3 Reasons Your Business Doesn't Need AI Agents
If you saw the HBO show Game of Thrones, you're probably aware of the close but complex relationship Daenerys Targaryen had with her three dragons, Drogon, Rhaegal, and Viserion. In the show, dragons are powerful but dangerous creatures—in Daenerys's case, two of them proved to be too uncontrollable for even her—the mother of dragons herself—to fully manage.
AI may not be able to incinerate an enemy army with a blast of flames, but even so, its awesome power reminds me quite a bit of those dragons. There's so much that today's technology can do, but its abilities should not be taken lightly. The AI landscape is still pitted with ethical and legal challenges, privacy concerns, unchecked biases and hallucinations. For leaders considering implementing agentic AI into their operations, these risks are essential to consider.
The truth is, not every company needs an AI agent. Thinking of building your own? Here are three reasons why you shouldn't.
Your Customers Don't Really Need It
Businesses of all stripes have gone all in on AI, and the result has been a multitude of AI-driven products that no one needs—or wants. But jumping on the agentic AI bandwagon just to keep up with the tech-enabled Joneses can not only backfire, it can be a liability.
In fact, research published in the Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management found that, rather than signalling advanced capabilities and features, products that advertise the use of AI can actually repel customers. 'When AI is mentioned, it tends to lower emotional trust, which in turn decreases purchase intentions,' said Mesut Cicek, the study's lead author. 'We found emotional trust plays a critical role in how consumers perceive AI-powered products.'
This isn't to say that AI isn't transformative for businesses—according to Gartner, 79 percent of corporate strategists agree that AI is critical to success. The key is to ensure you're actually implementing agents in a way that will serve your customers, and not simply capitalizing on the latest buzz. Conduct market research, figure out your friction points, and listen to feedback. The last thing you want is to dump time, energy and money into an offering that never needed to exist.
You're Hoping To Replace Your Human Workforce
What sets AI agents apart from LLMs is their ability to operate autonomously: For example, while an LLM can generate text responses or summaries when prompted, an AI agent can proactively schedule tasks, connect to external systems (like email or databases), and execute actions on its own—without waiting for a human request.
For organizations looking to unlock efficiency and save their human workforces from dull, repetitive tasks, agents represent an exciting opportunity. But if your goal is to eliminate every flesh-and-blood member of your team in exchange for a hyper-efficient, AI-powered workforce, you're looking at it wrong.
While the autonomy of agentic AI is one of its features, it's also one of its greatest risks. Their ability to act independently poses any number of threats, from accidental privacy exposure or data poisoning, which can lead to devastating consequences. As Shomit Ghose writes at UC Berkeley's Sutardja Center for Entrepreneurship and Technology: 'We might grant some lenity to an LLM-driven chatbot that hallucinates an incorrect answer, leading us to lose a bar bet. We'll be less charitable when an LLM-driven agentic AI hallucinates a day-trading strategy in our stock portfolios.'
As a leader, your goal should be for AI agents to work alongside your team, not to replace it. The fact is, agents are good, but they're not infallible. If an agent commits an error that doesn't get caught until it's too late, your organization will lose credibility that it may never recover.
You're Not Paying Attention To Government Regulations And Risk Management
The rapid advance of AI agents have created unprecedented opportunities for businesses, but without proper governance, these systems can quickly become liabilities. A major challenge is that AI operates autonomously across vast datasets, learning and evolving in ways that may not always align with ethical or regulatory standards. Leaders considering implementing agentic AI should familiarize themselves with all of the potential hazards, and establish structured oversight frameworks to mitigate them.
As AI-powered decision-making becomes more integral to business operations, companies must establish clear policies around compliance, transparency, and accountability. This includes adopting governance models that align with all current regulations, which are changing rapidly.
Organizations should also integrate AI risk management frameworks to ensure ongoing monitoring and ethical deployment.
