of the mayoral forum) we had a presentation showing we are 1700 doctors short in New Zealand.'
'We've got a net increase in police of less than 20.'
He also referenced the recent reduction in gynecological and obstetrics services that sees pregnant women having to be rushed to Tauranga for emergencies, and Ōpōtiki College having issues with black mould in its classrooms last year.
He said there had been a great deal of work done recently on possible funding solutions for councils.
'For example, the GST content of rates that gets forwarded to central. A tax on a tax, some say.
'There is no resistance to working smarter and sharing services wherever possible, but scale does not always mean saving for the community - something to think about on your next trip to the supermarket or when paying your latest power or insurance bills.
'The same out of control costs have hit councils too, which does nothing to help keeping costs down."
Kawerau Mayor Faylene Tunui said her community was against amalgamation.
'Mayor Drysdale can speak for Tauranga, but we know our communities are firmly rooted in the Eastern Bay of Plenty and that's where our people want their representation to be.
"Our three councils are busy implementing our joint spatial plan and joint economic development plan. That's our priority, not theoretical amalgamation discussions", Mrs Tunui said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
‘Deeply regret': Winston Peters' writes to United Nations after David Seymour letter
'We ... understand that you did not directly receive the letter to you by my colleague [REDACTED - likely to be David Seymour], but rather that you learned about its existence from reports in the media. 'We deeply regret this breakdown in protocol and appreciate this opportunity to put the record straight,' Peters said. It is not clear why Seymour's letter did not reach Barume. Peters went on to say that he understood Barume's letter to the Government did not convey his or the UN's official views, but merely sought the Government's response to concerns that had been raised by others with the United Nations, implying that Seymour's initial letter misunderstood this. The letter sets out the Government's position on the Regulatory Standards Bill and the Treaty settlement process and notes that the Government was 'committed to improving outcomes for all New Zealanders'. 'We are focused on reaching targets to improve outcomes in health, education, law and order, work and housing and on providing public services to all New Zealanders including working with iwi (tribes) and Māori to accelerate Māori economic growth and enable targeted investment in Maori social development.' Seymour was meant to be consulted on the new letter. The Herald understands he was consulted and wanted the contents of his original letter to be sent again, this time through Peter's' letter. Seymour did not see the final copy of the letter before it was sent, which did not include any of his earlier remarks. Peters included three appendices to his letter. One detailed New Zealand's relevant constitutional arrangements, including a section on MMP and the realities of coalition government. It also detailed the status of the Māori seats, the Bill of Rights Act, and the Waitangi Tribunal.


NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government kicks can down the road on Palestinian statehood
But will it happen? When asked at his post-Cabinet press conference on Monday what the Cabinet had actually decided to do, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said there was now a 'process' the Government would work through in order to come to a final decision. When asked what this process actually was, he couldn't say. 'We had a conversation today, we'll make a Cabinet decision in September and we'll communicate that in September … but again, I'm not wanting to get ahead of the process. I don't want to presuppose an outcome,' he said. Pressed again, Luxon said there will be 'ongoing conversations with Cabinet to get to a position'. The oral item Peters said he took to the Cabinet on Monday could have thrashed the issue out there and then. Instead, the parties have resolved to work through the issue over the next month. That means the most important thing heading into September is how the various parties feel. National seems the most likely to back recognition of Palestine. National's MPs are feeling the heat from their constituents, but it has some strong backers of Israel around the Cabinet table. Act, meanwhile, is more clearly unlikely to shift from New Zealand's current position. Its view is best summed up by MP Simon Court's contribution to a parliamentary debate last month, saying that recognising a Palestinian state would be viewed as 'a reward for acts of terrorism' committed by Hamas against Israel. NZ First's position is less clear. Peters has for a long time been a staunch supporter of Israel, but the fast-changing international position could see him change his mind. Peters is the conduit for MFAT's advice to the Cabinet, and that advice is likely to reflect the fast-changing international political situation, which has rendered New Zealand's 'when' not 'if' approach to Palestinian recognition untenable. Recognition, if it happens, has been a long time coming. Of the 193 United Nations states, 147 recognise a Palestinian state. Of those countries, most made some form of recognition in the 1980s. It might have happened in 2023, when Labour took a policy to the election of inviting the General Delegation of Palestine in Canberra to present credentials in Wellington, effectively recognising Palestine's statehood. This has remained Labour policy in opposition, with the party loudly calling on the Government to recognise a Palestinian state since 2024. This seemed most unlikely nearly two years ago, when Hamas' October 7 2023 attacks on Israel, killing 1200, made the recognition of a Palestinian state seem further away than ever (whatever Labour, soon to go into opposition, might have said). But Israel's bloody war in Gaza changed all that. Since October 2023, more than 60,000 people have been killed in Gaza as a result of Israeli military operations, according to the BBC. That, plus Israel's inability to stop widespread starvation in the strip, has led the Greens and Te Pāti Māori to describe the situation as 'genocide'. The Government's position, as articulated by Peters, has been that New Zealand's longstanding support for a two-state solution means recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of 'when' rather than 'if'. That position was a convenient one. It gives the Government something to say to the majority of states that do recognise Palestine, without doing the deed itself and risking the ire of Israel and its main backer, the United States. The United States isn't idle in its threats. Last month, when Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada would recognise a Palestinian state, President Donald Trump took to social media to say it would 'make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them'. New Zealand's holding pattern has become untenable, both internationally and domestically. Since French President Emmanuel Macron announced in July that France will recognise Palestine, there has been a cascade of what our Government often calls 'like-minded' nations following suit, or threatening to. This made the Government's position challenging. It was happy being among several countries waiting for certain conditions to be met to recognise a Palestinian state, but being one of the last countries to recognise a Palestinian state is about as good as not recognising one at all. The decision of Australia, New Zealand's closest partner, on Monday to join them, was possibly the cherry on top. In the past, countries like New Zealand and Australia had been able to kick the can down the road, pointing to the lack of proper infrastructure in Palestine for recognition to take place. But that position has been replaced by one articulated by Australia's Foreign Minister, Penny Wong, that if recognition did not happen now, there's a risk 'there will be no Palestine left to recognise'. The position is becoming domestically untenable too. Daily, New Zealanders read, watch and listen to the latest from Gaza, where Israel zealously prosecutes a bloody war, whilst doing little to lift the famine taking hold in the strip. National holds most of the country's electorate seats. Those electorate MPs' inboxes groan under the weight of outrage expressed by New Zealanders over what they see. As the polls start to take a tumble, those MPs are becoming increasingly sensitive to what they're hearing from their constituents. With polls on Monday showing the Government in trouble - including one poll showing a hung Parliament - it's possible that this selfish sentiment, as much as anything more altruistic, is driving some of this change, with anxiety in National's caucus room driving change at the Cabinet table.

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Allan Blackman and Aimie Hines Part 1
sport politics about 1 hour ago Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Allan Blackman and Aimie Hines. First, the government is to formally consider its position on recognising Palestine as a state. Australia announced this afternoon it has made this call already, following the likes of Britian, Canada and France. Where is this all leading to? Journalist Selwyn Manning joins the panel. Then, a new political poll suggests a hung parliament - politics PhD candidate Michael Swanson explains.