HS2 has suffered ‘significant cost' from legal challenges by public bodies
HS2 Ltd was given the power to construct the railway when the High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Act received royal assent in February 2017.
The most recent of the nine legal challenges the project has faced from other public bodies since then was launched by North Warwickshire Borough Council in relation to the extension of the under-construction Bromford Tunnel.
In May, the High Court rejected the council's bid for a judicial review.
Since royal assent was obtained, there have also been 25 appeals relating to the HS2 planning regime.
In a six-monthly written update to Parliament on HS2, Ms Alexander acknowledged it is 'right there are checks and balances embedded in our legal and planning systems', but expressed concern these are being used to 'frustrate the delivery of consented projects'.
She wrote: 'The delivery of HS2 has continued during this period to be the subject of both legal and planning challenges, which have added significant cost, uncertainty and potential for delay.'
She added: 'The Government continues to monitor this issue closely and will consider further interventions where appropriate, alongside its wider work on planning reform.'
Ms Alexander also announced that she has lifted safeguarding on the majority of land protected for HS2's former Phase 2b eastern leg between Birmingham and Leeds, which was cancelled in November 2021.
Safeguarding is used to stop land from being developed in a way that would conflict with future schemes.
More than 550 properties were acquired by HS2 Ltd ahead of the planned construction of Phase 2b's eastern section.
Removing safeguarding means the process of selling them can begin.
Former owners of property within the safeguarding zone, which was acquired by HS2 Ltd will be given the opportunity to buy it back at the current market value.
HS2 has suffered repeated delays and soaring costs.
Ms Alexander announced last month there was 'no route' to meet the target date of having HS2 services running by 2033.
In her update to Parliament, the Secretary of State said her department is working with HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Wild to 'reset' the project, with the aim of providing an 'updated delivery baseline and funding envelope in 2026'.
She went on: 'Until this work is completed, this Government is not in a position to say with confidence how much HS2 will cost or when it will be delivered.
'That is a deeply unsatisfactory position, but it is necessary to complete the hard work we have embarked upon.'
HS2 was originally planned to run between London and Birmingham, then on to Manchester and Leeds, but the project was severely curtailed by the Conservatives in power because of spiralling costs.
The first phase was initially scheduled to open by the end of 2026, but this was later pushed back to between 2029 and 2033.
In 2013, HS2 was estimated to cost £37.5 billion (at 2009 prices) for the entire planned network, including the now-scrapped extensions from Birmingham.
In June last year, HS2 Ltd assessed the cost for the line between London and Birmingham would be up to £66 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Labour plot to silence migrant hotel critics EXPOSED – ‘spy unit' crack down on social posts slamming ‘2-tier' policing
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A GOVERNMENT "spy unit" has been used by Labour in a plot to crack down on social media critics. Whitehall officials have allegedly been flagging posts which criticise migrant hotels, immigration and "two-tier" policing. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 6 Labour has been slammed for attacking freedom of speech Credit: Getty 6 A new policing unit is set to monitor social media posts about immigration Credit: UKNIP 6 Almost 900 migrants made the journey across the Channel on Wednesday Emails from last August - during the height of the Southport riots - have exposed exchanges between civil servants and major tech firms, including TikTok. Conversations show members of the Government's National Security and Online Information Team calling on the social media giants to "assess" certain videos and content online. The same team also enforced lockdown rules during the Covid pandemic. One particular post, revealed by The Telegraph, called for greater transparency on the location of migrant hotels. Another highlighted post pointed to "two-tier policing", accusing cops of treating white protesters more harshly than others during last year's riots. It comes as protests outside asylum hotels are continuing to heat up, with crowds gathering in the likes of Norwich, Leeds and Bournemouth. A Government spokesman said: 'Free speech is a cornerstone of our democracy. The Online Safety Act protects it. "Platforms have a duty to uphold freedom of expression, and the Act places no curbs whatsoever on what adults can say and see on the internet - unless it is something that would already be illegal, offline. 'The Government has no role in deciding what actions platforms take on legal content for adults – that is a matter for them, according to their own rules. 'However we make no apologies for flagging to platforms content which is contrary to their own terms of service and which can result in violent disorder on our streets, as we saw in the wake of the horrific Southport attack.' Deputy PM Angela Rayner warned the Cabinet last week that the Government must step in to address "real concerns" about immigration. And plans for a new elite team of cops tasked with monitoring social media for anti-migrant posts emerged earlier this week. 25K migrants have arrived across the Channel so far this year despite Labour's promise to crackdown They were spotted in a letter to MPs by Dame Diana Johnson, policing minister. Detectives would be handpicked from forces across the UK to take part in the new programme amid fears of rioting as the small boats crisis escalates. The division, overseen by the Home Office, would look to "maximise social media intelligence" gathering after multiple forces were slammed for their response to last year's migrant unrest. The National Internet Intelligence Investigations team would work out of the National Police Coordination Centre (NPoCC) in Westminster. The NPoCC provides the central planning for forces across the UK in terms of "nationally significant protests" and civil disorder. However, critics have labelled the social media policing as "disturbing" and questioned if they further restrict freedom of speech. Speaking on the plans, Dame Diana Johnson said the Government was "carefully considering recommendations" made by the Commons home affairs committee. 