Virginia school students learn from fish!
AMHERST COUNTY Va. (WFXR) — What if when you were in school, your classroom was a river and some of your teachers were fish?
You can find the answer to that in various schools across Virginia that are taking part in the Virginia Trout in the Classroom program. It comes courtesy of Trout Unlimited and the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources.
Amherst County Public Schools have adopted the program. Students there are raising brook trout in their classrooms and eventually releasing them into the Pedlar River, a native trout stream.
'We get eggs from the Department of Wildlife Resources in the fall, and they hatch those eggs and raise them in the classroom in tanks,' said Amherst County Public Schools Superintendent William Wells. 'The trout that make it into the spring are about an inch to two inches long; we put them here in Pedlar River.'
Wells actually leads the streamside study that includes releasing tiny brook trout, then surveying the river for other aquatic life, and assessing the water quality in the stream. On this day, it was a third grade class from Temperance Elementary School releasing their trout.
'I think I'm going to find a couple of crawfish, maybe like those, maybe like mayflies, or minnows,' said third-grader Grace Ramsey.
After releasing her brook trout, she was one of several students who broke up into groups to flip rocks to collect was then flowed downstream in a net. Based on the types of aquatic life they found like insects or other macro invertebrates, the students could follow a formula to measure water quality.
Based on what they discovered, the student found the quality of water in the Pedlar River to be in the excellent range.
The program is stealthy in the way it teaches. The children thought they were just having fun, but in reality, they were getting lessons in chemistry, biology, math, hydrology, earth science, and a host of other academic disciplines.
'It's definitely hands-on,' said Dr. Wells.
And, because it is hands-on, the lessons are likely to stick. Education experts have found children who practice hands-on learning develop a connection to and a better grasp of the concepts involved. That translates to greater knowledge retention.
That is good for the kids and good for the rest of us, because these are lessons that will last a lifetime.
'They need to understand that as stewards of the environment they have to be able to take care of what we have, and if we don't take care of it, no one else will,' Dr. Wells said. 'As much as I can get the kids out here to experience this, I think the better we are.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Anglers catch fish for science and to save a species vital to every state on the Atlantic coast
HIGHLANDS, N.J. (WFXR) — 'There she is, there she is, Fish on, fish on,' shouted Chuck Manny as a huge striped bass began to peel line off of a reel off the coast of northern New Jersey. Manny is an angler, one of the top striped bass sportfishermen around, but in this case, his fish-catching efforts are all in the name of science. Every striped bass Manny and the people on his boat catch, is tagged and tracked for research. Manny is one of thousands of charter captains and anglers who tag fish through a research program run by Gray Fish Tag Research. 'We tag and we research fish migrations,' said Roxanne Wilmer of Gray Fish Tag Research. 'We work with charter captains all around the world, so we have about 10-thousand charter captains we work with. What they do as they're releasing fish, they're tagging them with our tags.' Gray uses two types of tags. One is a 'spaghetti' tag; a thin green tube with a tag number on one side and a phone number and web address for Gray on the other. Anglers who catch a fish with those tags are asked to call the number or visit the website to report it. That way researchers can track the movement of where the fish was caught the first time and then every time after. Knowing those migrations is vital to understanding fish behavior. It is not uncommon to find a fish tagged in Virginia or Maryland several months later off the coast of New York or Massachusetts. The other type of tag is a satellite tag. It stays on the fish for six months collecting data on movement, depth, and water temperature. After six months, it detaches on its own and floats to the surface where the data is uploaded to a satellite. That data is collected by Gray. Thought to stay primarily coastal, those satellite tags have found striped bass range farther out into the Atlantic Ocean than previously thought. On this day, the species of interest were Atlantic striped bass or stripers as they are commonly known. Striped bass are a keystone species. Found in the waters of every U.S. state from Florida to Maine, they are a vital part of the commercial and sportfishing economies of those states, accounting for billions of dollars in economic impact. As of late, striper numbers are down due to poor spawns and other factors. That makes knowing as much about them as possible maybe more important than ever before. The data collected by Gray is made available for free to fisheries managers and researchers. 'So that we can get a better idea of their behavior and migration, but not just because it's static but because it changes as well,' said Stockton University researcher and professor Dr. Adam Aguiar. 