logo
Senate leaving Russia sanctions power fully in Trump's hands

Senate leaving Russia sanctions power fully in Trump's hands

The Hill17 hours ago
Republican senators are getting ready to leave Washington without advancing a major sanctions bill against Russia, giving President Trump sole discretion over whether to follow through on his threats against Russian President Vladimir Putin if he refuses to halt his war against Ukraine.
Trump has given an Aug. 8 deadline for Putin to stop fighting or risk tariffs on countries that import Russian oil. As a preview, he announced 25 percent tariffs on India, a major importer of Russian energy. That's far below the 500 percent secondary tariff power Congress laid out in draft legislation.
While Senate Ukraine hawks wanted to see their sanctions bill pass before the monthlong break, they ultimately left the decision entirely in Trump's hands, at least for the summer.
'I think he's going to be very careful about what he does,' Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said when asked by The Hill if Trump can be trusted to impose costs on Putin.
'But I think he is clearly disappointed in Putin and I think he is now coming around to recognizing that many of us were right.'
Democrats have expressed skepticism Trump will punish Putin, even as the president has shown increasing frustration with the Russian leader's refusal to accept a ceasefire.
Trump said Friday he ordered nuclear submarines to the region in response to threats of nuclear weapons use from Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president, current deputy chair of the security council and frequent online provocateur.
'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' Trump posted on his social media site Truth Social.
Trump told reporters Thursday that his special envoy for peace missions, Steve Witkoff, is expected to travel to Russia following a visit to Israel on Friday.
Trump described Russia's ongoing attacks against Ukraine as 'disgusting.'
'We have about eight days. … We're going to put sanctions,' he said.
Even as Trump has shortened the deadline for Russia to get serious about peace talks, the president is hedging on the impact U.S. financial penalties will have on Putin's country.
'I don't know that sanctions bother him. You know? They know about sanctions. I know better than anybody about sanctions, and tariffs and everything else. I don't know if that has any effect. But we're going to do it.'
While the U.S. has steadily ramped up sanctions on Russia throughout the war, the Senate bill would have marked a major economic escalation, seeking to isolate Moscow from trading partners that have kept its wartime economy afloat.
'Maintaining pressure on Russia economically, and going after its oil revenues in particular, remain crucial to containing and limiting Russia's current and future military and foreign policy options,' experts with the Center for Strategic and International Studies wrote in a report late last month.
Steep tariffs on Russia's trading partners would also risk shocks to the global energy market and further strain on U.S. relations with major economies such as India, China and Brazil.
Sen. James Risch (R-Idaho), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said deciding which sanctions are imposed — if Russia passes Trump's deadline — 'are a work in progress,' speaking with The Hill on Friday.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), coauthor of the Russia sanctions bill with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said he would view it as a win if Trump imposed even a fifth of what the Senate was proposing.
'We propose in our bill 500 percent. If it's 250 percent, I could live with it. Even if it's 100 percent, possibly. But you ought to impose bone-crushing sanctions that will stop them from fueling Russia's war machine,' Blumenthal said.
The Connecticut senator said even as he holds out hope for Trump to give Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) the green light to bring the sanctions bill to the floor, the bill has already moved U.S. policy.
'It has given credibility and momentum to the idea of sanctions so that now, even President Trump, who was seemingly Putin's best buddy, is giving him deadlines to stop the war or face sanctions,' he said.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, pointed to Trump's 25 percent tariffs on India as further evidence of this impact. Indian state oil refiners have already moved to pause imports of Russian oil, with the tariff set to go into effect Aug. 7.
'Clearly, India was paying attention to that. I think it's positive progress that the president is looking at ways in which he can put more pressure on Russia,' she said.
Graham said Trump has 'adopted the theory of the case' — going after countries that purchase Russian oil and don't help Ukraine.
'He can do it through executive action, or with the bill,' he said. 'I think the bill, as you say, gives him leverage, and we're in good discussions, so stay tuned.'
But some Republican senators pointed to a missed opportunity in adjourning before a vote on the Graham-Blumenthal bill.
'I don't think there are enough sanctions we can place on Russia. I think we should keep hammering them and make sure Ukraine's armed,' said Sen. Pete Ricketts (Neb.), the No. 2 Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Rounds told The Hill he believed the time is now to put the sanctions bill on the floor.
Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on Europe and Regional Security Cooperation, said he wanted a Senate vote on the sanctions package so the House could be ready to take it up when they come back in September.
'I think having that tool in your tool chest, ready to go, would be a good thing and keep the pressure on Russia,' he said.
'I think it gives [Trump] more leverage. You can always hold it ready to go, send it over to the House if needed and then to the president's desk. I think that's not a bad strategy.'
Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah), also a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, agreed.
'I think that's why it's important for us to have this teed up and ready — it gives [Trump] an option, and the more options he has the better,' he said.
Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told The Hill on Wednesday that Thune was 'absolutely aware' of his desire to vote on the Russia sanctions bill before the August recess.
'I certainly think it would be an excellent thing to do.'
Thune's office told The Hill on Friday it had no scheduling announcements related to the Graham-Blumenthal bill.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tells Schumer to ‘GO TO HELL' over Senate nominee deal after negotiations blow up
Trump tells Schumer to ‘GO TO HELL' over Senate nominee deal after negotiations blow up

New York Post

time5 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump tells Schumer to ‘GO TO HELL' over Senate nominee deal after negotiations blow up

