Taylor Swift unseated as world's youngest self-made female billionaire by Lucy Guo, a hard-partying, 30-year-old college dropout
Taylor Swift has been dethroned as the world's youngest self-made female billionaire, according to Forbes — by a 30-year-old, hard-partying college dropout who has reaped a windfall from the artificial intelligence boom.
Lucy Guo — a self-professed workaholic who rides an electric skateboard to work when she's not being chauffeured by an assistant — has a net worth of $1.3 billion, according to Forbes' list of America's Richest Self-Made Women released Wednesday.
Guo took Swift's title of world's youngest self-made woman billionaire in April, when it was reported that Scale AI — the firm she co-founded with Alexandr Wang in 2016 when she was just 21 and he was 19 — had been valued at $25 billion in a deal set to close by June 1.
The tender offer has not been finalized yet, but it is expected to close at that valuation in a few weeks, a source familiar with the matter told The Post.
The daughter of Chinese immigrants, Guo was raised in the San Francisco Bay Area, where she quickly picked up coding in middle school. She dropped out of Carnegie Mellon University as she clinched a $100,000 entrepreneurial scholarship bankrolled by billionaire investor Peter Thiel.
She took a job in 2015 at Quora, where she met Wang, and later worked at Snapchat for a brief period as the company's first female designer.
At Scale AI, Guo ran the operations and production design teams — until Wang, who took the chief executive position, reportedly fired her after the two sparred over how the company should be run.
'We had a difference of opinion but I am proud of what Scale AI has accomplished,' Guo told the tech news site the Information last year.
Still, Guo kept most of her 5% stake in Scale AI, which is worth approximately $1.2 billion, according to Forbes. The firm labels data used by tech giants like OpenAI and Alphabet to train their chatbots.
With 'a swanky apartment in Miami' and a house in Los Angeles, Guo has admitted she never buys groceries or cooks, instead ordering all her meals from Uber Eats.
She says she works at least eight hours a day when on vacation and has boasted about taking two Barry's bootcamp fitness classes a day. She frequently attends techno raves.
'A lot of people don't like me because, honestly, I seem like an a****** online. I would not like me on the internet,' she told The Post in 2022. 'But I've made a lot of friends because I think people appreciate my savage personality.'
The Post previously reported on her massive collection of Pokemon paraphernalia — including slippers, stuffed animals, artwork and a Swarovski crystal necklace.
She now runs Passes, a content creation platform that has been dubbed the family-friendly version of OnlyFans, and Patreon, claiming to 'make millionaires' by allowing creators to hold onto 90% of their earnings.
Passes reaped $40 million last year in a Series A funding round, according to Fortune — allowing Guo to fund her lavish party-girl lifestyle.
But now Passes and Guo are facing allegations, in a class-action suit filed in February, that the platform allowed child pornography.
The bombshell suit accuses Alec Celestin, the plaintiff's agent, and Lani Ginoza, the site's director of talent, of knowingly allowing sexually explicit content featuring OnlyFans model Alice Rosenblum — who was underage at the time — to circulate on Passes. Ginoza was not employed by Passes at the time of the alleged events, according to Passes and the site's legal representation.
'Guo personally intervened to override Passes' strict internal safety controls tailored for creators of social media content aged between 15 and 17 years old to strip and deprive Plaintiff of any protections offered by Passes against the exploitation of a minor,' the complaint alleged.
Just before the suit was filed, Passes banned all underage creators and wiped the site of their content, according to Forbes.
Lawyers for Guo filed a motion in April to dismiss the suit, which they slammed as a defamatory attempt to 'pursue the 'deep pockets' of Passes, a successful startup, and its wealthy founder.'
'This lawsuit is part of an orchestrated attempt to defame Passes and Ms. Guo, and these claims have no basis in reality,' Rollo Baker of Elsberg Baker & Maruri told The Post.
'Ms. Guo and Passes categorically reject the baseless allegations made against them in the lawsuit, which was only filed against them after they rejected a $15 million payment demand.'
In between founding Scale AI and Passes, Guo started a small investment firm known as Backend Capital.
