Why target-date funds are great IRA investments
Why do target-date funds make ideal IRA investments?
Here to discuss this topic is Jason Kephart, a senior principal with Morningstar's manager research team. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Q: Target-date funds tend to be great investments for an IRA, because if investors choose the target-date fund that fits their time horizon, then that IRA effortlessly fits in with the rest of a portfolio. Delve into that.
A: Target-date funds are a great set-it-and-forget-it for investors who don't want to spend a lot of time thinking about: How much of my portfolio should be in stocks versus bonds? What funds should I pick to fill those buckets?The target date takes all that off the hands of investors.
The other beauty is regular rebalancing, so your portfolio doesn't get out of whack. As you age and get closer to retirement, your portfolio should be getting a little bit more conservative—because you don't want to have a lot of risk at retirement, but you do want to have a lot of risk when you're young and have a huge time horizon in front of you.
This takes care of all that for you, so it's a great option for anyone who doesn't want to spend a lot of time managing their investments.
Q: Vanguard was in the headlines lately after making some sizable distributions from some of its target-date funds. Although Vanguard's distributions may have been big, target-date funds, in general, aren't great investments for taxable accounts. Talk about why.
A: They'repredominantly designed for 401(k) plans, which is mostly where the assets are. And tax-advantaged accounts, like an IRA, aren'treally thinking about taxes. Sothe bond portfolio, which tends to be taxable bonds, that income is taxed at an ordinary rate.
Also, we talked about rebalancing, which is when you sell your winners and buy your losers. Anytime you're selling your winners, that's going to trigger a taxable event. In a 401(k) or an IRA, you don't have to worry about those. In a taxable account, it could be kind of a headache.
Q: A lot of investors already have a relationship with a brokerage or an asset manager. Can they feel comfortable going with whomever they already have that relationship with? Or does it pay to shop around?
A: It always pays to look at your options, but I would caution that a lot of brokerages will take steps to steer you toward their own offerings. And that may mean additional fees may be charged if you pick a different target-date fund, which couldkind of kill the value proposition.
What we've seen with target-date funds is that the return differences can be narrow, soadditionalfees could make a significant difference.
Q: What are some key questions that investors should be asking before they invest in a target-date fund?
A: You want to know what the glide path looks like and whether it fits your risk tolerance at different stages in life, which could be difficult to know early on.
A 25-year-old probably isn't going to have a good sense of what their risk tolerance is going to look like at 60, but the shape of the glide path really does matter.
You also want to understand the underlying funds. Are they index funds, actively managed funds, or a combo of both? Maybe you have a preference.
The other thing you want to think about is fees. Fees matter, particularly in an IRA where you may not have the benefit of getting the cheapest share class like you would through a company 401(k).
____
This article was provided to The Associated Press by Morningstar. For more personal finance content, go to https://www.morningstar.com/personal-finance
Jason Kephart is a senior principal of multi-asset strategy ratings for Morningstar. Susan Dziubinski is an investment specialist at Morningstar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
Amazon's workforce to reduce on rollout of generative AI, agents
June 17 (Reuters) - Rollout of generative AI and agents will reduce Amazon's (AMZN.O), opens new tab total corporate workforce in the next few years, Andy Jassy, CEO of the online retailer wrote in a note to employees on Tuesday. Artificial intelligence is reshaping the global workforce by automating routine and repetitive tasks, and industry leaders expect this to prompt a reduction or transformation of certain roles across industries. "As we roll out more Generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done. We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs," Jassy said.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stephen Miller's wife ordered Social Security workers to cover up a lie from her new boss Elon Musk: report
The wife of one of President Donald Trump's closest and most trusted advisers, Stephen Miller, served in the White House for only a brief time, but in that period used her position to pressure the Social Security Administration to lie on behalf of the White House and its then-special government employee, Elon Musk, according to a new report. Katie Miller allegedly instructed the head of the SSA to tell reporters that 40 percent of all calls placed to SSA phone lines were linked to fraudulent Social Security claims — a number the president and Musk plucked out of thin air as the White House and Musk's DOGE effort set about making cuts to a wide range of federal agencies this year, the New York Times reported. 'The number is 40 percent,' Katie Miller reportedly told the acting SSA Administrator Leland Dudek in an April 1 call, the Times reported. 'Do not contradict the president.' 'Mr. Musk's team mobilized dozens of Social Security employees to affirm their views about fraud and began a project to ensure dead people were properly classified so they weren't mistakenly paid — even though DOGE officials acknowledged in an internal memo that payments were not being made in those cases,' the Times wrote. While Miller left the government in late May alongside Musk, the new head of the SSA refuted that figure directly in a statement to the Times. 