Trump administration freezes $339M in UCLA grants and accuses the school of rights violations
The federal government has frozen or paused federal funding over similar allegations against private colleges, but this is one of the rare cases in which it has targeted a public university.
Several federal agencies notified UCLA this week that they were suspending grants over civil rights concerns, including $240 million from the Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institutes of Health, according to the person, who spoke about internal deliberations on the condition of anonymity.
The Trump administration recently announced that the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division found UCLA violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 'by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students.'
Last week, Columbia agreed to pay $200 million as part of a settlement to resolve investigations into the government's allegations that the school violated federal antidiscrimination laws. The agreement also restores more than $400 million in research grants.
The Trump administration plans to use its deal with Columbia as a template for other universities, with financial penalties that are now seen as an expectation.
The National Science Foundation said in a statement that it informed UCLA that it was suspending funding awards because the school isn't in line with the agency's priorities.
UCLA's chancellor Julio Frenk called the government's decision 'deeply disappointing.'
'With this decision, hundreds of grants may be lost, adversely affecting the lives and life-changing work of UCLA researchers, faculty and staff," he said in a statement.
The Department of Energy said in its letter it found several 'examples of noncompliance' and faulted UCLA for inviting applicants to disclose their race in personal statements and for considering factors including family income and ZIP code. Affirmative action in college admissions was outlawed in California in 1996 and struck down by the Supreme Court in 2023.
The letter said the school has taken steps that amount to 'a transparent attempt to engage in race-based admissions in all but name,' disadvantaging white, Jewish and Asian American applicants.
It also said UCLA fails to promote an environment free from antisemitism and discriminates against women by allowing transgender women to compete on women's teams.
Mr. Frenk said that in its letter, the federal government "claims antisemitism and bias as the reasons' to freeze the funding, but 'this far-reaching penalty of defunding life-saving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination.'
Earlier this week, UCLA reached a $6 million settlement with three Jewish students and a Jewish professor who sued the university, arguing it violated their civil rights by allowing pro-Palestinian protesters in 2024 to block their access to classes and other areas on campus.
UCLA initially had argued that it had no legal responsibility over the issue because protesters, not the university, blocked Jewish students' access to some areas. The university also worked with law enforcement to thwart attempts to set up new protest camps.
The university has said that it's committed to campus safety and inclusivity and will continue to implement recommendations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
39 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Taiwan to face economic risk as US mulls semiconductor tariffs under Trump proposal: Think tank
ANI Taiwan is bracing for a significant economic challenge as US President Donald Trump threatens to impose a tariff on semiconductors, according to the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER), reported by Focus industry is central to the island's exports and overall economy. Information and communication technology (ICT) products account for over 70% of Taipei's exports to the United States, according to the CIER. CIER President Lien Hsien-ming told CNA on Friday that Taiwan's dependence on semiconductors is notably higher than that of other countries. "He said compared with other countries, the semiconductor industry carries a heavier weighting for Taiwan in terms of industrial and economic development. In 2024, Taiwan recorded a trade surplus of $73.9 billion with the United States, up from $47.8 billion in 2023, largely driven by strong American demand for AI servers and semiconductors during the ongoing artificial intelligence boom. "I think Trump really cares about a trade deficit resulting from purchases of high tech gadgets such as semiconductors," Lien said, referring to a US investigation launched in April under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, targeting ICT products--especially semiconductors--as part of a possible new tariff regime."As ICT products make up more than 70 percent of Taiwan's exports to the US, a tariff on semiconductors could have a bigger impact on Taiwan's economy than the 20 percent blanket tariff the White House announced Thursday," Lien newly announced blanket tariff rate was lowered from 32%, previously suggested by Trump on April response, President Lai Ching-te said the 20% tariff was provisional and that Taiwan would continue negotiations with the US to secure a lower rate. Taiwan's negotiating team will also address the semiconductor issue directly with their American counterparts. Lai's statements reflect a growing focus within the Taiwanese government on the potential threat posed by a targeted semiconductor tariff."Lai's remarks show the government is focused on a possible tariff on semiconductors as such a levy could threaten Taiwan's economy," Lien said, according to the Focus Vice President Chen Shin-horng echoed Lien's concerns, saying that based on current US negotiation tactics, targeted tariffs on specific industries like semiconductors are likely to be steeper than general blanket added that Trump appears to be leveraging Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act as a strategic tool to push for major foreign investments in the the US may be aware that foreign chipmakers are unlikely to launch new production facilities in the short term, tariffs could still be phased in gradually.A tariff under the clause could be set at a lower level at the beginning and gradually increased over the next two to three years, Chen Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC), currently investing $65 billion in Arizona with an additional $100 billion pledged, has already warned the US government that proposed tariffs on Taiwanese semiconductors could significantly undermine demand and disrupt its investment strategy."New import restrictions could jeopardize current US leadership in the competitive technology industry and create uncertainties for many committed semiconductor capital projects in the US, including TSMC Arizona's significant investment plan in Phoenix," the chipmaker wrote in a letter to the US Department of Commerce in May, according to the Focus Taiwan. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in late July that results of the ongoing investigation will be announced within two weeks, ahead of any final decision on semiconductor tariffs. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Jane St: How an options trader smelt a rat when others raised a toast TCS job cuts may not stop at 12,000; its bench policy threatens more Unlisted dreams, listed disappointments? NSDL's IPO leaves pre-IPO investors riled. Regulators promote exchanges; can they stifle one? Watch IEX Did Meesho's Valmo really deliver a knockout punch to e-commerce logistics? Sebi's settlement with market intermediaries: More mystery than transparency? Trump tantrum: Check the Indian pulse of your portfolio. 71 stocks from 5 sectors for whom Trump may not even be noise F&O Radar| Deploy Short Strangle in Nifty to gain from Theta decay Stock Radar: PI Industries stock showing signs of momentum; takes support above 50-DEMA – time to buy?
