
Stock Plunge Pushes Meta Platforms (META) Into Buy-The-Dip Territory
Shares of Meta Platforms (META) were down nearly 9% yesterday as the market sold off dramatically due to the tariff turmoil coming out of Washington, D.C. With yesterday's plunge, shares of the social media giant are now down nearly 30% from their 52-week high, giving investors a 'magnificent' opportunity to buy this dominant, blue-chip Mag 7 stock at a discount price.
Don't Miss Our End of Quarter Offers:
Discover the latest stocks recommended by top Wall Street analysts, all in one place with Analyst Top Stocks.
Make smarter investments with weekly expert stock picks from the Smart Investor Newsletter.
I'm bullish on Meta Platforms based on its valuation relative to the broader market and its magnificent seven peers, returns to shareholders, revenue and user growth, and track record of long-term performance. Furthermore, Wall Street analysts rate shares of the Menlo Park-based company a Strong Buy and forecast a potential upside of over 40% over the next year, further highlighting the attractive opportunity available to long-term investors here.
Magnificent Seven Valuation
The magnificent seven stocks, and tech stocks more broadly, have come under scrutiny for their elevated valuations. But at this point, Meta is hardly expensive, and one can even make the case that it's a value stock. Following the selloff, shares trade for an undemanding 21x consensus 2025 earnings estimates, roughly in line with the broader market, with the S&P 500 trading for 21.5 times 2025 times analyst earnings estimates.
A lot can happen between now and next year, especially given the volatility in the market and the broader economy. However, Meta Platforms look even cheaper looking ahead another year, with shares trading at just 18.3x 2026 analyst earnings estimates.
Not only is META stock trading at a negligible premium to the broader market, but it is also cheaper than many of its magnificent seven peers. For example, Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT) trade for 27.9x and 28.3x 2025 earnings, respectively, while Amazon trades for a similar 28.2x 2025 earnings.
Meta is roughly in line with Nvidia (NVDA) (22x NTM earnings) and trades at a premium to Alphabet (GOOGL) (16.8x 2025 earnings), both of which I am also bullish on. Meta is also significantly cheaper than Tesla (TSLA), which trades for over 100x 2025 earnings estimates, although at this point,t Tesla is clearly a bit of an outlier.
During the market correction, all the magnificent seven stocks, except Tesla, have become significantly cheaper and more attractive. However, Meta Platforms is still among the most affordable, making it an attractive opportunity to buy this blue-chip magnificent seven company.
META's Growing Returns to Shareholders
Meta is also burnishing its newfound appeal as a value stock by returning capital to shareholders. As of 2024, Meta is still a newly minted dividend stock. Admittedly, its yield of 0.4% today isn't much to write home about, but Meta has a lot of potential as a dividend growth stock that could be paying a much higher dividend in the future than today. The company has already increased its quarterly payout from $0.50 a share in 2024 to $0.525 this year. Plus, it features a miniscule payout ratio, meaning that there is plenty of room to continue to increase these dividend payouts over time.
Beyond the dividend, Meta is also significantly using share buybacks to return value to shareholders. Last year, t he company bought back an incredible $40 billion worth of shares, trailing only Apple in terms of the total value of these buybacks.
Share repurchases can be accretive to shareholders because they decrease a company's share count over time and thus increase earnings per share. As discussed above, Meta shares are inexpensive right now, and Meta has plenty of cash, so I would expect the company to continue buying back shares in 2025.
Meta is Huge and Still Growing
Meta is one of the world's largest companies but still growing. Revenue grew by 22% in 2024, which is quite impressive for a company of its size and scale. Over the long term, the company has demonstrated massive revenue growth—its 2024 revenue of $164.5 billion was more than double its revenue of $70.7 billion generated five years ago in 2019 and nearly triple its revenue of $55.8 billion recorded six years ago in 2018.
It might feel like Facebook and Instagram have been around forever, and everyone already has them. However, the company still increased daily active users by 5% during Q4 of 2024, which is no small feat given how ubiquitous the platforms already are.
Is Meta Platforms a Good Stock to Buy?
Turning to Wall Street, META earns a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 44 Buys, three Holds, and one Sell rating assigned in the past three months. The average analyst META stock price target of $761.49 implies a 48.6% upside potential from current levels.
Meta Stock Looks Like a Fast Pitch
Every now and then, the market throws investors a fast pitch that they can take a big swing at and knock out of the park, and right now, Meta looks like one of those rare opportunities.