'We're going to be a fact-based, rule-based organization that can count,' said Frank Bisignano, who joined the agency as commissioner in early May. Bisignano's predecessor, Dudek, did not back up Musk's claims either. According to the Times, the DOGE cuts at SSA — driven by Musk's fixation on Social Security as a major source of waste and fraud — were badly mismanaged and resulted in many newly open basic customer service roles being replaced by 'specialized professionals like lawyers, human resources staff and technologists' who are paid higher rates than colleagues who exited those roles or retired after being offered buyouts earlier this year. A staffing shortfall at the agency is now compounded by a growing backlog of Social Security claims. Miller followed Musk out the door and now works with him on his various business ventures, despite a massive, public blowup between the Tesla chief and Trump earlier this month. In now-deleted posts, Musk alleged that Trump, for whom her husband retains fervent loyalty, was linked to the deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and further claimed that Trump was responsible, through his own alleged inclusion in them, for the Epstein flight logs and other files being hidden from the public. Katie's fence-sitting between the two was the subject of its own CNN profile earlier this month. Dudek, who led the agency when Katie Miller ordered it to parrot the White House line, is apparently out of a job after his time as acting commissioner came to an end. In a statement, he fought back against criticism that he was unqualified — a claim stemming from the fact that he got the job after being placed on leave from his mid-level position at the SSA for going beyond the scope of his duties to help the fledgling DOGE effort make headway at the agency. That punishment prompted him to pen a LinkedIn post 'confessing' his efforts to help DOGE. 'I confess. I helped DOGE understand SSA. I mailed myself publically accessible documents and explained them DOGE,' he wrote in a February LinkedIn post first reported by CNN. 'I confess. I moved contractor money around to add data science resources to my anti-fraud team to examine Direct Deposit Fraud.' 'I confess. I bullied agency executives, shared executive contact information, and circumvented the chain of command to connect DOGE with the people who get stuff done,' he added at the time. That post caught the eye of Musk, who at the time still enjoyed a close relationship with Trump. In a tweet, the former DOGE-er-in-chief said that Dudek 'was brought back right away [by Trump] and now HE is upper management.' Upon his departure, Dudek thanked the president for his time at the agency. But privately, according to the Times, he has expressed 'deep misgivings about the effect of DOGE's oversight,' to his confidantes. 'Thank you President Trump for the opportunity to serve. Thank you DOGE team for your trust. Thank you SSA for all you do,' wrote Dudek in May. Bisignano, after taking over the agency, assured agency staffers that he was not planning the same kind of large-scale layoff policies that DOGE was pledging earlier this year at many federal agencies, some of which had to rehire workes who were sent home. 'I have no intent to RIF people,' he said during a 90-minute address to agency managers last month, according to the Federal News Network. But in his statement to the Times, Bisignano made clear that he knows how to play by the Trump White House's expectations, as he pushed back against the assertion that DOGE had messed up by claiming 40 percent of all Social Security help line callers to be linked to fraudulent claims. 'The work that DOGE did was 100 percent accurate,' he insisted.
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Federal employees say many government agencies at a standstill thanks to DOGE cuts: ‘We are set up for failure'
Some government agencies have come to a complete standstill because of cuts instituted by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), according to federal employees. A dozen workers told Politico that Musk's budget slashing and spending freezes have hindered basic functions of government work. Scientists aren't able to publish their research and some Energy Department staffers can't access their laboratories, the staffers told the outlet. At the Federal Emergency Management Agency, disaster planning exercises are being cancelled, the anonymous sources said. Compounding the matter, recipients of Biden-era energy grants have been left in uncertainty as they wait for authorization to continue their work. One FEMA officer told the outlet: 'We are set up for failure.' The Interior Department and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) are also being impacted by the disruption, said the workers. The Trump administration blamed the problems on 'several activist district court judges' who they claim have 'sought to seize control of the management of government agencies.' 'Delays and disruption caused by litigation are unfortunate, but they will not deter the president from delivering what the voters elected him to do — building a government that is leaner, more effective, and fully aligned with constitutional principles,' the White House told the outlet in a statement. The deferred resignation program, offered by DOGE shortly after Trump's inauguration, resulted in thousands of federal employees abandoning their posts. According to the outlet, about 1,300 employees at the EPA took the offer, while over 1,000 did so from NOAA, a staffing cut of roughly 10 percent. The Department of Energy also saw 3,500 people depart through the deferred resignation route. Meanwhile, about a quarter of the staff at the Interior Bureau of Reclamation has left the agency. At the Bureau of Land Management, about 1,000 people took the resignation offer or early retirement. These numbers are in addition to people who were laid off. One official at the EPA said scientific research has cratered due to the funding cuts. This includes work on air pollution studies that were taking place in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The majority of staff, the official added, are operating under a de facto spending freeze as workers need to request approval for expenses over $1. This has left scientists unable to submit their work to journals or conduct peer reviews through the EPA. Expenses for necessary items such as computer software to analyze data for scientific research have also not been approved. 'Without science, the agency can't function. And that's what we're seeing right now,' one source told Politico. Spokespeople for the agencies refuted the characterizations made by the employees. They did, however, state they've been imposing approval processes for expenses, claiming it would improve how taxpayer dollars are handled.
