Support staff at university call for strike action over proposed pension changes
Unite Scotland said on Tuesday that 94% of the staff employed at the University of Strathclyde had backed industrial action.
Employees represented by Unite include facilities workers such as technicians, cleaners and security.
They also include maintenance workers – including plumbers, joiners and electricians – and all backed industrial action.
The workers are part of the Strathclyde Pension Fund (SPF), who say they are at risk of losing thousands of pounds each year – accusing their employer of moving them on to a worse-off pension scheme.
Workers say the university's reason for doing so is because it wants to access a pension surplus of almost £100 million.
Some 94% of workers in an industrial action ballot supported strike action. The development comes despite a 'cynical' last-minute attempt by the university on the eve of the ballot result to amend its initial pension proposals without consulting the union.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'Unite's members at the University of Strathclyde have emphatically backed strike action.
'Pensions are deferred wages which our members contribute towards over many years for their retirement.
'The university's shameful cash grab from our hard-working members' pension pots will be vigorously resisted.
'Strathclyde University workers will have Unite's full support in defence of their pensions.'
The union says the university does not need to make the changes as it made a surplus of £46.8 million in 2023 from an income of £487.4 million.
Balloters also said the university has large reserves, holding net assets of £402.8 million in 2023, as well as an additional £142.7 million in cash.
They said the university also has strong liquidity with £360.7 million of its net assets being unrestricted, meaning they are not locked up and can be used in the event of any temporary financial downturn.
They also said the university's vice-chancellor, professor Sir Jim McDonald, earned a salary of £401,000 in 2023, with a further £3 million paid to the rest of the university's executive team.
Unite said strike dates would be announced in the near future, but said the university has a chance to scrap the proposed changes in order to avoid them.
Alison MacLean, Unite regional co-ordinating officer, said: 'The University of Strathclyde has refused to meaningfully consult with us throughout this dispute.
'The cynical attempt to change their initial punitive pension proposal on the eve of the ballot result will be seen for exactly what it is by our members.
'The facts remain that there is a pension surplus of £100 million and any changes could leave some workers thousands of pounds worse-off every year.
'The university has an opportunity to bin its proposals and if they want to genuinely explore ways of improving its short term financial position then Unite is willing to discuss ways to do this including tackling eye-watering executive pay.'
The University of Strathclyde was approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Airbus Workers to Strike at UK Wing Factories Over Pay
Thousands of Airbus SE workers in the UK are set to walk off the job for 10 days in September after 90% of union members voted to strike over the aircraft manufacturer's pay offer. The industrial action will start on Sept. 2 and continue over a three-week period at Airbus wing factories in Broughton and Filton, according to Unite, a union that represents more than 3,000 Airbus engineers and aircraft fitters.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Airbus workers to stage strikes amid pay dispute
Workers at aircraft manufacturer Airbus are to stage a series of strikes in a dispute over pay. Unite said around 3,000 of its members will walk out for 10 days in September after they voted overwhelmingly in favour of industrial action. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'Airbus is generating billions in profit; workers deserve a fair deal. Our members are simply seeking fairness not favours. 'Airbus workers have the total support of their union in this dispute.' Unite warned the strikes will hit production of wings for Airbus's commercial and military aircraft programmes.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
How ‘big lager' beat BrewDog in Britain's battle of the beers
It was not so long ago that BrewDog was among the fastest-growing beer brands in Britain. Credited with sparking Britain's craft beer revolution and amid an ambitious expansion in pubs and supermarkets across the country, the upstart Scottish firm appeared destined for even greater things. Not any more. Over the past two years, the brewer's products have disappeared from almost 2,000 pubs – most of those owned by big chains – from Aberdeen to Penzance, The Telegraph revealed last week. Beer drinkers are now more likely to find brightly coloured taps for Beavertown Brewery or Camden Town at their local pub instead of a Punk IPA, BrewDog's flagship 5.4pc ABV brew. And while its beers are still sold in hundreds of pubs across the UK, the retreat marks a major knock to its share of the market as 'big lager' – once written off as a spent force against the craft beer surge – stages a surprise comeback. Over the past few years, multinational brewers like Budweiser, Molson Coors and Heineken have put up fierce competition, while a decline in demand for craft beers in favour of more mainstream drinks such as Guinness and Madri is also compounding the problem. '[Pubs] obviously haven't got the confidence in BrewDog brands to be driving volume,' says Paul Pavli, the former boss of pub group Punch Taverns and now a hospitality consultant. BrewDog has blamed its losses in the pub trade on competition from bigger brewers, alleging they are using their huge scale to effectively squeeze independent brewers out of pubs. 