logo
Israel's Netanyahu survives opposition bid to dissolve parliament

Israel's Netanyahu survives opposition bid to dissolve parliament

Al Jazeeraa day ago

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's fractious right-wing coalition has survived an opposition-backed bid to dissolve parliament after ruling lawmakers reached a deal regarding the divisive mandatory military service.
The bill, which would have been a first step leading to an early election, was rejected early on Thursday by a majority of 61 lawmakers in the 120-seat Knesset, while 53 supported it.
'I am pleased to announce that after long discussions we have reached agreements on the principles on which the draft law will be based,' Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman Yuli Edelstein said in a statement.
The opposition had introduced the conscription bill, hoping to force elections with the help of ultra-Orthodox parties angry at Netanyahu over the contentious issue of forcing religious seminary students of draft age to serve in the army.
'It's more than ever urgent to replace Netanyahu's government and specifically this toxic and harmful government,' Labour's opposition lawmaker Merav Michaeli said ahead of the vote.
While the opposition is composed mainly of centrist and left-wing groups, ultra-Orthodox parties, including Shas and United Torah Judaism (UTJ), which are propping up Netanyahu's government, had earlier threatened to back the motion.
Military service is mandatory in Israel but under a ruling that dates to the country's creation – when the ultra-Orthodox were a very small community, men who devote themselves full-time to the study of sacred Jewish texts are given a de facto pass.
Efforts to scrap the exemption and the resulting blowback have intensified during Israel's continuing assault on Gaza as the military looks for more soldiers to be deployed.
Netanyahu is under pressure from his own Likud party to draft more ultra-Orthodox men and impose penalties on dodgers, a red line for the Shas party, who demand a law guaranteeing their members permanent exemption from military service.
Netanyahu's coalition, formed in December 2022, is one of the most right wing in the country's history.
Ahead of the vote, far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich argued that bringing down the government during wartime would pose 'an existential danger' to Israel's future.
'History will not forgive anyone who drags the state of Israel into elections during a war,' Smotrich told parliament, adding that there was a 'national and security need' for ultra-Orthodox men to fight in the military.
In the early hours of Thursday, Israeli media reported that most ultra-Orthodox lawmakers ultimately agreed not to support the proposal to dissolve parliament.
After the failed vote, the opposition will now have to wait six months to submit another bill.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How US politicians responded to Israel's attacks on Iran
How US politicians responded to Israel's attacks on Iran

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

How US politicians responded to Israel's attacks on Iran

Washington, DC – Less than three hours before Israel launched its first wave of strikes against Iran, United States President Donald Trump reiterated that the United States was committed to further diplomacy with Tehran. The Israeli attacks early on Friday have put those negotiations in jeopardy and raised the risk of an all-out conflict in the Middle East that may involve the US. Israel's strikes came as polar opposites on the right and left ideological spectrum of US politics have urged Trump to resist being dragged by Israel into a war with Iran. But support for Israel in the US political establishment remains formidable despite the cracks that have been showing in recent years, both in public opinion and among politicians. So as the bombs fell on Tehran and other Iranian cities, many American politicians rushed to send 'prayers' for Israel, while others expressed concern – if not outright rejection – over the escalation. Here's how US politicians responded to the events. The Trump administration was quick to distance itself from Israel's attacks, while also warning Iran not to retaliate against US interests in the region. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence. President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel,' Rubio said. Trump later reiterated Rubio's message, telling Fox News that the US is 'hoping to get back to the negotiating table' with Iran. But it is highly unlikely that diplomacy between Washington and Tehran will continue – at least in the near future. Early reports from Iran indicate that Tehran will not attend the sixth round of nuclear negotiations with the US that are scheduled to take place in Oman on Sunday. Numerous members of Trump's Republican Party in Congress were quick to voice support for Israel, with many calling for prayers for the US allies, although it was Israel that initiated the attack on Iran. At least three lawmakers – Katie Britt, Rick Scott and Gary Palmer – used the exact words 'Please join me in praying for Israel' in their statements. House Speaker Mike Johnson also showed unflinching support for Israel. 'Israel IS right – and has a right – to defend itself!' Johnson wrote in a social media post featuring the Israeli flag. Senate Majority Leader John Thune's defence of Israel was slightly less effusive, as he focused his statement on US interests. 'The United States Senate stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas,' Thune wrote in a social media post. 'Iran should heavily consider the consequences before considering any action against Americans in the region.'Hawkish Republican Senator Lindsey Graham – a Trump ally – was among the first lawmakers to comment on the strikes. 'Game on. Pray for Israel,' he wrote in a social media post. Despite assertions by some critics that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the bombing of Iran to sabotage Trump's diplomacy with Tehran, most of the US president's political party has come out in favour of the strikes. Several Democrats criticised the strikes outright, stressing that war with Iran would not serve US interests. Senator Chris Murphy said the Israeli strikes are 'clearly intended to scuttle' the Trump administration's diplomacy with Iran. 'This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiralling toward a new, deadly conflict,' Murphy said in a statement. 'A war between Israel and Iran may be good for Netanyahu's domestic politics, but it will likely be disastrous for both the security of Israel, the United States, and the rest of the region.' He added that the US has 'no obligation' to follow Israel into a war with Iran. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, also called on Trump to push for de-escalation. 'Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence,' Reed said in a statement. 'I urge both nations to show immediate restraint, and I call on President Trump and our international partners to press for diplomatic de-escalation before this crisis spirals further out of control.' Congressman Joaquin Castro noted that US officials were set to hold talks with Iran on Sunday. 'This attack by Netanyahu is pure sabotage,' Castro said in a social media post. 'What does 'America First' even mean if Trump allows Netanyahu to drag the country into a war Americans don't want?' The Israeli strikes have also highlighted the split within the Democratic Party on Israel, as some lawmakers voiced unreserved backing for the US ally despite criticism by their colleagues. Congressman Ritchie Torress claimed that Israel – which has its own undeclared nuclear arsenal and is accused by UN experts and major rights groups of carrying out a genocide against Palestinians in Gaza – is 'defending itself'. Senator John Fetterman rejoiced in the assassination of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps chief Hossein Salami. He wrote, 'thank u, next' in response to the US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard said earlier this year that Washington 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon', several lawmakers portrayed the Israeli attacks as an effort to stop Tehran from acquiring a nuclear bomb. 'America and the World will never be safe with a nuclear-capable Iran which would bring an existential threat to Israel and constant instability to the region,' Congressman George Latimer said. 'I support Israel's right to defend itself,' he added.