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
‘Everyone's a loser': From Canada to Laos, Trump's sweeping tariffs spare no one, not even the US
President Donald Trump's tariff onslaught this week left a lot of losers – from small, poor countries like Laos and Algeria to wealthy US trading partners like Canada and Switzerland. They're now facing especially hefty taxes – tariffs – on the products they export to the United States starting Aug. 7. read more President Donald Trump's latest wave of sweeping tariffs is shaking the foundations of global trade and leaving a trail of economic pain across rich and poor nations alike. Countries such as Laos, Algeria, Canada and Switzerland are now facing steep levies as Trump intensifies his protectionist agenda. But while allies scramble for exemptions and rivals brace for economic fallout, but analysts say no one has truly come out ahead not even the United States. 'In many respects, everybody's a loser here,'' Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at New York Law School told AP. Since returning to the presidency six months ago, Trump has torn up traditional trade norms, replacing multilateral agreements with a unilateral approach driven by threats and economic clout. 'The biggest winner is Trump,' said Alan Wolff, former deputy director-general of the World Trade Organization. 'He bet that he could get other countries to the table on the basis of threats, and he succeeded dramatically.'' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's tariff regime began on April 2, dubbed 'Liberation Day' when he imposed 'reciprocal' taxes of up to 50% on imports from countries with which the U.S. runs trade deficits, and a 10% baseline tax on others. Declaring the trade imbalance a national emergency under a 1977 law, Trump bypassed Congress to implement the sweeping changes, now being challenged in court. After an initial market selloff, Trump paused the new tariffs for 90 days to allow room for negotiations. Some countries took the opportunity to strike deals, though often under heavy pressure. The United Kingdom agreed to a 10% tariff, up from 1.3%, despite having maintained a trade surplus with the U.S. for nearly two decades. The European Union and Japan settled for 15%, lower than the threatened 30% and 25%, respectively. Other countries that agreed to higher tariffs include Pakistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Even those with reduced levies compared to April levels remain far worse off than pre-Trump norms. Angola's tariffs dropped from 32% to 15%, but were below 1.5% in 2022. Taiwan saw its April rate of 32% lowered to 20%, but still faces a financial burden. '20% from the beginning has not been our goal, we hope that in further negotiations we will get a more beneficial and more reasonable tax rate,' Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te said Friday. Trump also rolled back Lesotho's tariff from 50% to 15%, but economic damage there may already be done. On the harsher end, nations that refused to bend or angered Trump in other ways got slammed. Laos and Algeria whose GDPs per capita are a fraction of America's now face tariffs of 40% and 30%, respectively. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Brazil was hit with a 50% tax, reportedly in retaliation for its treatment of former President Jair Bolsonaro. Despite a consistent U.S. trade surplus with Brazil, the tariff went ahead. Canada was slapped with a 35% import tax, a move some analysts tie to Ottawa's plan to recognise Palestinian statehood, a position contrary to Trump's strong support of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Switzerland, which didn't secure a deal, was struck with a 39% tariff, more than the 31% initially proposed. 'The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington'' to make a deal, Wolff commented. 'They're clearly not at all happy.'' Trump's actions are now facing legal scrutiny. A group of American companies and a dozen states are suing, arguing that he overstepped his authority under the 1977 law. A New York court recently blocked the tariffs, but allowed collection to continue pending appeal, which may end up before the US Supreme Court. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Judges on the US Court of Appeals have expressed scepticism about the justification behind Trump's measures. 'If (the tariffs) get struck down, then maybe Brazil's a winner and not a loser,'' Appleton said. Although Trump frames tariffs as a way to tax foreign countries, in practice, U.S. importers bear the cost and pass it on to American consumers. Goldman Sachs estimates that foreign exporters have absorbed only a fifth of the tariff burden, leaving U.S. businesses and households to shoulder the rest. Major retailers and manufacturers including Walmart, Nike, and Ford — have raised prices in response. 'This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those who have lower incomes,'' said Appleton. 'Sneakers, knapsacks … your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to up because none of those are made in America.'' With average U.S. tariffs rising from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3% — the highest since 1934 — Yale's Budget Lab estimates the policy will cost the average American household $2,400 this year. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The U.S. consumer's a big loser,″ Wolff concluded. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Is a US recession imminent? A wake-up call as Trump's tariff shock meets collapsing job growth and Wall Street flashes crisis signals