'These fish are an important natural resource, not just to anglers, but to everybody, and they're an important aspect of the food chain, too.' Aguiar was one of a number of people on Manny's boat that day. In addition to researching stripers, he loves to catch them. Catching them is the only way to get tags into them. In this case, Manny was trolling live eels, a bait stripers find delectable. It was not long before Manny started boating stripers, sometimes three and four at a time in a scene that looked like organized chaos with anglers running for rods bowed double as huge striped bass peeled line off of reels. 'Mayhem's good,' laughed Manny. And it is in this case because these fish are being caught and released for science mayhem is good, and that is something Manny feels good about because it helps to preserve this iconic species he loves. 'The only thing that I know is that I don't know and that's why it's so important to do all this research on these fish,' said Manny. 'They have tails, they go where they want to go. They go where the bait goes; the temperature, whatever it is. All those satellite tags just prove that none of us really know and that's why you need to do more research.' Once a fish is caught, things move quickly. The striper is measured and weighed, tagged, and then released back into the water. The tags are inserted into a back muscle. It does not hurt or affect the fish. While Atlantic striped bass can be found from the Canadian Maritimes to Florida at various times of the year, the vast majority are spawned and reared in three places: The Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and the Hudson River. In the spring, schools of large striped bass are often found off of New Jersey and New York. Because of their migratory nature, they have a wide-ranging effect on the sport and commercial fisheries of the entire east coast. That is why a Virginia charter captain was on this trip, doing his part to help preserve a species that he will target next winter when he runs charters out of Cape Charles, Virginia. 'The fish that we're tagging today are the same fish that we're catching in the Chesapeake Bay in December and January,' said Captain Johnny Mathena of Patriot Fishing Charters. 'They are a migratory fish. We are tagging them so we can follow their migration patterns.' Knowing as much about striped bass can help fisheries managers reverse the downward trend in their numbers to prevent what happened in the 1980s when the species nearly collapsed and a fishing moratorium had to be instituted for several years until they rebounded in the 1990s. 'If you don't have data, then you don't know what's going on with the fishery,' said Wilmer. 'We have actual hands-on data. We get countless recoveries every week. If you don't have that information, then how do you know what the fish are actually doing?' This is part of a continuing occasional series on efforts to preserve Atlantic striped bass, which are Virginia's state saltwater fish and vital to the economies of every Atlantic coast state. On the day of this story, Gray Fish Tag Research held its annual Striper Quest, a one day tournament effort to catch and tag as many striped bass as possible. More than 200 fish were tagged for research on that day. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Chicago Tribune
03-06-2025
- Chicago Tribune
Review: In Lifeline Theatre's ‘War of the Worlds,' comedy wins out over human drama
Lifeline Theatre's new adaptation of the 1898 H.G. Wells novel 'The War of the Worlds' has many of the hallmarks of a campy sci-fi B movie: cheesy dialogue, exaggerated stock characters and visuals with the low-budget charm of mid-aughts 'Doctor Who.' With these bold stylistic choices by adapter John Hildreth and director Heather Currie, the play satirizes contemporary American society in an unconventional take on the science fiction classic. While Lifeline's version has its entertaining moments, the comedic approach comes at the expense of the story's human drama. Hildreth's loose adaptation changes the setting from southern England to northern Illinois, name-checking a litany of familiar cities, suburbs and rural townships throughout the play. The scientists who first discovered unusual activity happening on Mars work at 'the renowned Illinois Technological Institute, outside of Skokie, Illinois,' a fictional locale that is repeatedly introduced with the exact same wording until it becomes a mantra of sorts. This setting makes sense for a Chicago production, more so than English towns such as Woking and Weybridge, but the hyperlocal references sometimes feel a bit too cute. Professor Wittington (Mark Mendelsohn) narrates much of the action, and the dialogue is interspersed with clips of fictional TV news broadcasts — a nod to the format of Orson Welles' infamous 1938 radio adaptation, which reportedly convinced some listeners that aliens were actually attacking the United States. The professor and a small crew of scientists from the Institute, including an artificially intelligent humanoid called Assistant Professor Whitehurst (Amanda Link), investigate a series of strange explosions on the surface of Mars. Months later, the mystery is solved when cylindrical space capsules begin to crash on Earth, letting loose an army of giant metallic tripods wielding weapons that blast deadly heat rays. With Illinois at the epicenter of a national and potentially global crisis, the play satirizes a range of all-American ideologues: conspiracy theorists, doomsday preachers, isolationists and jingoistic military types. Even J.B. Pritzker gets a sendup with Anthony Kayer's performance as the fictional governor of