Hours of tense negotiations to strike a deal on President Donald Trump's nominees blew up Saturday night, and now lawmakers are headed home. Senate Republicans and Democrats were quick to point the finger at one another for the deal's demise, but it was ultimately Trump who nuked the talks. Advertisement In a lengthy post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of 'demanding over One Billion Dollars in order to approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees.' 'This demand is egregious and unprecedented, and would be embarrassing to the Republican Party if it were accepted. It is political extortion, by any other name,' Trump said. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' 'Do not accept the offer,' he continued. Advertisement 'Go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country. Have a great RECESS and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!' Instead of finding a pathway to vote on as many as 60 of the president's nominees, all of which moved through committee with bipartisan support, lawmakers rapid-fire voted on seven before leaving Washington until September. But prior to the president's edict, both sides of the aisle believed they were on the verge of a breakthrough to both meet Trump's desire to see his nominees confirmed and leave Washington. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said that there were 'lots of offers' made between him and Schumer over the course of negotiations. Advertisement 3 President Trump called out Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Truth Social, accusing him of 'demanding over One Billion Dollars in order to approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees.' AP 'There were several different times where I think either or both sides maybe thought there was a deal in the end,' he said. Senate Democrats wanted the White House to unfreeze billions in National Institute of Health and foreign aid funding, in addition to a future agreement that no more clawback packages would come from the White House. In exchange, they would greenlight several of Trump's non-controversial nominees. Advertisement Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., accused Schumer of going 'too far' by upping the price tag on his demands. 3 Trump also said in his post, 'Go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country.' 'We've had three different deals since last night,' he said. 'And every time it's been, every time it's 'I want more,'' Mullin said of Schumer's demands. He said that Republicans weren't caught off guard by Trump's call to halt talks, and noted that the White House had been heavily involved in negotiations. 'You get to a realization that there was, it was never about making a deal,' he continued. 3 Lawmakers decided to only vote on 7 of Trump's 60 nominees for positions in his administration. AP 'They want to go out and say the President's being unrealistic, and because he can't answer to his base to make a deal like we have in every other president in history.' Advertisement Now, Republicans won't pursue recess appointments, but Mullin noted that moving ahead with a rule changes to the confirmation process when lawmakers return in September was going to happen in response. Senate Democrats, on the other hand, countered that their offer never changed, and that Republicans kept increasing the number of nominees they wanted across the line, and attempted to include in more controversial, partisan picks. 'The ask evolved on both sides quite a bit over time,' Thune said. 'But in the end, we never got to a place where we had both sides agree to lock it in.'

Senate heads home with no deal to speed confirmations as irate Trump tells Schumer to ‘go to hell'
Senate heads home with no deal to speed confirmations as irate Trump tells Schumer to ‘go to hell'

Boston Globe

time5 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Senate heads home with no deal to speed confirmations as irate Trump tells Schumer to ‘go to hell'

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Schumer said a rules change would be a 'huge mistake,' especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. Advertisement 'Donald Trump tried to bully us, go around us, threaten us, call us names, but he got nothing,' Schumer said. The latest standoff comes as Democrats and Republicans have gradually escalated their obstruction of the other party's executive branch and judicial nominees over the last two decades, and as Senate leaders have incrementally changed Senate rules to speed up confirmations — and make them less bipartisan. Advertisement In 2013, Democrats changed Senate rules for lower court judicial nominees to remove the 60-vote threshold for confirmations as Republicans blocked President Barack Obama's judicial picks. In 2017, Republicans did the same for Supreme Court nominees as Democrats tried to block Trump's nomination of Justice Neil Gorsuch. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (center) during a news conference after a policy luncheon at the Capitol on Tuesday. Mariam Zuhaib/Associated Press Trump has been pressuring Senate Republicans for weeks to cancel the August recess and grind through dozens of his nominations as Democrats have slowed the process. But Republicans hoped to make a deal with Democrats instead, and came close several times over the last few days as the two parties and the White House negotiated over moving a large tranche of nominees in exchange for reversing some of the Trump administration's spending cuts on foreign aid, among other issues. The Senate held a rare weekend session on Saturday as Republicans held votes on nominee after nominee and as the two parties tried to work out the final details of a deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country.' Thune said afterward that there were 'several different times' when the two sides thought they had a deal, but in the end 'we didn't close it out.' It's the first time in recent history that the minority party hasn't allowed at least some quick confirmations. Thune has already kept the Senate in session for more days, and with longer hours, this year to try and confirm as many of Trump's nominees as possible. Advertisement But Democrats had little desire to give in without the spending cut reversals or some other incentive, even though they too were eager to skip town after several long months of work and bitter partisan fights over legislation. 'We have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as we have right now,' Schumer said.

Trump trade adviser: President has ‘real concerns' about jobs data after BLS firing
Trump trade adviser: President has ‘real concerns' about jobs data after BLS firing

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump trade adviser: President has ‘real concerns' about jobs data after BLS firing

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer weighed in on President Trump's decision to fire the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer, saying the commander-in-chief has 'real concerns' about the jobs numbers that extend beyond the dismal Friday report. 'Even last year during the campaign, there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers, and so sounds to me like the President has real concerns. You know, not just based on today's but everything we saw last year,' Greer said during his Friday appearance on CBS News' 'Face The Nation.' 'You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers. There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the President is the President. He can choose who works in the executive branch,' Greer, one of Trump's top tariff negotiators, told host Margaret Brennan. Trump fired McEntarfer after a Friday morning jobs report from the Labor Department showed the U.S. added 258,000 fewer jobs in May and June than what was previously reported. The report also said the country added 73,000 jobs in July. Trump axed the BLS chief Friday afternoon, accusing her of manipulating data to make him and Republicans look bad. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump wrote Friday on Truth Social. The firing of McEntarfer was met with criticism from Democrats, but also by William Beach, who was appointed as BLS head during Trump's first term. Greer said on Friday that the nation will see a 'big' increase in the number of manufacturing jobs now that Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' was signed into law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store