'This team will provide a national capability to monitor social media intelligence and advise on its use to inform local operational decision-making," she added. Dame Diana was responding to an inquiry by the committee into cops' handling of riots last summer. It had recommended setting up a new policing system with 'enhanced capacity to monitor and respond to social media at the national level'. Tory councillor Raymond Connolly's wife Lucy was jailed for 31 months last October after posting comments on her X account. The posts were made just hours after evil Axel Rudakubana murdered three girls in the Merseyside town on July 29 last year. Ms Connolly shared a call to arms following the deaths of Bebe King, six, nine-year-old Alice Dasilva Aguiar and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, last July. The 41-year-old childminder wrote: "Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... "If that makes me racist, so be it." Posts wrongly claimed monster Rudakubana was a Muslim asylum seeker when he was actually born in Cardiff and raised Christian. Ms Connelly's punishment sparked fury across the political divide. Furious Brits noted that despite the former child minder quickly deleting her post, she remains in prison while paedos such as Hugh Edwards escaped jail time. A record number 25,000 people have come to the UK on small boats this year, with 898 arriving on just Wednesday alone. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage slammed the fresh data, saying: "This means more hotels, costs and more people who should not be here. "The public have had enough." The figure is up 51 per cent on this point last year, and is 73 per cent higher than in 2023. 6 Lucy Connolly urged rioters to set migrant hotels alight 6 She published the comments on her X account Credit:
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
9/11 mastermind could be freed in days despite confession
A 'despicable' terrorist who confessed to his role in 9/11 and the July 7 bombings is set to be freed from prison within days despite officials declaring him a 'risk to national security'. Haroon Aswat (pictured), 50, could be released from a secure hospital unit in the UK without a full risk assessment due to his mental health treatment. He was jailed in 2015 in the US for 20 years having admitted trying to start a terrorist training camp in Oregon. Aswat was visited by a British psychiatrist in America before he was deported back to Britain in 2022 where he declared: 'I'm a terrorist.' Now newly surfaced US court documents show Aswat also confessed to being a 'mastermind behind the [9/11] attacks and a 2005 attack in the UK', The Sun has reported. In addition to his connection to the 7/7 London terror bombings, which killed 52 people, Aswat has also threatened to kill Jews, Christians and certain groups of Muslims. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said he feared Aswat's return to the streets of Britain and said: 'He should never experience freedom again.' Despite officials admitting their concern and the High Court's Mr Justice Robert Jay previously saying there was 'evidence of an ongoing risk', Aswat will only be subject to a notification order upon his release. It means Aswat must continually notify the police about certain information and keep them up-to-date. These details include his address, foreign travel details and vehicle registration. Earlier this year Mr Justice Jay concluded: 'These were very serious offences and there is evidence of ongoing risk. A risk assessment in relation to terrorist offending is always inherently uncertain and in the present case is compounded by the mental instability of the defendant. Overall, I am satisfied for the reasons that I have given that a notification order should be made in all the circumstances of this case. A psychiatrist has deemed his treatment as being effective and his release from detention is expected in the relatively near future, with the understanding being that he will return to his family in Yorkshire.' He added: 'No formal terrorist risk assessment has been carried out since the defendant's return here. The circumstances of his detention have precluded that. However, on the basis of the material which is available the defendant has been assessed by various police officers — including the senior officer dealing with this case — that he remains a risk to national security.' A document from the US District Court, which has been released for the first time, described Aswat as a terrorist and foot soldier of al-Qaeda, and revealed he openly admitted to his involvement in terrorist activities. 