BREAKING NEWS Anthony Albanese's government considering a new Donald Trump style tariff: What it means for you
Teaming up with other regional economies to impose tariffs on carbon-intensive iron and other goods has been pitched as key to Australia's future as a major player in emerging green industries.
The case for Asian carbon border tariffs has been made by think tank Climate Energy Finance days after the federal energy minister signalled openness to charges at the border on emissions-heavy steel and cement.
Carbon border adjustment mechanisms, known as CBAMs, can level the playing field for heavy industries subject to domestic carbon pricing.
Without them, steelmakers and other producers may choose to move factories offshore to countries with less stringent regulations on pollution, a problem known as 'carbon leakage'.
The European Union has been leading the charge and its carbon border adjustment mechanism is scheduled to come into full force in 2026.
There was a strong case for an Asian equivalent building on the 17 domestic carbon pricing schemes already across the region, Climate Energy Finance net-zero transformation analyst and report author Matt Pollard said.
This includes Australia, which forces big polluters to pay a carbon penalty if their emissions are above a certain threshold via the safeguard mechanism.
China, South Korea, Japan and Singapore also have carbon pricing in some shape or form.
With most emissions-intensive goods produced in Asia for export traded within the Asia Pacific, a regional border mechanism would effectively function as a price on carbon in international trade.
'As a result, lower-emission products can more effectively compete against higher-emissions products in a global market,' Mr Pollard explained.
The think tank wants Australia to spearhead the conversation as part of its bid to co-host the COP31 climate summit alongside Pacific nations.
Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen would not rule out the possibility of carbon tariffs on specific sectors, such as steel and cement, during an interview on ABC's Insiders on Sunday
He cited an ongoing review into carbon leakage headed by Australian National University climate change economics expert Frank Jotzo.
'We want to ensure Australian industry is best placed to compete in a decarbonising world,' he said on Sunday.
Opposition energy and emissions reduction spokesman Dan Tehan criticised the minister for floating the idea immediately after winning the federal election.
'He's put electricity prices up, he's put gas prices up, and he's put emissions up, and now he wants to follow Donald Trump's lead and put in place tariffs,' Mr Tehan said on social media platform X on Sunday.
Mr Pollard rejected the comparison to the US president's 'erratically applied, economically and industrially destructive and investment-deterring' tariff agenda.
'Carbon border adjustment mechanisms are not discriminatory, and enhance globalisation, international collaboration and climate action - which is intrinsically a global problem,' he said.
While they are tariffs by nature, carbon border adjustment mechanisms have the opposite objectives of the Trump administration's trade policies that are designed to 'enhance protectionism and isolationism'.
The push for regional Asian carbon tariffs was welcomed by groups like clean energy industry body Smart Energy Council and economic think tank The Superpower Institute.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
China's rare earth weapon changes contours of trade war battlefield
BEIJING, June 6 (Reuters) - China has signalled for more than 15 years that it was looking to weaponise areas of the global supply chain, a strategy modelled on longstanding American export controls Beijing views as aimed at stalling its rise. The scramble in recent weeks to secure export licences for rare earths, capped by Thursday's telephone call between U.S. and Chinese leaders Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, shows China has devised a better, more precisely targeted weapon for trade war. Industry executives and analysts say while China is showing signs of approving more exports of the key elements, it will not dismantle its new system. Modelled on the United States' own, Beijing's export licence system gives it unprecedented insight into supplier chokepoints in areas ranging from motors for electric vehicles to flight-control systems for guided missiles. "China originally took inspiration for these export control methods from the comprehensive U.S. sanctions regime," said Zhu Junwei, a scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Beijing-based think tank focused on international relations. "China has been trying to build its own export control systems since then, to be used as a last resort." After Thursday's call, Trump said both leaders had been "straightening out some of the points, having to do mostly with rare earth magnets and some other things". He did not say whether China committed to speeding up licences for exports of rare earth magnets, after Washington curbed exports of chip design software and jet engines to Beijing in response to its perceived slow-rolling on licences. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in EV motors. In April it added some of the most sophisticated types to an export control list in its trade war with the United States, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licences. That put a once-obscure department of China's commerce ministry, with a staff of about 60, in charge of a chokepoint for global manufacturing. The ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters' questions sent by fax. Several European auto suppliers shut down production lines this week after running out of supplies. While China's April curbs coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally. "Beijing has a degree of plausible deniability – no one can prove China is doing this on purpose," said Noah Barkin, senior adviser at Rhodium Group, a China-focused U.S. thinktank. "But the rate of approvals is a pretty clear signal that China is sending a message, exerting pressure to prevent trade negotiations with the U.S. leading to additional technology control." China mines about 70% of the world's rare earths but has a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. Even if the pace of export approvals quickens as Trump suggested, the new system gives Beijing unprecedented glimpses of how companies in a supply chain deploy the rare earths it processes, European and U.S. executives have warned. Other governments are denied that insight because of the complexity of supply chain operations. For example, hundreds of Japanese suppliers are believed to need China to approve export licences for rare earth magnets in coming weeks to avert production disruptions, said a person who has lobbied on their behalf with Beijing. "It's sharpening China's scalpel," said a U.S.