X, CLF, NUE: Canada to Raise Steel and Aluminum Counter-Tariffs
Canada is threatening to raise its counter-tariffs on imports of U.S. steel and aluminum products starting on July 21.
Confident Investing Starts Here:
Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions
Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his government will place tariffs on steel and aluminum products that are 'consistent' with U.S. duties that currently sit at 50%. The move will coincide with the end of the 30-day trade deal deadline announced after Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump met at a recent G7 meeting.
Prime Minister Carney also said that his government's procurement policies will favor Canadian suppliers and 'reliable trading partners' moving forward. Finally, his government will unleash new, retroactive tariff quota rates at 100% of 2024 levels on imports of steel products from non-free trade agreement countries.
Higher tariffs from Canada are likely to impact major steel producers such as U.S. Steel (X), Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF), and Nucor Corp. (NUE).
Tit-for-Tat
The announcement of more tit-for-tat tariffs comes as Canada's industrial sector strains under pressure from President Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. Earlier in June, the president hiked existing metals tariffs from 25% to 50% in a move aimed at protecting American workers.
Since the first Trump tariffs were introduced in April, layoffs have risen and investments fallen in Canada's metals sector, says the Canadian Steel Producers Association, which has previously said that, 'At a 50 per cent tariff rate, the U.S. market is effectively closed to Canadian steel.'
Now, Prime Minister Carney says that new counter tariffs unveiled in coming weeks will combat symptoms of 'persistent global overcapacity.'
Is CLF Stock a Buy?
Cleveland-Cliffs stock has a consensus Hold rating among eight Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on two Buy, five Hold, and one Sell recommendations issued in the last three months. The average CLF price target of $8.34 implies 13.78% upside from current levels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
20 minutes ago
- CTV News
Chrystia Freeland slams BC Ferries' decision to build ships in China
Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland responds to a question during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Thursday, June 12, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick Controversy over BC Ferries' decision to award a contract to a Chinese state-owned shipyard to build four new vessels has reached Ottawa. Federal Transportation Minister Chrystia Freeland had some strong words for her B.C. counterpart Mike Farnworth in a letter dated June 16 and obtained by CTV News Friday. Read more: Eby won't stop BC Ferries from building new ships in China, but says it's 'not ideal' 'It is with great consternation and disappointment that I learned of BC Ferries' recent announcement it has selected China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards,' the letter begins. Freeland pointed out China's tariffs on Canadian agriculture products—which include a 100 per cent levy on canola oil, meal and peas and 25 per cent on fish and pork—calling them unjustified. She also highlighted concerns regarding threats to cybersecurity from the country. 'I am dismayed that BC Ferries would select a Chinese state-owned shipyard to build new ferries in the current geopolitical context,' she wrote. Read more: BC Ferries union upset Chinese company was hired to build new vessels She asked to be informed of what measures BC Ferries is taking to address potential security threats. 'I would like your assurance that BC Ferries conducted a robust risk assessment, and I expect them to engage with the relevant provincial and federal security agencies and departments to mitigate any security risk,' the letter reads. When BC Ferries announced the deal on June 10, it said it would have its own team of experts on site during construction 'to provide oversight and quality assurance.' Read more: Business leader says BC Ferries' hiring of Chinese shipyard is 'informed decision' 'We are confident that CMI Weihai will be able to meet our high expectations for safety and quality, while delivering tremendous value for our customers and on-time delivery of the four vessels,' the company said in a statement at the time. Notably, no Canadian companies placed a bid on the project. When BC Ferries opened its call for proposals last September, major B.C. shipbuilder Seaspan said in a statement it would not be able to compete with countries that pay workers less and have lower environmental and safety standards. 'Given the value of the contract and the level of taxpayer funding that has been provided to support BC Ferries' operations, I am surprised that BC Ferries does not appear to have been mandated to require an appropriate level of Canadian content in the procurement or the involvement of the Canadian marine industry,' Freeland wrote. Read more: Minister flags concern over BC Ferries' deal with Chinese state-owned shipyard She listed some of the funding the federal government has given the province and BC Ferries over the years, including $308 million during the COVID-19 pandemic—and asked Farnworth to 'verify and confirm with utmost certainty that no federal funding will be diverted to support the acquisition of these new ferries.' B.C. leaders, namely Farnworth and Premier David Eby, have—using much softer language—expressed disapproval of BC Ferries' decision, but said they won't step in to kill the contract, despite calls from opposition critics and unions to do so.