'It's a hugely, hugely competitive space. Obviously the likes of Heineken have got such a breadth of portfolio, and they also have their own craft brands. They've got buying power that smaller viewers or independent growers like ourselves don't have,' claims Lauren Carrol, BrewDog's chief operating officer. At a time when the cost of everything from beer to fuel and labour has gone through the roof, BrewDog has argued this is putting independents at a disadvantage as pub chains prioritise margins. In the case of pub chains which are owned by breweries, Carrol claims companies are putting more emphasis on selling their own beers rather than independents for the same reasons. 'You obviously have your cost and you've got your negotiations around your keg price, [but] big brewers will have the economies of scale that that your smaller brewers won't have. 'We try to be competitive but if someone's looking to consolidate all of their beer under one partner, that's something that we struggle to to compete with. It's an expensive place [hospitality]. It's kind of pay to play.' Big brewers are able to sell to pub groups at an increasingly competitive price because they produce a much higher volume of beer – often granting more beneficial prices when a wider range of their brands are stocked. Plus, the fact that big brewers own their own craft brands like Camden Town and Beavertown means they can supply pub groups with a wider range of beers under a single deal. BrewDog claims its comparative smallness leaves it at a disadvantage compared to these giants. For example, the larger 'portfolio' of beers offered by the likes of Heineken – such as Amstel, Birra Moretti, Cruzcampo and Tiger – gives the multinational an upper hand in negotiations. As one pub industry source explains: 'There is a market squeeze from the big brewers. BrewDog are not being delisted because they're expensive. They're being delisted because it's not a portfolio play. 'Commercially, [BrewDog] is really aggressive. You can see [from] the price in the supermarkets they're prepared to not make a lot of money on beer. 'But what they're prepared to invest – when you combine it with what an overall Molson Coors deal looks like, or an overall Heineken deal – is just not in the ballpark. 'BrewDog could beat Beavertown to a listing, or could beat Camden to a listing, but the minute the big brewers find out, the price of the other beers that that company buys from the Heineken or Budweiser would go up.' Not everyone is convinced, pointing out that BrewDog is not a plucky upstart but one of Britain's largest brewers, backed by heavyweight private equity money from the US. According to The Grocer magazine, it is still the 20th biggest alcohol brand in British supermarkets with current annual sales of almost £207m– although retail growth has slowed with sales effectively flat this year. It also has a major deal with Britain's largest pub chain JD Wetherspoon, which distributes BrewDog at its nearly 800 pubs. '[BrewDog] are one of the big guys,' says Pavli says. 'Maybe they're not as big as Diageo or Carlsberg … but they're a massive group. They can't be saying 'we're independent, that's why we're affected.'' BrewDog is also grappling with a shift in Britain's drinking culture. While it is true that BrewDog lacks the sheer financial heft of the biggest brewers, tastes have undeniably changed since it was on the ascendant in the mid 2010s. Hoppy IPAs and small-batch brews are no longer in vogue. 'Consumers, in a way, decide what's been sold on the bar. So maybe their brands aren't as strong as they think,' Pavli says. 'If BrewDog went out and said to the pub companies to take Pravha or Madri off, then consumers would go crazy. '[Pub groups] will only take beers off the bar if it's not going to affect their their range and therefore their sales.' It's not just on the bar lineup that BrewDog's faded eminence is apparent. One look at its precarious financial position also shows the impact of the industry changes. Sales of its beers have flatlined amid ballooning losses, while its reputation has suffered from allegations of being a 'toxic' workplace. It said many employees had positive experiences working there. James Taylor, the new chief executive, is battling to restore faith in the company and put the past behind it after its controversial founder James Watt stepped down. The pub industry source believes that BrewDog's past controversies, including an open letter that emerged in 2021 alleging a 'culture of fear', may have played a role in putting some pub companies off them. While in charge of BrewDog, Watt was also accused of behaving inappropriately with female staff, which he stringently denied. Further incidents included a staff backlash in 2024 when BrewDog dropped out out of the accredited real living wage scheme, and, more recently, allegations by union Unite that staff at 10 BrewDog bars were given just days notice that the venues would shut. BrewDog denies any wrongdoing. 'Depending on where you are in the country and what kind of pub you run, the staff might have an attitude towards BrewDog. when all the negative press was happening, how much of that was being absorbed by the people that behind the bar?' says the source. 'You're not going to force your staff to work on something that they don't really like. And I guess in the more liberal, modern world, they're probably more anti-Brewdog than in your spit-and-sawdust pubs.' Just how badly the losses to its pub business will hurt BrewDog in the long run is unclear. While chief executive Taylor has admitted the company will not return to profit in its yet-to-be-published 2024 accounts, he recently insisted the company was profitable on an another earnings measure (known as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation). In the future, BrewDog has pinned its hopes on broadening its appeal to drinkers who may not have encountered it before, by signing big sports sponsorship deals with the likes of Lord's cricket ground and West Ham United. 'What we're trying to do is is really appeal to a more mainstream audience,' says Carrol. But it may take some time before it can truly shake off the controversies of its past. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
