Sarepta Therapeutics stock sinks after FDA tells company to stop shipping its bestselling drug
This extended decline in the stock comes even as analysts have pared back their concerns over the weekend, after Wall Street sent the stock into free fall on Friday, down 35% at the close of trading.
"Net-net, so long as Elevidys stays on the market (which we think, post digging into FDA's press release on Friday, is certainly the case for ambulatory patients), from current levels, there is upside in SRPT shares. We acknowledge that if we are wrong about Elevidys staying on the market in ambulatory patients, fundamentally, then this would clearly be thesis changing for us," JPMorgan analyst Anupam Rama wrote in a note to clients Monday.
Elevidys generated $282 million in revenues in the second quarter of this year, or about half of the company's $513 million in net revenues.
The patient death occurred a month ago in a phase 1 trial of the unnamed therapy but was not revealed in an earnings call last week. BioCentury first reported the patient death, which then prompted the FDA to request Sarepta to halt shipments of Elevidys, its Duchenne muscular dystrophy drug. Sarepta refused.
That shocked analysts who on Friday and Saturday said that management's handling of the situation, as well as its defiance of the FDA, has put investors in "unprecedented times."
"This saga continues to get messier, and we are increasingly in unprecedented times, with the FDA requesting Sarepta to suspend the distribution of Elevidys, and the company refusing to do so," Leerink Partners analyst Joseph Schwartz wrote in a note to clients Saturday.
Elevydis was also in the crosshairs after two teenagers died earlier this year following treatment, making the latest death the third for the company in a year.
Leerink downgraded the stock to Market Perform and lowered its price target to $10 from $14. The company's stock is down 88% year to date.
Read more about Sarepta's stock moves and today's market action.
Management's messaging
The downturn began just days after Sarepta's second quarter earnings call, in which CEO Doug Ingram said the company would end several clinical trials, including for SRP-9004, as part of a restructuring. But none of the executives on the call mentioned the death.
On a call with investors Friday, Ingram attempted to quell concerns that ending some research programs was related to the death and was focused instead on the need to cut costs.
"We did not discuss this matter in our call on Wednesday, because it was neither material nor central to the topics at hand on Wednesday," Ingram said at the start of the call Friday.
He described the patient as a 51-year-old late-stage, nonambulatory male.
"After only recently learning about a death that occurred a month ago ... [we are] losing any remaining confidence we had in the management team, and seeing the headlines that the FDA will request SRPT to voluntarily stop all shipments of Elevidys (SRP-9001) in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), we stepped to the sidelines and downgraded the stock," Leerink's Schwartz wrote in a note to clients Friday.
Jefferies analyst Andrew Tsai said the revelation could make Sarepta's stock less appealing.
"Seeing a third SRPT-related death occur within a span of 4 months will raise questions about SRPT's gene therapy platform," Tsai wrote on Friday. "Serious downside risks (i.e. deaths) have been challenging to handicap, which could cause near-term stock exhaustion."
In a statement Friday, following the FDA's request to halt Elevidys, Sarepta said it did not see a reason to acquiesce.
"Based on our comprehensive scientific interpretation of the data, which shows no new or changed safety signals in the ambulant patient population, we will continue to ship Elevidys to the ambulant population. We look forward to continued discussions and sharing of information with FDA in order to advance our shared purpose of protecting patient safety and informed access to care," the company said in a statement Friday.
Weekend turnaround
Over the weekend, management spoke with analysts and appeared to have allayed some concerns. They told analysts that the FDA was aware of the death and that the agency's sudden request to pull Elevidys was not valid.
"Regarding the FDA's request that SRPT voluntarily stop all shipments of Elevidys (SRP-9001) in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), management agreed with our thoughts that this was seemingly in reaction to the headlines on Friday, rather than a decision rooted in science or regulatory precedent, especially as the agency has been aware of the death ... for quite some time," Leerink's Schwartz wrote.
Others, like JPMorgan's Rama, noted that the FDA is unlikely to pull the drug off the market for the population unaffected by the drug — the mobile, or ambulatory, population.
Meanwhile, Jefferies analyst Andrew Tsai held a more cautious tone.
