logo
Iran's uranium stockpile: What we know about its facilities after US strikes

Iran's uranium stockpile: What we know about its facilities after US strikes

Indian Express5 hours ago

After days of debate over whether Israeli and US strikes damaged Iran's three key nuclear facilities, the fate of the country's enriched uranium stockpile remains a mystery.
While a CIA report confirmed 'significant damage' to nuclear facilities that has pushed the nuclear programme back by many years, there is still little to no information on the current status of Iran's enriched uranium stock.
At a Pentagon press briefing on Thursday (June 26), US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium in advance of the US strikes.
'I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise,' he said.
US President Donald Trump, echoing the defence secretary's statements, said that nothing was taken out of the site prior to the attack. In a post on Truth Social, Trump, referring to the Fordow nuclear facility, said, 'Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!'
Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, also said that American intelligence agencies were watching the Iranian nuclear sites closely, 'and there was no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strike.'
The clarification by top US officials comes after a US intelligence report prepared by the Pentagon assessed that the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities on June 20 did not damage the core components of Tehran's nuclear programme, but has only set it back by several months.
Trump refuted the claims, standing firm on his stance, that the US strikes 'completely obliterated' the nuclear facilities.
He blamed his Democratic opponents, without any evidence, for leaking the intelligence report to US media. 'The Democrats are the ones who leaked the information on the PERFECT FLIGHT to the Nuclear Sites in Iran,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'They should be prosecuted!'
He also slammed CNN for its report suggesting that the US strikes had failed to destroy Iran's nuclear sites.
A CIA report, however, revealed with 'credible evidence' that Iran's Nuclear Program has been 'severely damaged' by recent strikes.
While the facilities were targeted, there is a little doubt whether Iran's entire enriched uranium stockpile was completely destroyed, and the country would struggle to produce more quickly.
Intelligence officials have assessed that Iran may have attempted to move its stockpile of enriched uranium out of Fordow in anticipation of an attack on its nuclear facilities.
There is no clear confirmation regarding which facility stored most of Iran's enriched uranium. Trump has said it was at Fordow, the site he claims was severely destroyed. Others argue it was at Natanz, while the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said the majority of the stockpile was at Isfahan, where Iran maintains reactors and other facilities that utilise enriched uranium.
IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said that Iranian officials had told his officials they planned to move the material if they believed it was under threat. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had also sent a letter to the IAEA Director General on 13 June, warning that Iran would 'adopt special measures to protect our nuclear equipment and materials'.
In the days leading up to the US strikes, there was evidence of vehicles transporting materials in or out of the Isfahan nuclear site.
Satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showed 'unusual activity' at Fordow, with a long line of vehicles queued outside the facility, according to Reuters. A senior Iranian source also told Reuters that most of the 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the attack.
The IAEA Director General later said that a significant amount of the near-bomb-grade fuel appeared to remain under Iranian control. 'I don't know if they moved all of it,' he told the Financial Times, 'but the evidence points to their moving out a lot of it.'
The Financial Times, citing European intelligence assessments, also reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact, as it was not concentrated at Fordow.
Iranian officials have suggested that the enriched uranium was indeed moved from Fordow prior to the US bombing of the plant and could now be hidden in unknown locations.
The newspaper, citing two people briefed on preliminary intelligence assessments, said European capitals believe Iran's stockpile of 408 kilogram of enriched uranium close to weapons-grade levels was not concentrated in Fordow at the time of last weekend's attack.
Over the years, Iran has stockpiled more than 8,400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent, which is considered near bomb-grade. However, Tehran continues to insist its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.
(With inputs from The New York Times, Financial Times, and Reuters)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rush Hour: 3 arrested in Kolkata gangrape case, Trump hints at trade deal with India and more
Rush Hour: 3 arrested in Kolkata gangrape case, Trump hints at trade deal with India and more

Scroll.in

time28 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Rush Hour: 3 arrested in Kolkata gangrape case, Trump hints at trade deal with India and more

We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. Support Scroll's studio fund today. Three men have been arrested for the alleged gangrape of a student inside a law college in Kolkata. The student was allegedly raped inside the campus of the South Calcutta Law College on Wednesday. Among those arrested, one is a former student while the rest were studying at the college. They were held based on the student's complaint and remanded to four days of police custody on Friday. Read on. The toll from a flash flood near a hydroelectric project site in Himachal Pradesh's Kangra district has risen to five. On Wednesday, about 15 to 20 workers at a labour colony near the Indira Priyadarshini Hydroelectric project site at Khaniyara near Dharamshala were feared to have been swept away. The incident occurred after a surge in the water level of the Manuni river. Search and rescue operations were ongoing for the remaining missing workers. Himachal Pradesh witnessed three cloudbursts, nine flash floods and three landslides over the past 24 hours. Read on. United States President Donald Trump has said that India could sign a 'very big' trade deal with Washington. This came days before the suspension of tariffs announced by Trump expires on July 9. Trump had imposed so-called reciprocal tariffs on several countries, including a 26% 'discounted' levy on India on April 9. Hours later, he reduced the rates of imports from most countries to 10% for 90 days to provide time for trade negotiations. New Delhi has said that it was in talks with Washington to finalise a bilateral trade agreement between September and November. Read on. Students in Jharkhand's single-teacher schools are being deprived of their fundamental right to elementary education, owing to absenteeism and a lack of engagement from educators, according to a new study. A single-teacher school is a violation of the Right to Education Act, which mandates at least two educators for a primary school. In about 87.5% of such schools in Latehar's Manika block, no active teaching was taking place when surveyors made unannounced visits to the institutes between January and March, showed the study prepared by the NREGA Sahayata Kendra. It said that absenteeism among teachers was a 'persistent issue', which left the students without 'proper guidance and supervision'. Even when the teachers are present, they are often occupied with administrative work, the study pointed out. Read on.