Illinois. Reading 'The War of the Worlds' as a satire is not a novel interpretation; Wells himself acknowledged that the book's anti-imperial themes were inspired by the brutality of European colonialism. But at Lifeline, the comedic tone is dialed up so high that the social commentary loses some of its bite. The production team augments the cast's over-the-top performances with floor-to-ceiling tentacles (set designer Lindsay Mummert), bursts of green light from the heat rays (lighting designer Sarah Riffle) and warbling sound effects that evoke a 1950s sci-fi film (sound designer Joe Griffin). The onstage violence is occasionally macabre but never gruesome; when Whitehurst, the android, loses both arms in battle, their silver-tipped severed limbs go flying (props designer Jenny Pinson), but none of the human characters shed visible blood. Later, during the dissection of a captured Martian, the creature's blue and orange color scheme mimics the Illini jacket that the governor previously appeared in (costume designer Aly Amidei). What gets lost in this inventive production are the human relationships that could give it more heart. For most of the play, Professor Wittington thinks that his wife, Dr. Wittington (Jocelyn Maher), has been killed by the Martians, but this emotional arc is overshadowed by the narrative weight his character bears. Since Lifeline can't recreate an alien invasion onstage any more realistically than Shakespeare could cram armies into his 'wooden O,' audience members must exercise their imaginations to picture the battles that Professor Wittington describes. There's little room for character development amid the action sequences, so the play doesn't have much of an emotional impact despite its high stakes for humankind. The inhabitants of Earth never get answers to the question of what they've done to deserve this catastrophe, but the play points the finger back at humanity by claiming that war is our greatest export and that the militaristic Martians offer a glimpse into our collective future. Toward the end, Whitehurst has a crisis of faith, revealing that the scientists have programmed the android with some sense of belief in god and an afterlife. It's a strange interlude that hints at the often-fraught relationship between science and religion. While hardcore sci-fi fans may be disappointed by this 'War of the Worlds,' those who appreciate the genre's more irreverent side will likely enjoy it. Lifeline never shies away from scaling epic stories to fit onto its small stage, and the company's gutsy creativity is evident in this latest world 'War of the Worlds' (2.5 stars) When: Through July 13 Where: Lifeline Theatre, 6912 N. Glenwood Ave. Running time: 1 hour, 35 minutes Tickets: $20-$45 at 773-761-4477 and
Scientific American
20-05-2025
- Scientific American
The Neuroscience of Murderbot's Cyborg Brain
Murderbot, the titular character of a new television show on Apple TV+, doesn't do much murdering. Instead it enjoys the freedom of having hacked its governor module, the internal control system that punished it for disobeying orders from its corporate owners. Now you could say it's 'quiet quitting': slacking off by watching its favorite soap operas on the job and trying to keep the humans under its protection from realizing that it's gone rogue. The show, based on a book series by Martha Wells called The Murderbot Diaries, features a main character made of cloned human tissue and robot hardware. It isn't a human, and it isn't a bot; it's something in-between called a 'construct.' It can see with security cameras or with its eyes; it can talk to computer systems with code and humans with language; its digital memory can be wiped by its creators, but its biological memory clings to traumatic flashes that can't be purged. It does not always understand human emotions, yet it feels, deeply. Exactly how this integration of cloned human neural tissue and computer circuitry works, we don't know—and the creators of the TV version told me that they don't know either. Wells, the books' author and a consulting producer on the show, keeps it vague. '[Wells] likes playing with the possibilities, but her world creation isn't so intensely detailed that we don't get to find our way through it ourselves,' says Chris Weitz, who adapted the series for TV along with his brother, Paul Weitz. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. For me, a Murderbot fan and brain science nerd, 'finding my way through it' involved talking to neuroscientists to understand how this seamless integration of brain and computer might work—because mixing brains and computer circuitry is not only science fiction. 'It's a very cool idea that we're moving toward in many ways,' says Alexander Huth, a neuroscientist at the University of Texas at Austin (and fellow Murderbot fan). And as neuroscientists get better at linking up our minds with computers, they're revealing some of what is so unique, and confounding, about the human brain and how we consciously experience the world. The Electrical Brain On the surface, it seems like brains and computers should be compatible enough—both work using electricity. Scientists have been using electricity to interact with the brain since 1924, when the psychiatrist Hans Berger first used electrodes to measure brainwaves. Fifty years later the first brain-computer interfaces used electrical readouts to affect the outside world—by controlling a cursor on a computer screen or, in the case of one avant-garde composer, converting brainwaves into music. Today