Shirui flag row: Meitei group rejects provocation claims
1
2
Imphal: Following widespread condemnation by Manipur-based Tangkhul Naga organisations regarding the display of Meiteis' seven-coloured flag (Salai Taret) and raising of slogans atop Shirui hill peak by members of Arambai Tenggol, the Meitei organisation on Saturday said that misleading content on social media had created unnecessary confusion.
Arambai Tenggol issued a statement indicating that Tangkhul Naga apex student body Tankhul Katamnao Long (TKS) had been influenced by incorrect information distributed by the Facebook page 'Manipur Stylish'.
The controversy erupted after a photo went viral on Friday night, showing Arambai Tenggol members in traditional attire holding the Meiteis' seven-coloured flag while raising slogans such as 'Long live Manipur' and 'Mother Shirui be blessed.'
"In sensitive matters such as this, we believe it is imperative to verify the authenticity of sources before arriving at hasty conclusions. Misinterpretation of such events only fuels division, and it is evident that certain elements are working with the intent to disrupt peaceful coexistence between the Meitei and Naga communities," Arambai Tenggol Unit 58 COBRA stated in a press communiqué.
The organisation emphasised that Shirui Lily represents the entire state's identity rather than a specific community, noting that the event was officially organised by the Manipur govt with participants engaging in cultural celebrations.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
40대 이상이고 PC가 있으세요? 그럼 이 게임을 정말 좋아하실 거예요!
Sea of Conquest
플레이하기
Undo
Arambai Tenggol, supporting a unified Manipur and committed to maintaining the state's territorial integrity, stated that the image showing members with the 'Salai Taret' flag is being overly politicised. "Displaying this flag in Shirui Hills does not, and should not, be construed as a territorial claim or provocation. Just as carrying the flag in the United States, Europe, or the Himalayas does not imply ownership of those regions, its presence here signifies cultural continuity, not confrontation," it added.
The organisation urged TKS and others to consider the video's context objectively, clarifying that their intention was to support traditions peacefully rather than cause offence.
The GPRN's Wung-Tangkhul Region secretariat condemned Arambai Tenggol's Cobra Team Unit 58's actions during the Shirui Lily Festival in Ukhrul district. On Saturday, WTR criticised the group's display of the 'Salai Taret' flag on Shirui peak, describing it as an intrusion into Tangkhul territory.
"The 'Salai Taret' flag has no cultural, historical, or political association with the Tangkhul people," the statement asserted, adding that such acts only reflect Arambai Tenggol's 'war-mongering' nature.
WTR demanded a public apology from Arambai Tenggol within 48 hours, warning of consequences otherwise.
Previously, TKS called the act provocative and disrespectful to Tangkhul Naga identity and territory.
"The Shirui Lily Festival is a solemn celebration of our rare endemic flower, our land, and the enduring spirit of the Tangkhul Naga people," the TKS said adding that such act is a 'symbolic aggression in sacred Tangkhul territory is a calculated attempt to disrupt peace and politicise a neutral cultural platform."
TKS disputed the seven-coloured Meitei flag's representation of Manipur, affirming their commitment to the sky-blue Naga flag as their symbol of political aspirations. "We will not tolerate any attempt to politicise our sacred spaces or challenge the historical and cultural ownership of our land," the student union warned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
China silent about lifting export curbs on rare earth metals amid growing concerns in India, world
China, which holds the global monopoly over the precious rare earth metals needed for manufacturing of phones, automobiles and missiles, continues to play hardball over lifting export restrictions of the precious metals warding off pressures from a host of countries, including, the US, EU and India. "China's export control measures are consistent with universal practices," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said responding to a question during a media briefing here on Thursday that Japanese automaker Suzuki has suspended production of its main small cars in Japan because of delays due to rare earth restrictions. "Such measures are non-discriminatory and not targeted at any particular country," he said, adding that the question should be directed to competent authorities. This is the second-time this week that Lin deflected a question on the growing global concerns over the restrictions over exports of Chinese rare earth metals. On Tuesday, he evaded a question about reports that executives and representatives of the car industry in Europe, the US and India expressed concern that China's rare earth export controls are creating the risk of shortages that could lead to the stoppages in production soon, saying that the question should be addressed to competent authorities. Reports from Tokyo on Thursday said Suzuki Motor halted production of its Swift model cars in Japan from May 26 due to China's rare earth restrictions. Reports in recent weeks from India too spoke of growing concerns among the automobile manufactures about scarcity about rare earth magnets, which are critical components in electric vehicles (EVs) and even some parts of traditional internal combustion engine vehicles. Also, China's export restrictions of the rare earths specially germanium, a critical mineral that is used in manufacturing of semiconductors, fibre optic cables and solar panels, has sparked concerns in India among the respective industries. Officials of India as well as many other countries say they are engaged with the concerned ministries and departments. Rare earths are a group of metals consisting of 17 elements. Though present in several counties, their extraction is costly and messy causing massive amounts of pollution. According to the International Energy Agency, currently China accounts for 61 per cent of global mined rare earth production, but controls 92 per cent of the global output. China's exports restrictions of rare earths which were imposed in June last year through a decree by