Trump's one-line reply on Russia-Ukraine war, ‘ceasefire not possible…', says, ‘we're not giving anything; we're selling weapons'
News
Trump's one-line reply on Russia-Ukraine war, 'ceasefire not possible…', says, 'we're not giving anything; we're selling weapons'
Trump's one-line reply on Russia-Ukraine war, 'ceasefire not possible…', says, 'we're not giving anything; we're selling weapons'
After the meeting, Zelensky said that Ukraine will buy US weapons worth $90 billion.
New Delhi: In a significant turn of events, US President Donald Trump hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several top European leaders at the White House on Monday, 18 August, to bring the Russia-Ukraine war to an end.
Who are the top leaders who attended the Trump-Zelensky summit?
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, UK PM Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and Italian PM Giorgia Meloni were present in the White House for the summit.
What is the outcome of the Trump-Zelensky summit?
However, the much-anticipated meeting between US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy and European leaders at the White House on Monday, 18 August, did not reach any agreement on a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. Trump said that a ceasefire is not possible 'so soon' at the moment.
Trump-Putin phone call
However, Ukraine's security guarantee was discussed in the meeting. Trump said that the US and European countries will work together on this. At the same time, the Russian President's Office (Kremlin) said that Trump stopped the meeting and talked to Putin on the phone for 40 minutes.
During this, Putin supported direct talks between representatives of Russia and Ukraine. German Chancellor Friedrich Mertz said that during a phone conversation with Trump, Putin agreed to meet Zelensky within 15 days.
After the meeting, Zelensky held a press conference and said that Ukraine will buy US weapons worth $90 billion (about Rs 8 lakh crore) with Europe's money in exchange for security guarantees.
Ukraine to purchase weapons worth billions from the US
Zelensky said that his talks with Trump and European leaders at the White House focused on a plan for Ukraine to buy about USD 90 billion worth of American weapons, with Europe helping to fund the deal as part of the security guarantees for Ukraine.
When asked about future aid, Trump told reporters, 'We're not giving anything. We're selling weapons.'
The Russia-Ukraine War intensified in February 2022 after Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine and began occupying more of the country, starting the biggest conflict in Europe since World War II. The war has resulted in a refugee crisis and thousands of deaths.
For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest World News on India.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
a minute ago
- Mint
Google is beating Apple on smartphone AI
The race to develop the killer AI-powered phone is on. But Apple is getting lapped by its Android competitors. Apple teased a smarter Siri but it's MIA, and other Apple Intelligence offerings are meh. Meanwhile, Samsung is fusing Gemini into its Galaxy phones, and the new Google Pixels are chock-full of AI this and AI that. Tools we'd actually use. The coming Pixel 10, announced on Wednesday by Alphabet subsidiary Google and available Aug. 28, dressed me in an AI-generated blazer right in the camera app. A convincing clone of my voice fluently discussed lunch in German, which I don't speak. When I called United customer service, flight reservation information automatically appeared on screen. The Pixel holds just a fraction of the smartphone market—and that's unlikely to change, given how attached we are to our mobile devices—but it's leagues ahead of the iPhone in AI. In a recent ad, Google mocked Apple's smart-Siri delay, suggesting iPhone owners change to the new Pixel 10. Regardless of which side you're on, don't we all just want to know what AI can really do for us on a phone? After I checked out the Pixel 10, I have an answer: information that appears right when you need it, real-time translation in your own voice, a virtual photographer directing your shots, a personalized fitness coach and more. What can't it do? Turn those iPhone green text bubbles into blue ones. Google is introducing new devices, including the Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro, that come with useful AI-powered software. Google Pixel phones have always been more about wow-inducing software than hardware—and that includes the new Pixel 10 ($799 and up) and Pixel 10 Pro ($999 and up). But you have to rely heavily on Google's own apps, like Gmail and Maps. For iPhone users including me, the most jealousy-inducing feature is Magic Cue. It rifles through your inbox, calendar and texts, then surfaces information when it thinks you need it. Say Mary texts: 'What's that coffee shop Ben recommended?" Magic Cue can surface the recommendation from your conversation with Ben. If Mary then asks whether you want to try it on Sunday, a shortcut to view your calendar will appear. Magic Cue rifles through your inbox, texts and more and surfaces information when it thinks it's relevant. One example: flight-reservation details when you call the airline. When you call a restaurant, the phone app can pull up reservation details from your email. When you open Google Maps just before the reservation, navigating to