"Will Work To Make Rahul Gandhi Next PM": Tejashwi Yadav
Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav on Tuesday made a strong pitch in support of his 'bade bhai (elder brother)' and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi, during the ongoing Voter Adhikar Yatra and declared that the Mahagathbandhan (RJD-Cong-Left alliance in Bihar) will work towards making him the next Prime Minister.
Tejashwi's poll pitch for Rahul Gandhi came at their roadshow in Nawada district. Addressing the gathering of supporters, he said, "Whenever the next Lok Sabha elections are held, we will dislodge the NDA government from power and will work to make Rahul Gandhi the Prime Minister."
The war cry by the RJD leader and also the unarguable face of Mahagathbandhan in the Bihar elections, was greeted with loud cheering and applause from the crowd.
Tejashwi and Rahul, having launched 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' from Bihar's Sasaram, are set to tour 1300 km in the state to win public support ahead of the Assembly elections. The bonhomie between the two leaders is also apparent, with Tejashwi in the driver's seat while the Congress MP gives him company. In one of the viral pictures from the rally, Tejashwi was seen driving a jeep while Rahul was waving to the crowd from the 'passenger' seat.
While batting for Rahul Gandhi as the next Prime Minister, Tejashwi also blasted the Centre as well as the Nitish government for 'tampering' with the electoral rolls and 'abandoning' the people of Bihar.
He said that many names have been struck off the Bihar electoral rolls, and many people who voted in the Lok Sabha elections have been declared dead in the current draft electoral list.
"BJP is snatching the rights of people to vote in upcoming elections, in connivance with the Election Commission," Tejashwi said and credited Rahul for 'exposing' the corruption and voter fraud in Bihar's electoral process.
Slamming the Nitish administration, he said the Chief Minister is in an "unconscious state" and unable to lead the state, and therefore it is time to throw out this 'inefficient and ineffective' government.
He said that the Bihar government has no plan or framework for people's welfare, and it is just aping policies proposed by him and the grand alliance.
"Mahagathbandhan promised people of Bihar -- free electricity, enhanced pension, formation of youth commission. They copied our promises and started it just ahead of the elections to fool and cheat you," he stated.
He added that it is the INDIA bloc that will shape the future of Bihar as it has the 'vision and mission' for the state and also has a 'pool of young leadership' to steer the state.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
When DMK opposed a Vice-President candidate from Tamil Nadu 41 years ago
Shortly after the BJP-led NDA fielded Maharashtra Governor and former Coimbatore MP C.P. Radhakrishnan as its candidate for the upcoming polls for the post of Vice-President, several political party leaders, including AIADMK leader Edappadi K. Palaniswami and TMC (Moopanar) leader G.K. Vasan, had appealed to parties in Tamil Nadu to sink differences and back his candidature. The last time a candidate hailing from Tamil Nadu was fielded for the post was 41 years ago – when R. Venkataraman entered the fray. However, now, the Opposition INDIA bloc, of which the ruling DMK in Tamil Nadu is a constituent, has announced former Supreme Court judge B. Sudarshan Reddy, who hails from Telangana, as their nominee to take on Mr Radhakrishnan. While Mr. Radhakrishnan's victory is likely guaranteed on account of the NDA's numbers in both Houses of Parliament, the DMK and its allies shall be opposing the 'son of the soil' for political reasons. However, such a stand is not new for the Dravidian party. On August 1, 1984, the Congress (I) Parliamentary board formally nominated R. Venkataraman, who was serving as the Defence Minister in Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's Cabinet, for the office of Vice-President of India. He had earlier served as a Minister holding various portfolios in Madras State, playing an instrumental role in the State's industrialisation. A report published in The Hindu on August 2, 1984, said that after nominating Venkataraman, also called R.V., Indira Gandhi apprised Satyasadan Chakraborty, the CPI(M) leader in the Lok Sabha, of the views of the Congress board members. The CPI(M) leader, in turn, informed his colleagues in the Opposition about the ruling party's decision, as the Prime Minister had sought their support to ensure Venkataraman's election by consensus, even though the Congress nominee could win comfortably on the party's own strength. Referring to the archival reports of Murasoli, the DMK's mouthpiece, R. Kannan, the author of The DMK Years and biographer of Dravidian stalwarts C.N. Annadurai and M.G. Ramachandran, noted