Farmers are reeling from Trump's attacks on agricultural research

Yahoo

25-03-2025

Jason Myers-Benner wants answers. Most of the time, the Virginia farmer feels 'unsettled' by the lack of communication and clarity surrounding the U.S. Department of Agriculture's funding freeze. During the quieter moments he's spent staring at an empty inbox, awaiting word about his pending grant, he's felt 'disgusted' by how the government has treated him and many of his peers.
'It's a sort of powerlessness, that it doesn't feel like there's anything that I can do about it,' said Myers-Benner. 'Like, can you count on these systems or not?'
Myers-Benner owns a family-run six acre farm in Keezletown, Virginia. Last spring, the USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture awarded him a little more than $18,000 to support the farm's work breeding winter peas that could increase soil's ability to trap carbon. The grant is through the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program, or SARE, which has supported farmer-led research initiatives nationwide for decades. The money represented an opportunity to expand work he and his family have been bootstrapping for years, growing crops that help feed lower-income, rural communities like his while preserving the planet.
Then, in late January, the Trump administration began freezing funds for programs across a broad swath of the government. Shortly after, his SARE representative at the University of Georgia fell silent. That's when he started to worry: Without the grant, which reimburses expenses already incurred, he would need to line up part-time work to pay the bills. 'There's just a deflated feeling of 'Okay. We were just about getting this rolling,'' he said. 'And then … one change at the top has the potential to just completely wipe that out. And so we'll have to pick up and hard-scrabble our way through it.'
Myers-Benner finally got an answer on Monday, though one riddled in ambiguity. 'You may continue your research or you are welcome to put your research on hold given the uncertainty of the situation, and once we learn more we can communicate that to you,' he was told by email, which he shared with Grist. 'If this situation delays your research and outreach per your grant timeline we can offer a no-cost extension if you still have monies left in your budget. Feel free to reach out with any questions. If you decide to hold your project let us know so we can note that in your files. That's about the best information we can provide at this time while we wait to receive further guidance from USDA.'
The USDA administers SARE through four regional offices hosted in universities. Daramonifah Cooper, a spokesperson for Southern SARE at the University of Georgia, which oversees Myers-Benner's grant, told Grist it is holding all calls for proposals until it hears from its federal funding source. When asked, Cooper could not clarify the funding status for grants already awarded.
Read Next
Slim margins, climate disasters, and Trump's funding freeze: Life or death for many US farms
Ayurella Horn-Muller & Naveena Sadasivam
Since late January, the USDA has frozen, rescinded, or cancelled funding supporting everything from donations to food banks to climate-smart agricultural practices. The move aligns with the administration's goal of rolling back diversity, equity, and inclusion mandates and climate benchmarks. These steps prompted the termination of thousands of federal employees before courts intervened, pressuring the USDA to reinstate many of them, albeit temporarily, and federal judges have repeatedly ordered the administration to release gridlocked funds. Such abrupt and sweeping moves by the agency, and wider administration, have thrown the world of publicly-funded agricultural research into a tailspin.
A USDA employee, whom Grist granted anonymity to protect them from retaliation, said 'basically all' of the agency's programs that fund agricultural research, including SARE grants, have been put on standstill due to the freeze. This person called the environment within the agency 'a shitshow' and said, 'It's all really unknown right now. Even internally.'
'We know that, yeah, things have been paused. Some political appointee at some level is reviewing our calls for proposals' this person added. 'We know that DOGE is in the system, reviewing, doing searches of our databases, but we don't know like … are they going to massively cut things right now? Things are on hold. But is the shoe gonna drop, and is lots of stuff getting canceled?'
'Trump doesn't really care about farmers or delivering services or efficiency or cost-savings. This is all politics. And we're caught in the middle of it.'
At least 19 university labs have ceased agricultural research work because the Department of Government Efficiency dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development in February, a move one federal judge said may be unconstitutional. These decisions by the administration have impacted research programs nationwide.
Kansas State University shut down two labs that were developing drought-resilient varieties of wheat and sorghum crops and pest-resistant plants. Johns Hopkins, the largest university recipient of federal research funding, cut roughly 2,200 jobs. USDA staffing cuts forced a federal project in Maryland investigating unprecedented managed honeybee losses to ask others to carry on its work. Seed and crop research being conducted across the nation's network of gene banks have also been hobbled by layoffs and grant application suspensions, and grape breeding programs and work on crops affected by wildfire smoke in California have reported disruptions. The administration then announced an abrupt withdrawal of millions in federal funds for multiple universities, triggering a new round of layoffs, lab closures, and project suspensions across the country.
The federal government provides roughly 64 percent of the country's public agricultural research and development funding. 'With federal funding, especially research dollars, being on the chopping board for the current administration, the consequences of that, coupled with layoffs … means that at a time when we need innovation the most to deal with climate change, to make our food systems more resilient, that capacity is going to be lost,' said soil scientist Omanjana Goswami of the nonprofit the Union of Concerned Scientists.
There will likely be economic fallout, too. A study published March 11 finds that the compounding effects of climate change and lagging investment in research and development has U.S. agriculture facing its first productivity slowdown in decades.