CTV News
20 minutes ago
- CTV News
Business groups push back ahead of Vancouver ‘carbon tax' on commercial buildings
Vancouver City Hall is seen in Vancouver, on Saturday, Jan. 9, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck Carbon taxes are falling out of style, with the federal and provincial governments recently pulling back. But in Vancouver, stricter emissions rules are coming for commercial buildings starting next year. It's part of the city's efforts to cut carbon pollution in half by 2030. 'What the City of Vancouver is planning to implement here essentially amounts to a second carbon tax being implemented at the municipal level,' Ryan Mitton with the Canadian Federation of Independent Business told CTV News in an interview on Friday. 'And what this is going to be a charge of $350 per tonne of CO2 that each building emits over a certain level set by the City of Vancouver.' The new rules take effect in January and include a $500 permit fee. Business groups fear buildings in violation could be hit with fines in the range of $14,000. 'The landlord will then take that invariably and pass that on to the tenants,' Ian Tostenson with the BC Restaurant and Foodservices Association told CTV News. While restaurant emissions are exempt according to the city, if a large building is penalized for emitting too much, Tostenson fears landlords will pass that cost on to all tenants in the building, including restaurants. Given the federal and provincial governments recently eliminated carbon taxes, businesses are calling for Vancouver to follow suit and back away from this plan. 'I just really hope that Mayor Ken Sim and council look at this proposal and decide to walk it back,' Mitton said. The city believes 84 per cent of buildings will be in compliance, based on 2024 figures, and says financial penalties only kick in by 2027 – which it says will allow enough time for building owners to prepare for the new regulations. This is a phased program that was initially voted for in 2022, and given how much has changed economically, some of these business groups believe city council would be willing to press pause on this, but there is no formal indication at this point that will happen. The city stresses this plan is about reducing emissions, not about generating revenue, and says based on reporting to date, most large buildings will be in compliance when the rules kick in.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. judge blocks National Science Foundation from slashing universities' federal funding
A federal judge on Friday prevented the National Science Foundation from sharply cutting research funding provided to universities in the latest legal setback to efforts by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to slash government support of research at major academic institutions. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston invalidated a policy NSF adopted in May that limited the ability of universities to be reimbursed for administrative and facility costs that indirectly support grant-funded research, ruling that it was 'arbitrary and capricious.' Spokespeople for NSF and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling. NSF, a US$9 billion agency that funds scientific research, adopted the policy after having already canceled hundreds of grants out of step with the Republican president's priorities. His administration has also been freezing billions of dollars in government funding for numerous universities, including Harvard. NSF's policy, which was announced on May 2, set a cap on how much grant funding could go to cover indirect costs. NSF said funding for such costs could equal no more than 15% of the funding for direct research costs, regardless of what the costs actually were at universities. Historically, universities had negotiated with NSF and other agencies over the rate at which indirect costs could be reimbursed. The cap meant that for every $100 in funding going directly to a research grant award, universities would receive just $15 to cover overhead, such as the costs of maintaining lab space and paying for electricity and staff. The Trump administration said it sought through the policy to rein in spending on administrative overhead, which had grown to consume US$1.07 billion of NSF's annual US$4.22 billion grant-making budget for higher education institutions. That rate, though, is significantly lower than the indirect cost that many of the 69 research universities belonging to Association of American Universities had negotiated, which was often in the 50 per cent to 65 per cent range, the group's lawyers said. Talwani, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, said in her Friday decision that the administration's 15 per cent rate was unlawful. The association along with two other academic trade groups and 13 schools sued in May to block the policy, after earlier convincing judges in Boston to block similar funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health and U.S. Department of Energy. The association did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Friday decision. Among the schools that challenged NSF's funding cuts were the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Brown University, the University of California, Carnegie Mellon University, Cornell University, the University of Michigan and the University of Pennsylvania. They argued that NSF's action, if allowed to stand, 'will badly undermine scientific research at America's universities and erode our nation's enviable status as a global leader in scientific research and innovation.' The U.S. Department of Defense has since also adopted a 15 per cent cap, which a judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked pending a hearing on July 2. He did so a day after a different judge in Boston ordered NIH to reinstate hundreds of grants for research on diversity-related topics nixed as part of the administration's purge of initiatives viewed as supporting 'diversity, equity and inclusion.'