Guo landed at No. 26 on Forbes' list of America's Richest Self-Made Women, while Swift came in at spot 21.
Swift still holds the title of world's richest female musician with a net worth of $1.6 billion, after her blowout-success international Eras Tour pushed her into billionaire status in October 2023.
Diane Hendricks took the top spot, with a $22.3 billion net worth thanks to her company ABC Supply, one of the largest distributors of roofing, siding and windows in the country.
Originally published as Taylor Swift unseated as world's youngest self-made female billionaire by Lucy Guo, a hard-partying, 30-year-old college dropout
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
Editorial: Pressure grows on Albanese over defence spending
If Prime Minister Anthony Albanese needed any more reminding about the likely high priority the Group of Seven summit is likely to attach to defence at its looming summit, it came yesterday. Firstly there was the news that the Chinese Navy has sent its two aircraft carriers into the Pacific for the first time, demonstrating to the world its ability as a naval power to threaten America's dominance of the world's biggest ocean. Two carrier battle groups led by the Liaoning and the Shandong operated near the Japanese island of Iwo Jima over the weekend, the Japanese Government reported. And then came a warning flag hoisted by European Union Ambassador Gabriele Visentin. The European Union's top diplomat to Australia described China's military expansion as a 'worrying sign' and signalled the EU's growing ambition to become 'a strong security actor' in the Indo-Pacific. 'We have seen maybe some worrying signs of military scaling up of China,' he said. '(There's) a clear link between the Chinese and the Russian visions of what the new international rules-based order should be.' Mr Visentin said Europe's security was 'completely intertwined' with that of the Indo-Pacific. 'The security for Europe depends also on what is happening in (the) Indo-Pacific, and vice versa,' he said. The warning came against a backdrop of ongoing pressure from the US for its allies to boost defence spending. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has floated Washington's demand for Australia to hike its defence budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP, far beyond the projected 2.3 per cent by 2033. The US challenge has helped spark NATO into responding. The alliance's Secretary-General Mark Rutte has warned that 'wishful thinking will not keep us safe' and has set out a plan for NATO members to spend 5 per cent of GDP on defence. He said Russia could be ready to use force against NATO in five years and that a 'quantum leap' in collective defence was required following the Russian President Vladimir Putin's illegal invasion of Ukraine. But the Albanese Government is seemingly not for turning from its announced strategy. This week Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles said the Government would determine its defence budget based on strategic needs rather than meeting any benchmark. Mr Albanese largely batted it away too at his National Press Club address on Tuesday. 'Arbitrary figures, you know, lead to a cul-de-sac. And we want to make sure as well that every single dollar that Defence spends results in actual assets,' Mr Albanese said. But the pressure is set to go up again at the G7 summit getting under way in Canada this weekend. Should the expected meeting between Mr Albanese and US President Donald Trump go ahead on the sidelines of the meeting, it is a fair bet that Mr Trump will not be shy of personally pressuring Mr Albanese to do more on defence too.