that failing to achieve consensus, leaders of the Opposition parties, including Era. Mohan of the DMK, Atal Bihari Vajpayee of the BJP and Indrajit Gupta of the CPI convened a meeting on August 2, 1984, and decided to field B.C. Kamble, a former MP from the Republican Party, was their joint candidate, fully realising that the contest would only be token in nature. Mr. Chakraborty said the Opposition had nothing personal against R.V. but regretted that the Prime Minister had not followed the procedure of choosing a candidate on the basis of all-party consensus. The Opposition was keen that a member of the weaker sections be given an opportunity to occupy the post of Vice-President, The Hindu reported. Despite not being a part of the Congress-led alliance in the Parliamentary elections in 1980, the AIADMK, which eventually showed signs of moving closer towards the Congress in the early 1980s, supported R.V.'s candidature for the Vice-President post. The election held on August 22, 1984, ended as expected with R.V. defeating Kamble by a comfortable margin. In a statement, Chief Minister M.G. Ramachandran (MGR) thanked Indira Gandhi, saying, 'I am happy that Mr. R. Venkataraman has been elected Vice-President of the Indian Republic. You made it possible by enabling a Tamilian to contest the election and to win it. On behalf of the people and the Government of Tamil Nadu and on my own behalf, I express my sincere thanks to you for having fulfilled a long-cherished wish of the people of Tamil Nadu.' Three years later, when the Congress nominated R.V., the incumbent Vice-President, for the post of President, the AIADMK, by then in alliance with the Congress, backed him. The Opposition parties convened a meeting in New Delhi and unanimously decided to field eminent jurist V.R. Krishna Iyer for the top post. Even this time, the DMK opposed R.V.'s candidature and backed the Opposition as it was part of it. R.V. comfortably won the elections and went on to become the eighth President of India. Chief Minister MGR, in a statement, congratulated R.V. and said, 'Your election to the highest office of the Indian Republic is thus a natural culmination of your eventful public life and is a most fitting tribute to your selfless service. It is a matter of supreme pride for the people of Tamil Nadu, and I am profoundly happy in sharing this pride with them.' The DMK President M. Karunanidhi, in a telegram to R.V., said, 'Please accept my hearty congratulations on your election as the President of India.' AIADMK, DMK both backed Kalam In 2002, when the BJP-led NDA proposed the name of A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, an eminent scientist and native of Tamil Nadu, for the post of President of India, both the ruling AIADMK and the DMK rallied behind him. The DMK was then a key constituent of the NDA. Despite not being a part of the combine, AIADMK supremo and Chief Minister Jayalalithaa described Kalam as the ideal choice and said her party was happy to extend support. In a statement, she said Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had spoken to her over the phone about Kalam's candidature. 'I told him that I was delighted with the choice…. Apart from the fact that Dr. Kalam is an eminent and internationally renowned scientist who is respected all over the world, it is a matter of great pride and happiness for the AIADMK that he belongs to Tamil Nadu,' The Hindu reported on June 12, 2002, quoting Jayalalithaa. A report published in this daily on June 16, 2002, noted how the DMK too welcomed Kalam's nomination. Reacting to the Left's contention that Kalam lacked political experience and knowledge of the Constitution, DMK president M. Karunanidhi said political experience was not listed as a necessary qualification for the post of the President of India. Comparing Kalam to former Presidents S. Radhakrishnan and Zakir Hussain, Karunanidhi said all three were eminent in their fields. 'In the current situation, a non-political, secular, non-partisan person like Dr. Kalam was best suited for the role,' he said. On July 18, 2002, the 71-year-old scientist was elected as the President of India. With the support of the NDA, the Congress, the Telugu Desam Party and the Samajwadi Party, Kalam secured nearly 90% of the valid votes against his sole rival Captain Lakshmi Sahgal. After his victory, Kalam addressed his critics who had doubted his suitability for the presidency because of his lack of political background. 'I have been working from 1982 onwards directly with the Government, whether it be related to research, launch vehicles or nuclear programmes. Unless political decisions are taken, satellites will not be in orbit. Political decisions are vital for the success of any programme. I have worked with six Prime Ministers, I know how to handle politics,' a report published in The Hindu on July 19, 2002, quoted Kalam.
