Mentera Launches Search for New Junior Non-Executive Director
Open to candidates under the age of 30, the successful applicant will join Mentera's Board, actively contributing to the strategic direction and growth of the company. This initiative is part of Mentera's commitment to nurturing the next generation of business leaders in Wales and building a Board that reflects the diverse communities it serves.
Mentera has a 35-year track record of providing tailored support to new and expanding businesses across Wales and beyond, in key sectors such as agriculture, skills development, and food and drink. The company manages vital programmes on behalf of the Welsh Government, including aspects of Farming Connect and Cywain.
Mentera's Board comprises experienced non-executive directors from diverse business, academic, and social enterprise backgrounds. Mentera is committed to increasing the diversity of its Board and welcomes applications from individuals of all backgrounds to ensure a broad range of perspectives are represented.
Fflur Jones, Chair of the Mentera Board and Managing Partner at Cardiff law firm Darwin Gray, said:
'Mentera is dedicated to nurturing the leaders of tomorrow. We recognise that gaining board-level experience can be a significant hurdle, particularly for young professionals. The Junior Non-Executive Director role is designed to address this, offering a two-year term where the successful candidate will gain first-hand experience in shaping the future of Mentera and contributing to the prosperity of Wales.'
The previous holders of the Junior Director role have highlighted the profound impact of the experience.
Elin Havard, who has now become a full member of the Mentera board, said:
'The experience of being on Mentera's Board over the past three years has been extremely valuable and I am extremely grateful for the opportunity. I would encourage anyone to apply to be part of a truly progressive and exciting company – you won't get a similar opportunity to learn and build skills, while making a positive contribution to the well-being and prosperity of Wales.'
Erin Thomas, a previous Junior Non-Executive Director, said:
'Being a Junior Non-Executive Director on Mentera's board has been a fantastic opportunity to develop my professional skills, understand governance, and learn from inspiring individuals. I now feel more confident to contribute strategically and would encourage anyone passionate about developing Wales to apply.'
Mentera's Chief Executive, Llŷr Roberts, added:
'We are eager to welcome a new young person to our Board who is driven, a strong team player, and will bring fresh perspectives to our strategic discussions. We are particularly keen to encourage applications from individuals from all backgrounds across Wales, reflecting the diverse nature of the communities we serve. This is a unique opportunity for someone looking to make a real contribution and develop their career at a high level.'
Along with the Chief Executive and Executive Management team, the Board is responsible for setting the company's strategy and overseeing its delivery. These are voluntary non-executive director positions, with the Board meeting four times a year. Some Welsh language skills are essential as meetings are conducted through the medium of Welsh.
For more information about the position of Junior Non-Executive Director and how to apply, please click here.
Applications close on 25 June 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scotch whisky: 'No sign' US tariffs will increase to 25%
The US President has so far agreed a 10% tariffs on UK exports and 15% on EU ones. Across the Scotch whisky sector, there are concerns that this deal - which is believed to be costing the industry £4m a week - will lead to significant harm for businesses. READ MORE: Scotch whisky hopes rise after Trump pledges to talk tariffs Trump talks of 'great love' for Scotland during visit 'Scotland must switch whisky exports from America to Canada' The Secretary of State is currently leading a UK Government delegation to Germany this week to 'increase economic ties' with the EU. Mr Murray said it was important to point out that trade deals with the likes of EU and India, the largest growing economy in the world, will provide a 'great opportunity' for Scotch whisky. Yet, earlier on the programme, Scotland's public finance minister Ivan McKee warned that 25% tariffs could be imposed next year as a deal previously reached with America on temporary duty reliefs could be lifted. Between October 2019 and March 2021, the tariff imposed as a result of the Boeing dispute resulted in £600 million in lost Scotch whisky exports. A deal was eventually reached in 2021 to take the 25% tariff off the industry. However, Mr McKee said: 'That was done on a temporary basis and that runs out next year so it's really important that it is taken out of the picture permanently because when that was in place, that was a significant hamper to Scotch whisky exports. 