AI agents, like Daenerys's dragons, hold immense power. But without careful and deliberate strategy, they can quickly become more of a liability than an asset. Instead of rushing to adopt AI for the sake of staying on trend, businesses must take a measured approach, ensuring their agents serve real needs, support human expertise, and adhere to evolving regulations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Remains the AI Poster Child as $2 Trillion Opportunity Unfolds
Wedbush's Daniel Ives says that Nvidia (NVDA, Financials) is still the best company to buy during the AI boom. Ives called AI the "Fourth Industrial Revolution" in a new note to investors and said that businesses and governments would spend $2 trillion on it over the next three years. Nvidia, which has a strong hold on the AI chip industry, is likely to benefit the most. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NVDA. Ives also called a recent change in U.S. policy that lets Nvidia start selling its H20 chips to China again a "key strategic positive" and said it could mean that trade tensions will ease in the future. He also said that AI has a bigger effect than most people think. He thinks that for every $1 that goes into Nvidia, $8 to $10 more is made in the IT ecosystem. He says the ripple effect keeps Nvidia at the center of the tale. On the day the memo came out, Nvidia's stock price went up 1.53%. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
Intel cuts 15% of its staff as it pushes to make a comeback
Corporate news Job market Investing Stocks FacebookTweetLink Intel said Thursday it has mostly completed plans it announced last quarter to cut 15% of its workforce, as the struggling chipmaker attempts a turnaround. The layoffs, tucked in Intel's second quarter earnings report, marked one of the first major decisions by new CEO Lip-Bu Tan, who took over the company's top job in March. 'It's going to take time, but we see clear opportunities to enhance our competitive position, improve our profitability and create long-term shareholder value,' Tan said in a press release announcing the earnings results. Intel shares (INTC) rose 3% in after-hours trading following the news, although it posted a quarterly net loss of $2.9 billion, nearly double its loss during the same period in the prior year. The stock is up nearly 12% since the start of this year, suggesting that while Intel's future is far from certain, investors have confidence in Tan. Intel said the staff reduction is 'designed to create a faster-moving, flatter and more agile organization.' The company reported having 108,900 employees as of the end of 2024 across Intel and its subsidiaries, which include autonomous driving company Mobileye. The company said it plans to end 2025 with 75,000 employees in its core Intel division — not including subsidiaries — as a result of 'workforce reductions and attrition. Intel filed a layoff notice in Oregon earlier this month indicating plans to cut nearly 2,400 workers — though it's not clear whether those layoffs are part of the 15%. The company also said it's scrapping projects in Germany and Poland as part of its cost cutting measures and will slow down construction on its Ohio chip factories 'to ensure spending is aligned with market demand.' Intel has had a series of bruising years that saw the one-time industry leader fall behind rivals after it failed to predict two major tech transformations — mobile devices and artificial intelligence — prompting takeover rumors and a leadership shakeup. Meanwhile, rival Nvidia's market capitalization (NVDA) briefly crossed $4 trillion earlier this month, making it the first publicly traded company to do so. Last summer, Intel said it would slash 15% of its staff, 15,000 jobs, part of a $10 billion plan to reduce costs as it tried to play catch-up in the AI chipmaking race. Intel is one of several tech giants to implement layoffs this year. Microsoft laid off around 9,000 workers in early July, while Meta cut about 5% of employees in January.
CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
Intel cuts 15% of its staff as it pushes to make a comeback
Intel said Thursday it has mostly completed plans it announced last quarter to cut 15% of its workforce, as the struggling chipmaker attempts a turnaround. The layoffs, tucked in Intel's second quarter earnings report, marked one of the first major decisions by new CEO Lip-Bu Tan, who took over the company's top job in March. 'It's going to take time, but we see clear opportunities to enhance our competitive position, improve our profitability and create long-term shareholder value,' Tan said in a press release announcing the earnings results. Intel shares (INTC) rose 3% in after-hours trading following the news, although it posted a quarterly net loss of $2.9 billion, nearly double its loss during the same period in the prior year. The stock is up nearly 12% since the start of this year, suggesting that while Intel's future is far from certain, investors have confidence in Tan. Intel said the staff reduction is 'designed to create a faster-moving, flatter and more agile organization.' The company reported having 108,900 employees as of the end of 2024 across Intel and its subsidiaries, which include autonomous driving company Mobileye. The company said it plans to end 2025 with 75,000 employees in its core Intel division — not including subsidiaries — as a result of 'workforce reductions and attrition. Intel filed a layoff notice in Oregon earlier this month indicating plans to cut nearly 2,400 workers — though it's not clear whether those layoffs are part of the 15%. The company also said it's scrapping projects in Germany and Poland as part of its cost cutting measures and will slow down construction on its Ohio chip factories 'to ensure spending is aligned with market demand.' Intel has had a series of bruising years that saw the one-time industry leader fall behind rivals after it failed to predict two major tech transformations — mobile devices and artificial intelligence — prompting takeover rumors and a leadership shakeup. Meanwhile, rival Nvidia's market capitalization (NVDA) briefly crossed $4 trillion earlier this month, making it the first publicly traded company to do so. Last summer, Intel said it would slash 15% of its staff, 15,000 jobs, part of a $10 billion plan to reduce costs as it tried to play catch-up in the AI chipmaking race. Intel is one of several tech giants to implement layoffs this year. Microsoft laid off around 9,000 workers in early July, while Meta cut about 5% of employees in January.
