
China's exports jump 5.8% in June as tariffs reprieve prompts a rush of orders
Exports climbed 5.8% from a year earlier, up from a 4.8% rise in May. Imports also recovered, growing 1.1% in the first increase so far this year, according to customs data released Monday.
Exports to the United States fell 16% but that was less than half the 34.5% drop seen in May.
After U.S. President Donald Trump imposed tariffs of up to 245% on imports from China and Beijing responded with its own steep import duties, the two sides agreed to hold back to allow time for talks. But preliminary discussions between the two sides have yet to produce significant progress.
In the meantime, the Trump administration has hiked tariffs on imports from China by 35%, pending an Aug. 12 deadline for reverting to the higher tariffs Washington and Beijing have delayed for now.
The recovery in trade is expected to help boost economic growth in the April to June quarter. The Chinese government is due to report those figures on Tuesday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Waller says he's willing to lead Fed if Trump asks, but no contact so far
By Howard Schneider WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Federal Reserve Governor Chris Waller, an advocate for an immediate interest rate cut, said on Friday he would accept the job as head of the U.S. central bank if asked by President Donald Trump, but so far Trump has not contacted him about it. "In 2019 the president contacted me and said, 'Would you serve?' And I said yes," Waller told Bloomberg Television, referring to Trump's appointment of him to the Fed's Board of Governors. "If the president contacted me and said, 'I want you to serve,' I would do it. But he has not contacted me." Trump has launched a barrage of nearly daily criticism at Fed Chair Jerome Powell over the central bank's reluctance to cut rates due to concern the administration's trade and tariff policies will increase inflation. Waller favors a rate cut at the Fed's upcoming July 29-30 meeting because he feels the tariffs are likely to have a limited impact on inflation, and he is concerned the economy and private-sector hiring are starting to slow. Though the unemployment rate is low, Waller said underlying data "are not indicating a super healthy private-sector labor market," and the Fed should "get ahead" of a possible hiring slowdown. The U.S. central bank is widely expected to keep its benchmark interest rate steady in the 4.25%-4.50% range at its upcoming meeting. Only Waller and another Trump appointee, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, favor a cut that soon, though eight of their colleagues have indicated a reduction in the policy rate could happen in September. Waller, who has said explicitly that his rate stance is "not political," has been credited by economists for making a cogent case for lower rates, even as administration officials have tried to amplify pressure on Powell over cost overruns in a renovation of the Fed's headquarters in Washington. Trump, who feels rates should be slashed to levels more aligned with a recession, has repeatedly said Powell should resign. Powell has vowed to remain Fed chief until his term expires in May. Waller "is not talking about cost overruns on the Eccles Building or lowering the cost of government finance or 'regime change,' but he is talking about the shifting balance of risks in the economy," Neil Dutta, head of economics at Renaissance Macro Research, wrote in an analysis that argued appointing Waller to succeed Powell was "the most obvious way" for Trump to boost his impact at the Fed. CASTING CALL As a sitting Fed governor, Waller would have an immediate vote and voice on policy if tapped to succeed Powell. Others mentioned as possible nominees include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett, and Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor and perennial critic of the central bank since leaving its Board of Governors in 2011. In an extended television interview this week, Warsh said the Fed needed "regime change." As it stands, Bessent, Hassett or Warsh could not join the central bank's seven-member board until Fed Governor Adriana Kugler's seat expires in February. Bessent said this week a "formal process" was underway to choose a successor to Powell, who was elevated from governor to the Fed's top job by Trump in 2018 but quickly fell out with the president in a similar dispute over interest rates. While Waller, a former economics professor and research director at the St. Louis Fed, acknowledges that cutting rates in September rather than in two weeks wouldn't matter much to the economic outcome, the Fed's reluctance to reduce rates has stoked Trump's anger since he returned to office in January. The president seemed ready to try to fire Powell earlier this week. Though his ability to do so is legally doubtful, the lingering threat of a move against the Fed chief has made the economic logic for or against a rate cut seemingly secondary to the debate about the implications of Trump's actions for the Fed's independence in setting monetary policy. Central banks' ability to focus on inflation in setting rates and not, for example, to help finance government spending, as Trump says he wants, is widely accepted as a staple of sound economic management and the best way to keep inflation in check. Finance leaders from the Group of 20 countries, including a representative from the U.S. Treasury, issued on Friday a final communique stressing the importance of central bank independence following a two-day meeting in Durban, South Africa. "Central banks are strongly committed to ensuring price stability, consistent with their respective mandates, and will continue to adjust their policies in a data-dependent manner. Central bank independence is crucial to achieving this goal," the communique said. Key Republican members of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, which would have to confirm a new Fed chief or governor, also emphasized the point this week. Powell has made building strong ties in Congress a key aspect of his tenure as Fed chief. "It really is best for the economic conditions in our country that the markets understand that the Fed really is independent. And I think that will pay dividends for the administration," Republican Senator Mike Rounds told reporters this week. "I personally have a good working relationship with the chairman. I'm going to continue to have that. And I respect the independence that he is trying to maintain."