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
China's rare-earth mineral squeeze puts defence giants in the crosshairs
The automotive and robotics industries have been hit particularly hard by China's rare earth export restrictions in recent weeks, but analysts warn Western defence giants will also feel the heat. Top US and Chinese officials are resuming trade talks in London for a second consecutive day on Tuesday, pushing to de-escalate tensions over rare-earth minerals and advanced technology. The White House has signalled a willingness to ease chip export controls if Beijing accelerates rare earth exports, boosting investor hopes of a breakthrough. Both sides have accused each other of reneging on a preliminary trade deal struck in Geneva last month. China's Ministry of Commerce in early April imposed export restrictions on several rare earth elements and magnets widely used in the automotive and defence sectors. The curbs were part of a response to US President Donald Trump's tariff increase on Beijing's exported products. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Monday told CNBC's 'Squawk Box' that he expected a deal on rare earths to be struck quickly. 'So, our expectation is that ... immediately after the handshake any export controls from the US will be eased, and the rare earths will be released in volume, and then we can go back to negotiating smaller matters,' Mr Hassett said. China is the undisputed leader of the critical minerals supply chain, producing roughly 60 per cent of the world's supply of rare earths and processing almost 90 per cent, which means it is importing these materials from other countries and processing them. US officials have previously warned that this dominance poses a strategic challenge amid the pivot to more sustainable energy sources. William Bain, head of trade policy at the British Chambers of Commerce, said it appeared some progress had been made on the first day of US-China trade talks, but it remains 'absolutely vital' to achieve a further breakthrough on rare earth policy. 'We've seen some relaxation over the weekend with licenses granted in sectors connected with robotics and electric vehicles, but if you take, for example, a critical mineral like samarium, within magnets, that's absolutely essential for F-35 fighter jet construction in the US,' Mr Bain told CNBC's 'Europe Early Edition' on Tuesday. 'They can't make them without that. And not having access to that is severely affecting both U.S. construction in that area, but also perhaps its national security if that remains in place,' he added. CNBC has contacted the U.S. Department of Defense and the European Commission, the European Union's executive arm, for comment. The restrictions imposed by China's Ministry of Commerce in early April require firms to apply for a license for the export of rare earths and magnets. Rare earth elements play an integral role in modern defence technologies, according to the SFA-Oxford consultancy, enabling advanced radar and sonar systems, laser guidance and propulsion technologies in combat environments. Automotive industry groups have complained about the cumbersome process of trying to get necessary approvals, warning of increasing production threats as inventories deplete. China nevertheless appeared to offer US and European auto giants something of a reprieve over the weekend. China's Ministry of Commerce on Saturday said it was willing to establish a so-called 'green channel' for eligible export license applications to expedite the approval process to European Union firms. Beijing also granted rare earth licenses to suppliers of US auto giants General Motors, Ford and Jeep-maker Stellantis, Reuters reported on Friday, citing unnamed sources. Gracelin Baskaran, director of the critical minerals security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington-based think tank, said it was just a matter of time before the defence industry sounds the alarm over a rare earth shortage — noting that many of them have already done so behind closed doors. 'Defense companies are in the front line of impact, given we need thousands of pounds of rare earths in each submarine and fighter jet,' Ms Baskaran told CNBC by email. The US, European Union and Australia must coordinate supply- and demand-side interventions to boost rare earths production, CSIS' Baskaran said, adding that this need arises primarily because of prevailing price dynamics. 'If the price of praseodymium-neodymium (PrNd) oxide—a critical input for rare earth permanent magnets—remains below $60 per kilogram by 2030, nearly half of the projected non-Chinese supply would become financially unviable. On the supply side, this will necessitate measures such as production tax credits and subsidies,' Ms Baskaran said. 'On the demand side, implementing incentives to procure minerals from allied nations—similar to the provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act—will be essential,' she added. Last month, China temporarily paused export restrictions targeting 28 American companies following a trade truce reached between Washington and Beijing in Switzerland. China continued to block exports from that country of seven rare earth metals to the US, however. Many of the 28 American companies given a reprieve on dual-use export restrictions are common targets of Beijing's sanctions because of their activity in the defence sector. Henry Sanderson, associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), a London-based defence and security think tank, said the defence industry hasn't been nearly as vocal as the automotive sector when it comes to concerns over the impact of a rare earth shortage. 'Defense is hard because its less transparent, but they definitely use rare earths and rare earth magnets and especially what's called samarium cobalt magnets, but it's a much smaller demand than EVs or robots or anything like that,' Mr Sanderson told CNBC by phone. 'I'm less clear whether defence is as worried as the civilian industries, but saying that, looking at the level of magnet production in the West, it is very small,' he added.
AU Financial Review
5 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
AUKUS in jeopardy as Pentagon reviews US role
Australia's $300 billion-plus plans to build and acquire nuclear submarines to protect against Chinese military action in the Indo-Pacific are in jeopardy after the United States launched a review into the AUKUS defence pact. The Financial Times reported on Wednesday (Thursday Australian time) that Eldridge Colby, a sceptic of the AUKUS pact between military allies Australia, the US and the United Kingdom, would review Washington's contribution for the Pentagon.