US recession fears grow as Trump's new tariffs hit amid shocking job losses—Wall Street warns of a perfect economic storm- The phrase 'US recession imminent' is no longer just a headline—it's a growing reality both on Wall Street and in American households. President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs, combined with surprisingly weak job data and heightened market volatility, are creating what many economists now call a 'perfect economic storm.' From job losses to trade disruption and tumbling markets, the signals are flashing red—and the stakes couldn't be higher for your wallet, your job, and the future of the U.S. economy. Job report shocks Wall Street, weakens confidence in the economy The July jobs report landed like a bombshell. The U.S. added only 73,000 jobs, far short of projections. Adding to the concern, job gains from May and June were slashed by a combined 258,000—essentially erasing most of the perceived progress from earlier months. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Design Thinking healthcare Project Management MBA Operations Management Degree Technology PGDM Data Science MCA Others CXO Cybersecurity Finance Public Policy Data Science Leadership Digital Marketing Artificial Intelligence Healthcare others Product Management Management Data Analytics Skills you'll gain: Duration: 25 Weeks IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK PCP DTIM Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 22 Weeks IIM Indore CERT-IIMI DTAI Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Crucially, this wasn't limited to one sector. Even typically stable areas like government hiring and services showed declines. With the unemployment rate rising to 4.2% and labor force participation dropping for the third month straight, economists now warn that these aren't seasonal trends—they may point to a long-term economic slowdown. Trump's global tariff wave adds fuel to the fire Just hours after the job report, President Trump signed an executive order on July 31, triggering 'reciprocal tariffs' on imports from over 60 countries. New tariffs include: Live Events Canada: 35% India: 25% Switzerland: 39% Taiwan: 20% Rates are set to take effect within days, with the White House insisting the move will 'level the playing field.' But economists and trade experts warn that raising import costs right now could backfire—driving up prices for consumers and businesses, curbing investment, and deepening the downturn. Wall Street rattled by warning signs of recession Markets reacted swiftly to the double blow of the job data and tariffs : Dow Jones fell 1.2% S&P 500 dropped 1.6% Nasdaq plunged 2.2% —marking its worst day in over three months The VIX index, known as Wall Street's 'fear gauge,' spiked. Meanwhile, Treasury yields collapsed, with the 2-year yield dropping at its fastest pace since 2001—a clear signal of recession fears. Investors are now betting on the Federal Reserve slashing interest rates by September, suggesting the need for emergency intervention to prevent a full-scale economic downturn. Trump fires BLS chief, sparking alarm over data integrity In a dramatic twist, Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), just hours after the jobs report was released. The White House claimed the numbers were 'manipulated' to damage the administration's image. This has sparked major concerns about the credibility of official economic data. Many fear this move could undermine public trust at a time when accurate, transparent reporting is more critical than ever. How it impacts the average American This isn't just about Wall Street. Everyday Americans are already feeling the pressure: Job prospects are weakening, especially in industries exposed to global trade Prices are rising as tariffs take hold—from electronics to groceries 401(k)s and retirement savings are vulnerable as markets wobble Mortgage rates might fall , but that may not offset the pain of job insecurity The mix of rising costs and falling job security is putting serious pressure on working families, even before any official recession is declared. What to watch next as recession risk rises Here's what could shape the coming weeks: August jobs report : Continued weakness could confirm that a recession is already underway Federal Reserve response : Rate cut signals will be key market movers Tariff negotiations : Some countries may seek exemptions, but Trump warns it's 'too late' Consumer spending : A major pullback could tip the economy into full contraction Are we already in the eye of the storm? Many experts believe we're no longer waiting for a recession—we may already be in the early stages of one. The combination of slowing job growth, trade tensions, falling market confidence, and policy uncertainty is creating a fragile and volatile environment. This so-called 'perfect economic storm' is no longer hypothetical—it's forming before our eyes. What happens next will depend on policy decisions from Washington, the strength of the U.S. consumer, and how the global economy reacts in the critical weeks ahead. FAQs: Q: What caused the latest US recession fears? Trump's new tariffs and weak job data triggered rising concerns of a U.S. recession. Q: How do Trump's tariffs affect average Americans? They raise prices on imports, making everyday goods more expensive. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