How the world is reacting to Israel's attacks on Iran
How the world is reacting to Israel's attacks on Iran

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

How the world is reacting to Israel's attacks on Iran

Israel's military says it launched a wave of strikes on Iran, hitting key nuclear facilities and killing senior Iranian commanders and nuclear scientists in a major attack. The assault in the early hours of Friday also hit residential sites, injuring at least 50 people, according to Iran's Tasnim state news agency. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned Israel that it 'must expect severe punishment' following its 'crime', while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that the military operation will continue as long as necessary. Here is how the world is reacting: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called for 'maximum restraint' to avoid 'descent into deeper conflict'. 'The secretary-general condemns any military escalation in the Middle East,' Guterres's spokesperson Farhan Haq said. 'He is particularly concerned by Israeli attacks on nuclear installations in Iran while talks between Iran and the United States on the status of Iran's nuclear programme are under way.' Oman, which has been mediating nuclear talks between the US and Iran over recent months, decried Israel's attacks as a 'dangerous and reckless escalation' that 'violates the principles of international law'. '[It] represents unacceptable and ongoing aggressive behaviour that undermines the foundations of stability in the region,' the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. 'Israel is responsible for this escalation and its consequences.' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took 'unilateral action against Iran' and that Israel advised the US that it believed the strikes were necessary for its self-defence. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Rubio said in a statement released by the White House. 'Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' Saudi Arabia denounced the 'heinous' Israeli attacks. 'The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia expresses its strong condemnation and denunciation of the heinous Israeli attacks against the brotherly Islamic Republic of Iran,' the Saudi Foreign Ministry said in a statement on X. The ministry said Israel's brutal offensive on Iran 'violates its sovereignty and constitutes a blatant breach of international laws and norms'. It pointed to the UN Security Council's responsibility for immediately confronting and halting the repeated Israeli aggression. Qatar said it was deeply concerned over the 'dangerous escalation' and called on the international community to 'urgently halt these Israeli violations'. 'The State of Qatar expresses its strong condemnation and denunciation of the Israeli attack targeting the territory of the sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran, considering it a flagrant violation of Iran's sovereignty and security, and a clear breach of the rules and principles of international law,' the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Israel's strikes on Iran are concerning and that all parties need to step back and reduce tensions. 'Stability in the Middle East must be the priority, and we are engaging partners to de-escalate. Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy,' Starmer said. Australia said it was 'alarmed by the escalation between Israel and Iran'. 'This risks further destabilising a region that is already volatile. We call on all parties to refrain from actions and rhetoric that will further exacerbate tensions,' said Foreign Minister Penny Wong. 'We all understand the threat of Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programme represents a threat to international peace and security, and we urge the parties to prioritise dialogue and diplomacy,' Wong said. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the attacks were an 'unwelcome development' in the region. 'The risk of miscalculation is high. That region does not need any more military action, and risk associated with that,' Luxon said. Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya said the use of military forces at a time of diplomacy and negotiations between the US and Iran is 'deeply regrettable'. 'The government strongly condemns this action, which escalates the situation,' Iwaya said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store