'As the UK Government concludes the deal with the US Government, we would expect it to be 10% tariffs on whisky which is clearly something we wish wasn't there.' Mr McKee said he would hope this was not re-imposed but added: 'There's nothing but unpredictability when it comes to Donald Trump and tariffs so who knows what's happening.' However, Mr Murray insisted it is unlikely this would happen. Asked how likely it would be for 25% tariffs to be re-imposed on Scotch whisky, Mr Murray said: 'There is no sign of that at the moment.' He added: 'It's 10% tariffs on Scottish whisky. Yes, we would rather that was as close to zero as possible but ten percent is as low as anybody else in the world right now." Mr Murray said the Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been able to 'reset international relationships' to do a deal with the US on tariffs. He said: 'Many, including the First Minister, wanted us to walk away from the US president but it was really important in the national interest and in the Scottish national interest for us to have that relationship to do that deal. '10% is the lowest tariff in the world. We did the first trade deal it saved the steel industry, the car industry. 'Yes, 10% tariffs on Scotch whisky is disappointing and we will continue to champion the cause for the really unique position of whisky. "We don't want it to be subject to historic trade wars as it has been in the past. It is a really thriving industry.' Speaking about the US president's visit to Scotland, Mr Murray said it was a 'great privilege' to when he landed in the country last week. He said he was in 'no doubt' of Mr Trump's 'great love of Scotland', adding: 'That is something we should exploit in the national interest.' During his visit to Scotland, President Trump promised to 'take a look' at tariffs on Scotch whisky during his meeting with Starmer as he said he wanted Scotland "to thrive". Since then, however, no changes have been made to the current arrangement. Speaking on the radio today, the Secretary of State also said Mr Trump suggested he should join him at the press conference beside Air Force One when he arrived in the country, however, the Secretary of State declined. Mr Murray said: 'He did tap me on the shoulder and said, 'let's go and do this press conference together' which I declined…because it's not for me to do so. 'I don't think it was for me to speak to the American press pack who is travelling on Air Force One with the President of the United States.'
South Wales Argus
8 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Aberthaw power station and Severn tidal lagon in progress
Proposals for a tidal lagoon, that would be smaller than a barrage spanning the Severn which has been previously touted but dismissed on cost grounds, were revealed in March in a report by the Severn Estuary Commission Its report called for the UK and Welsh governments to support the project though the commission was hosted by the Western Gateway Partnership, of local authorities in South Wales and South West of England, that was disbanded in June. But Monmouthshire County Council leader Mary Ann Brocklesby, who chairs the Cardiff Captial Region that represents the 10 unitary authorities in South East Wales, said it is still working on the proposal with counterparts not only in the south west of England but also Liverpool. 'We've started to realise our relationship with the West of England Combined Authority and with Liverpool around tidal power, that is very exciting,' Cllr Brocklesby told a meeting of the Cardiff Capital Region's overview and scrutiny committee. She said the region's purchase of the former Aberthaw coal fired power station, on the Vale of Glamorgan coast – which has ultimately resulted in the body having to pay a £5 million legal settlement over how a contract to dismantle it was awarded – will also benefit its ambitions. It paid £38m for the purchase of the 500 acre site, in 2022, which it intends developing as a 'renewable and green energy park'. 'Aberthaw can be huge benefit socially as well as economically,' said Labour's Cllr Brocklesby who acknowledged 'working our way through the procurement issues' which resulted in it having to pay the £5m settlement has been a 'real challenge' for the region in its first year as an independent body, having first been a project established by the partner councils. The capital region's chief executive Kellie Beirne said it has 'good relationship' with the National Grid on a 'reconnection agreement' that will be submitted shortly for Aberthaw, which ceased operating in 2019. 'There is a lot of work to build upon around the tidal lagoon opportunity as highlighted by the Severn Estuary Commission, that is something for us to keep building on,' Ms Beirne told the committee of councillors from across the region. She also described Aberthaw, which is owned by CCR Energy a limited company in which the capital region is the only shareholder, as a 'key asset'. She said: 'Apart from the two National Grid substations there is 18 million tonnes of pulverised fuel ash we've drilled down nearly 27 holes, down to depths of nearly 30 metres, to be able to understand, a valorisation exercise, on that fuel ash that will hopefully tell us the mineral content, what it was used for and could be in the future.' She also said the first phase of demolition at the site has been completed and handed back to the the region which will be able to 'claim things like land reclamation tax against that'. But she warned the regional body won't be able to fully fund the development of the site itself. She said: 'Will we be able to afford to do it all? No way. The cost will ultimately require significant private sector input. In 18 months time, when the demolition is complete, that is when we will be able to bring the full master plan together and start enacting some of the projects that we've spoken about in the past.'