-based executive at a company seeking to piece together an alternative supply chain who sought anonymity. "It's not a way to oversee the export of magnets, but a way to gain influence and advantage over America." Fears that China could weaponise its global supply chain strength first emerged after its temporary ban of rare earth exports to Japan in 2010, following a territorial dispute. As early as 1992, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping was quoted as saying, "The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths." Beijing's landmark 2020 Export Control Law broadened curbs to cover any items affecting national security, from critical goods and materials to technology and data. China has since built its own sanctions power while pouring the equivalent of billions of dollars into developing workarounds in response to U.S. policies. In 2022, the United States put sweeping curbs on sales of advanced semiconductor chips and tools to China over concerns the technology could advance Beijing's military power. But the move failed to halt China's development of advanced chips and artificial intelligence, analysts have said. Beijing punched back a year later by introducing export licenses for gallium and germanium, and some graphite products. Exports to the United States of the two critical minerals, along with germanium, were banned last December. In February China restricted exports of five more metals key to the defence and clean energy industries. Analysts face a hard task in tracking the pace of China's approvals following the Trump-Xi call. "It's virtually impossible to know what percentage of requests for non-military end users get approved because the data is not public and companies don't want to publicly confirm either way," said Cory Combs, a critical minerals analyst with Trivium, a policy consultancy focused on China.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
China's yuan slips to 2-year low versus peers after Trump-Xi call leaves issues unresolved
SHANGHAI, June 6 (Reuters) - China's yuan slipped against the dollar while falling to a near two-year low versus its major trading partners on Friday, as U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping held a much-anticipated call but left key issues that have stoked tensions between the world's two largest economies unresolved. During the more than one-hour-long call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that have roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary. "Although the likelihood of a U.S.-China deal increases with more high-level dialogues, investors remain skeptical that both sides are merely buying time to address some pressing issues," said Gary Ng, senior economist at Natixis. Trump said on social media that the talks focused primarily on trade led to "a very positive conclusion," announcing further lower-level U.S.-China discussions and that "there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products." "The call does not offer much comfort in cutting tariffs, but only touching on access of critical materials and tech export control," Ng said. "Therefore, there is no certainty of what kind of deal will be made, and it may only be a partial one given the wide range of issues between the U.S. and China." As of 0830 GMT, the onshore yuan ended its domestic trading session at 7.1847 per dollar, down 0.08% from the previous night. Its offshore counterpart traded at 7.1852 around 0830 GMT. "The talk itself should lift market sentiment, but Trump's erratic policies make it hard to convince investors," said a trader at a foreign bank. Wang Zhuo, partner at Zhuozhu Investment in Shanghai, said "Trump's fickleness has made such talks less and less meaningful to the market", but added that direct communications were helpful for removing some misunderstandings. Trade talks between Washington and Beijing had stalled after a meeting in Geneva last month, where both sides agreed to temporarily roll back most of the tariffs imposed on each other's goods since April. Trump has accused China of violating the bilateral deal. Prior to the market opening, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) set the midpoint rate at 7.1845 per dollar, its strongest since May 26 and 90 pips firmer than a Reuters' estimate of 7.1935. The spot yuan is allowed to trade 2% either side of the fixed midpoint each day. Based on Friday's official guidance fix, the CFETS yuan index (.CFSCNYI), opens new tab, a gauge that measures the yuan's weighted value versus 25 currencies of trading partners, fell to 95.58 and is down 5.8% year-to-date, according to Reuters calculations based on official data. The spot yuan has, however, strengthened 1.6% versus the dollar during the same period. While Beijing has said it does not deliberately seek a weaker currency, the currency's passive decline versus its peers comes at a time of heightened Sino-U.S. tensions for an economy struggling with deflationary pressures and weak domestic demand. Investors will shift their attention to a string of Chinese economic data releases next week, including inflation and trade data on Monday, as investors are keen to gauge the health of the broader economy under Trump's tariffs.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong faces second charge under national security law
HONG KONG, June 6 (Reuters) - Hong Kong authorities once again arrested prominent activist Joshua Wong on Friday and charged him with conspiracy to collude with a foreign country under a Beijing-imposed national security law. Wong, 28, was originally set to be released in January 2027 from a 56-month jail sentence he is serving under the same law for conspiracy to commit subversion after he participated in an unofficial primary election. Taken to the West Kowloon magistrates' courts, Wong faced a new charge of conspiracy to collude with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security. The former student pro-democracy activist, who wore a blue shirt and appeared noticeably thinner than before, replied, "Understand," when the clerk read out the charge and details of the offence. Wong did not apply for bail, and the case was adjourned to August 8. Before returning to custody, he waved, shrugged, and shook his head in the direction of the public gallery. In a statement, Hong Kong's national security police said they had arrested a 28-year-old man on suspicion of the offence, as well as for "dealing with property known or believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offence". A charge sheet seen by Reuters accuses Wong of having conspired with exiled activist Nathan Law and others to ask foreign countries, institutions, organizations, or individuals outside China to impose sanctions or blockades. Such actions against Hong Kong or China, along with other hostile activities targeting them, took place in 2020, between July 1 and November 23, it added. The National Security Law, which punishes offences such as acts of subversion, collusion with foreign forces, and terrorism, with terms of up to life in jail, was imposed by Beijing on the former British colony in 2020. The Chinese and Hong Kong governments say the law is necessary to restore stability following anti-government protests in 2019. But some Western governments have criticised it as being used to suppress free speech and dissent.