Premier Li Qiang reportedly became stricter since US President Donald Trump imposed 146 per cent tariffs on Chinese exports. This week, the European Union (EU) urged China to stop restricting the export of rare earth minerals and magnets, with the bloc's trade chief saying its industries are in an "alarming situation", the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post reported on Thursday. The request was made during a meeting between the sides' top commerce officials in Paris on Tuesday. It comes as sectors across Europe raise the alarm about a shortage of rare earths, which are used to manufacture hi-tech goods ranging from electric cars and smartphones to military tanks and aircraft. "I informed my Chinese counterpart about the alarming situation in the European car industry, but I would say industry as such because clearly rare earths and permanent magnets are absolutely essential for industrial production," EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said on Wednesday, briefing reporters a day after his meeting with Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
The Story Of Filmmaker Roshaan Khattak, Hunted By Pakistan, Let Down By Cambridge
On April 10, 2025, UK MP John McDonnell issued a stark warning to the University of Cambridge: 'It is absolutely essential that his research into the critical issue of the Balochistan genocide is not obstructed - regardless of pressure from the Pakistani state.' His message, sent to Cambridge Vice-Chancellor Deborah Prentice and Wolfson College President Ijeoma Uchegbu, called for urgent clarity on how the university was responding to security concerns surrounding a postgraduate researcher facing threats. 'I would therefore be most grateful,' McDonnell added, 'if you could clarify any current security concerns and let me know how I and other Members of Parliament familiar with the Balochistan situation might offer assistance.' Why Both China And Pak Are Interested McDonnell was advocating on behalf of Roshaan Khattak, an Oscar-nominated filmmaker and academic whose proposed doctorate at Cambridge investigates enforced disappearances and other genocidal crimes in Balochistan - a region of Pakistan intersected by China's multibillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Politically explosive, both Islamabad and Beijing have a deep interest in controlling the narrative. And so, what began as a scholarly project has morphed into a high-stakes test: will one of the world's most prestigious universities defend academic freedom, or capitulate to the pressures of transnational repression? Roshaan's ordeal began in December, when he started receiving explicit threats. One anonymous message warned: 'Don't forget even Cambridge and the UK is not safe. They can get anywhere…. Don't be stupid.' According to security analysts, the threats bear the hallmarks of Pakistan's intelligence services. Rather than receiving institutional support, Khattak says he encountered obstruction. Wolfson College abruptly revoked his accommodation, changed his door locks without notice, and permitted staff to access his room while he was abroad - compromising hard drives that stored sensitive data. He also reports that key emails mysteriously vanished from his university account. All of this, he says, occurred without a formal security review. Anonymous emails also warned that 'senior staff had mentioned that the Pakistani state via its embassy and networks… [is] not happy with your research' and cautioned that 'just like they were looking for excuses to cancel your room, they will now be looking to cancel your PhD'. 'Do It Yourself' The university's response? Roshaan was told Cambridge lacked the 'resources or expertise' to help, and was advised to rely on 'his own resources'. This is no isolated case. Transnational repression - the long arm of authoritarian regimes targeting exiles and dissidents abroad - is now a grim feature of global politics. In the UK alone, police thwarted an assassination attempt on Dutch-based Pakistani activist Waqas Goraya. Scotland Yard has issued warnings to Iranian journalists in London. And in November 2023, Pakistani exile Shahzad Akbar survived an acid attack in England, widely believed to be orchestrated by Pakistan's ISI. What's new, however, and deeply troubling, is the encroachment of these tactics into British universities. Dr Andrew Chubb, who serves on the UK Parliament's working group on the issue, has described Khattak's case as 'a clear instance of transnational repression'. He's right. The threats are credible. The patterns are familiar. And the institutional response has been shamefully inadequate. Cambridge, of all places, should know better. Between 2020 and 2024, the university accepted up to £19 million from Chinese sources. That alone should have triggered safeguards and scrutiny when a researcher's work touched Beijing's strategic interests. Instead, the university appears to have treated the problem not as a matter of principle, but of risk management - removing the vulnerable rather than confronting the powerful. This goes far beyond Cambridge. If one of Britain's most prestigious universities can't - or won't - protect a single postgraduate researcher, what hope is there for smaller institutions? What message does this send to young academics investigating authoritarianism, state violence, or contested territories? A Break-In, A Threat For Roshaan, the risks are not theoretical. 'Two years ago,' he recalls, 'I travelled to Stockholm to investigate the mysterious assassination of fellow journalist Sajid Hussain Baloch. Right at the start of my investigation, my hotel room was broken into. My cameras, laptop, passport, and hard drives containing invaluable research were stolen. A man carrying a dagger was reportedly seen on my floor that very night.' Khattak, who is part of the working group for UK Parliamentary inquiry into transnational repression, has since submitted detailed testimony to the Parliament and proposed a model draft for the Transnational Repression Bill, calling for visa bans, asset freezes, and criminal penalties targeting foreign officials who orchestrate threats or harassment abroad. These are not abstract proposals. They are urgently needed tools in an increasingly hostile global landscape. Universities Must Do Better The stakes could not be higher. The deaths of Sajid Hussain in Sweden and Karima Baloch in Canada at the hands of Pakistani intelligence are grim reminders of what happens when states silence dissenters. Without formal safeguards - whether through the Office for Students, the Department for Education, or another body - Khattak's case won't be the last. As authoritarian regimes grow more aggressive, academics researching politically sensitive topics will continue to face serious threats, often without any institutional backup. Universities must decide what they stand for. Academic freedom is not just a slogan for glossy brochures. It's a moral and academic duty. And it's tested not in moments of comfort, but under pressure. Cambridge failed that test. The rest of the world should take note. Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