Iran says no agreement made to resume U.S. talks
Iran says no agreement made to resume U.S. talks

United News of India

time32 minutes ago

  • United News of India

Iran says no agreement made to resume U.S. talks

Tehran, June 27 (UNI) Iran's Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi yesterday said that no arrangement or commitment had been made to resume negotiations with the United States, amid heightened tensions following attacks by Israel and the United States on Iranian territory. In an interview with state broadcaster IRIB, Araghchi said the possibility of restarting talks was under consideration but would depend on whether Tehran's national interests were protected. "Our decisions will be based solely on Iran's interests," he said. "If our interests require a return to negotiations, we will consider it. But at this stage, no agreement or promise has been made and no talks have taken place." Araghchi accused Washington of betraying Iran during previous rounds of negotiations on reviving the 2015 nuclear deal and lifting U.S. sanctions. The Iranian diplomat also confirmed that a law suspending cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog had become binding after being passed by parliament and approved by the Guardian Council, a top constitutional oversight body. "The law is now obligatory and will be implemented. Our cooperation with the IAEA will take a new shape," he said. Araghchi also said the damage caused by the 12-day war with Israel was "serious" and that experts from the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran were conducting a detailed assessment. He said the question of demanding reparations was high on the government's agenda. The conflict began on June 13 when Israel launched airstrikes on multiple targets across Iran, including military and nuclear facilities, killing several senior commanders, nuclear scientists, and civilians. The attacks came just days before Iran and the United States were expected to resume indirect nuclear negotiations in Muscat, Oman, on June 15. In response, Iran launched waves of missile and drone strikes on Israel, causing casualties and damage. On June 21, the U.S. Air Force struck three key Iranian nuclear sites. In retaliation, Iran fired missiles at the U.S. Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar on June 23. The 12-day conflict ended with a ceasefire between Iran and Israel on June 24. UNI XINHUA ARN

NATO withdrawal bill: US to withdraw from NATO? Lawmaker introduces bill, labels it
NATO withdrawal bill: US to withdraw from NATO? Lawmaker introduces bill, labels it

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

NATO withdrawal bill: US to withdraw from NATO? Lawmaker introduces bill, labels it

Senator Mike Lee has introduced a bill to withdraw the U.S. from NATO, arguing it's outdated and Europe isn't paying its fair share. This move comes amid debates about European defense spending and America's role in global security. While Trump has previously questioned NATO, he recently expressed support, creating uncertainty about the bill's prospects. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What Congress has done before Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What Trump said What Senator Lee said FAQs Senator Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, has introduced a new bill to make the U.S. leave NATO. He named the bill " Not A Trusted Organization Act ", which makes fun of NATO's thinks NATO is no longer useful and says European countries aren't paying their fair share, making Americans pay more. The bill asks the President to officially tell NATO the U.S. is quitting, as allowed in Article 13 of the NATO treaty. It also wants to stop any U.S. money from going to NATO, according to the report by December 2023, Congress passed a bipartisan law saying the President cannot leave NATO alone — they need Senate approval or a full act of Congress. Back in 2019, the House also passed a rule stopping President Trump from quitting NATO on his own during his first Lee also introduced two more bills to check how much NATO countries are spending, one is the Allied Burden Sharing Report Act. The other is the NATO Burden Sharing Report Act. These were supported by Senators Rand Paul and Marsha Blackburn. Blackburn said these bills will show who is paying their fair share and who is not, as per the report by is happening while people are again debating Europe's defense spending and America's role in world security. If the U.S. leaves NATO, it would be a huge change in foreign policy and affect military partnerships and global to the report by Associated Press, President Donald Trump has often questioned NATO in the past, but at the summit in The Hague, he said he supports NATO's Article 5 — the rule that says if one NATO country is attacked, all defend it. Trump said: "If I didn't stand with it, I wouldn't be here." He was happy that NATO members agreed to spend 5% on defense, as stated by the Newsweek Williams, a professor from Syracuse University, was at the summit and said tensions were high. He said NATO's Secretary General, Mark Rutte, tried hard to get all countries to agree to the 5% defense target and keep Trump happy. Williams also said it's not clear if Europe really trusts the U.S. to stay committed to said: 'America's withdrawal from NATO is long overdue.' He said NATO is based on old threats that no longer exist and that Europe should be paying more. He believes his bill will put America bill might not pass easily because many people in both parties still support staying in NATO. Trump also seems to be less against NATO now, which could mean less support for the bill from his side too, as reported by Mike Lee says NATO is no longer useful and that Europe is not paying its fair share. He believes the U.S. is spending too much and wants to stop funding A 2023 law says the President must get Senate approval or a full act of Congress to withdraw the U.S. from NATO.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store