the restaurant takes only a quick tap. Voice Translate also ups the wow. This live language translator (with real-time voice clone) is similar to the Meet function I tested earlier this year. On the Pixel, it works right in the phone app, translating English, Spanish, German, Japanese, Italian, Portuguese, French, Swedish, Russian, Hindi and Indonesian. I tried it with a German speaker, choosing his preferred language. I spoke English and, after a slight delay, heard my own voice speaking German. A transcription of our conversation, in my native English, appeared on screen. The German-to-English translation wasn't perfect, but I always understood the gist. I could have used this tool when I lived in France, struggling with administrative tasks as a non-native speaker—like convincing my landlord the water heater was broken. The Pixel 10's photo experience is infused with AI. The Camera Coach is actually unsettling at first. A Google representative pointed the camera at me and hit the AI camera button. After about 10 seconds, it asked what we wanted in the photo: a full-body portrait, a close-up or some more novel plan. We tapped 'get inspired" and it generated a rough guide image of me, sitting more relaxed on the sofa. Then it gave the photographer some instructions: Have me sit down, place me on the left side of the frame, move to capture the scene lower and at an angle, use Portrait Mode, then take the shot from my waist up. The final photo looked pretty good. Maybe something I could use on LinkedIn. But did it convey the right seriousness? In editing mode, you can tap Ask Photos then type or say instructions. 'Make it look better" might touch up the photo, but I went with 'Make it look professional": It brightened the lighting and turned up the blur. It gave me four options in around 20 seconds. 'Send Nicole to outer space" changed the background to the Milky Way. 'Add a business suit" put me in a virtual blazer. Though some variations made me look a little ragged, one result was convincing. I was actually more into Google's other Gemini-powered coach, launching in October: personalized health and fitness insights for Fitbit trackers and Pixel Watches. The health coach can adjust workout plans based on real-time data, such as last night's sleep. Mention back pain during a check-in, and the coach will change its suggestions. The Apple Watch's coming Workout Buddy is less AI coach, and more AI hype person. It can tell you when you hit a personal best, but it can't craft a workout for you. Google says Pixel's advanced AI features can 'make magic happen." Samsung prominently labels its phones with 'Galaxy AI." Apple's website highlights 'AI-opening possibilities." People aren't demanding AI features in their phones just yet, says Sheng Win Chow, an analyst at Canalys, which tracks smartphone sales. But Google is betting they soon will. The race continues and for now, Apple has a lot of catching up to do. Write to Nicole Nguyen at
Mint
a minute ago
- Mint
Trump turns up the heat. Fed Chair Jerome Powell tries to keep his cool.
Minutes before his congressional testimony this summer, Jerome Powell sat alone, staring straight ahead in the wood-paneled chamber, appearing deep in thought. The Federal Reserve chair later told an associate he felt locked in, prepared for questions about the central bank's chief roles—keeping inflation low and Americans employed. Powell looked steeled for criticism, and he didn't have to wait long. A Republican ally of President Trump, Ohio Sen. Bernie Moreno, launched into a theatrical beatdown an hour into the hearing. He accused Powell of partisanship for comments linking Trump's tariffs with the potential for higher prices and a slowing economy. 'I don't comment on tariffs at all, actually," Powell said. 'I comment only on inflation." Ignoring him, Moreno said inflation was going down, echoing a Trump talking point. The president has demanded an immediate rate cut and disparaged Powell's integrity and intelligence for failing to comply, calling him a knucklehead and a moron. Trump himself nominated Powell for the job in 2017. 'We got elected by millions of voters," Moreno said as his time expired. 'You got elected by one person, and he doesn't want you to be in that job." Powell raised an eyebrow, clicked off his microphone and turned to face the next senator's questions. It was just another day for the Fed chair, who wakes up every morning under siege by critics, led by Trump, who say inflation has been tamed and the economy is ready for a rate cut. Powell and many others have a wait-and-see view. Fed Chair Jerome Powell waiting to testify at a Senate committee hearing on June. 25. Powell's remarks Friday at the annual economic symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyo., will be closely watched by investors and Washington policymakers. Everyone with skin in the game, which is just about everyone who carries a wallet, has reason to listen for clues about when rates might fall. To Powell, the Fed's survival as a central bank that operates outside of partisan control, which he considers a pillar of national prosperity, will depend on how it navigates the current economic moment. Those who have worked closely with him say he is focused almost exclusively on making the right decisions, relying on lessons gained from steering the Fed in the pandemic and then being slow to tackle the worst inflation spike in decades. 