'In March 2017 the defendant stated, 'if you think I am a terrorist, I don't shy away from my responsibility' and also stated he was a mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and a 2005 terrorist attack in the UK.' The papers show that Aswat revealed his associations with Osama bin Laden (pictured) and that he had spent time training in al-Queda camps in Afghanistan just months before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, which claimed more than 3,000 lives. His name was also found on a ledger discovered in a house in Pakistan where Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the 'architect' of 9/11, had been staying. Other activities included helping hate preacher Abu Hamza establish a US terror camp in 1999, staying at a house in Pakistan in 2002 - where he met two of the 7/7 bombers - and possessing a terror manual and alleged bomb materials. Police also traced 20 calls made by the 7/7 bombers to a phone connected to Aswat. Det Chief Supt Gareth Rees, head of operations for the Met's SO15 Counter Terrorism Command, said of Aswat in a witness statement: 'Based on my experience, this is conduct which gives me grave concerns about the risk which the defendant poses to the UK's national security and to the public.' A report compiled by Dr Richard Taylor, who travelled to America in the summer of 2022, found Aswat still posed a risk to the public. The report states that in 2017 Aswat made remarks to prison staff in support of Al Qaeda and threatened violence towards them. In 2022 he sent letters which made demands and death threats, seemingly motivated by a terrorist ideology. Dr Taylor concluded that he openly endorsed an extremist ideology, but there was no evidence that Aswat was mentally ill. However he had had limited opportunity to address the extremist mindset and showed traits of glibness, superficial charm, charisma, intelligence and elements of manipulativeness and narcissism. Even when mentally stable he continued to express violent, extremist Islamic ideology, Dr Taylor found. The diagnosis showed a schizoaffective disorder with symptoms showing unpredictable and aggressive behaviour. Dr Taylor did not complete a full terrorist risk assessment, but identified 15 of the 22 relevant factors in the government's extreme risk guidance. He concluded: 'There remains the risk of Islamic violent extremism motivated targeted terrorist offending behaviour given his threats to kill Jews, Christians and certain groups of Muslims. There is also a risk of him influencing other vulnerable individuals, as when he is in an abnormal mental state his religious extremist rhetoric is amplified by mental illness.' A senior police officer, Detective Inspector Karen Bradley, who was involved in the case, concluded that Aswat remains a risk to national security. Aswat was born and grew up in Yorkshire but moved to Wood Green in north London where he fell under the spell of hate preacher Abu Hamza - and together they planned a terror training camp in Oregon with Aswat moving to Seattle to organise it. He also spent time in Afghanistan and in Pakistan - where he met and associated with fellow Yorkshire terror sympathiser Mohammed Sidique Khan and his accomplice Shehzad Tanweer. They would go on to carry out the deadly 7/7 bombings in London which killed 52 people on underground trains and a bus in July 2005. Aswat served most of his sentence in America and was deported back to the UK in December 2022. He is currently detained at Bethlem Royal Hospital in Bromley, south east London.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Divorced man left with 0.5pc of wife's fortune wins ‘gender bias' appeal
A husband who received £325,000 in a divorce from his multimillionaire wife has won a court appeal after accusing the divorce judge of ' gender prejudice '. High Court judge Mr Justice Francis awarded Simon Entwistle, a 42-year-old City trader, just 0.5 per cent of Jenny Helliwell's fortune in January last year. Mr Entwistle claimed that the judge, who upheld a pre-nuptial agreement in which the couple agreed to keep their own assets in the event of a split, would not have made the same ruling if the genders were reversed. Appeal judge Lady Justice King ruled that Mr Entwistle's case should be heard again, after she accused Ms Helliwell, 42, of 'fraudulent' behaviour by not declaring almost £48m of her £66m personal fortune whilst making the prenup. Mr Entwistle and Ms Helliwell married in 2019 in a £500,000 ceremony in Paris and lived in a £4.5m villa in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. They split after three years of marriage in August 2022 when Ms Helliwell ordered her husband out of their home with 48 hours' notice. In court, Mr Entwistle asked for £2.5m of his ex-wife's personal fortune, including £26,000 for a personal meal plan, as a court heard he ' can't even cook an omelette '. He was left with a 0.5 per cent cut after the judge upheld a prenup, which Mr Entwistle went on to dispute. Appealing the ruling, Mr Entwistle said he was a victim of 'gender prejudice' and that the prenup had been invalidated by Ms Helliwell having failed to disclose assets worth almost £48m – amounting to 73 per cent of her wealth – when he signed it. At the Court of Appeal in March 2025, Deborah Bangay KC, for Mr Entwistle, said: 'The judge was warned against gender prejudice, but failed to heed that warning. 'Had the positions been reversed, it is very unlikely that [Mr Justice Francis] would have ... so ungenerously assessed the needs of a wife after a six-year relationship.' Lady Justice King has ruled that the non-disclosure by the heiress amounted to 'fraudulent' behaviour, which invalidated the prenup. She sent the case back to the divorce courts, ordering it to be recalculated as if the prenup did not exist. The appeal judge said: 'Since the husband in the instant case was deliberately deprived of information which it had been agreed that he should have, in my judgment, the agreement cannot stand.' A 'fraudulent' prenup Lady Justice King, giving her ruling today, made no finding on the gender prejudice argument, but said that when agreeing to the agreement, Ms Helliwell disclosed £18.2m of assets, and failed to include £47.9m assets. The assets Ms Helliwell failed to mentioned in her prenup included almost £40m worth of business assets, £8m worth of beachfront land in Dubai and a £1.6m house in Wimbledon, where her mother lives. Lady Justice King said: 'The deliberate decision by the wife not to disclose her business assets and her interest in her mother's house amounted to fraudulent non-disclosure which vitiates the agreement.' She concluded: 'In my judgment, the judge erred in law in concluding that on the facts of the case, the wife's deliberate non-disclosure, on current figures, of some 73 per cent of her wealth did not serve to vitiate the agreement.' She added there must be a 'reconsideration of the husband's needs and in particular his housing provision'.