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
South vs South: Oppn names ex-SC judge Reddy as V-P pick
Former Supreme Court judge B Sudershan Reddy will be the Opposition's candidate for the vice-presidential election, Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge announced on Tuesday, pitching the September 9 poll as a battle between those who uphold the Constitution and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), where National Democratic Alliance (NDA) nominee CP Radhakrishnan began his political life. INDIA bloc's Vice-Presidential candidate former Supreme Court judge B Sudershan Reddy with MPs of Opposition parties at Delhi airport. Justice Reddy's nomination is also a calculated move to push lawmakers from K Chandrasekhara Rao's Bharat Rashtra Samithi, YS Jaganmohan Reddy's YSR Congress, and N Chandrababu Naidu's Telugu Desam Party to vote for a Telugu-speaking public figure. To be sure, the TDP and the YSRCP reiterated their support for Radhakrishnan although there was no comment from the BRS. 'All Opposition parties have decided to have a common candidate; the decision has been taken unanimously. I am happy that all opposition parties have agreed on one name. It is a big achievement for democracy, Whenever democracy and the Constitution are under attack, Opposition parties unite to fight against it. So we have decided to field a good candidate in this election,' Kharge said. Justice Reddy's nomination means that the vice-presidential election will be a battle between two candidates from southern India, a first for the position. In the 781-member electoral college comprising both Houses of Parliament, the NDA holds the edge with 425 votes. HT had reported on Monday that the Trinamool Congress was pushing for justice Reddy. 'It is the parliamentarians who elect the vice-president. Political parties may sponsor the candidates. There is only one citizenship in this country. Myself and CP Radhakrishnan ji are Indian nationals. Whether it is South, North, East, West, nothing matters…,' the former judge said. The Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi hailed justice Reddy's selection. 'A distinguished jurist and champion of justice, he represents the spirit of our Constitution - safeguarding people's rights, equality and our democracy. We stand united in this ideological battle and wish him all the very best,' he said. After discussing a number of possible candidates in the Opposition meeting on Monday, the contest narrowed to the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam's choice of former space scientist Mylswamy Annadurai and Trinamool Congress-backed justice B Sudershan Reddy on Tuesday. As a back-up, Mahatma Gandhi's great grandson Tushar Gandhi's name was also shortlisted. On Tuesday, DMK leaders indicated they won't 'push' for Annadurai if there is a larger consensus for Reddy. When the Opposition leaders met again at Kharge's house on Tuesday morning, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh proposed the name of Reddy. Kharge spoke about Reddy's profile. No other names were discussed in the meeting. Later, Congress general secretary Nasser Hussain told HT, 'In the background of the ideological battle taking place in the country, we need someone with clear thoughts, who can defend democracy and can uphold the spirit of the Constitution. We also thought a person belonging to none of the parties, someone non-partisan, and who can uphold all these values would be a good candidate in this election.' An expert on the Constitution, Reddy was born in an agricultural family on July 8, 1946 in the Ranga Reddy district of Telangana (then part of the princely state of Hyderabad). Reddy graduated from Osmania University in Hyderabad in 1971. He was elevated as the additional judge of the Andhra Pradesh high court on May 2, 1995 and chief justice for Gauhati high court on December 5, 2005. On January 12, 2007, he was elevated to the Supreme Court of India; he retired on July 8, 2011. Among his notable verdicts was one declaring Salwa Judum, a local militia propped up by the state government in Chhattisgarh to fight Maoists, as anti-constitutional. He was also part of a bench that pulled up the then United Progressive Alliance government for 'sleeping' on the issue of black money, and ordered a special investigation team in 2011. After his retirement, he was appointed as the first Lokayukta of Goa in March 2013. Reddy was also the chairman of the expert group for the Telangana caste survey. Reddy arrived in Delhi on Tuesday evening to an impromptu reception by Opposition leaders. The last date of filing nominations for the V-P election is August 21. Reading out the joint statement, Kharge said, 'This vice-presidential contest is an ideological battle. The Opposition parties have nominated Shri B. Sudershan Reddy garu as their joint candidate since he fully reflects the values that shaped our country's freedom movement so profoundly and the values on which our country's Constitution and democracy have been anchored. All these values are under assault and therefore, our collective and determined resolve to fight this election.' DMK leader K Kanimozhi tweeted, 'Safeguarding democracy is about fighting all battles, big and small, on behalf of the people of India. INDIA stands united in this fight.' Communist Party of India lawmaker P Sandosh called the poll a fight between an RSS pracharak and the Constitution. 