Business Wire
14 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Argonne and partners celebrate Aurora supercomputer's impact on science with AI and exascale power
LEMONT, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory hosted a ribbon-cutting ceremony to celebrate its new Aurora exascale computer, marking a major milestone for AI-powered science. The event brought together DOE leaders, researchers, and partners from Intel and HPE to recognize Aurora's potential to transform scientific discovery. 'Aurora is a powerful example of what American science and innovation can deliver,' said U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright. 'As global competition accelerates, systems like Aurora give the United States a decisive edge in artificial intelligence, scientific discovery, and national security — fields where we can't afford to fall behind. We're at the start of a new Manhattan Project. If we don't unleash American energy, innovation, and American science, we will lose Manhattan Project 2 — with President Trump's leadership, the United States will win the AI race, but it will take energy dominance and strong public-private partnerships like the one behind Aurora to win this critical race.' Deployed for science earlier this year, Aurora is one of the most powerful computing systems ever built. The machine is designed to accelerate breakthroughs in science and engineering by combining simulation, AI, and data analysis capabilities at an unprecedented scale. Aurora is one of three DOE supercomputers to surpass the exascale threshold, capable of performing more than a quintillion calculations per second and is one of the world's fastest supercomputers for AI performance. Developed in collaboration with Intel and HPE, Aurora is equipped with 63,744 graphics processing units (GPUs), making it one of the largest GPU-powered supercomputers in the world. Spanning eight rows of refrigerator-sized cabinets and covering 10,000 square feet, Aurora features advanced water-cooling infrastructure and over 300 miles of networking cables. Aurora is already enabling breakthroughs across a wide range of scientific fields. In biology and medicine, researchers are using AI and simulation to predict virus evolution, improve cancer treatments, and map neural connections in the brain. In aerospace engineering, Aurora is helping scientists better understand airflow around aircraft, reducing the need for physical testing and accelerating the design of quieter, more efficient planes. Aurora is advancing fusion energy research by simulating extreme reactor conditions and using AI to predict particle behavior. In quantum computing, Aurora supports large-scale simulations to validate quantum experiments and test algorithms for molecular design. By delivering faster, more accurate insights across research fields, Aurora is powering a new era of science driven by AI, simulation, and collaboration, with far-reaching impacts on technology and everyday life.

Engadget
14 minutes ago
- Engadget
Meta says it won't sign the EU's AI code of practice
Meta said on Friday that it won't sign the European Union's new AI code of practice. The guidelines provide a framework for the EU's AI Act, which regulates companies operating in the European Union. The EU's code of practice is voluntary, so Meta was under no legal obligation to sign it. Yet Meta's Chief Global Affairs Officer, Joel Kaplan, made a point to publicly knock the guidelines on Friday. He described the code as "over-reach." "Europe is heading down the wrong path on AI," Kaplan posted in a statement. "We have carefully reviewed the European Commission's Code of Practice for general-purpose AI (GPAI) models and Meta won't be signing it. This Code introduces a number of legal uncertainties for model developers, as well as measures which go far beyond the scope of the AI Act." So, why kick up a (public) fuss about not signing something Meta was under no obligation to sign? Well, this isn't the first time the company has waged a PR battle against Europe's AI regulations. It previously called the AI Act "unpredictable," claiming "it goes too far" and is "hampering innovation and holding back developers." In February, Meta's public policy director said, "The net result of all of that is that products get delayed or get watered down and European citizens and consumers suffer." Outmuscling the EU may seem like a more attainable goal to Meta, given that it has an anti-regulation ally in the White House. In April, President Trump pressured the EU to abandon the AI Act. He described the rules as "a form of taxation." Mark Zuckerberg at Trump's inauguration in January (Pool via Getty Images) The EU published its code of practice on July 10. It includes tangible guidelines to help companies follow the AI Act. Among other things, the code bans companies from training AI on pirated materials and requires them to respect requests from writers and artists to omit their work from training data. It also requires developers to provide regularly updated documentation describing their AI features. Although signing the code of practice is voluntary, doing so has its perks. Agreeing to it can give companies more legal protection against future accusations of breaching the AI Act. Thomas Regnier, the European Commission's spokesperson for digital matters, added more color in a statement to Bloomberg . He said that AI providers who don't sign it "will have to demonstrate other means of compliance." As a consequence, they "may be exposed to more regulatory scrutiny." Companies that violate the AI Act can face hefty penalties. The European Commission can impose fines of up to seven percent of a company's annual sales. The penalties are a lower three percent for those developing advanced AI models. If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.