'I think it is no more subtle than he wakes up every day and probably goes to bed every night thinking, 'What can I do to preserve the institution?'" said Richard Clarida, who served as the Fed's No. 2 during the first half of Powell's tenure. The political pressure reached a surreal peak during Trump's surprise visit last month to the renovation project at Fed headquarters. White House advisers had spent weeks heaping blame on Powell for cost overruns. Trump and Powell, each wearing white hard hats and suits, toured the dusty construction site. In front of TV news cameras, Trump motioned Powell to stand closer to him and then declared that costs to renovate two historical buildings had climbed to $3.1 billion from $2.5 billion. Powell shook his head, and Trump handed him a printout prepared by White House staff. Powell easily found what he needed to dispute the president's claim. 'You just added in a third building," he said, one that had been completed years earlier. Trump later smoothed things over and declared that the meeting with Powell went well. 'There was no tension," the president said. On Wednesday, Trump called for the immediate resignation of Fed governor Lisa Cook, who has consistently voted with Powell, over allegations of mortgage fraud before her Fed appointment. The president told aides he is considering firing Cook, according to people familiar with the matter, which would leave a vacancy for him to fill. 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position," Cook said. 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts." President Trump handing Fed Chair Jerome Powell a tally sheet last month showing costs for renovations at the Federal Reserve in outside the Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve building in Washington last month. The Jesuit-educated Powell leads an institution that is an easy target for politicians because, like the Vatican, the Fed has authority but no army. Powell has told associates that despite looking older, he doesn't feel worn down by the pressure. He has maintained what he calls, at age 72, the best physical shape of his life, swimming three times a week and working out with a personal trainer. The regimen helps Powell manage stress, though the weight of decisions affecting millions of Americans sometimes wakes him in the middle of the night. Powell draws strength from an outpouring of support, voiced privately by lawmakers of both parties, bank executives and the occasional stranger who approaches him at the airport or gym. He keeps letters from people who thank him for his steadiness. 'He has a really strong sense of what he's doing there and why," said Jon Faust, who was a senior adviser to Powell for his first six years as Fed chair. At the congressional hearings this summer, Powell sidestepped a question about political pressure and said he was focused on keeping the economy in good shape with inflation under control. 'I want to turn it over to my successor in that condition," he said. 'That's the only thing I think about." Beyond partisan political pressures, the economic challenge alone would test any Fed chair. The Fed's tool—raising or lowering interest rates—is a blunt instrument for a complex $30 trillion economy: push rates too high and risk recession, lower rates too much and risk higher inflation. Powell must steer through an economy facing the uncertainties of Trump's trade policy and the impact of artificial intelligence. The still unknown fallout from tariffs and AI will shape how businesses hire and set prices. And the Fed's decisions will affect whether Americans can afford a home or see their paychecks keep up with costs. Inflation has been above the Fed's 2% target for four years. Officials worry tariffs will encourage businesses to raise prices and keep inflation elevated. Economic policymakers also worry about the health of the U.S. labor market, which can take years to return to normal after recessions. Postpandemic employment trends have been hard to read. Recent swings in business formation and immigration can make estimates of labor demand difficult to pin down. Monitors at the New York Stock Exchange showing Fed Chair Jerome Powell speak on July 30. 'They're in a no-win situation because they're going to be late on employment no matter what, given the downward revisions we've already seen," said Diane Swonk, chief economist at KPMG. 'And inflation is likely to look worse before it looks better." Recent economic data shows the challenge. After declining gradually last year, a gauge of underlying inflation fell to a low of 2.6% this year and is now creeping toward 3%. Payroll growth slowed sharply over the three months that ended in July with significant downward revisions to May and June figures. Even so, the unemployment rate has held close to 4.2%. The hiring slowdown coincides with Trump administration policy shifts that include immigration crackdowns, tariffs, federal job cuts and reduced spending on government contractors and nonprofits. The Trump administration says its tax cuts and deregulation might offset some of those headwinds. A majority of Fed officials supported holding rates steady last month, though two Fed governors, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, dissented in favor of a rate cut. Waller and Bowman are Trump appointees who are under consideration to become Fed chair when Powell's term ends in May. Waller warned that job growth is weaker than it looks, with some indicators 'flashing red." He has argued that officials shouldn't decide rates based on tariff-related price increases, saying those aren't likely to be repeated. In a swipe at Powell, Bowman said Fed decisions haven't been consistent. She pointed out that housing, consumer spending and the share of working-age people with jobs were weaker now than last year, when the Fed began to cut rates. On the other side of the rate-cut debate are the inflation hawks. Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid, a voting member of the rate-setting committee this year, argued in a speech last week that the effect of tariffs on inflation had been limited, in part, because the Fed hadn't eased rates prematurely. He said he expected the uncertainty of its impact on prices would last months. Powell's job is to forge consensus from these competing views and, when needed, guide it in his preferred direction. The path there may be emerging from the economic data itself. The July jobs report provided clearer evidence of labor market softness—potentially giving Powell rationale for a rate cut next month. The labor market 'is not bad right now," San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said. 'But you know that the direction of change is going the wrong way." She also said tariffs aren't passing through to higher prices as much as some forecasters feared, reducing the risk of a big shock. Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said the Fed might have to cut rates now to support the labor market and leave open the prospect of reversing those moves if inflation resurges. 'I don't love that path," he said, 'but that might be the best of a limited set of options." Others are undecided. St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem and Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee flagged an unexpected rise last month in prices for services, which would suggest holding rates steady. Yet Musalem also pointed to slower economic growth, which could favor a future rate cut. Trump's challenge is that Fed independence runs deeper than any single leader. Even if Powell is replaced by someone more sympathetic to the White House next spring, there may still be officials worried about inflation and impervious to political pressure. Powell has served as a shield for some colleagues. His relationships with Fed peers are likely 'stronger than ever because the committee knows the tough spot that both the chair and the institution are in," Faust said. Some see less danger in the blustery attacks by Trump on Powell than the possibility of a White House campaign to weaken the Fed structure, including the 12 reserve banks. Meetings to set interest rates are attended by the 12 bank presidents and a seven-member board of governors, though only five presidents at a time have a vote on policy decisions. Unlike Fed governors, who are nominated by the president, regional bank presidents are chosen by their local boards and have traditionally operated independent of Washington. The Fed presidents serve five-year terms at a time, and the terms run concurrently. The 12 presidents must be reappointed by the governors to new five-year terms before next March. A Fed board could remove a regional bank president by majority vote, but it never has done so. Fed Chair Jerome Powell arriving for a Federal Reserve Board meeting last month in Washington. Since the governors are appointed by the president, there are nervous conversations about the possibility of the White House seating a future board dominated by Trump appointees, who would threaten to block reappointments of Fed presidents before March or remove them after they are reappointed. A Trump administration official alleged Wednesday that Cook, a Fed governor appointed by Biden, might have committed mortgage fraud by applying for loans on two properties she each identified as her primary residence. Trump selected one of his economic advisers to fill the seat of a Fed governor who resigned unexpectedly this month. If another governor leaves early, the president could install an ally and give his appointees a majority on the board. A final source of pressure on the Fed came last week from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a former hedge-fund investor with keen knowledge of monetary policy who is overseeing the search for the next Fed chair. Bessent, who had pledged not to comment on rates, said in a TV interview that the Fed should consider a larger half-percentage-point rate cut in September and, after that, to continue to lower its benchmark rate, currently around 4.3%, to less than 3%. Some investors subsequently dialed up expectations for a half-point cut. Bessent did more than just voice an opinion. He appeared to put Powell in a corner. If investors buy or sell assets because the Treasury secretary's comments lead them to believe a sizable rate cut has become more likely, Powell risks disappointing markets and taking the blame for any selloff if the Fed doesn't follow through. When Bessent was asked about his comments during an interview the following day, he said, 'I didn't tell the Fed what to do." Write to Nick Timiraos at
Economic Times
a minute ago
- Economic Times
Tulsi Gabbard slashing intelligence office workforce, cutting budget by over $700 million