"We acknowledge the story could be challenging to navigate after a third patient death, but we are merely assessing the situation as more information becomes available," he wrote in a note to clients on Sunday. "Despite the FDA's request to halt Elevidys shipments, SRPT will elect to continue shipping the gene therapy to ambulatory DMD patients. Since we are unsure if the FDA can pull Elevidys, the logical question is how Elevidys sales will trend amid increased uncertainty and pot'l FDA controversy."
Sarepta's management also told analysts that if it were forced to pull Elevidys, it would have to cut more costs in order to stay afloat.
Anjalee Khemlani is the senior health reporter at Yahoo Finance, covering all things pharma, insurance, provider services, digital health, PBMs, and health policy and politics. That includes GLP-1s, of course. Follow Anjalee as AnjKhem on social media platforms X, LinkedIn, and Bluesky @AnjKhem.
Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest health industry news and events impacting stock prices
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tampa woman turns to Ramsey Show hosts after her brother refused to repay a car loan she took out to help him
Four years ago, Carmen from Tampa, FL, did her brother a solid by letting him move into her home when he was low on cash. She didn't charge him rent and she even took out a car loan for him — in her name. Fast forward to now, and their fortunes are reversed. Carmen needs the money, but her brother doesn't want to repay the car loan. During an episode of The Ramsey Show, Carmen said her brother has 'fully recovered' from his financial woes. He works on commission, has stocks, CDs and retirement savings, and 'is living a good life,' she said. Yet, when it comes to the car loan, he told his sister he wasn't going to 'take that upon my credit.' As Carmen pondered whether she should pay off the remaining loan herself — which is around $11,000 — co-host Ken Coleman told her: 'You know what you're supposed to do.' Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it What happened? Carmen's husband made a career switch that she says will eventually pay off, but in the meantime, they're bringing in less money. And to get a mortgage, they were told by their lender that they need to get rid of the car loan debt first. Carmen didn't just co-sign the loan; she put it under her name. So her brother is making monthly payments to Carmen on a car that's not in his name and that 'he's never going to own,' said co-host Jade Warshaw. If he's not willing to pay back the full amount of the loan, then Carmen has every right to repossess the vehicle. 'That is not mean, Carmen. That is not a bad sister,' said Warshaw. 'That is just you doing something that is very normal and fair by saying, 'if I'm paying for a car that's in my name, I'm going to be the one owning it and driving it.'' If her brother wants to keep making monthly payments, 'then he needs to go rent a car,' said Warshaw. Carmen said a private seller would pay $19,000 for the vehicle. 'I would go get that car from your brother today and sell it instantaneously,' said Coleman. At that point, her brother can decide whether he wants to buy the car from her, in which case he can pay back his sister for the full amount of the loan and she can transfer the title over to him. If he's not interested in buying it, she can find another buyer and pay back the loan from the proceeds. Still, Carmen is hesitant because she doesn't want to cause a rift in the family. 'It already has,' said Warshaw. 'The damage you're worried about being done has already been done.' Warshaw said she wants Carmen to be respected. 'It's a disrespectful transaction and if you let it continue, he's not just disrespecting you — you're disrespecting yourself at that point.' Read more: Americans are 'revenge saving' to survive — but millions only get a measly 1% on their savings. Should you loan a family member money? While you may want to help out a family member in need, a 'friends and family' loan should still be treated as any other loan. Otherwise, you could consider the money a gift (particularly if you don't think you'll ever see that money again). About one-third of U.S. adults have provided financial support to friends or family, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). It could make sense in some circumstances — for example, parents may loan their adult child some money when they're just starting out in their career or don't yet have a credit history to qualify for a loan. Whatever the case, if you're thinking about lending money to a friend or family member, first consider your own financial situation — for example, it's probably not a good idea to drain your own emergency fund to pay for a family member's emergency. And, if you do have some extra cash, how much of it can you afford to part with and for how long? If you do lend money to a friend or family member, put it in writing (you can find several options for templates online by searching under loan agreements). This contract should outline the terms of the loan, such as when you expect it to be repaid (either in a lump sum or a series of payments over a specified period of time). You should also specify whether you'll be charging interest on the loan (perhaps the rate you'd be getting if that money was sitting in your high-interest savings account) and what the consequences will be if they can't pay you back. For example, in Carmen's case, if she had made her brother sign a contract before getting a car loan, she