'This may create certain political changes in Andhra Pradesh,' he said. Samajwadi Party MP Dharmendra Yadav said, 'Justice Reddy has had an outstanding reputation in the legal field... I believe our entire alliance has made an excellent decision...' Jharkhand Mukti Morcha MP Mahua Maji said, 'This will be a close contest.' Aam Aadmi Party MP Sanjay Singh announced that his party will support justice Reddy. Bharatiya Janata Party's Amit Malviya said justice Reddy is remembered for a judgment that weakened India's fight against Naxalism, referring to the banning of the Salwa Judum. 'The judgment was seen not just as a blow to a state government's counter-insurgency strategy, but as an instance of judicial sympathy for those aligned with the Maoist cause.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NSUI first to release manifesto, promises e-bike stations and mental health counselling
Chandigarh: Solar rooftops, subsidised canteens, 24×7 health centres, ramps and lifts, even e-scooter stations- NSUI opened the manifesto season at Panjab University with a catalogue of promises that sounded ambitious, but to many on campus, familiar. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Last year's commitments of placements, self-defence classes and pad-vending machines still remain unfulfilled, and doubts are already circling whether this manifesto will fare any better. The Congress-backed student body released its document at Chandigarh Congress office, with NSUI national president Varun Choudhary and Chandigarh Congress chief H S Lucky present. Choudhary said the manifesto "reflected the aspirations of every student" and would help NSUI "sweep the elections." Asked how the long list would be assured, Lucky replied, "Manifesto means manifestation, and the motive is to strive for it. " The manifesto covers nearly every aspect of campus life: OBC reservation in admissions and hostels, scholarships for EWS students, a "One PU, One App" for grievances and results, 24×7 innovation hubs in unused classrooms, subsidised food with daily menu voting, women's safety desks, leadership programmes, sports scholarships, and more. Yet PU's lived reality points to a wide gap. As reported earlier this week, manifestos at PU "promise the moon but deliver not even an email ID." On disability access, NSUI talks of ramps and lifts. But even after a Punjab State Human Rights Commission directive and memorandums by students from 2023, PU still lacks a basic ramp at the SBI fee counter where every student queues, as reported in June. An accessibility audit in 2024 exposed further deficits, while last year's council chose to prioritise cultural fests instead. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Women's safety is another major plank. NSUI promises a 24×7 task force, grievance desks and full CCTV coverage. But PU already struggles with inadequate security staff, and despite budget approval in December for CCTV expansion, installation is yet to begin. As TOI reported in July, even with the library buzzing 24×7, many women students avoid the dark, poorly lit roads leading back to their hostels. Mental health counselling, too, finds mention. But counselling is already mandatory under UGC norms, and PU has only one part-time counsellor for over 16,000 students- a crisis TOI exposed in July. Likewise, the pledge for a YouTube channel ignores that PU already runs one. With the university facing a financial crunch and still awaiting over Rs 47 crore for hostel construction, proposals like solar rooftops, e-scooter stations and 24×7 doctors sound more like slogans than plans. The much-touted "One PU, One App", pitched as a digital hub for results, grievances, library and transport- also seems a distant dream. PU councils have failed for years to provide students even a basic official email ID, despite repeated assurances in manifestos. Against that backdrop, an all-in-one app looks more like a distant hope than a deliverable. Choudhary admitted NSUI could only "pressurise" the administration, without explaining how the projects would move from manifesto to implementation. Still, by releasing its manifesto first, NSUI has forced other groups to catch up. Whether this document turns into delivery or another year of recycled paper promises is the question weighing on PU voters.