I'm bullish on Meta Platforms stock based on its cheap valuation, and continued impressive growth in revenue and users while, importantly, not forgetting to give back to shareholders. Sell-side analysts rate the stock a Strong Buy and forecast a potential upside of almost 50% over the next year, further underscoring the attractive opportunity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
31 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
GOLDSTEIN: Ignoring contracting rules costs taxpayers billions: auditor general
Auditor General of Canada, Karen Hogan, holds a press conference at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. Photo by Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS Federal auditor general Karen Hogan on Tuesday reported widespread incompetence in the awarding of government contracts by the public service, resulting in billions of dollars of taxpayers' money being wasted. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account What's even more alarming is that everyone in the system knows it and no one is doing anything about it. Given that, what is the point of having an auditor general if every time she exposes incompetence and waste, the government pays lip service to implementing her recommendations and then goes back to doing the same things that led to the issue being investigated by the auditor general in the first place? In her latest report, this concern arises from Hogan's deep dive into federal contracts awarded to Ottawa-based GCStrategies Inc. a two-person Ottawa-based IT staffing firm — meaning it doesn't do the work but contracts it out to other companies — to develop the infamous ArriveCan app. That was supposed to cost $80,000. As far as Hogan could determine — because the record keeping was so bad — it ended up costing almost $60 million. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. This time Hogan, at the request of the House of Commons, examined a near-decade of 106 professional services contracts awarded to GCStrategies from 2015 to 2024 by 29 federal departments and agencies, one Crown corporation and one agent of Parliament, valued at up to $92.7 million with $64.5 million actually paid out. Among her findings: — in 58% of the contracts examined that were awarded without tendering, federal departments failed to assess whether doing so would have resulted in lower costs to taxpayers. –in more than 80% of the contracts examined that were awarded without competition or with only one valid bid, government departments failed to verify that the fees paid did not exceed market rates. — in almost 50% of the contracts examined, federal departments couldn't show the work was delivered, even though payments were made. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. — in 33% of the contracts examined, federal departments couldn't show the firms contracted were capable of completing the work. –in 21% of the contracts examined, federal departments lacked documentation showing valid security clearances for contractors working on government networks containing sensitive information. The most alarming conclusion by Hogan was her observation that she has no reason to believe these government failures were confined to this one vendor. She noted the same thing happened last year when she examined 97 contracts awarded by 10 federal departments and agencies and 10 Crown corporations valued at $209 million with $200 million paid out, to McKinsey & Company for consulting services from 2011 to 2023. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Hogan — who didn't make any recommendations to improve procurement policies saying the problem isn't a lack of policies but failure to follow them — said she believes the same thing is happening throughout the federal government. Writ large, that's why, to cite just one of countless examples, the estimated cost to taxpayers for Canada acquiring 88 F-35 fighter jets — another issue Hogan examined in her report — increased by almost 50% from $19 billion in 2022 to $27.7 billion in 2024, with at least another $5.5 billion needed to make the purchases fully operational. Read More Without drawing conclusions from these specific examples, the fact the same failures keep happening over and over again year after year across the federal government, raises the question of whether beyond incompetence, political corruption is involved, which is beyond the auditor general's purview. Whether, for example, political pressure is being put on public servants to ignore procurement rules in favour of handing contracts to favoured companies and if so, why? RECOMMENDED VIDEO Celebrity NHL Editorial Cartoons Columnists Toronto Maple Leafs


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Brazil's Supreme Court justices agree to make social media companies liable for user content
BRASILIA, Brazil — The majority of justices on Brazil's Supreme Court have agreed to make social media companies liable for illegal postings by their users. Gilmar Mendes on Wednesday became the sixth of the court's 11 justices to vote to open a path for companies like Meta, X and Microsoft to be sued and pay fines for content published by their users. Voting is ongoing but a simple majority is all that is needed for the measure to pass. The ruling will come after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials allegedly involved in censoring American citizens. The only dissenting Brazilian justice so far is André Mendonça and his vote was made public last week. The social media proposal would become law once voting is finished and the result is published. But Brazil's Congress could still pass another law to reverse the measure. The current legislation states social media companies can only be held responsible in those cases if they do not remove hazardous content after a court order. Mauricio Savarese, The Associated Press


Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Brazil's Supreme Court justices agree to make social media companies liable for user content
BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — The majority of justices on Brazil's Supreme Court have agreed to make social media companies liable for illegal postings by their users. Gilmar Mendes on Wednesday became the sixth of the court's 11 justices to vote to open a path for companies like Meta, X and Microsoft to be sued and pay fines for content published by their users. Voting is ongoing but a simple majority is all that is needed for the measure to pass. The ruling will come after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials allegedly involved in censoring American citizens. The only dissenting Brazilian justice so far is André Mendonça and his vote was made public last week. The social media proposal would become law once voting is finished and the result is published. But Brazil's Congress could still pass another law to reverse the measure. The current legislation states social media companies can only be held responsible in those cases if they do not remove hazardous content after a court order.