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
AI isn't to blame for the graduate jobs crisis
You should think about being a powerboat driver. Or perhaps a railway builder. Or, although it might not be great for your online dating profile, a sewage worker. On absolutely no account should you consider anything that requires a degree. Microsoft last week released a study of the careers that are most likely to survive the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI). It joins a whole series of reports pinning the blame for the graduate jobs crisis on super smart chatbots. But while there is a desperate shortage of vacancies out there, it is the Government that is to blame and AI is just a convenient excuse. If you graduated from university this summer, being a sewage worker was probably not vying with law, consulting or finance as your top career choice. According to Microsoft, however, perhaps you should be thinking about it after all. After examining 200,000 conversations with chatbots to determine which roles were most at risk from the rise of AI, it concluded that historians, translators and sales reps were the most likely to be replaced by machine, along with anything that traditionally required a degree. By contrast, blue-collar jobs were a lot safer, with pile drivers and dredge operators up there with the sewage guys at the very top of the 'safe for life' list. It turns out the chatbots don't want to get their hands dirty any more than the rest of us. It joins a host of reports pinpointing AI as the explanation for the terrifying collapse in graduate recruitment. The online jobs board Adzuna said only last month that the number of entry-level jobs on offer in May was down 32pc from three years ago, before ChatGPT and all its rivals were released. Meanwhile, we have now learnt that 'Mickey Mouse' degrees are paying less than ever. Figures released this week showed that 630,000 graduates are now collecting benefits, which hardly suggests their careers are accelerating into the fast lane. All those student loans are unlikely to be paid back. There is no question that the job market for new graduates is grim right now. It has always been tough to get your foot on the career ladder, but right now it is harder than ever. But should we really blame AI for that? In fact, there is a far simpler explanation. It is the Government that has no idea how the economy works that is the real problem. Over the year since it took office, the Labour Government has made employing someone, and especially a new graduate, about as unattractive as it possibly could be. In her first Budget, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, imposed a steep rise in the rate of National Insurance that employers have to pay, while reducing the threshold at which it starts to kick in. If you put a big new tax on jobs it should not come as any surprise if, not long afterwards, there are fewer of them. That is what happens. Next, the reform of employment legislation by Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, has made it harder to sack anyone if they don't work out. In the graduate jobs market in particular, companies want to try people out and figure out if they have the skills and attitude for the working world before offering them a full-time position. But that is no longer possible. If you hire a 22-year-old now, you are stuck with them for 40 years, no matter how completely hopeless they are, or else you have to pay a huge bill for getting rid of them. The flexibility has gone, and the safest thing to do is not to hire anyone in the first place. Finally, the economy has been crushed by taxes and regulations. Output shrank again last month, and with yet more tax rises likely to be imposed in the autumn, we may soon be in a full blown recession. The Institute of Directors reported on Friday that business confidence had fallen to its lowest level on record, below even the levels reported during the Covid pandemic. With the outlook so bleak, the easiest thing for any company to do is simply to slash graduate recruitment. If you are not planning to expand, you don't need the extra people anyway, and at least it will save some money. Over time, AI will almost certainly change the labour market, and potentially radically so. It will automate a lot of routine white collar work, and that may eliminate some jobs. We should however, keep two points in mind before falling for too much of the hype. To start with, we have a couple of hundred years of industrial history to tell us that new technologies don't ever lead to a reduction in the overall amount of work available. We just find new stuff to do that we had not thought of before. And, just as significantly, it is surely far too early to see the impact on employment. Most companies are experimenting with AI and trying to figure out where it can help them. But very few of them have yet got to the stage of replacing their workers in droves. They don't trust it enough yet, and probably rightly so. The blunt truth is this. The Government has taken a wrecking ball to the jobs market. It has punished employers with tax rises, crushed the market with regulations, and killed growth stone dead. Against that backdrop, it is easy to blame AI for the shortage of graduate jobs. But it is really just a convenient excuse. It is destructive government policies that are really to blame. And we should focus on fixing that before telling all the English, philosophy and history graduates this summer to send their CVs straight to the sewage works.