The researchers modelled the eroding effects of climate change on American agriculture and the decades-long stagnation of spending for publicly funded research and development, using the estimates to quantify the research investment necessary to avoid agricultural productivity declining through 2050. To offset an imminent climate-induced productivity slowdown, federal agricultural research spending, which includes expenditures from every USDA agency except the U.S. Forest Service, and state agricultural experiment stations and schools, must replicate the unprecedented boom in public spending that followed both world wars. The government currently allocates approximately $5 billion annually to ag research and development, a figure that grew less than 1 percent annually from 1970 to 2000 before leveling off. Adding at least $2.2 billion per year to that tally would offset the climate-induced slowdown, the paper found.
If the current investment trend doesn't change, the costly impacts of warming, including higher inputs, reduced yields, and supply chain shocks, will result in lower productivity, leading to more government bailouts and increased U.S. reliance on other countries for food, said Cornell University climate and agricultural economist Ariel Ortiz-Bobea. Without action, agricultural productivity is estimated to drop up to 12 percent with each passing year by 2050. This will cost the U.S. economy billions annually. American farms contributed roughly $222.3 billion to the economy in 2023 alone.
'This is like a double whammy. They're both human-caused, inflicted wounds. One because we're failing to invest in R&D, the other because we're emitting so much that it is actually slowing down productivity itself. So it's like it's being compressed from both sides,' said Ortiz-Bobea, who led the new study.
Experts worry that the Trump administration is heading in the wrong direction with its layoffs, funding freezes, and efforts to roll back scientific initiatives. House Republicans, for example, have been pushing to cut some $230 billion in agriculture spending over 10 years. Millions of dollars in reductions to the USDA's research, inspection, and natural resources arms were included in the funding stopgap bill Trump signed March 15.
Most of the foundational agricultural research that happens in the United States is through some kind of USDA funding mechanism. The USDA is made up of multiple agencies and offices with their own research pipelines that support universities, nonprofits, businesses, farmers, ranchers, and foresters, among others. SARE grants are one of the ways the wider agency has funneled money into agricultural research conducted on farms nationwide, awarding nearly $406 million across 8,791 initiatives from its inception.
Jon Kasza runs an organic vegetable farm in New York's Hudson Valley and relies on SARE funds to conduct his agricultural research. He doesn't understand why the agency is still freezing that funding, given all of the administration's promises to put farmers first. 'I can't say enough about how fragile it all looks to me,' said Kasza. He's thinking about the excessively volatile bouts of rain that battered his fields in summer of 2023, followed by a smattering of dry periods last year that dried his soil so much he couldn't plant his cover crops on-time in the fall. That's where research grants like SARE, which he said allow farmers to bypass the typically 'sluggish' timelines of conventional scientific trials to develop things like drought-resistant crop varieties, are critical.
In November, he submitted his first SARE grant proposal of nearly $30,000 to grow multiple varieties of rice on hillsides in raised beds with biodegradable plastic mulch to conserve water and expand where the crop can be produced. Earlier this year, he was notified by a regional representative that the grant had been approved. 'We're moving forward as if some of the funding is going to be there, but we know that that's uncertain,' said Kasza, who called the messaging surrounding the freeze a 'rollercoaster' of confusion. A local land conservation group has promised to step in to save about 20 percent of the project if federal funding falls through. Still, that is 'not nearly enough' to complete the work, he said.
'It's already hard enough just to have an agricultural business, but then to have climate change as a factor on top of that, and then have this administration who's wreaking havoc?' he said. 'Cutting research, particularly our farmer-driven research, off at the knees, just seems like such a silly and short-sighted thing to do.'
Read Next
The Trump administration's climate policies jeopardize research in disaster-prone Puerto Rico
Víctor Rodríguez Velázquez, Centro de Periodismo Investigativo
On the Hawaiian island of Kauai, another SARE grant recipient has also been stuck in limbo. Rancher Don Heacock spent decades working as an aquatic biologist for the Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources before retiring and launching his nearly 40-acre farm in the late 1980s. Ever since, he's raised a herd of water buffalo, grown crops like taro, and cultivated ponds of tilapia. He does it all with local food systems, soil health, and water conservation at the forefront, maximizing crop diversity, maintaining living roots in the ground year round, and integrating livestock farming.
Up until now, Heacock had heard nothing about his pending SARE grant, a $59,000 funding proposal submitted last year to expand his farm's agrotourism education, buffalo raising, and soil conservation work. Then, suddenly, late last week, he was told the proposal was denied. He believes that rejection is linked to the federal funding freeze.
After reaching out to SARE representatives for all four regions and the national arm of the program, Grist has learned that the USDA-NIFA has frozen funding for all pending grant applications this fiscal year, which began in October. When asked, a national spokesperson confirmed those funds were still 'under review' while regional representatives told Grist that all new calls for proposals have been paused as a result. None of the representatives specified a timeline for when those funds were disbursed nor whether already-awarded grant funding will be released.
For farmers like Heacock, the stakes of the administration grounding agricultural research initiatives like his is far bigger than the work happening on one lone project or farm. 'Trump has got it all wrong. Climate is a real issue and it's hitting us right in the face,' he said. 'If we don't become sustainable real quick, we're dead in the water.'
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Farmers are reeling from Trump's attacks on agricultural research on Mar 25, 2025.