could have specified that she'd take back possession of the vehicle if he didn't pay back the loan in full by a certain period of time. Another option is co-signing a loan, but only do so if you trust this person — not because you're feeling pressured by your family to do so. A co-signer is a person 'who agrees to be legally responsible for someone else's debt,' according to Equifax, one of the three major credit reporting agencies in the U.S., along with Experian and TransUnion. This provides a safety net to lenders, but it also means the co-signer is legally responsible for that debt if the borrower is unable to pay it back. Plus, if you're the co-signer, that debt will show up on your credit report and could influence your credit score and/or debt-to-income ratio. If the borrower fails to make payments, that will harm your credit rating — and it will likely put a strain on your relationship. If you're already in that situation, like Carmen, there's no easy way out. 'We didn't say this was going to be fun but… it's already not fun,' said Coleman, 'so let's go ahead and rip the band-aid off and take possession of the car.' What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of 'massive unemployment' in the US due to the 'biggest change' in history — and says this 1 group of 'smart' Americans will get hit extra hard. Are you one of them? How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microchip Technology (MCHP) Surged Following the Improvement in Fundamentals
Aristotle Capital Management, LLC, an investment management company, released its 'Value Equity Strategy' second quarter 2025 investor letter. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. Although the U.S. equity market started with volatility in the second quarter, it rebounded with strength, with the S&P 500 Index rising 10.94% during the quarter. The composite returned 4.88% gross of fees (4.75% net of fees) in the first quarter, outperforming the 3.78% return of the Russell 1000 Value Index and underperforming the 10.94% return of the S&P 500 Index. In addition, you can check the fund's top 5 holdings to determine its best picks for 2025. In its second quarter 2025 investor letter, Aristotle Capital Value Equity Strategy highlighted stocks such as Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP). Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP) manufactures and distributes smart, connected, and secure embedded control solutions. The one-month return of Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP) was 5.11%, and its shares lost 13.06% of their value over the last 52 weeks. On July 22, 2025, Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP) stock closed at $75.26 per share, with a market capitalization of $40.616 billion. Aristotle Capital Value Equity Strategy stated the following regarding Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP) in its second quarter 2025 investor letter: "Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP), the microcontroller (MCU) and analog semiconductor producer, was a top contributor for the quarter. After several quarters of underperformance driven by prolonged customer destocking, the company's fundamentals began to improve meaningfully, as returning CEO Steve Sanghi's turnaround plan is underway. Bookings showed signs of stabilization, supported by more balanced inventories across customers and distribution channels, as well as indications of recovering end-market demand. Operational execution also improved under the renewed leadership, with early benefits emerging from cost-saving initiatives—such as the closure of its Arizona wafer fabrication facility—and tighter inventory management. Microchip's long-standing customer relationships and commitment to extended product lifecycles continue to support recurring revenue and reduce design-in risk. Combined with its consistent record of strong FREE cash flow generation and shareholder returns, this disciplined approach reinforces our conviction in the company's ability to manage through industry cycles. Longer term, we believe Microchip remains well-positioned to gain share in 16- and 32-bit MCUs and areas including IoT, 5G infrastructure, autonomous vehicles and data centers." A semiconductor wafer at various stages of fabrication, showing the company's range of expertise. Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP) is not on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 56 hedge fund portfolios held Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP) at the end of the first quarter, which was 44 in the previous quarter. In the March quarter, Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP) reported net sales of $970.5 million, which was down 5.4% sequentially. While we acknowledge the potential of Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP) as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. In another article, we covered Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ:MCHP) and shared the list of best tech stocks to buy under $100. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q2 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NextEra Energy beats quarterly profit estimates
(Reuters) -NextEra Energy beat Wall Street estimates for second-quarter adjusted profit on Wednesday, helped by strength in its renewables unit and increased power demand. The company earned $1.05 per share on an adjusted basis, compared with analysts' average estimate of $1.01 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG. Sign in to access your portfolio