China's rare earth weapon changes contours of trade war battlefield
China has signalled for more than 15 years that it was looking to weaponise areas of the global supply chain, a strategy modelled on longstanding American export controls Beijing views as aimed at stalling its rise. The scramble in recent weeks to secure export licences for rare earths, capped by Thursday's telephone call between U.S. and Chinese leaders Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, shows China has devised a better, more precisely targeted weapon for trade war. Industry executives and analysts say while China is showing signs of approving more exports of the key elements, it will not dismantle its new system. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Support elderly mothers. Donate Today HelpAge India Donate Now Undo Modelled on the United States' own, Beijing's export licence system gives it unprecedented insight into supplier chokepoints in areas ranging from motors for electric vehicles to flight-control systems for guided missiles. "China originally took inspiration for these export control methods from the comprehensive U.S. sanctions regime," said Zhu Junwei, a scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Beijing-based think tank focused on international relations. Live Events "China has been trying to build its own export control systems since then, to be used as a last resort." After Thursday's call, Trump said both leaders had been "straightening out some of the points, having to do mostly with rare earth magnets and some other things". He did not say whether China committed to speeding up licences for exports of rare earth magnets, after Washington curbed exports of chip design software and jet engines to Beijing in response to its perceived slow-rolling on licences. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in EV motors. In April it added some of the most sophisticated types to an export control list in its trade war with the United States, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licences. That put a once-obscure department of China's commerce ministry, with a staff of about 60, in charge of a chokepoint for global manufacturing . The ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters' questions sent by fax. Several European auto suppliers shut down production lines this week after running out of supplies. While China's April curbs coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally. "Beijing has a degree of plausible deniability - no one can prove China is doing this on purpose," said Noah Barkin, senior adviser at Rhodium Group, a China-focused U.S. thinktank. "But the rate of approvals is a pretty clear signal that China is sending a message, exerting pressure to prevent trade negotiations with the U.S. leading to additional technology control." China mines about 70% of the world's rare earths but has a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. Even if the pace of export approvals quickens as Trump suggested, the new system gives Beijing unprecedented glimpses of how companies in a supply chain deploy the rare earths it processes, European and U.S. executives have warned. Other governments are denied that insight because of the complexity of supply chain operations. For example, hundreds of Japanese suppliers are believed to need China to approve export licences for rare earth magnets in coming weeks to avert production disruptions, said a person who has lobbied on their behalf with Beijing. "It's sharpening China's scalpel," said a U.S.-based executive at a company seeking to piece together an alternative supply chain who sought anonymity. "It's not a way to oversee the export of magnets, but a way to gain influence and advantage over America." DECADES IN THE MAKING Fears that China could weaponise its global supply chain strength first emerged after its temporary ban of rare earth exports to Japan in 2010, following a territorial dispute. As early as 1992, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping was quoted as saying, "The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths." Beijing's landmark 2020 Export Control Law broadened curbs to cover any items affecting national security, from critical goods and materials to technology and data. China has since built its own sanctions power while pouring the equivalent of billions of dollars into developing workarounds in response to U.S. policies. In 2022, the United States put sweeping curbs on sales of advanced semiconductor chips and tools to China over concerns the technology could advance Beijing's military power. But the move failed to halt China's development of advanced chips and artificial intelligence, analysts have said. Beijing punched back a year later by introducing export licenses for gallium and germanium, and some graphite products. Exports to the United States of the two critical minerals, along with germanium, were banned last December. In February China restricted exports of five more metals key to the defence and clean energy industries. Analysts face a hard task in tracking the pace of China's approvals following the Trump-Xi call. "It's virtually impossible to know what percentage of requests for non-military end users get approved because the data is not public and companies don't want to publicly confirm either way," said Cory Combs, a critical minerals analyst with Trivium, a policy consultancy focused on China.