Synopsis The Trump administration, under Director Tulsi Gabbard, is significantly downsizing the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, cutting its budget by over $700 million and reducing its workforce by more than 40%. This move includes restructuring the Foreign Malign Influence Centre, with its functions being integrated into other government areas. AP Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard The Office of the Director of National Intelligence will dramatically reduce its workforce and cut its budget by more than $700 million annually, the Trump administration announced Wednesday. The move amounts to a major downsizing of the office responsible for coordinating the work of 18 intelligence agencies, including on counterterrorism and counterintelligence, as President Donald Trump has tangled with assessments from the intelligence community. His administration also this week has revoked the security clearances of dozens of former and current officials, while last month declassifying documents meant to call into question long-settled judgments about Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. "Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorised leaks of classified intelligence, and politicised weaponisation of intelligence," Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said in a statement announcing a more than 40% workforce reduction. She added: "Ending the weaponisation of intelligence and holding bad actors accountable are essential to begin to earn the American people's trust which has long been eroded." Among the changes are to the Foreign Malign Influence Centre, which is meant to track influence operations from abroad and threats to elections. Officials said it has become "redundant" and that its core functions would be integrated into other parts of the government. The reorganisation is part of a broader administration effort to rethink how it tracks foreign threats to American elections, a topic that has become politically loaded given Trump's long-running resistance to the intelligence community's assessment that Russia interfered on his behalf in the 2016 election. In February, for instance, Attorney General Pam Bondi disbanded an FBI task force focused on investigating foreign influence operations, including those that target US elections. The Trump administration also has made sweeping cuts at the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which oversees the nation's critical infrastructure, including election systems. And the State Department in April said it shut down its office that sought to deal with misinformation and disinformation that Russia, China and Iran have been accused of spreading. Reaction to the news broke along partisan lines in Congress, where Sen Tom Cotton, Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, praised the decision as "an important step towards returning ODNI to that original size, scope, and mission. And it will help make it a stronger and more effective national security tool for President Trump". The panel's top Democrat, Sen Mark Warner, pledged to carefully review Gabbard's proposals and "conduct rigorous oversight to ensure any reforms strengthen, not weaken, our national security". He said he was not confident that would be the case "given Director Gabbard's track record of politicising intelligence". Gabbard's efforts to downsize the agency she leads is in keeping with the cost-cutting mandate the administration has employed since its earliest days, when Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency oversaw mass layoffs of the federal workforce. It's the latest headline-making move by an official who just a few month ago had seemed out of favour with Trump over her analysis of Iran's nuclear capabilities but who in recent weeks has emerged as a key loyalist with her latest actions. The Foreign Malign Influence Centre was created by the Biden administration in 2022 to respond to what the US intelligence community had assessed as attempts by Russia and other adversaries to interfere with American elections. Its role, ODNI said when it announced the centre's creation, was to coordinate and integrate intelligence pertaining to malign influence. The office in the past has joined forces with other federal agencies to debunk and alert the public to foreign disinformation intended to influence US voters. For example, it was involved in an effort to raise awareness about a Russian video that falsely depicted mail-in ballots being destroyed in Pennsylvania that circulated widely on social media in the weeks before the 2024 presidential election. Gabbard said Wednesday she would be refocusing the centre's priorities, asserting it had a "hyper-focus" on work tied to elections and that it was "used by the previous administration to justify the suppression of free speech and to censor political opposition." Its core functions, she said, will be merged into other operations. The centre is set to sunset at the end of 2028, but Gabbard is terminating it "in all but name," said Emerson Brooking, a resident fellow at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which tracks foreign disinformation. Though Gabbard said in a fact sheet that the center's job was redundant because other agencies already monitor foreign influence efforts targeting Americans, Brooking refuted that characterisation and said the task of parsing intelligence assessments across the government and notifying decision-makers was "both important and extremely boring." "It wasn't redundant, it was supposed to solve for redundancy," he said.