brain-computer interfaces are far more advanced. Electrodes implanted inside the brain (or in some cases, simply sitting outside the scalp) pick up subtle patterns of neuron activation in the parts of the brain that generate movement and speech to guide prosthetic limbs or allow people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to communicate, respectively. Some researchers are working on devices to bypass spinal cord injuries to send signals from the brain to paralyzed limbs. And, increasingly, researchers are feeding the brain sensory information with computers, too, by developing prosthetic limbs that send physical sensations of touch back to the brain. Retinal implants for vision, similar to cochlear implants for hearing, are being developed to send visual information directly to the brain for some people who have lost their sight as a result of a condition called retinitis pigmentosa. And some groups are developing brain prosthetics to restore vision by directly stimulating its visual processing centers. It's still pretty low-resolution, Huth says, but 'this is happening.' The Brain's Big Principle None of these advances will allow scientists to create a bot-human construct like Murderbot anytime soon. In fact, the deeper you get into this research, the more it becomes clear why: although both run on electricity, human brains and computers have entirely different strategies for processing information. Take a classic sci-fi trope that happens to be one of Murderbot's core abilities: seeing a digital display in its mind's eye. What would it take to beam an episode of TV into someone's head? 'We don't really know,' Huth says. The most obvious method involves sticking electrodes into the region at the back of the brain, called the primary visual cortex, which first processes visual information from the eyes. But there's a problem. 'You'd need millions and millions and millions of electrodes to be able to read in a high-resolution image into your brain. And that's not plausible, at least in the near term,' Huth says. Some researchers are getting around this problem by forgoing the high-resolution details entirely. They're experimenting with stimulating higher-level visual regions that process more abstract information, such as faces. 'You would have the experience that there's a face' even without seeing all the details, Huth explains. The problem, says neuroscientist Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, is that the brain is an abstraction machine. Unlike a computer, it isn't set up to care about the details. We forget the details of most of what we experience—in fact, we never commit them to memory at all. 'The human brain doesn't want to remember. It wants to understand, which is very different,' says Quiroga, who studies visual perception and memory at the University of Leicester in England. He explains that most of what we remember perceiving is a construction rebuilt from a few pillars of meaning that we determine are important. Vision, memory and consciousness are all built from sparse details. 'The big principle of brain function, for me, is that it's all a construction,' Quiroga says. Computers, on the other hand, encode every single bit of information. Unlike a human, who would likely remember only the gist of what they've experienced, 'a computer can play [ Blade Runner ] from beginning to end without any errors,' Quiroga says. Might a brain-computer interface one day exist that can augment your brain to play back the entirety of Blade Runner (or Murderbot's favorite soap opera, The Rise and Fall of Sanctuary Moon) in your mind's eye? Maybe. 'Imagine that this is possible. Do you want that—because one of the key features of how the brain works is that we forget a lot of things,' Quiroga says. This prevents us from getting lost in endless unimportant details. 'If it works like that, it's because of millions of years of evolution. So there might be a reason for it,' he warns. The Age of AI Though brains may never work like computers, computers are increasingly working more like brains. 'ChatGPT is much more brainlike than a laptop,' says Huth, who studies the human language system. Artificial intelligence large language models are 'a really good match to how our brains represent information and language—the best that we have,' he says. Scientists are also developing computer hardware that mimics neuronal circuitry. And some have tried hooking AI hardware up to brain organoids, or cultured clumps of neurons grown in a lab, to process information. It's no wonder, then, that Murderbot strikes a chord now. All the way back to Frankenstein, science fiction has reflected our deep cultural fears about the technology we're currently birthing. 'On a certain level [ Murderbot 's story is] topical because people are preoccupied with AI,' show co-creator Paul Weitz says. But Murderbot caught his attention because 'it felt like a great literary character more than anything else.' Chris Weitz adds: '[Murderbot] sort of flips the trope—we're so used to the idea of this artificial person who wants to be human and wants to experience human emotions. And [Wells's] character, which is brilliant, doesn't want to do that.' Murderbot isn't human. That much it makes very clear to everyone who projects that desire onto it. But it is nonetheless a person, and that reality can't be changed even by those who seek to control it. It's that 'irreducibility of personhood,' Paul Weitz says, that drives the story. 'That to me was the huge, beautiful lesson in it.'
